eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Toxicology

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome

Theodore I Benzer, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director of Clinical Operations, Director of Toxicology, Chair of Quality and Safety, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital

Updated: Aug 18, 2009

Introduction

Background

The neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, but life-threatening, idiosyncratic reaction to a neuroleptic medication. The syndrome is characterized by fever, muscular rigidity, altered mental status, and autonomic dysfunction.

Although potent neuroleptics (eg, haloperidol, fluphenazine) are more frequently associated with NMS, all antipsychotic agents, typical or atypical, may precipitate the syndrome. For example, these agents have been associated with NMS: prochlorperazine (Compazine), promethazine (Phenergan), clozapine (Clozaril), and risperidone (Risperdal). NMS has also been associated with non-neuroleptic agents that block central dopamine pathways such as metoclopramide (Reglan), amoxapine (Ascendin), and lithium.1

Pathophysiology

All medications implicated in NMS have dopamine D2-receptor antagonist properties. NMS has been noted following withdrawal of anti-Parkinson medication. The clinical syndrome is thought to be secondary to decreased dopamine activity in the central nervous system (CNS) either from blockade of dopamine D2-receptors or from decreased availability of dopamine itself, and NMS shares similarities with malignant hyperthermia and the serotonin syndrome. Blockade of dopamine neurotransmission in the nigrostriatum and hypothalamus results in muscular rigidity and altered thermoregulation, respectively. Sympathetic nervous system activation or dysfunction may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of NMS.2,3

Frequency

United States

Incidence is uncommon, with rates ranging from 0.02-12.2% of patients treated with a neuroleptic medication. Prospective studies and pooled data from the literature report an incidence of 0.07-0.2%. Because of increased awareness of this syndrome and efforts at prevention, the incidence is probably less now than in the past.

Mortality/Morbidity

  • The incidence of mortality, once reported at 20-30% is now estimated at 5-11.6%. Death usually results from respiratory failure, cardiovascular collapse, myoglobinuric renal failure, arrhythmias, or diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC).
  • Morbidity from NMS includes rhabdomyolysis, pneumonia, renal failure, seizures, arrhythmias, DIC, and respiratory failure.

Sex

NMS has been reported to be more common in males, most likely because of increased use of neuroleptics in males. The male-to-female ratio is 2:1.

Age

No age predilection for NMS exists. NMS may occur in patients of any age who are receiving neuroleptics or other precipitating medications.

Clinical

History

  • Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is more likely to develop following initiation of neuroleptic therapy or an increase in the dose.
  • The onset can be within hours, but, on average, it is 4-14 days after initiation of therapy. However, NMS can occur at any time during neuroleptic use, even years after initiating therapy.
  • Of those patients who develop NMS, 90% of them do so within 10 days.
  • NMS is a heterogeneous syndrome that spans a broad severity continuum. The diagnosis is made on clinical grounds based on the presence of certain historical, physical, and laboratory findings. The diagnosis is confirmed, but not necessarily excluded, by the presence of the following 5 criteria:
    • Recent treatment with neuroleptics within past 1-4 weeks
    • Hyperthermia (temperature above 38°C)
    • Muscular rigidity
    • At least 5 of the following:
      • Change in mental status
      • Tachycardia
      • Hypertension or hypotension
      • Diaphoresis or sialorrhea
      • Tremor
      • Incontinence
      • Increased creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) or urinary myoglobin level
      • Leukocytosis
      • Metabolic acidosis
      • Exclusion of other drug-induced, systemic, or neuropsychiatric illness
  • Clinical signs
    • Hyperthermia
    • Profuse diaphoresis
    • Generalized rigidity (lead pipe)
    • Mental status changes
    • Autonomic instability
  • Atypical NMS4
    • Patients with NMS may present with atypical features that don't include muscle rigidity or hyperthermia at the onset.
    • Hyperthermia and muscle rigidity may develop over time or not at all.
    • Atypical presentation of NMS may be more common after treatment with the atypical class of antipsychotics.

