eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Trauma & Orthopedics

Replantation

Mark I Langdorf, MD, MHPE, FAAEM, FACEP, RDMS, Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Department Chair, Associate Residency Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine
J Akiva Kahn, MA, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine

Updated: Sep 14, 2009

Introduction

Replantation aims to restore the amputated part to its anatomical site, preserving function and appearance. Outcome depends on factors intrinsic to the patient and to the nature of the injury. Young patients who have distal, cleanly amputated extremities have the best return of function; multiple levels of injury, crush, or avulsing injuries have less. Patients must be fully informed about the commitment to rehabilitation and the possibility of multiple surgeries needed for best results.

Background

In the past 200 years, successful replantation of amputated digits has gradually moved from fantasy to reality. William Balfour performed the first successful fingertip reattachment in 1814; Thomas Hunter is credited with the first thumb replantation performed in the following year.

Little progress was made until the pioneering work of William Steward Halstead and Alexis Carrel, who performed replantation experiments with dog limbs in the 1880s. Dr Carrel won the Nobel Prize in 1912 for his work on vascular anastomoses and for pioneering renal transplantation. 

In 1962, Ronald A. Malt performed the first successful replantation of an entire limb in a 12-year-old boy whose arm had been severed in a train accident. With the development of the operating microscope by Julius Jacobson and Ernesto Suarez in the early 1960s, replantation became easier, and its use began to spread throughout the Western world. 

With the advent of microvascular reanastomosis, digit replantation became tenable. In 1965, Shigeo Kmatsu and Susumu Tamai were the first to perform such a procedure. Since then, medicine has advanced to include the successful replantation of a child’s completely amputated ear as well as replantation of multiple digits and hands.1,2

Modern replantation is now available in most large hospitals and favorable functionality and cosmetic appearance is increasingly common.3

For additional information, see eMedicine articles Hand, Amputation and Replantation, Digital Amputations, Replantation, and Thumb Reconstruction.

Pathophysiology

Amputation replantation is the reattachment of a completely severed part. This is distinguished from incomplete nonviable amputations, which require revascularization. Revascularization is the reconstruction of the blood supply of an incompletely amputated part. In general, revascularization usually provides better functional results than replantation itself.

However, viability alone is an inadequate measure of success. The main predictive factors include injury mechanism (crushing and avulsion have the worst prognosis), platelet count, smoking after operation, preservation method of amputated part, and the use of vein grafting.4 The amputations of the distal phalanx and the thumb, male gender, and ischemia time greater than 12 hours along with presence of diabetes seem to portend a somewhat worse prognosis. Age and history of alcohol use are less significant factors toward the success of replantation.5  

As replantation techniques advance, and success rates increase regardless of adverse factors, the focus is shifting from merely achieving anatomic survival through adequate tissue perfusion, to reconstruction of a functional limb. In some instances, a hand with a well-formed stump may be more functional than one with a functionless digit. The goal of replantation should not be the indiscriminate replantation of all severed fingers but the preservation of quality of life through regained function and appearance.

Clinical

History

An adequate history of the amputation injury is important and should include the mechanism, time, and place of injury; condition of the injured part; hand dominance; and general condition of the patient.

  • The mechanism of amputation is important; injuries due to sharp mechanisms have a much better chance of successful replantation than those caused by blunt crushing forces.
    • If a narrow zone of crush injury is present, replantation may be possible by excising the crush zone and replanting with clean margins.
    • Avulsion amputations caused by rollers offer a markedly reduced chance of successful, functional replantation, although such repairs are not impossible.
    • Degloving injuries are those in which the soft tissue is torn from the underlying bone, as when a glove is removed from the hand. These often are a result of jewelry getting caught in machinery.
  • The time elapsed since injury affects the amount of local and systemic hemorrhage and, hence, the degree of ischemia in the tissue and amputated part.
  • Wound contamination progresses with time because bacteria proliferate on the wound surface. The source of contamination may influence the choice of antibiotic, method and duration of irrigation, and degree of debridement prior to replantation.
  • Determine the patient's dominant hand, although this information is of only relative importance.
  • Ask about allergies, immunizations, and chronic active disease processes.
  • Ask if any old injury is present. Negative prognostic factors include old age, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus with complications. In the surgeon's judgment, these factors may make replantation inadvisable.
  • Assess the patient's psychiatric history. If the amputation was self-inflicted, a psychiatric evaluation is recommended.

