Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.


Nursemaid Elbow Treatment & Management

  • Author: Wayne Wolfram, MD, MPH; Chief Editor: Kirsten A Bechtel, MD  more...
Updated: Feb 07, 2016

Prehospital Care

"First do no harm" is a useful precept for prehospital care. Assume that a fracture is present. Taking appropriate precautions to immobilize and protect the extremity is usually wise.


Emergency Department Care

"First do no harm" is also a useful precept to follow in the ED.

Because normal function can be quickly restored in the ED, this can be a gratifying condition for the physician to treat.

Treatment consists of manipulating the child's arm (closed reduction) so that the annular ligament and radial head return to their normal anatomic positions. Traditionally, the manipulation consists of forearm supination and elbow flexion, as follows:

  • This is accomplished by immobilizing the elbow and palpating the region of the radial head with one hand.
  • The other hand applies axial compression at the wrist while supinating the forearm and flexing the elbow.
  • As the arm is manipulated, a click or snap may be felt at the radial head.

A click noted by the examiner has a positive predictive value of more than 90% in 2 published case series[17] and a negative predictive value of 76% in one case series.[4]

Some authors believe the likelihood of successful reduction is increased if pressure is applied over the radial head.

Reports describe successful closed reduction using forearm hyper-pronation (HP) instead of supination-flexion (SF) Pronation may be more effective and/or less painful than supination manipulation.[18, 19, 20, 21] A recent prospective, pseudorandomized, controlled non-blinded study compared the efficacy and pain associated with HP and SF reduction techniques. Successful reduction was accomplished on first attempt in 121(80.7%) of cases, with 56 of 82(68.3%) using the SF technique and 65 of 68 (95.6%) using the HP technique (P<0.001). However, pain levels of both techniques were not statistically different.[22]   The findings are corroborated by two other randomized, prospective studies that found significantly higher rates of first-attempt success with the HP technique.[23, 24]

Videos are available online showing both forearm SF and HP techniques.[25, 26] A quick overview of the disorder and the reduction maneuvers is also available for free through the NEJM website.[27]

A 2012 Cochrane Collaboration review noted that the total number of patients assessed in all of these studies was small. Furthermore, all studies were at high risk for assessor bias due to lack of blinding of the assessors. One study was assessed to be at high risk for selection bias. The conclusion was that evidence is limited for low-quality clinical trials and further study is warranted.[28]

If manipulating the elbow produces a click, the child should be observed in the ED. Many references report immediate return of function, but often the child will not use the arm normally for 15-30 minutes.

If radiographic findings reveal no fracture and the child continues to refuse to use the arm normally, another attempt at reduction (ideally, by a different health professional, if available) is reasonable. Given that intra-operator variability is not always reported and one may become comfortable with one technique or the other, it is reasonable to make first and second attempts at reduction with either method.

Age younger than 2 years and a delay of more than 4 hours before treatment have been associated with failure to use an affected arm within 30 minutes.

If manipulating the elbow produces a click, the child should be observed in the ED. Many references report immediate return of function, but often the child will not use the arm normally for 15-30 minutes.

Postreduction films are not necessary.

An important part of the management is educating parents about the risk of reoccurrence.



If radiographic findings demonstrate no fracture, repeat attempts at reduction are unsuccessful, and the child does not regain normal function after 30-40 minutes, the safest management is to support the arm in a sling (or splint and sling) and have the child reevaluated by a physician (usually a primary care physician, not an orthopedist) in 1-2 days. One case series reported 7 patients meeting these criteria had either spontaneous return of function or successful reduction at follow-up evaluation by day 4.

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Wayne Wolfram, MD, MPH Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mercy St Vincent Medical Center; Chairman, Pediatric Institutional Review Board, Mercy St Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio

Wayne Wolfram, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Devin N Boss, DO Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, St John's Clinic

Devin N Boss, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark Panetta, MD Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mercy St Vincent Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Grace M Young, MD Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland Medical Center

Grace M Young, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Kirsten A Bechtel, MD Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine; Co-Director, Injury Free Coalition for Kids, Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital

Kirsten A Bechtel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Garry Wilkes, MBBS, FACEM Director of Clinical Training (Simulation), Fiona Stanley Hospital; Clinical Associate Professor, University of Western Australia; Adjunct Associate Professor, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

  1. Schutzman SA, Teach S. Upper-extremity impairment in young children. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Oct. 26 (4):474-9. [Medline].

  2. Salter RB, Zaltz C. Anatomic investigations of the mechanism of injury and pathologic anatomy of "pulled elbow" in young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971. 77:134-43. [Medline].

  3. Eismann EA, Cosco ED, Wall EJ. Absence of Radiographic Abnormalities in Nursemaid’s Elbow. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014. 34(4):426-31.

  4. Schunk JE. Radial head subluxation: epidemiology and treatment of 87 episodes. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Sep. 19(9):1019-23. [Medline].

  5. Vitello S, Dvorkin R, Sattler S, Levy D, Ung L. Epidemiology of Nursemaid's Elbow. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul. 15 (4):554-7. [Medline].

