Laboratory Studies
Currently, no specific testing has sufficient power to be absolutely indicated for evaluation of syncope. Research-based and consensus guideline recommendations are listed below.
Serum glucose level
In one study, 2 of 170 patients with syncope tested for serum glucose were found to be hypoglycemic.
Despite this low yield, rapid blood glucose assessment is easy, fast, and may be diagnostic, leading to efficient intervention.
CBC count
If performed empirically, a CBC count has an exceedingly low yield in syncope. Some risk stratification protocols use a low hematocrit level as a poor prognostic indicator.
A prospective evaluation of syncope found that 4 of 170 patients had signs and symptoms of GI hemorrhage with a confirmatory CBC count. No occult bleeding was diagnosed based on an empiric CBC count in this study.
Anemia has been shown in several studies to suggest poor short-term outcomes.
Serum electrolyte levels with renal function
These tests if performed empirically have an exceedingly low yield in syncope. Some risk stratification protocols use electrolyte level abnormalities and renal insufficiency as poor prognostic indicators.
In the study by Martin et al, 134 patients with syncope had electrolytes drawn as part of the routine workup.[21] One patient was unexpectedly found to be hyponatremic secondary to diuretic use.
Serum electrolyte tests are indicated in patients with altered mental status or in patients in whom seizure is being considered.
If arrhythmia is noted, evaluation of electrolytes may be useful.
Cardiac enzymes
These tests are indicated in patients who give a history of chest pain with syncope, dyspnea with syncope, or exertional syncope; those with multiple cardiac risk factors; and those in whom a cardiac origin is highly suspected.
Total creatine kinase (CK)
A rise in CK levels may be associated with prolonged seizure activity or muscle damage secondary to a prolonged period of loss of consciousness.
BNP level >300 pg/mL is a predictor of serious outcomes at 30 days.[11]
Urinalysis/dipstick
In elderly and debilitated patients, UTI is common, easily diagnosed, and treatable and may precipitate syncope. UTIs may occur in the absence of fever, leukocytosis, and symptoms in this population.
Imaging Studies
Chest radiography
In elderly patients and in patients who are debilitated, pneumonia is common, easily diagnosed, and treatable and may precipitate syncope. Pneumonia may occur in the absence of fever, leukocytosis, and symptoms in this population.
Evaluation of a select number of etiologies of syncope may be aided by chest radiography. Pneumonia, CHF, lung mass, effusion, and widened mediastinum can all be seen if present and may guide therapy.
Head CT scanning (noncontrast)
Head CT scanning is not indicated in a nonfocal patient after a syncopal event. This test has a low diagnostic yield in syncope.
Of 134 patients prospectively evaluated for syncope using CT scanning, 39 patients had abnormal findings on scans.[21] Only 1 head CT scan was diagnostic in a patient not expected to have intracranial pathology. Of the remaining scans, 5 showed subdural hematomas thought to be secondary to syncope.
Head CT scanning may be clinically indicated in patients with new neurologic deficits or in patients with head trauma secondary to syncope.
Chest/abdominal CT scanning
This imaging study is indicated only in select cases, such as cases in which aortic dissection, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, or pulmonary embolus is suspected.
Brain MRI/magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA)
These tests may be required in select cases to evaluate vertebrobasilar vasculature and are more appropriately performed on an inpatient basis in consultation with a neurologist or a neurosurgeon.
Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning
This test is appropriate for patients in whom pulmonary embolus is suspected.
Echocardiography
In patients with known heart disease, left ventricular function and ejection fraction have been shown to have an accurate predictive correlation with death.
Echocardiography is the test of choice for evaluating suspected mechanical cardiac causes of syncope.
Other Tests
Electrocardiography [17]
Obtain a standard 12-lead ECG in syncope. This is a level A recommendation by 2007 ACEP consensus guidelines for syncope. ECG is used in most every clinical decision rule for risk stratification.
Normal ECG findings are a good prognostic sign.
ECG can be diagnostic for acute MI or myocardial ischemia and can provide objective evidence of preexisting cardiac disease or dysrhythmia such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, Brugada syndrome, atrial flutter, or AV blocks.
Bradycardia, sinus pauses, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and sustained ventricular tachycardia, and atrioventricular conduction defects occur with increasing frequency with age and are truly diagnostic only when they coincide with symptoms.
Holter monitor/loop event recorder
This is an outpatient test. In the past, all patients with syncope were monitored for 24 hours in a hospital. Later, loop recorders and signal-averaged event recorders allowed for monitoring over longer time periods, which increased the yield of detecting an arrhythmia.
