Pediatric Foreign Body Ingestion Treatment & Management
- Author: Gregory P Conners, MD, MPH; Chief Editor: Richard G Bachur, MD more...
Prehospital Care
- Most children who have swallowed a foreign body do not require specialized care. For the large majority, providing comfort care while transporting to an emergency department is all that is required.
- Patients with drooling may require suction.
- Children benefit by being allowed to remain with their parents and being allowed to assume a position of comfort.
- Although a theoretical risk of spontaneously vomiting and then aspiration of a foreign body exists, this is unusual. Children should not routinely be intubated to protect their airways.
- Similarly, do not attempt to dislodge a foreign body from a spontaneously breathing patient by giving abdominal thrusts or syrup of ipecac.
- If available, discussions regarding management of unusual foreign bodies with the local poison control center may be helpful.
Emergency Department Care
The usual goal of ED management is to localize the position of the ingested foreign body. Patients with drooling, marked emesis, or altered mental status (likely from excess vagal stimulation) may require supportive measures to protect the airway.
Most patients should undergo radiographic imaging as described above. Metal detectors may be used to locate metallic foreign bodies. Even radiopaque foreign bodies may be difficult to localize. Referral for endoscopy should be considered.
Remember that children with no symptoms may have impacted foreign bodies and that children with foreign body sensation or pain may not. Radiographs of about 15% of children presenting to the ED after witnessed coin ingestions do not show a coin. Although some will have vomited or otherwise removed the ingested object before their evaluation, this suggests that not all children with even witnessed foreign body ingestions have truly ingested something.
- Esophageal foreign bodies
- Objects found within the esophagus should generally be considered impacted. Because impacted esophageal foreign bodies may lead to significant morbidity (and even mortality), removal of impacted esophageal foreign bodies is mandatory. An important exception is blunt esophageal foreign bodies (except button [disk] batteries) that are well tolerated and are known to have been in place for less than 24 hours (see Spontaneous passage below).
- Endoscopy (esophagoscopy) is by far the most commonly used means of removal and is usually the procedure of choice. Most children with esophageal foreign bodies are stable. Endoscopy usually can be delayed until the child's stomach is emptied and a surgical team is assembled. However, pointed objects, such as an embedded esophageal thumbtack, should be removed as rapidly as possible to avoid further injury to the esophageal mucosa and mediastinitis. Impacted button (disk) batteries are notorious for rapidly causing local necrosis and should be removed from the esophagus without delay.
- Because endoscopy is relatively invasive and expensive, 2 other methods of esophageal foreign body removal have been investigated and are probably more cost-effective when used appropriately. Both have been performed most commonly on children with esophageal coins.
- Foley catheter method: Blunt foreign bodies may be removed by use of a Foley catheter. Typically, the patient is restrained in a head-down position on a fluoroscopy table, and an uninflated catheter is inserted distal to the object. The catheter is then inflated and gently withdrawn, drawing the foreign body with it. One some occasions, the object is dislodged and passed into the stomach. Progress is typically monitored fluoroscopically. This procedure is performed without radiographic monitoring at some centers with extensive experience. Because any esophageal foreign body may pass spontaneously, chest radiography should be performed immediately prior to any removal procedure. Only experienced personnel should perform this procedure, and it should be reserved for previously healthy children whose ingestion of a blunt object was witnessed less than 24 hours prior to the procedure.
- Bougienage method: Blunt esophageal foreign bodies may be advanced into the stomach with a bougie. While the child is sitting upright, the lubricated instrument is gently passed down the esophagus, dislodging the object. The object is then expected to pass through the rest of the GI tract; thus, this procedure should not be performed on children with known lower GI tract abnormalities. A brief observation period and a repeat radiograph should follow any removal procedure to rule out retained foreign bodies and other complications (eg, pneumomediastinum). Because any esophageal foreign body may pass spontaneously, chest radiography should be performed immediately prior to any removal procedure. Again, only experienced personnel should perform this procedure, and it should be reserved for healthy children whose ingestion of a blunt object was witnessed less than 24 hours prior to the procedure.