Physical

  • Hyperthermia
  • Diaphoresis
  • Generalized muscular rigidity (lead pipe)
  • Tachycardia
  • Hypertension or hypotension
  • Tremor
  • Incontinence
  • Altered mental status
  • Tachypnea

Causes

  • All classes of neuroleptics (dopamine D2-receptor antagonists) are associated with NMS, and dopamine receptor blockade is considered the cause of NMS.
    • Experimental blockade of dopamine in the striatum can cause rigidity, tremor, and rhabdomyolysis.
    • Blockade of dopamine in the hypothalamus can cause impaired temperature regulation and hyperthermia.
    • This theory does not explain why only some patients develop NMS. It also does not explain why patients rechallenged with neuroleptics do not always redevelop NMS.
  • Risk factors for developing NMS include the following:
    • Increased ambient temperature
    • Dehydration
    • Patient agitation or catatonia
    • Rapid initiation or dose escalation of neuroleptic
    • Withdrawal of anti-Parkinson medication
    • Use of high-potency agents and depot intramuscular preparations
    • History of organic brain syndrome or affective disorder
    • History of NMS
    • Concomitant use of predisposing drugs (eg, lithium, anticholinergic agents)

Differential Diagnoses

Encephalitis
Toxicity, Cocaine
Herpes Simplex
Toxicity, Cyclic Antidepressants
Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
Toxicity, Lithium
Polymyositis
Toxicity, MDMA
Rabies
Toxicity, Medication-Induced Dystonic Reactions
Renal Failure, Acute
Toxicity, Methamphetamine
Rhabdomyolysis
Toxicity, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor
Spider Envenomations, Widow
Toxicity, Neuroleptic Agents
Toxicity, Amphetamine
Toxicity, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor
Toxicity, Anticholinergic
Withdrawal Syndromes
Toxicity, Antihistamine

Other Problems to Be Considered

Parkinsonism
Pheochromocytoma
Serotonin syndrome
Strychnine toxicity
Dystonic reactions
Lethal catatonia

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Complete blood count (CBC)
  • Blood cultures
  • Liver function tests (LFTs)
  • Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels
  • Calcium and phosphate levels
  • Creatine kinase level
  • Urine myoglobin level
  • Arterial blood gas (ABG) level
  • Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR)
  • Serum and urine toxicologic screening (eg, salicylates, cocaine, amphetamines)

Imaging Studies

  • Perform chest radiography, if aspiration pneumonia is a concern.
  • Perform a head CT to evaluate for a structural lesion or before a lumbar puncture (LP). No universal agreement exists on the absolute need for a CT scan before the LP in patients without clinical evidence of a structural lesion; the decision is left to the individual practitioner.

Procedures

  • The LP is indicated to rule out meningitis in patients exhibiting fever and altered mental status.

Treatment

Prehospital Care

  • Any patient being evaluated by prehospital personnel requires assessment of the airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs).
  • Any patient with altered mental status should receive thiamine, dextrose (or rapid glucose determination), and naloxone.
  • Prehospital personnel must assess the patient's safety and, if necessary, restrain the patient. Restraint use in agitated, hyperthermic patients can increase the risk of significant morbidity and mortality in various disease states (eg, NMS, cocaine intoxication, amphetamine abuse). Chemical restraints (eg, benzodiazepines), if available, may be preferable in such situations.
  • Prehospital personnel should try to get an accurate medication list. If that is impossible, bring all the medication bottles found with the patient. Simultaneous administration of 2 dopamine-blocking agents can sometimes precipitate NMS.

Emergency Department Care

Successful treatment requires prompt recognition, withdrawal of neuroleptic agent, exclusion of other medical conditions, aggressive supportive care, and administration of certain pharmacotherapies.

  • A careful history should be taken before starting a new neuroleptic medication.
  • NMS may recur when medications are restarted.
  • Monitor a patient carefully while administering neuroleptic medication to prevent excessive agitation and dehydration because these conditions may predispose a patient to NMS.
  • Benzodiazepines and physical restraints may be useful.
  • Stop all neuroleptics.
  • Correct volume depletion and hypotension with intravenous fluids.
  • Methods to reduce the temperature include the following:
    • Cooling blankets
    • Antipyretics
    • Cooled intravenous fluids
    • Ice packs
    • Evaporative cooling
    • Various pharmacotherapies to reduce rigidity (see below)
  • When rhabdomyolysis occurs, maintain vigorous hydration and alkalinize the urine with intravenous NaHCO3 to prevent renal failure.
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been used to treat NMS. It can help with the alteration of temperature, level of consciousness, and diaphoresis. It may also be useful in treating the underlying psychiatric disease in patients who are unable to take neuroleptics. ECT with anesthesia has generally been safe with no increased incidence of malignant hyperthermia from succinylcholine administration.5,6

Consultations

  • Consultation with a neurologist may be needed if the diagnosis is in question.
  • Consultation with a psychiatrist can be helpful to manage the underlying psychiatric disease once the neuroleptics have been withdrawn.
  • Consultation with a nephrologist is needed if the patient develops rhabdomyolysis and renal failure.