Recent studies show that age-matched asymptomatic populations have an equivalent number of arrhythmic events recorded by ambulatory monitoring. Loop recorders have a higher diagnostic yield than Holter monitor evaluation with a marginal cost savings.[22]
A study completed through an ECG outpatient registry in Vermont by Gibson and Heitzman involving 1512 patients referred for syncope, showed that symptomatic arrhythmias were found in just 0.5% of patients.[23] In fact, patients had symptoms without arrhythmias more often than symptoms with arrhythmias, advancing the notion that ambulatory monitoring has a higher negative than positive diagnostic yield.
Head-up tilt-table test
This test is useful for confirming autonomic dysfunction and can generally be safely arranged on an outpatient basis.
The test involves using a tilt table to stand a patient at 70 degrees for 45 minutes. Various modified protocols with concomitant medications, fasting, and maneuvers exist. Normally norepinephrine (NE) levels rise initially and are maintained to hold BP constant.
A positive result occurs when NE levels fatigue with time and a falling BP and pulse rate produce symptoms.
The head-up tilt-table test is less sensitive than electrophysiologic stress testing, and a negative result does not exclude the diagnosis of neurogenic syncope.
Electroencephalography
Electroencephalography (EEG) can be performed at the discretion of a neurologist if seizure is considered a likely alternative diagnosis.
Stress test
Stress test/electrophysiologic studies (EPS) have a higher diagnostic yield than the Holter monitor and should be obtained for any patient with a suspected arrhythmia as a cause of syncope.
A cardiac stress test is appropriate for patients in whom cardiac syncope is suspected and in whom have risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. This test can assist with cardiac risk stratification and can guide future therapy.
Procedures
Carotid sinus massage has been used with some success to diagnose carotid sinus syncope.
Patients are placed on a cardiac monitor and beat-to-beat BP monitoring device. Atropine is kept at the bedside.
Longitudinal massage lasting 5 seconds is initiated at the point of greatest carotid pulse intensity at the level of the thyroid cartilage on one side at a time.
The maximal response occurs after approximately 18 seconds, and a positive result is one that produces 3 seconds of asystole or syncope. If the result is negative, the process is repeated on the other carotid sinus.
Carotid sinus massage may theoretically precipitate an embolic stroke in persons with preexisting carotid artery disease.
Chen L, Chen MH, Larson MG, Evans J, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Risk factors for syncope in a community-based sample (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. May 15 2000;85(10):1189-93. [Medline].
Savage DD, Corwin L, McGee DL, Kannel WB, Wolf PA. Epidemiologic features of isolated syncope: the Framingham Study. Stroke. Jul-Aug 1985;16(4):626-9. [Medline].
Middlekauff HR, Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW, Saxon LA. Syncope in advanced heart failure: high risk of sudden death regardless of origin of syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 1993;21(1):110-6. [Medline].
Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. Sep 19 2002;347(12):878-85. [Medline].
Suzuki M, Hori S, Nakamura I, Soejima K, Aikawa N. Long-term survival of Japanese patients transported to an emergency department because of syncope. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 2004;44(3):215-21. [Medline].
Martin TP, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN. Risk stratification of patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 1997;29(4):459-66. [Medline].
Sarasin FP, Hanusa BH, Perneger T, Louis-Simonet M, Rajeswaran A, Kapoor WN. A risk score to predict arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope. Acad Emerg Med. Dec 2003;10(12):1312-7. [Medline].
Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, Sellers KL, Kohn MA, Wells GA. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. Feb 2004;43(2):224-32. [Medline].
Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Hess EP, Alreesi A, Perry JJ, Wells GA, Stiell IG. External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in the Canadian setting. Ann Emerg Med. May 2010;55(5):464-72. [Medline].
Birnbaum A, Esses D, Bijur P, Wollowitz A, Gallagher EJ. Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population. Ann Emerg Med. Aug 2008;52(2):151-9. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Reed MJ, Newby DE, Coull AJ, Prescott RJ, Jacques KG, Gray AJ. The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 23 2010;55(8):713-21. [Medline].
Costantino G, Perego F, Dipaola F, et al. Short- and long-term prognosis of syncope, risk factors, and role of hospital admission: results from the STePS (Short-Term Prognosis of Syncope) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 22 2008;51(3):276-83. [Medline].