Physical

  • Perform a detailed examination of the hand, and describe the injury and neurovascular status. Check sensation on both sides of the distal part to assess digital nerve function before any digital nerve anesthesia.
    • In cases of amputated digits, determine whether the amputation is within zone II of the hand (proximal to the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon insertion). Injuries in this zone are associated with poor postoperative functional outcome.
    • A red-line sign may be seen in avulsion injuries with associated traction on the neurovascular bundle. These are small subcutaneous hematomas caused by intimal tears along the bundle. This is usually a negative prognostic sign.
    • A ribbon sign is seen in patients where the blood vessel was subjected to stretch and torsion. The vessel will resemble a gift-wrap ribbon. This also portends a negative prognosis.


Complete amputation of two digits.

Complete amputation of two digits.



Complete thumb amputation.

Complete thumb amputation.



Complete thumb amputation.

Complete thumb amputation.



Surgical amputation of a left big toe.

Surgical amputation of a left big toe.


  • Perform a general physical examination, concentrating on cardiovascular disease.
  • Perform a rectal examination to ensure that anticoagulation can be accomplished during or after surgery, if necessary, without placing the patient at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Causes

The 6 mechanisms of amputation injury are the following:

  1. Sharp cut, as from a knife or meat slicer
  2. Dull cut, as from a saw or dull edge (eg, fan blade)
  3. Cut with a narrow segment of crush injury, as from a punch press
  4. Cut and avulsion, as from a machine that causes partial amputation and subsequent reflexive withdrawal of the hand that completes the amputation
  5. Avulsion, as from a finger or a hand caught in an anchor rope or horse reins
  6. Crush avulsion, as from a machine (eg, rollers) that crushes the limb then pulls the digits off

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Assess the patient's hemoglobin/hematocrit at baseline, and follow up with serial determinations if significant blood loss is suspected. Assess coagulopathy by determining the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count if the patient's history suggests a bleeding disorder or liver disease.
  • Type and cross-match 2-4 units of packed red blood cells if the patient's history suggests significant blood loss.
  • Obtain an electrocardiogram in patients older than 45 years and in those with a history of cardiac ischemia or arrhythmia.
  • A case report suggests that pulse oximetry can be used to document arterial flow to a part that is incompletely amputated when clinical findings of arterial flow with Doppler ultrasonography suggest an absence of arterial perfusion.6

Imaging Studies

  • Radiographs of the injured part
    • Obtain posteroanterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of the amputated part and stump.
    • Carefully assess for radiopaque foreign bodies.
    • Comminution of the fracture implies a crush injury mechanism and is associated with soft-tissue trauma.
    • If the joint is destroyed at the level of amputation, perform arthrodesis (fusion); this results in loss of joint function.
    • If a crush injury is severe, a mosaic of fragments may preclude attempts at replantation.


Radiologic appearance of a hand with two-digit am...

Radiologic appearance of a hand with two-digit amputation.



Radiologic appearance of a complete thumb amputat...

Radiologic appearance of a complete thumb amputation.


  • Obtain a chest radiograph if it is indicated by the patient's age or underlying lung or heart disease or if blunt or penetrating chest injury is suspected.

Treatment

Prehospital Care

  • At the scene, collect and preserve all amputated parts, even those crushed and not thought to be useful. Parts not suitable for replantation can provide tendons or bone. 
    • Cool the amputated part to 4°C to preserve it; 1 hour of warm ischemia is equivalent to approximately 6 hours of cold ischemia. Hence, cooling can markedly prolong the window of opportunity for replantation or revascularization.
    • Wrap the part in saline-soaked gauze and wrap in a towel. Next, place it in a dry, plastic bag. Place this bag on ice, or in a second bag filled with ice and water, as soon as possible. This 2-layer approach avoids submersion of the part in ice water, which causes freezing of the tissues and cell destruction. Dry ice is too cold and causes tissue freezing and cell destruction.7
    • Estimate the blood lost at the scene; this information is useful regarding resuscitation prior to surgery. Control bleeding from the amputated stump.
    • Label the bag with the patient’s information.8,9

