eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Trauma & Orthopedics

Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Paul A Testa, MD, Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Medical Center, Bellevue Hospital
Coauthor(s): Eric Legome, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan; Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP, Director, SICU and Surgical Critical Care Fellowship, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Surgical Emergencies, Yale University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 28, 2008

Differential Diagnoses

Anemia, Acute
Shock, Hypovolemic
Compartment Syndrome, Abdominal
Trauma, Lower Genitourinary
Diaphragmatic Injuries
Trauma, Upper Genitourinary
Domestic Violence
Ultrasonography, Abdominal
Pregnancy, Trauma
Shock, Hemorrhagic

Other Problems to Be Considered

Coagulopathy
Comorbid medical conditions
Concomitant closed head injury
Concomitant penetrating chest injury

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Patients with penetrating abdominal trauma generally require complete laboratory profiles in case of need for emergent operation.
    • Blood type and crossmatch
    • Complete blood count (CBC)
    • Electrolyte levels
    • BUN level
    • Creatinine level
    • Glucose level
    • Prothrombin time (PT)/activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
    • Venous or arterial lactate level
    • Calcium, magnesium, and phosphate levels
    • Urinalysis
    • Serum and urine toxicology screen
  • Calculate the anion gap (reference range, 8-12 mmol/L) and base deficit (reference range, ±4 mmol/L) as guides to hypoperfusion.

Imaging Studies

  • The imaging needs of each patient differ, depending on hemodynamic stability and associated injuries.
  • Plain radiography
    • Plain abdominal radiography should be obtained with a history of projectiles or retained foreign body. The radiograph allows one to account for bullets, shrapnel, and foreign bodies. If all foreign bodies are not accounted for, consider the possibility that it is intraluminal or intravascular and a potential source of emboli distant from the site of entrance.
    • Chest radiography allows for evaluation of pneumothorax or hemothorax and is relatively specific, although insensitive, for diagnosing diaphragmatic injury.
  • FAST examination: The focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has gained acceptance in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma. Speed, noninvasiveness, and reproducibility make it a good diagnostic study to aid in rapidly diagnosing intraperitoneal injury that requires laparotomy. That is, a positive FAST result in the setting of penetrating trauma is usually an indication for laparotomy due to the high positive predictive value for a therapeutic laparotomy. Unfortunately, a negative FAST result cannot rule out the need for laparotomy and cannot be relied on to exclude important intraperitoneal injury.
  • Ultrasonography: Sonographic evaluation of penetrating wounds also has been evaluated in the detection of fascial defects resulting from anterior abdominal stab injuries, reducing the need for local wound exploration. In one prospective trial, a positive fascial sonogram result obviated the need for invasive wound exploration because such patients were then taken to the operating room (OR). However, a negative fascial sonogram result did not rule out a penetration of the peritoneum.
  • Computed tomography
    • Triple contrast computed tomography (CT), using intravenous, oral, and rectal contrast, enables evaluation of the intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal structures. It is useful for evaluation of penetrating flank and back wounds and is found to be 97% accurate. Exploration of these wounds is more difficult, less reliable, and therefore not indicated.
    • Abdominal CT is the most sensitive and specific study in identifying and assessing the injury severity to the liver or spleen. The presence of a contrast blush on CT or ongoing hemorrhage is indication for laparotomy or angiography and embolization.
    • The primary limitation is lack of sensitivity in diagnosing mesenteric, hollow visceral, and diaphragmatic injuries, all of which are common in penetrating trauma. Therefore, unless the wound is clearly superficial on CT scan, admission and serial observation is indicated, even with a negative CT result for injury.
    • No absolute indications exist for CT in anterior penetrating trauma. Some centers use CT as a screening tool to complement physical examination, while others perform serial examination or DPL.
    • Increasingly, CT scan is being used for penetrating, nontangential gunshot wounds with a decrease in the negative laparotomy rate. It should be used only with patients who are stable and do not have evidence of generalized peritonitis. While it has been studied in several forms, the latest study looked at intravenous contrast alone with good results.1

Other Tests

  • Almost all other tests relate to (1) a skeletal survey for associated fractures, (2) a CT scan of the brain for coincident head injuries, or (3) a retrograde urethrogram or cystogram in a stable patient who has blood at the urethral meatus or evidence of urethral or bladder injury from penetration.
  • Nuclear medicine studies have no role in the acutely injured abdominal trauma patient.