Medication

Pharmacotherapy recommendations are from noncontrolled prospective and retrospective studies and case reports; no controlled studies exist. The mortality rate has declined from approximately 20% to less than 10%. The decrease may be due to improved supportive care modalities. Whether the addition of dantrolene to dopamine agonists will improve the prognosis is unclear. A recent review of case reports indicates that combining dantrolene with other pharmacotherapy prolongs the recovery period.  Using dantrolene as monotherapy seemed to be associated with increased mortality. Dopaminergic medications can be especially useful if the NMS was caused by withdrawal of anti-Parkinson medication.7,8,9

Dopamine agonists

Dopamine agonists reverse the dopamine D2-receptor blockade produced by neuroleptics. In retrospective studies, agonists appear to decrease mortality and shorten the course of NMS.


Bromocriptine (Parlodel)

Semisynthetic, ergot alkaloid derivative. Strong, dopamine D2-receptor agonist. Partial dopamine, D1-receptor agonist.
May relieve akinesia, rigidity, and tremor associated with Parkinson disease. Stimulates dopamine receptors in the corpus striatum.
Approximately 28% is absorbed from the GI tract and metabolized in the liver. Approximate elimination half-life is 50 h with 85% excreted in feces and 3-6% eliminated in urine.
Initiate at low dosage. Slowly increase dosage to individualize therapy. Assess dosage titration q2wk. Gradually reduce dose in 2.5-mg decrements if severe adverse reactions occur.

Dosing

Adult

7.5-30 mg/d PO divided tid (2.5-10 mg/dose); not to exceed 100 mg/d

Pediatric

<15 years: Not recommended
>15 years: Not established

Interactions

Toxicity may increase with ergot alkaloids, erythromycin, isometheptene, phenylpropanolamine (recalled from US market), and ethanol; amitriptyline, butyrophenones, zotepine, imipramine, methyldopa, phenothiazines, and reserpine may decrease bromocriptine effects

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; ischemic heart disease; peripheral vascular disorders

Precautions

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Caution in renal or hepatic disease, breastfeeding women, cardiovascular disease, and concomitant antihypertensive therapy


Amantadine (Symmetrel)

May act to release dopamine from dopaminergic terminals and other central sites.

Dosing

Adult

100-300 mg PO bid

Pediatric

<1 year: Not established
1-9 years: 4.4-8.8 mg/kg/d PO; not to exceed 150 mg/d PO qd or divided bid
9-12 years: 100 mg PO bid
>12 years: Administer as in adults

Interactions

Drugs with anticholinergic or CNS stimulant activity increase toxicity; concurrent administration of hydrochlorothiazide plus triamterene with amantadine may increase plasma concentrations of amantadine

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in liver disease, uncontrolled psychosis, eczematoid dermatitis, seizures, and those receiving CNS stimulant drugs; do not discontinue this medication abruptly


Levodopa and carbidopa (Sinemet)

Large neutral amino acid absorbed in proximal small intestine by saturable carrier-mediated transport system. Absorption is decreased by meals, which include other large neutral amino acids. Only patients with meaningful motor fluctuations need consider a low protein or protein redistributed diet. Greater consistency of absorption achieved when levodopa taken >1 h after meals. Nausea often is reduced if levodopa is taken immediately following meals. Some patients with nausea benefit from additional carbidopa in doses up to 200 mg/d. Half-life of levodopa/carbidopa is approximately 2 h.
Provide at least 70-100 mg/d carbidopa. When more carbidopa required, substitute 25/100 tab for each 10/100 tab. When more levodopa required, substitute 25/250 tab for the 25/100 or 10/100 tab.
Sustained-release formulation of levodopa/carbidopa is more slowly absorbed and provides more sustained levodopa levels than the immediate-release dosage form. Effective as immediate-release formulation when levodopa is required initially and may be more convenient when fewer intakes are desired.
Most patients have been adequately treated with 2-8 tab/d (divided doses) at intervals of 4-8 h while awake. Higher doses (>12 tab/d) and intervals <4 h have been used but are not usually recommended. If <4 h interval used or if divided doses are not equal, give smaller doses at end of day. Allow at least a 3-d interval between dosage adjustments. May administer as whole or half tab, which should not be crushed or chewed.

Dosing

Adult

25/250 mg PO tid/qid

Pediatric

Not established; 10/100 mg/d PO suggested if patient aged 6-10 y; increase by 1 tab qod prn; not to exceed 60/600 mg/d

Interactions

Hydantoins, pyridoxine, phenothiazine, and hypotensive agents may decrease effects; toxicity increases with antacids and MAOIs

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; narrow-angle glaucoma; malignant melanoma; undiagnosed skin lesions

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Certain adverse CNS effects (eg, dyskinesias) may occur at lower dosages and earlier in therapy with SR form; caution in MI, arrhythmias, asthma, and peptic ulcer disease; high-protein diets should be distributed throughout the day to avoid fluctuations in levodopa absorption; short-term adverse effects include nausea, hypotension, and hallucinations; long-term adverse effects include motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (chorea)

Skeletal muscle relaxant

These agents stimulate muscle relaxation by modulating skeletal muscle contractions at site beyond myoneural junction and acting directly on muscle itself.