Emergency Department Care

  • Uncontrolled arterial bleeding is the only immediately life-threatening complication likely to be encountered in the ED after injury to the upper extremity. Normal hemostasis involves circumferential constriction of affected arteries and their retraction into the amputated stump. The addition of a pressure dressing usually suffices to control bleeding. With partial arterial lacerations, retraction is prevented, and bleeding control can be more difficult.
  • Control hemorrhage in the upper extremities with local direct pressure or a pressure dressing. Use of a proximal tourniquet is acceptable, although not preferred, if direct pressure is not effective. The surgeon can clamp and ligate a bleeding vessel, but this can complicate later repair. In the ED, point control with localized pressure over the bleeding vessel or use of a pressure dressing is preferred.
  • Elevate the arm. Ensure that a poorly applied pressure dressing does not become a tourniquet and cause ischemia in the amputated stump. If a tourniquet is used, use it as briefly as possible, perhaps only during resuscitation for acute hypovolemia. Use of a tourniquet for more than 3 hours may lead to irreversible loss of function. Do not use a tourniquet during an interhospital transfer. A consultant may appropriately use a temporary tourniquet to better identify important structures such as nerves and vessels.
  • Blind ligation or clamping of bleeding vessels could lead to greater damage because neurovascular bundles place ischemia-sensitive nerves near bleeding vessels. Careless clamping can also lead to vessel thrombosis, which requires shortening of a vessel and/or interposition of a vessel graft.
  • Do not allow the patient to smoke prior to making the decision to replant or repair the amputation; smoking can cause vasospasm and complicate the procedure.
  • For partial amputations, splint the involved extremity to prevent further damage. Reduce any malrotation to limit ischemia. Avoid tension on the tissue bridge, which can damage nerves or vessels. Cooling of a partially amputated part is controversial. If no demonstrable perfusion of the part exists, cool it as if it were completely amputated. If a pulse or bleeding from the capillary bed is present, avoid cooling.
  • Bone, tendon, and skin can tolerate approximately 8-12 hours of warm ischemia and as long as 24 hours of cold ischemia. However, muscle necroses after 6 hours of warm ischemia or 12 hours of cold ischemia. In general, amputated digits may tolerate 12 hours of warm ischemia and 24 hours of cold ischemia. Other major amputations tolerate 6 hours of warm ischemia and 12 hours of cold ischemia because of their larger muscle content. Excessive ischemia time reduces muscle function and can result in myoglobinuria on reperfusion, placing renal function at risk. More proximal amputations involving more muscles must, therefore, be treated quickly.
  • Any amputation involves bone and tendon injury and is therefore a tetanus-prone wound by definition. Therefore, 0.5 mL of tetanus toxoid (adsorbed) must be administered intramuscularly if the last booster was received more than 5 years earlier. If the patient has not had primary immunization as a child or if the immunization status is unclear, administer tetanus toxoid as well as tetanus immune globulin (500 U intramuscularly) in opposite limbs.
  • A digital or regional nerve block is not recommended before a hand or a plastic surgeon evaluates the patient because documentation of nerve function prior to surgery is important. Use systemic analgesics with intravascularly administered narcotics.

Consultations

Consult a microvascular hand surgeon.

Medication

Prophylactic antibiotics are indicated with amputation, crush, or degloving injuries. Devitalized tissue is a good culture medium for bacterial contaminants. Common pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus (most likely organism) and group A streptococci, whereas clostridia species and organisms from the Enterobacteriaceae family are less common. Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria are more commonly found with extensive tissue damage or with wounds grossly contaminated with soil, saliva, or feces. In these cases, perform Gram staining and cultures before initiating antibiotic therapy.

If the amputation is from a human bite, antibiotic coverage should include streptococci, Eikenella corrodens, anaerobic bacteria, and staphylococci. Use oral amoxicillin and clavulanate for human bites without amputation. Use intravenous ampicillin and sulbactam or ticarcillin and clavulanate for amputations or established infections caused by human bites. A combination of penicillin G and an antistaphylococcal antibiotic is also acceptable for minor bite wounds.

Antibiotics

Empiric antimicrobial therapy must be comprehensive and should cover all likely pathogens.


Cefazolin (Ancef, Kefzol)

First-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin; binds one or more penicillin-binding proteins; arrests bacterial cell-wall synthesis and inhibits bacterial growth; primarily active against skin flora, including S aureus.

Dosing

Adult

500-1500 mg IV/IM q6-8h; not to exceed 100 mg/kg/d

Pediatric

25-50 mg/kg/d IV/IM divided tid/qid

Interactions

Probenecid decreases renal clearance and prolongs effect; concurrent use with aminoglycosides may increase renal toxicity; may yield a false-positive result for glucose with urine dipstick testing

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Adjust dose in patients with renal impairment


Ampicillin and sulbactam (Unasyn)

Drug combination that involves a beta-lactamase inhibitor with ampicillin; covers skin organisms, enteric flora, and anaerobes; not ideal for nosocomial pathogens.