Procedures

  • Local wound exploration
    • In the trauma patient with an anterior stab wound, local wound exploration may be a valuable diagnostic aid. Its utility is dependent on the wound's mechanism and location. Stab wounds to the anterior abdomen are well suited for local wound exploration because many do not penetrate the fascia. Exploration requires aseptic technique, good overhead lighting, and local anesthesia. The wound is enlarged as necessary so that the posterior fascia may be evaluated. If penetration occurs or is inconclusive, the wound is considered intraperitoneal and must be evaluated further by DPL or more invasive procedures.
    • Gunshot wounds and those produced by thin instruments, such as an ice pick, are more difficult to explore, and accordingly, are generally considered intraperitoneal injuries.
    • Once the area is surgically prepared, draped, and anesthetized, the wound may be widened with gentle retraction and gently probed with a hemostat to determine if a tract exists. If the wound is small, extending it to aid visualization is accomplished with a No 10 blade scalpel. The rectus fibers may be separated by spreading in their direction using a hemostat or Kelly clamp. The posterior rectus sheath is easily identifiable as a white layer directly underlying the rectus musculature. If yellow fat or omentum is identified, a fascial violation is established.
  • Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
    • The utility of DPL in the hemodynamically stable patient with penetrating abdominal injury is to identify hollow viscus or diaphragmatic injury. A DPL may be performed infraumbilically or supraumbilically. The bladder and stomach must be decompressed. An open mini-laparotomy or closed Seldinger technique may be used. Once the catheter is in place, the initial aspiration of gross blood or food particles mandates surgical exploration, and the procedure is terminated. If the aspiration is negative for blood, 1000 mL of warm Ringer lactate solution (20 mL/kg for pediatric patients) is infused rapidly and allowed to return by placing the intravenous bag on the floor.
    • Fluid is sent for analysis (eg, cell count, differential, Gram stain, bilirubin, amylase, vegetable matter, fecal matter). A positive test result varies with the mechanism of injury. A 100,000 RBC count or 100-500 WBC count may be considered positive in a stab wound. However, if a diaphragmatic injury is possible, some physicians lower the value of a positive test to 5000 RBC. Because of the more serious nature of gunshot wounds, clinicians often use a similarly lower value for a positive test when there is concern a projectile has entered the peritoneal cavity.
    • The lower the threshold for positivity, the more sensitive the test, but the higher the nontherapeutic laparotomy rate (ie, higher rate of false-positive result).
    • The primary disadvantages are invasiveness, inability to evaluate the retroperitoneum, moderate specificity for therapeutic laparotomy, and a significant false-positive rate.
  • Proctosigmoidoscopy
    • This procedure is indicated for evaluation of suspected rectal or sigmoid injury. While mainly performed by surgeons, it is occasionally performed by emergency physicians.
    • The patient is placed in the left lateral decubitus position in a knee-chest manner (provided the spine is clear). The sigmoidoscope is introduced into the anal canal and directed toward the patient's umbilicus. Identification of rectal or low sigmoid colon full-thickness rents, intramural hematoma, or luminal arterial blood loss requires prompt surgical exploration.
  • Laparoscopy
    • Laparoscopy is a reasonably safe, effective procedure for the evaluation and treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal trauma, and it can reduce the number of nontherapeutic laparotomies performed. In thoracoabdominal stab wounds, laparoscopy aids in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic and other intra-abdominal injuries.
    • Patients with stab wounds to the anterior abdomen or with uncertain peritoneal penetration are also candidates for diagnostic laparoscopy. Gunshot wounds to the anterior abdomen with questionable penetration may be assessed this way.
  • Emergency department thoracotomy
    • Victims of penetrating abdominal trauma with loss of vital signs or in whom present with exsanguination hemorrhage that is not controllable with direct external pressure are candidates for an ED left anterolateral-left thoracotomy. The purpose of this procedure is to relieve cardiac tamponade, control cardiac bleeding, obtain proximal aortic control, and provide open cardiac massage to improve cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation efforts.
    • This procedure is performed only in extremely selected circumstances since survival from abdominal injury requiring a resuscitative ED thoracotomy is rare. It is much more effective if the arrest is due to cardiac injury with thoracoabdominal trauma. Patients who may be considered for thoracotomy are those who had vital signs on arrival or en route, with or without pulseless electrical activity (PEA) on the monitor. Thoracotomy is rarely successful in blunt trauma.
    • After rapidly preparing and draping the entire chest, a curvilinear incision is made from the left sternal border of the fifth intercostal space to the table, paralleling the course of the underlying rib. All tissues above the rib are divided with the scalpel, respirations are halted, and the intercostal muscle bundle above the rib is pierced with a finger or a Kelly clamp and then divided with a curved Mayo scissor for the length of the incision. The lungs are reinflated, and a rib spreader is inserted with a ratchet mechanism placed laterally. The pericardium is opened longitudinally to avoid injury to the pericardiacophrenic vessels and the phrenic nerve. Subluxing the heart into the left chest allows for open massage. The left lung is retracted superiorly using a moist laparotomy pad, and the inferior pulmonary ligament is divided using Metzenbaum scissors.
    • The tissues overlying and just lateral to the vertebral bodies contain the aorta, esophagus, thoracic duct, and countless nerves. Usually, blunt dissection frees the aorta enough to place a Satinsky or long, curved DeBakey clamp. In certain circumstances, the aorta is not identified easily, and the aorta and esophagus must be clamped en masse in a patient who is in extremis. Warm saline is essential to prevent cooling of the heart, and presser support usually is needed as well.