  6. Pearson BV, Kuhns DW. Nursemaid's elbow in a 31-year-old female. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Feb. 25(2):222-3. [Medline].

  7. Teach SJ, Schutzman SA. Prospective study of recurrent radial head subluxation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Feb. 150(2):164-6. [Medline].

  8. Michaels MG. A case of bilateral nursemaid's elbow. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989 Dec. 5(4):226-7. [Medline].

  9. Diab HS, Hamed MMS, Allam Y. Obscure pathology of pulled elbow: dynamic high-resolution ultrasound-assisted classification. ournal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2010. 4(6):539-543.

  10. Kosuwon W, Mahaisavariya B, Saengnipanthkul S, et al. Ultrasonography of pulled elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1993. 75(3):421-2.

  11. Dohi, D. Confirmed specific ultrasonographic findings of pulled elbow. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Dec. 33(8):829-31.

  12. Sohn Y, Lee Y, Oh Y, Lee W. Sonographic finding of a pulled elbow: the "hook sign". Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Dec. 30 (12):919-21. [Medline].

  13. Rabiner JE, Khine H, Avner JR, Tsung JW. Ultrasound findings of the elbow posterior fat pad in children with radial head subluxation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 May. 31 (5):327-30. [Medline].

  14. Rabiner JE, Khine H, et al. Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Elbow Fractures in Children. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 2013. 61:9-17.

  15. Shabet S, Folman Y, Mann G, Kots Y, Fredman B, Banian M, et al. The role of sonography in detecting radial head subluxation in a child. Case Report. J Clinical Ultrasound. May 2005. 33(4):187-9. [Medline].

  16. Pai DR, Thapa M. Musculoskeletal ultrasound of the upper extremity in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Mar. 43 Suppl 1:S48-54. [Medline].

  17. Quan L, Marcuse EK. The epidemiology and treatment of radial head subluxation. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Dec. 139(12):1194-7. [Medline].

  18. Macias CG, Bothner J, Wiebe R. A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations. Pediatrics. 1998 Jul. 102(1):e10. [Medline].

  19. McDonald J, Whitelaw C, Goldsmith LJ. Radial head subluxation: comparing two methods of reduction. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jul. 6(7):715-8. [Medline].

  20. Green DA, Linares MY, Garcia Peña BM, Greenberg B, Baker RL. Randomized comparison of pain perception during radial head subluxation reduction using supination-flexion or forced pronation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr. 22(4):235-8. [Medline].

  21. Bek D, Yildiz C, Köse O, Sehirlioglu A, Basbozkurt M. Pronation versus supination maneuvers for the reduction of 'pulled elbow': a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun. 16(3):135-8. [Medline].

  22. 27. Gunaydin YK, Katirci Y, Duymaz H, Vural K, Halhalli HC, Akcil M, et al. Comparison of success and pain levels of supination-flexion and hyperpronation maneuvers in childhood nursemaid's elbow cases. Am J Emerg Med. 2013. 31(7):1078-81.

  23. García-Mata S, Hidalgo-Ovejero A. Efficacy of reduction maneuvers for "pulled elbow" in children: a prospective study of 115 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jun. 34 (4):432-6. [Medline].

  24. Guzel M, Salt O, Demir MT, Akdemir HU, Durukan P, Yalcin A. Comparison of hyperpronation and supination-flexion techniques in children presented to emergency department with painful pronation. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr. 17 (2):201-4. [Medline].

  25. Dr. Vader. Nursemaid Elbow manipulation. Available at Accessed: January 31, 2014.

  26. Mellick L. Nursemaid Elbow Reduction. Available at Accessed: January 31, 2014.

  27. Aylor MI, Anderson JM, Vanderford P, et al. Videos in clinical medicine. Reduction of pulled elbow. N Engl J Med. 20 Nov 2014. 371(21):e32:[Full Text].

  28. Krul M, van der Wouden JC, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Koes BW. Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. 1-18.

  29. Frumkin K. Nursemaid's elbow: a radiographic demonstration. Ann Emerg Med. 1985 Jul. 14(7):690-3. [Medline].

  30. Griffith ME. Subluxation of the head of the radius in young children. Pediatrics. 1955. 103-6.

  31. Kaplan RE, Lillis KA. Recurrent nursemaid's elbow (annular ligament displacement) treatment via telephone. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul. 110(1 Pt 1):171-4. [Medline].

  32. O'Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, Cohen MS, Ring D, McKee MD. Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls. Instr Course Lect. 2003. 52:113-34. [Medline].

  33. Ring D, Hannouche D, Jupiter JB. Surgical treatment of persistent dislocation or subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint after fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2004 May. 29(3):470-80. [Medline].

  34. Stone CA. Subluxation of the head of the radius. JAMA. 1916. 67:28-9.

  35. Toupin P, Osmond MH, Correll R, Plint A. Radial head subluxation: how long do children wait in the emergency department before reduction?. CJEM. 2007 Sep. 9(5):333-7. [Medline].

  36. Van Arsdale WH. On subluxation of the head of the radius in children with a resume of one hundred consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1889. 9:401-23.

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.