- The bougienage method has been shown to be far more cost-effective than endoscopy, for properly selected patients.[16, 17, 18]
- Emergency department rapid sequence intubation, followed by removal of esophageal coins with Magill forceps and/or a Foley catheter, has been shown to be safe and effective in children.[19]
- Spontaneous passage: Blunt foreign bodies located at the LES often spontaneously pass within several hours of ingestion. This has been best studied in coin ingestions. Previously healthy children may be given food and drink and have repeat radiographs 24 hours following ingestion. Often, the coin passes through the LES, and a removal procedure can be avoided.[20, 16]
- Although blunt foreign bodies located in other areas of the esophagus are less likely to spontaneously pass, this strategy may be an appropriate alternative for stable children with normal esophageal anatomy and a foreign body in the thoracic inlet or the mid esophagus.[21] This may be most successful in asymptomatic children.
- Complications: Children with significant complications, such as airway involvement, peritonitis, or hematemesis (possibly heralding exsanguination from an aortoenteric fistula), should be referred to an appropriate surgeon without delay.
- Stomach/lower GI tract
- Most swallowed foreign bodies harmlessly pass through the GI tract once they have reached the stomach. Treatment of children with known abnormalities of the GI tract or previous problems with foreign bodies should be discussed with a specialist, preferably one familiar with the child.
- Unusual foreign bodies: Very sharp or pointed objects may perforate the GI tract (sewing needles are notorious). Therefore, such objects should be endoscopically removed from the stomach. If such an object has passed into the intestines, early consultation with a surgeon is recommended. Objects that are too long (eg, >6 cm) or too wide (eg, >2 cm) to pass through the pyloric sphincter should be removed from the stomach.
- Button (disk) batteries in the stomach or intestines do not need to be removed immediately, as they generally pass through the lower GI tract without difficulty. Button batteries retained in the stomach or at a fixed spot in the intestines should be removed. One strategy is to instruct families to observe the stool for the battery and to return for a repeat radiograph if it is not passed in 2-3 days. If a battery is still in the stomach at that time, it should be endoscopically removed. If it is in the intestines, its progress should be intermittently monitored via radiographs, to be sure it is progressing.
- Body packers (ie, patients who have ingested wrapped packages of drugs to avoid detection during transport) are at risk of death if the packets rupture. Such patients should be hospitalized and whole-bowel irrigation considered. Consultation with a poison control center is suggested.
Consultations
- The treatment of children with known GI tract disorders should be discussed with a physician familiar with the child whenever possible.
- Experienced personnel, such as a pediatric surgeon, otolaryngologist, or gastroenterologist, should perform endoscopy.
- Psychiatric consultation is indicated for those with a suspected or confirmed associated psychiatric problem.
Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Triantafyllou A, Psarras K, Kontoulis TM, Sakantamis AK. Management of ingested foreign bodies. How justifiable is a waiting policy?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. Jun 2008;18(3):286-7. [Medline].
O'Hara SM, Donnelly LF, Chuang E, Briner WH, Bisset GS 3rd. Gastric retention of zinc-based pennies: radiographic appearance and hazards. Radiology. Oct 1999;213(1):113-7. [Medline].
Robinson AJ, Bingham J, Thompson RL. Magnet induced perforated appendicitis and ileo-caecal fistula formation. Ulster Med J. Jan 2009;78(1):4-6. [Medline].
Vijaysadan V, Perez M, Kuo D. Revisiting swallowed troubles: intestinal complications caused by two magnets--a case report, review and proposed revision to the algorithm for the management of foreign body ingestion. J Am Board Fam Med. Sep-Oct 2006;19(5):511-6. [Medline].
Fenton SJ, Torgenson M, Holsti M, Black RE. Magnetic attraction leading to a small bowel obstruction in a child. Pediatr Surg Int. Dec 2007;23(12):1245-7. [Medline].
Pryor HI 2nd, Lange PA, Bader A, Gilbert J, Newman K. Multiple magnetic foreign body ingestion: a surgical problem. J Am Coll Surg. Jul 2007;205(1):182-6. [Medline].
Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, Green JL, Rumack BH, Heard SE. 2007 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 25th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). Dec 2008;46(10):927-1057. [Medline].