Andrea U, Attilio DR, Franco G, et al. Early and late outcome of treated patients referred for syncope to emergency department: the EGSYS 2 follow-up study. Eur Heart J. Feb 18 2010;[Medline].
Dipaola F, Costantino G, Perego F, Borella M, Galli A, Cantoni G. San Francisco Syncope Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term outcome of syncope. Am J Emerg Med. May 2010;28(4):432-9. [Medline].
Serrano LA, Hess EP, Bellolio MF, et al. Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. Oct 2010;56(4):362-373.e1. [Medline].
Pratt JL, Fleisher GR. Syncope in children and adolescents. Pediatr Emerg Care. Jun 1989;5(2):80-2. [Medline].
[Guideline] Huff JS, Decker WW, Quinn JV, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2007;49(4):431-44. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Atkins D, Hanusa B, Sefcik T, Kapoor W. Syncope and orthostatic hypotension. Am J Med. Aug 1991;91(2):179-85. [Medline].
Calkins H, Shyr Y, Frumin H, Schork A, Morady F. The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med. Apr 1995;98(4):365-73. [Medline].
Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. Nov 2009;30(21):2631-71. [Medline].
Martin GJ, Adams SL, Martin HG, Mathews J, Zull D, Scanlon PJ. Prospective evaluation of syncope. Ann Emerg Med. Jul 1984;13(7):499-504. [Medline].
Rockx MA, Hoch JS, Klein GJ, et al. Is ambulatory monitoring for "community-acquired" syncope economically attractive? A cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring. Am Heart J. Nov 2005;150(5):1065. [Medline].
Gibson TC, Heitzman MR. Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1 1984;53(8):1013-7. [Medline].
Quinn J, McDermott D. Electrocardiogram findings in emergency department patients with syncope. Acad Emerg Med. Jul 2011;18(7):714-8. [Medline].
Shen WK, Decker WW, Smars PA, et a. Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS): a multidisciplinary approach to syncope management. Circulation. Dec 14 2004;110(24):3636-45. [Medline].
Bachinsky WB, Linzer M, Weld L, Estes NA 3rd. Usefulness of clinical characteristics in predicting the outcome of electrophysiologic studies in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. Apr 15 1992;69(12):1044-9. [Medline].
Baron-Esquivias G, Errazquin F, Pedrote A, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with vasovagal syncope. Am Heart J. May 2004;147(5):883-9. [Medline].
Bass EB, Curtiss EI, Arena VC, et al. The duration of Holter monitoring in patients with syncope. Is 24 hours enough?. Arch Intern Med. May 1990;150(5):1073-8. [Medline].
Benditt DG, Can I. Initial evaluation of "syncope and collapse" the need for a risk stratification consensus. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 23 2010;55(8):722-4. [Medline].
Bhatia A, Dhala A, Blanck Z, Deshpande S, Akhtar M, Sra AJ. Driving safety among patients with neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Nov 1999;22(11):1576-80. [Medline].
Calkins H, Shyr Y, Frumin H, Schork A, Morady F. The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med. Apr 1995;98(4):365-73. [Medline].
Claydon VE, Schroeder C, Norcliffe LJ, Jordan J, Hainsworth R. Water drinking improves orthostatic tolerance in patients with posturally related syncope. Clin Sci (Lond). Mar 2006;110(3):343-52. [Medline].
Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M. Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J. May 2003;24(9):811-9. [Medline].
Crane SD. Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. Jan 2002;19(1):23-7. [Medline].
Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldman L. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med. Jul 1982;73(1):15-23. [Medline].
Denes P, Uretz E, Ezri MD, Borbola J. Clinical predictors of electrophysiologic findings in patients with syncope of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med. Sep 1988;148(9):1922-8. [Medline].
Dovgalyuk J, Holstege C, Mattu A, Brady WJ. The electrocardiogram in the patient with syncope. Am J Emerg Med. Jul 2007;25(6):688-701. [Medline].
Eagle KA, Black HR. The impact of diagnostic tests in evaluating patients with syncope. Yale J Biol Med. Jan-Feb 1983;56(1):1-8. [Medline].
Eagle KA, Black HR, Cook EF, Goldman L. Evaluation of prognostic classifications for patients with syncope. Am J Med. Oct 1985;79(4):455-60. [Medline].
Farwell DJ, Sulke AN. Does the use of a syncope diagnostic protocol improve the investigation and management of syncope?. Heart. Jan 2004;90(1):52-8. [Medline].