More on Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating

Overview: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating
Treatment & Medication: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating
Follow-up: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating
Multimedia: Abdominal Trauma, Penetrating
References

References

  1. Velmahos GC, Constantinou C, Tillou A, et al. Abdominal computed tomographic scan for patients with gunshot wounds to the abdomen selected for nonoperative management. J Trauma. Nov 2005;59(5):1155-60; discussion 1160-1. [Medline].

  2. Ahmed N, Whelan J, Brownlee J, et al. The contribution of laparoscopy in evaluation of penetrating abdominal wounds. J Am Coll Surg. Aug 2005;201(2):213-6. [Medline].

  3. Aldemir M, Tacyildiz I, Girgin S. Predicting factors for mortality in the penetrating abdominal trauma. Acta Chir Belg. Aug 2004;104(4):429-34. [Medline].

  4. Alzamel HA, Cohn SM. When is it safe to discharge asymptomatic patients with abdominal stab wounds?. J Trauma. Mar 2005;58(3):523-5.

  5. Arikan S, Kocakusak A, Yucel AF, Adas G. A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration. J Trauma. Mar 2005;58(3):526-32. [Medline].

  6. Biffl WL, Harrington DT, Majercik SD, et al. The evolution of trauma care at a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg. Jun 2005;200(6):922-9. [Medline].

  7. Bir CA, Stewart SJ, Wilhelm M. Skin penetration assessment of less lethal kinetic energy munitions. J Forensic Sci. Nov 2005;50(6):1426-9. [Medline].

  8. Bozorgzadeh A, Pizzi WF, Barie PS, et al. The duration of antibiotic administration in penetrating abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. Feb 1999;177(2):125-31. [Medline].

  9. Brown CV, Velmahos GC, Neville AL, et al. Hemodynamically "stable" patients with peritonitis after penetrating abdominal trauma: identifying those who are bleeding. Arch Surg. Aug 2005;140(8):767-72. [Medline].

  10. Chol YB, Lim KS. Therapeutic laparoscopy for abdominal trauma. Surg Endosc. Mar 2003;17(3):421-7. [Medline].

  11. Cotton BA, Nance ML. Penetrating trauma in children. Semin Pediatr Surg. May 2004;13(2):87-97. [Medline].

  12. Delgado G Jr, Barletta JF, Kanji S, et al. Characteristics of prophylactic antibiotic strategies after penetrating abdominal trauma at a level I urban trauma center: a comparison with the East guidelines. J Trauma. Oct 2002;53(4):673-8. [Medline].

  13. Demetriades D, Murray J, Charalambides K, et al. Trauma fatalities: time and location of hospital deaths. J Am Coll Surg. Jan 2004;198(1):20-6. [Medline].

  14. Demetriades D, Velmahos G. Technology-driven triage of abdominal trauma: the emerging era of nonoperative management. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:1-15. [Medline].

  15. Drost TF, Rosemurgy AS, Kearney RE, Roberts P. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Limited indications due to evolving concepts in trauma care. Am Surg. Feb 1991;57(2):126-8. [Medline].

  16. Eddy VA, Morris JA, Rozycki GS. Trauma and pregnancy. In: The Textbook of Penetrating Trauma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996:695-701.

  17. Ertekin C, Yanar H, Taviloglu K, et al. Unnecessary laparotomy by using physical examination and different diagnostic modalities for penetrating abdominal stab wounds. Emerg Med J. Nov 2005;22(11):790-4. [Medline].

  18. Fabian TC, Croce MA. Abdominal trauma, including indications for celiotomy. J Trauma. 2000;1583-602.

  19. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stewart RM, et al. A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma. Ann Surg. May 1993;217(5):557-64; discussion 564-5. [Medline].

  20. Ferrada R, Birolini D. New concepts in the management of patients with penetrating abdominal wounds. Surg Clin North Am. Dec 1999;79(6):1331-56. [Medline].

  21. Friese RS, Coln CE, Gentilello LM. Laparoscopy is sufficient to exclude occult diaphragm injury after penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma. Apr 2005;58(4):789-92. [Medline].