Conners GP, Chamberlain JM, Weiner PR. Pediatric coin ingestion: a home-based survey. Am J Emerg Med. Nov 1995;13(6):638-40. [Medline].
Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L, White NC, Marsolek M. Emerging battery-ingestion hazard: clinical implications. Pediatrics. Jun 2010;125(6):1168-77. [Medline].
Kavanagh KR, Batti JS. Traumatic epiglottitis after foreign body ingestion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Jun 2008;72(6):901-3. [Medline].
Brayer AF, Sciera M, Conners GP. Pediatric coin ingestion: an unusual presentation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Oct 16 2000;55(3):211-3. [Medline].
Riddlesberger MM Jr, Cohen HL, Glick PL. The swallowed toothbrush: a radiographic clue of bulimia. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21(4):262-4. [Medline].
Silverberg M, Tillotson R. Case report: esophageal foreign body mistaken for impacted button battery. Pediatr Emerg Care. Apr 2006;22(4):262-5. [Medline].
Conners GP. Diagnostic uses of metal detectors: a review. Int J Clin Pract. Aug 2005;59(8):946-9. [Medline].
Conners GP. Finding aluminum foreign bodies. Pediatr Rev. May 2000;21(5):172. [Medline].
Conners GP. Esophageal coin ingestion: going low tech. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2008;51(4):373-4. [Medline].
Dahshan AH, Kevin Donovan G. Bougienage versus endoscopy for esophageal coin removal in children. J Clin Gastroenterol. May-Jun 2007;41(5):454-6. [Medline].
Arms JL, Mackenberg-Mohn MD, Bowen MV, Chamberlain MC, Skrypek TM, Madhok M. Safety and efficacy of a protocol using bougienage or endoscopy for the management of coins acutely lodged in the esophagus: a large case series. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2008;51(4):367-72. [Medline].
Bhargava R, Brown L. Esophageal coin removal by emergency physicians: a continuous quality improvement project incorporating rapid sequence intubation. CJEM. Jan 2011;13(1):28-33. [Medline].
Conners GP, Chamberlain JM, Ochsenschlager DW. Symptoms and spontaneous passage of esophageal coins. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Jan 1995;149(1):36-9. [Medline].
Sharieff GQ, Brousseau TJ, Bradshaw JA, Shad JA. Acute esophageal coin ingestions: is immediate removal necessary?. Pediatr Radiol. Dec 2003;33(12):859-63. [Medline].
Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L. Preventing battery ingestions: an analysis of 8648 cases. Pediatrics. Jun 2010;125(6):1178-83. [Medline].
Bassett KE, Schunk JE, Logan L. Localizing ingested coins with a metal detector. Am J Emerg Med. Jul 1999;17(4):338-41. [Medline].
Bonadio WA, Emslander H, Milner D, Johnson L. Esophageal mucosal changes in children with an acutely ingested coin lodged in the esophagus. Pediatr Emerg Care. Dec 1994;10(6):333-4. [Medline].
Brayer AF, Conners GP, Ochsenschlager DW. Spontaneous passage of coins lodged in the upper esophagus. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Jun 1 1998;44(1):59-61. [Medline].
Buckler JM, Stool SE. Failure to thrive. An exogenous cause. Am J Dis Child. Dec 1967;114(6):652-3. [Medline].
Byard RW, Moore L, Bourne AJ. Sudden and unexpected death--a late effect of occult intraesophageal foreign body. Pediatr Pathol. 1990;10(5):837-41. [Medline].
Calkins CM, Christians KK, Sell LL. Cost analysis in the management of esophageal coins: endoscopy versus bougienage. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 1999;34(3):412-4. [Medline].
Conners GP. A literature-based comparison of three methods of pediatric esophageal coin removal. Pediatr Emerg Care. Apr 1997;13(2):154-7. [Medline].
Conners GP. Management of asymptomatic coin ingestion. Pediatrics. Sep 2005;116(3):752-3. [Medline].
Conners GP, Chamberlain JM, Ochsenschlager DW. Conservative management of pediatric distal esophageal coins. J Emerg Med. Nov-Dec 1996;14(6):723-6. [Medline].
