eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Trauma & Orthopedics
Back Pain, Mechanical: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Jul 16, 2009
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Other Problems to Be Considered
Perforated viscous
Pancreatitis
Large bowel obstruction
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- Consider performing urinalysis if the problem is not clearly musculoskeletal or an exacerbation of chronic back pain.
- Perform a complete blood count (CBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) if the patient is febrile or if an epidural or spinal abscess, or osteomyelitis is suspected. While ESR has moderate specificity, the sensitivity is relatively high in cases of abscess, and it can be used as a screening test.
- Other laboratory studies are rarely needed unless a disorder other than back pain is strongly suspected.
Imaging Studies
- Radiography
- Lumbosacral spine series are expensive and expose the reproductive organs to significant radiation. Annually, 7-8 million such tests are obtained, but most have little value in directing therapy, particularly among adults younger than 50 years.
- Unless a history of traumatic injury or systemic illness is present, such films should be obtained only for suspicion of malignancy or infection. Malignant involvement of vertebral bodies can be evident on plain film when as little as 30% of the vertebral body has been replaced.
- Other indications that suggest the need for radiographic imaging include chronic steroid use and acute onset of pain in patients older than 50 years or in the pediatric age group.
- The physician may also consider obtaining radiographs in patients whose cases involve (or potentially involve) litigation or for patients seeking compensation.
- CT and MRI12
- CT and MRI are generally considered the studies of choice for more precise imaging of the vertebrae, paraspinal soft tissues, discs, or spinal cord. CT images cortical bone with higher resolution and can delineate some fractures better than MRI.
- MRI is generally the preferred imaging modality for detecting disc, cord, or soft tissue abnormalities.
- Ultrasonography may be useful if the differential diagnosis includes appendicitis, a pathologic pelvic process, or abdominal aneurysm.
- True emergencies that necessitate imaging include the following:
- Patients with a history of malignancy and new evidence of nerve entrapment
- Patients with back pain associated with paralysis or gross muscle weakness
- Patients with bilateral neurologic deficits associated with bowel or bladder function loss
- Patients in whom an epidural hematoma or epidural abscess is suspected
- Postoperative patients with a recent lumbar laminectomy or hip replacement
Improvement occurs in almost all patients within 4-6 weeks, except those with infection, occult malignancy, or systemic illness. If pain fails to significantly improve or resolve in this time frame, imaging is always indicated.13
Other Tests
- Perform the straight leg raising test with the patient in a supine position. Record the response to raising each leg. An approximation of the test may be performed with the patient sitting and each leg straightened at the knee. The examiner should take care to make sure that the quadriceps muscle is relaxed while passively raising the leg to ensure that the sciatic nerve is being adequately stretched during the testing. If the quadriceps is contracted, it will take the pressure off the sciatic nerve and may give a false-negative result.
- The stoop test helps distinguish true claudication from pseudoclaudication. Patients with true claudication sit down to rest when pain occurs, while patients with pseudoclaudication attempt to keep walking by stooping or flexing the spine to relieve the stretch on the sciatic nerve.
More on Back Pain, Mechanical |
| Overview: Back Pain, Mechanical |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Back Pain, Mechanical |
| Treatment & Medication: Back Pain, Mechanical |
| Follow-up: Back Pain, Mechanical |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Kinkade S. Evaluation and treatment of acute low back pain. Am Fam Physician. Apr 15, 2007;74(8):1181-8. [Medline].
Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Kammann E, Keller RB, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 2000;82(1):4-15. [Medline].
de Inocencio J. Musculoskeletal pain in primary pediatric care: analysis of 1000 consecutive general pediatric clinic visits. Pediatrics. Dec 1998;102(6):E63. [Medline].
Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?. JAMA. Aug 12 1992;268(6):760-5. [Medline].
Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1990;72(3):403-8. [Medline].
Hadjipaviou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Oct 2008;90(10):1261-70. [Medline].
van Tulder M, Koes B. Low back pain and sciatica (chronic). Clin Evid. Dec 2003;(10):1359-76. [Medline].
Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. Feb 1 2001;344(5):363-70. [Medline].
Borenstein D. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Mar 1996;8(2):124-9. [Medline].
Marriott A, Newman NM, Gracovetsky SA, Richards MP, Asselin S. Improving the evaluation of benign low back pain. Spine. May 15 1999;24(10):952-60. [Medline].
Frank AO, De Souza LH, McAuley JH, Sharma V, Main CJ. A cross-sectional survey of the clinical and psychological features of low back pain and consequent work handicap: use of the Quebec Task Force classification. Int J Clin Pract. Dec 2000;54(10):639-44. [Medline].
Lurie JD. What diagnostic tests are useful for low back pain?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. Aug 2005;19(4):557-75. [Medline].
Kuritzky L. Current management of acute musculoskeletal pain in the ambulatory care setting. Am J Ther. Nov-Dec 2008;Suppl 10:S7-11. [Medline].
van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine. Sep 15 1997;22(18):2128-56. [Medline].
Cherkin D, Sherman KJ. Conceptualization and evaluation of an optimal healing environment for chronic low-back pain in primary care. J Altern Complement Med. 2004;10 Suppl 1:S171-8. [Medline].
Nelson L, Aspegren D, Bova C. The use of epidural steroid injection and manipulation on patients with chronic low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. May 1997;20(4):263-6. [Medline].
Moffett JK, Torgerson D, Bell-Syer S, Jackson D, Llewlyn-Phillips H, Farrin A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ. Jul 31 1999;319(7205):279-83. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Sertpoyraz F, Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Capaci K, Kirazli Y. Comparison of isokinetic exercise versus standard exercise training in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. Mar 2009;23(3):238-47. [Medline].
[Guideline] Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, Rosenquist RW, Atlas SJ, Baisden J. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine. May 1 2009;34(10):1066-77. [Medline].
Hodges P, van den Hoorn W, Dawson A, Cholewicki J. Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence. J Biomech. Jan 5, 2009;42(1):61-6.
Lotz JC. The biomechanics of prevention and treatment for low back pain: 2nd international workshop. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Mar 1999;14(3):220-3. [Medline].
Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ. Feb 26 1994;308(6928):577-80. [Medline].
Croft PR, Macfarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Silman AJ. Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study. BMJ. May 2 1998;316(7141):1356-9. [Medline].
Harris IA, Young JM, Rae H, Jalaludin BB, Solomon MJ. Factors associated with back pain after physical injury: a survey of consecutive major trauma patients. Spine. Jun 15 2007;32(14):1561-5. [Medline].
Panjabi MM. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. Aug 2003;13(4):371-9. [Medline].
Spector LR, Madigan L, Rhyne A, Darden B 2nd, Kim D. Cauda equina syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Aug 2008;16(8):471-9. [Medline].
Tauney PJW, Siegel CB, LaBan MM. Thoracic and lumbar pain syndromes. In: Tintinalli, et al, eds. Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 4th ed. 2000:1866-1873.
van Poppel MN, Hooftman WE, Koes BW. An update of a systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the primary prevention of back pain at the workplace. Occup Med (Lond). Aug 2004;54(5):345-52. [Medline].
Walsh MJ. Evaluation of orthopedic testing of the low back for nonspecific lower back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. May 1998;21(4):232-6. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
low back pain, mechanical low back pain, low back pain treatment, low back pain causes, musculoligamentous injury, classic nerve root syndrome, musculoskeletal pain syndrome, impingement syndrome, herniated disk, herniated disc, spinal degeneration, cauda equina syndrome, myofascial pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, osteomyelitis, sacroiliitis, spinal stenosis, degenerative joint disease, straight leg test
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Back Pain, Mechanical