  22. Green SM. Is there evidence to support the need for routine surgeon presence on trauma patient arrival?. Ann Emerg Med. May 2006;47(5):405-11. [Medline].

  23. Ivatury RR, Porter JM, Simon RJ, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension after life-threatening penetrating abdominal trauma: prophylaxis, incidence, and clinical relevance to gastric mucosal pH and abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma. Jun 1998;44(6):1016-21; discussion 1021-3. [Medline].

  24. Jansen JO, Logie JR. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage - an obituary. Br J Surg. May 2005;92(5):517-8. [Medline].

  25. Kahdi FU. Role of ultrasound in penetrating abdominal trauma: a prospective clinical study. J Trauma. 2000;50(3):475-9.

  26. Kaplan LJ, Santora TA, Blank-Reid CA, Trooskin SZ. Improved emergency department efficiency with a three-tier trauma triage system. Injury. Sep 1997;28(7):449-53. [Medline].

  27. Kuczkowski KM, Ispirescu JS, Benumof JL. Trauma in pregnancy: anesthetic management of the parturient with multiple gun shot wounds to the gravid uterus and fetal injury. J Trauma. Feb 2003;54(2):420. [Medline].

  28. Leppaniemi A, Haapiainen R. Diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal stab wounds: a prospective, randomized study. J Trauma. Oct 2003;55(4):636-45.

  29. Luchette FA, Borzotta AP, Croce MA, et al. Practice management guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in penetrating abdominal trauma: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. J Trauma. Mar 2000;48(3):508-18. [Medline].

  30. Mattox KL, Goetzl L. Trauma in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. Oct 2005;33(10 Suppl):S385-9. [Medline].

  31. Murphy JT, Hall J, Provost D. Fascial ultrasound for evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wound injury. J Trauma. Oct 2005;59(4):843-6.

  32. Nicholas JM, Rix EP, Easley KA, et al. Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. J Trauma. Dec 2003;55(6):1095-108; discussion 1108-10. [Medline].

  33. Pryor JP, Reilly PM, Dabrowski GP, et al. Nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds. Ann Emerg Med. Mar 2004;43(3):344-53. [Medline].

  34. Richards CF, Mayberry JC. Initial management of the trauma patient. Crit Care Clin. Jan 2004;20(1):1-11. [Medline].

  35. Schurink GW, Bode PJ, van Luijt PA, van Vugt AB. The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. May 1997;28(4):261-5. [Medline].

  36. Sebesta J. Special lessons learned from iraq. Surg Clin North Am. Jun 2006;86(3):711-26. [Medline].

  37. Simon RJ, Rabin J, Kuhls D. Impact of increased use of laparoscopy on negative laparotomy rates after penetrating trauma. J Trauma. Aug 2002;53(2):297-302; discussion 302. [Medline].

  38. Swan KG, Swan RC. Principles of ballistics applicable to the treatment of gunshot wounds. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1991;71(2):221-39. [Medline].

  39. Todd SR. Critical concepts in abdominal injury. Crit Care Clin. Jan 2004;20(1):119-34. [Medline].

  40. Tsikitis V, Biffl WL, Majercik S, et al. Selective clinical management of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Am J Surg. Dec 2004;188(6):807-12.

  41. Udobi KF, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC, Scalea TM. Role of ultrasonography in penetrating abdominal trauma: a prospective clinical study. J Trauma. Mar 2001;50(3):475-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

gunshot wound, GSW, stab wounds, SW, shotgun wounds, impalement, penetrating trauma, penetrating abdominal wounds, penetrating abdominal trauma, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, peritonitis, intra-abdominal injury, peritoneal injury, abdominal injury, abdominal trauma, intraperitoneal injury

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Paul A Testa, MD, Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Medical Center, Bellevue Hospital
Paul A Testa, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Emergency Medicine Residents Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Eric Legome, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan
Eric Legome, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP, Director, SICU and Surgical Critical Care Fellowship, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Surgical Emergencies, Yale University School of Medicine
Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, Association for Surgical Education, Connecticut State Medical Society, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, International Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society, Society for the Advancement of Blood Management, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Surgical Infection Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Roy Alson, MD, PhD, FACEP, FAAEM, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine; Medical Director, Forsyth County EMS; Deputy Medical Advisor, North Carolina Office of EMS; Associate Medical Director, North Carolina Baptist AirCare
Roy Alson, MD, PhD, FACEP, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, National Association of EMS Physicians, North Carolina Medical Society, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Wilderness Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Public Health Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Rick Kulkarni, MD, Medical Director, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital
Rick Kulkarni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: WebMD Salary Employment

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.