Conners GP, Cobaugh DJ, Feinberg R, Lucanie R, Caraccio T, Stork CM. Home observation for asymptomatic coin ingestion: acceptance and outcomes. The New York State Poison Control Center Coin Ingestion Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. Mar 1999;6(3):213-7. [Medline].
Conners GP, Hadley JA. Esophageal coin with an unusual radiographic appearance. Pediatr Emerg Care. Oct 2005;21(10):667-9. [Medline].
Dahiya M, Denton JS. Esophagoaortic perforation by foreign body (coin) causing sudden death in a 3-year-old child. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. Jun 1999;20(2):184-8. [Medline].
Darrow DH, Holinger LD. Aerodigestive tract foreign bodies in the older child and adolescent. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Apr 1996;105(4):267-71. [Medline].
Ewing S, Miller R. Generalized nickel dermatitis in a 6-year-old boy as a result of swallowing a Canadian nickel. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 1991;25(5 Pt 1):855-6. [Medline].
Fleisher AG, Holgersen LO, Stanley-Brown EG, Mones R. Prolonged gastric retention of a swallowed coin following pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Sep-Oct 1986;5(5):811-3. [Medline].
Gilchrist BF, Valerie EP, Nguyen M, Coren C, Klotz D, Ramenofsky ML. Pearls and perils in the management of prolonged, peculiar, penetrating esophageal foreign bodies in children. J Pediatr Surg. Oct 1997;32(10):1429-31. [Medline].
Karaman A, Cavusoglu YH, Karaman I, Erdogan D, Aslan MK, Cakmak O. Magill forceps technique for removal of safety pins in upper esophagus: a preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Sep 2004;68(9):1189-91. [Medline].
Macpherson RI, Hill JG, Othersen HB, Tagge EP, Smith CD. Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1996;166(4):919-24. [Medline].
Mahafza TM. Extracting coins from the upper end of the esophagus using a Magill forceps technique. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Jan 11 2002;62(1):37-9. [Medline].
Mohiuddin S, Siddiqui MS, Mayhew JF. Esophageal foreign body aspiration presenting as asthma in the pediatric patient. South Med J. Jan 2004;97(1):93-5. [Medline].
Nolte KB. Esophageal foreign bodies as child abuse. Potential fatal mechanisms. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. Dec 1993;14(4):323-6. [Medline].
Paul RI, Christoffel KK, Binns HJ, Jaffe DM. Foreign body ingestions in children: risk of complication varies with site of initial health care contact. Pediatric Practice Research Group. Pediatrics. Jan 1993;91(1):121-7. [Medline].
Paul RI, Jaffe DM. Sharp object ingestions in children: illustrative cases and literature review. Pediatr Emerg Care. Dec 1988;4(4):245-8. [Medline].
Pellerin D, Fortier-Beaulieu M, Gueguen J. The fate of swallowed foreign bodies. Experience of 1250 instances of subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies in children. Prog Pediatr Radiol. 1969;2:286-302.
Sacchetti A, Carraccio C, Lichenstein R. Hand-held metal detector identification of ingested foreign bodies. Pediatr Emerg Care. Aug 1994;10(4):204-7. [Medline].
Seikel K, Primm PA, Elizondo BJ, Remley KL. Handheld metal detector localization of ingested metallic foreign bodies: accurate in any hands?. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Aug 1999;153(8):853-7. [Medline].
Sheikh A. Button battery ingestions in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. Aug 1993;9(4):224-9. [Medline].
Smith SA, Conners GP. Unexpected second foreign bodies in pediatric esophageal coin ingestions. Pediatr Emerg Care. Aug 1998;14(4):261-2. [Medline].
Soprano JV, Fleisher GR, Mandl KD. The spontaneous passage of esophageal coins in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Oct 1999;153(10):1073-6. [Medline].
Vargas EJ, Mody AP, Kim TY, Denmark K, Moynihan JA, Barcega BB, et al. The removal of coins from the upper esophageal tract of children by emergency physicians: a pilot study. CJEM. Nov 2004;6(6):434-40. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Waltzman ML, Baskin M, Wypij D, Mooney D, Jones D, Fleisher G. A randomized clinical trial of the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics. Sep 2005;116(3):614-9. [Medline].