Dantrolene (Dantrium)

Inhibits ionized calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum and results in direct muscle relaxation. Used to treat NMS-associated muscular rigidity and hyperthermia.
Based on retrospective studies, the addition of dantrolene to bromocriptine does not appear to offer additional advantage. Dantrolene therapy alone appears to shorten the duration of illness, but use is controversial. Reduction of fever and rigidity is not immediate but occurs over a mean of 1.7 d. When rapid rigidity reduction is necessary, alternative means (eg, neuromuscular paralysis) may be preferable. A recent review of case reports indicates that adding dantrolene to other medication prolongs the course of NMS. Therapy with dantrolene alone had increased mortality. The only benefit to dantrolene was in patients who prior to NMS had been on a neuroleptic monotherapy.
Most patients respond to 400 mg/d or less.

Dosing

Adult

1-3 mg/kg IV initial, followed by 10 mg/kg/d PO/IV in divided doses

Pediatric

0.5 mg/kg PO/IV bid initial, increase to 0.5 mg/kg bid/qid, then by increments of 0.5 mg/kg to 3 mg/kg bid/qid prn; not to exceed 100 mg qid

Interactions

Toxicity may increase with the coadministration of clofibrate and warfarin; coadministration with estrogen may increase hepatotoxicity in women >35 y; coadministration with verapamil may lead to hyperkalemia

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; active hepatic disease (hepatitis and cirrhosis)

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

May cause hepatotoxicity (use only for recommended indications); caution in impaired pulmonary function and severe cardiac insufficiency; may cause photosensitivity with exposure to sunlight; unlabeled use for NMS; G-6-PD deficiency

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

  • Additional evaluation and treatment should be in an inpatient setting, preferably an ICU.
  • The patient must be monitored closely to rule out underlying infection.
  • Adequate hydration must be maintained.
  • Rhabdomyolysis must be diagnosed and treated aggressively with alkalinization and hydration to prevent renal failure.
  • The patient's psychiatric disease must be evaluated and treated during withdrawal of the neuroleptic medication.
    • Challenge with an atypical antipsychotic may be appropriate since these drugs have a lower incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS).
    • Treatment with ECT may be useful to treat the underlying psychiatric disease after an episode of NMS.

Further Outpatient Care

  • NMS may be prolonged. If the patient is discharged, close follow-up care should be given to monitor residual symptoms. If neuroleptics are to be reinstituted, they should be administered at relatively low initial doses.

Transfer

  • If NMS is diagnosed in a psychiatric facility, the patient should be transferred to an acute care medical facility where intensive monitoring and treatment is available.

Deterrence/Prevention

  • Take a careful history before starting a new neuroleptic medication. NMS frequently recurs when medications are restarted.
  • Monitor a patient carefully while administering neuroleptic medication to prevent excessive agitation and dehydration because these conditions may predispose a patient to NMS.
  • Benzodiazepines and physical restraints may be useful.

Complications

  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Renal failure
  • Seizures
  • Respiratory failure
  • Aspiration pneumonia
  • Decompensation of psychiatric disease with the withdrawal of neuroleptics
  • Diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC)

Prognosis

  • Increased mortality, up to 50%, is seen in patients who develop renal failure during an episode of NMS.
  • In the absence of rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, or aspiration pneumonia, and with good supportive care, the prognosis for recovery is good.
  • The syndrome may last 7-10 days after discontinuing oral neuroleptics and up to 21 days after using depot neuroleptics (eg, fluphenazine).

Patient Education

  • After an episode of NMS, the patient must be told that he or she is at risk for recurrence if rechallenged with a neuroleptic medication. The patient should report this reaction to all health care providers.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Failure to consider this diagnosis and to institute prompt therapies
  • Failure to consider other non-NMS diagnoses as the cause of similar symptoms
  • Failure to obtain a prior history of NMS before instituting medical therapies with any medications known to cause NMS

References

  1. Strawn JR, Keck PE Jr, Caroff SN. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. Jun 2007;164(6):870-6. [Medline].

  2. Gurrera RJ. Sympathoadrenal hyperactivity and the etiology of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. Feb 1999;156(2):169-80. [Medline].