Freed LA, Eagle KA, Mahjoub ZA, et al. Gender differences in presentation, management, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with syncope. Am J Cardiol. Nov 1 1997;80(9):1183-7. [Medline].
Gatzoulis K, Sideris S, Theopistou A, Sotiropoulos H, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Long-term outcome of patients with recurrent syncope of unknown cause in the absence of organic heart disease and relation to results of baseline tilt table testing. Am J Cardiol. Oct 1 2003;92(7):876-9. [Medline].
Glasser SP, Clark PI, Applebaum HJ. Occurrence of frequent complex arrhythmias detected by ambulatory monitoring: findings in an apparently healthy asymptomatic elderly population. Chest. May 1979;75(5):565-8. [Medline].
Hammill SC. Value and limitations of noninvasive assessment of syncope. Cardiol Clin. May 1997;15(2):195-218. [Medline].
Henderson MC, Prabhu SD. Syncope: current diagnosis and treatment. Curr Probl Cardiol. May 1997;22(5):242-96. [Medline].
Hilgard J, Ezri MD, Denes P. Significance of ventricular pauses of three seconds or more detected on twenty-four-hour Holter recordings. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1 1985;55(8):1005-8. [Medline].
Junaid A, Dubinsky IL. Establishing an approach to syncope in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. Sep-Oct 1997;15(5):593-9. [Medline].
Kapoor WN. Diagnostic evaluation of syncope. Am J Med. Jan 1991;90(1):91-106. [Medline].
Kapoor WN. Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope. JAMA. Nov 11 1992;268(18):2553-60. [Medline].
Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Wieand S, Peterson JR, Levey GS. A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope. N Engl J Med. Jul 28 1983;309(4):197-204. [Medline].
Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Hoch JS, Skanes AC. Cost implications of testing strategy in patients with syncope: randomized assessment of syncope trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 6 2003;42(3):495-501. [Medline].
Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Takle-Newhouse T, Norris C. Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators. Circulation. Jan 26 1999;99(3):406-10. [Medline].
Kushner JA, Kou WH, Kadish AH, Morady F. Natural history of patients with unexplained syncope and a nondiagnostic electrophysiologic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 1989;14(2):391-6. [Medline].
Linzer M, Pritchett EL, Pontinen M, McCarthy E, Divine GW. Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. Jul 15 1990;66(2):214-9. [Medline].
Lu CC, Diedrich A, Tung CS, et al. Water ingestion as prophylaxis against syncope. Circulation. Nov 25 2003;108(21):2660-5. [Medline].
McIntosh S, Da Costa D, Kenny RA. Outcome of an integrated approach to the investigation of dizziness, falls and syncope in elderly patients referred to a 'syncope' clinic. Age Ageing. Jan 1993;22(1):53-8. [Medline].
Meyer MD, Handler J. Evaluation of the patient with syncope: an evidence based approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 1999;17(1):189-201, ix. [Medline].
Mozes B, Confino-Cohen R, Halkin H. Cost-effectiveness of in-hospital evaluation of patients with syncope. Isr J Med Sci. Jun 1988;24(6):302-6. [Medline].
Narkiewicz K, Cooley RL, Somers VK. Alcohol potentiates orthostatic hypotension : implications for alcohol-related syncope. Circulation. Feb 1 2000;101(4):398-402. [Medline].
Parry SW, Tan MP. An approach to the evaluation and management of syncope in adults. BMJ. Feb 19 2010;340:c880. [Medline].
Racco F, Sconocchini C, Alesi C, Zappelli L, Pratillo G. Long-term follow-up after syncope. A group of 183 patients observed for 5 years. Minerva Cardioangiol. Mar 2000;48(3):69-78. [Medline].
Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Carballo D, et al. Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study. Am J Med. Aug 15 2001;111(3):177-84. [Medline].
Sheldon R, Connolly S, Rose S, et al. Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): a randomized, placebo-controlled study of metoprolol in the prevention of vasovagal syncope. Circulation. Mar 7 2006;113(9):1164-70. [Medline].
Sloane PD, Linzer M, Pontinen M, Divine GW. Clinical significance of a dizziness history in medical patients with syncope. Arch Intern Med. Aug 1991;151(8):1625-8. [Medline].
Sun BC, Derose SF, Liang LJ, et al. Predictors of 30-day serious events in older patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. Dec 2009;54(6):769-778.e1-5. [Medline].
Tan MP, Parry SW. Vasovagal syncope in the older patient. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 12 2008;51(6):599-606. [Medline].
Print