  3. Jauss M, Krack P, Franz M, Klett R, Bauer R, Gallhofer B, et al. Imaging of dopamine receptors with [123I]iodobenzamide single-photon emission-computed tomography in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Mov Disord. Nov 1996;11(6):726-8. [Medline].

  4. Picard LS, Lindsay S, Strawn JR, Kaneria RM, Patel NC, Keck PE Jr. Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome: diagnostic controversies and considerations. Pharmacotherapy. Apr 2008;28(4):530-5. [Medline].

  5. Ozer F, Meral H, Aydin B, Hanoglu L, Aydemir T, Oral T. Electroconvulsive therapy in drug-induced psychiatric states and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J ECT. Jun 2005;21(2):125-7. [Medline].

  6. Hermesh H, Aizenberg D, Weizman A. A successful electroconvulsive treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Acta Psychiatr Scand. Mar 1987;75(3):237-9. [Medline].

  7. Rosebush PI, Stewart T, Mazurek MF. The treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Are dantrolene and bromocriptine useful adjuncts to supportive care?. Br J Psychiatry. Nov 1991;159:709-12. [Medline].

  8. Sakkas P, Davis JM, Janicak PG, Wang ZY. Drug treatment of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27(3):381-4. [Medline].

  9. Schneider SM. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: controversies in treatment. Am J Emerg Med. Jul 1991;9(4):360-2. [Medline].

  10. Adnet P, Lestavel P, Krivosic-Horber R. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Br J Anaesth. Jul 2000;85(1):129-35. [Medline].

  11. Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin. May 2004;22(2):389-411. [Medline].

  12. Buckley PF, Hutchinson M. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Mar 1995;58(3):271-3. [Medline].

  13. Carbone JR. The neuroleptic malignant and serotonin syndromes. Emerg Med Clin North Am. May 2000;18(2):317-25, x. [Medline].

  14. Caroff SN, Mann SC. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(1):25-9. [Medline].

  15. Caroff SN, Mann SC, Lazarus A. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Sep 1987;44(9):838-40. [Medline].

  16. Colosimo C, Merello M, Albanese A. Clinical usefulness of apomorphine in movement disorders. Clin Neuropharmacol. Jun 1994;17(3):243-59. [Medline].

  17. Heiman-Patterson TD. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant hyperthermia. Important issues for the medical consultant. Med Clin North Am. Mar 1993;77(2):477-92. [Medline].

  18. Lazarus A, Mann SC, Caroff SN. The Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome and Related Conditions. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1989.

  19. Nierenberg D, Disch M, Manheimer E, Patterson J, Ross J, Silvestri G, et al. Facilitating prompt diagnosis and treatment of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Clin Pharmacol Ther. Nov 1991;50(5 Pt 1):580-6. [Medline].

  20. Reulbach U, Dütsch C, Biermann T, Sperling W, Thuerauf N, Kornhuber J, et al. Managing an effective treatment for neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R4. [Medline].

  21. Sachdev P, Mason C, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. Case-control study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. Aug 1997;154(8):1156-8. [Medline].

  22. Shiloh R, Valevski A, Bodinger L, Misgav S, Aizenberg D, Dorfman-Etrog P, et al. Precautionary measures reduce risk of definite neuroleptic malignant syndrome in newly typical neuroleptic-treated schizophrenia inpatients. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. May 2003;18(3):147-9. [Medline].

Keywords

neuroleptic malignant syndrome, neuroleptic medication, NMS, idiosyncratic reaction, muscular rigidity, autonomic dysfunction, haloperidol, fluphenazine, antipsychotic agents, prochlorperazine, promethazine, clozapine, risperidone, metoclopramide, amoxapine, lithium, dopamine D2-receptor antagonist, withdrawal of anti-Parkinson medication, respiratory failure, cardiovascular collapse, myoglobinuric renal failure, arrhythmias, diffuse intravascular coagulation, DIC, rhabdomyolysis, pneumonia, renal failure, seizures, hyperthermia, profuse diaphoresis, sialorrhea, metabolic acidosis, dopamine receptor blockade, impaired temperature regulation

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Theodore I Benzer, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director of Clinical Operations, Director of Toxicology, Chair of Quality and Safety, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
Theodore I Benzer, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American College of Emergency Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Mark S Slabinski, MD, FACEP, FAAEM, Vice President, EMP Medical Group
Mark S Slabinski, MD, FACEP, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, and Ohio State Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

John T VanDeVoort, PharmD, Regional Director of Pharmacy, Sacred Heart & St. Joseph's Hospitals
John T VanDeVoort, PharmD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Michael J Burns, MD, Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard University Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Michael J Burns, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Medical Toxicology, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Asim Tarabar, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Further Reading

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)