Dosing

Adult

1.5 g (1 g ampicillin with 0.5 g sulbactam) to 3 g (2 g ampicillin with 1 g sulbactam) IV/IM q6h; not to exceed 4 g/d sulbactam or 8 g/d ampicillin

Pediatric

<3 months: Not established
3 months to 12 years: ampicillin 100-200 mg/kg/d (150-300 mg Unasyn) IV divided q6h
>12 years: Administer as in adults

Interactions

Probenecid and disulfiram decrease renal excretion of ampicillin and sulbactam and increase levels of the antibiotics; allopurinol increases ampicillin excretion; may potentiate ampicillin rash and decrease the effect of oral contraceptives

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity

Precautions

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Adjust dose in patients with renal failure; evaluate rash and differentiate from hypersensitivity reaction


Ticarcillin and clavulanic acid (Timentin)

Inhibits biosynthesis of cell wall mucopeptide and is effective during stage of active growth; antipseudomonal penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor covers most gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, as well as anaerobes.

Dosing

Adult

3.1 g IV q4-6h; not to exceed 18-24 g/d

Pediatric

100 mg/kg/dose IV q8h

Interactions

Tetracyclines may decrease the effects of ticarcillin; high concentrations of ticarcillin may physically inactivate aminoglycosides if they are administered in same IV line; effects when administered with aminoglycosides are synergistic; probenecid may increase penicillin levels

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; do not treat severe pneumonia, bacteremia, pericarditis, emphysema, meningitis, and purulent or septic arthritis with oral penicillin during the acute stage

Precautions

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Obtain complete blood count before therapy and at least weekly during therapy; monitor for liver function abnormalities by measuring aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) during therapy; exercise caution in patients with hepatic insufficiencies; perform urinalysis, and determine blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels during therapy, and adjust dose if values become elevated; monitor blood levels to avoid possible neurotoxic reactions

Analgesics

Pain control is essential to quality patient care, ensuring patient comfort and promoting pulmonary toilet. Most analgesics have sedating properties, which are beneficial for patients with painful skin lesions.


Fentanyl (Duragesic)

More potent narcotic analgesic with a much shorter half-life than morphine sulfate; drug of choice for conscious sedation analgesia; ideal for analgesic action of short duration during anesthesia and in immediate postoperative period. For patient needing long-term pain control, sustained-release fentanyl transdermal patch (Duragesic) may control pain with 72-h dosing intervals; some patients require dosing intervals of 48 h. Onset of transdermal fentanyl patch analgesia is delayed for 8-12 hours, so acute pain control must be provided prior to full effect of patch. Overdose has been reported, so start with lowest dose/hour patch (25 mcg/h).

Dosing

Adult

1 mcg (0.001 mg)/kg IV/IM q30min to q2h prn
(50-100 mcg IV q1-2h prn; alternatively 0.5-1.5 mcg/kg/h IV infusion)

Pediatric

1-3 years:
Dose: 2-3 mcg/kg IV q1-4h prn; alternatively 1-2 mcg/kg IV X 1, then 0.5-1 mcg/kg/h infusion; titrate upward
3-12 years:
Dose: 1-2 mcg/kg IV q1-4h prn; alternatively 1-2 mcg/kg IV X 1, then 0.5-1 mcg/kg/h infusion; titrate upward
>12 years: Administer as in adults

Interactions

Phenothiazines may antagonize analgesic effects of opiate agonists; tricyclic antidepressants may potentiate adverse effects when both drugs are used concurrently

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; respiratory depression; constipation; nausea; emesis; urinary retention; hypotension; potentially compromised airway that would make it difficult to establish airway control rapidly

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in hypotension, respiratory depression, constipation, nausea, emesis, or urinary retention; idiosyncratic reaction, known as chest wall rigidity syndrome, may require neuromuscular blockade to increase ventilation


Morphine (Astramorph, MS Contin, Duramorph, Oramorph)

Drug of choice for narcotic analgesia because of its reliable and predictable effects, safety profile, and ease of reversibility with naloxone. Various IV doses are used and are commonly titrated until desired effect is obtained.

Dosing

Adult

4-10 mg bolus slow IV; may repeat to maximum of 30 mg for severe pain

Pediatric

0.1-0.2 mg/kg slow IV/IM

Interactions

Phenothiazines may antagonize analgesic effects of opiate agonists; tricyclic antidepressants, MAOIs, and other CNS depressants may potentiate adverse effects

Contraindications

Documented hypersensitivity; respiratory depression; nausea; emesis; constipation; urinary retention; hypotension; potentially compromised airway that would make it difficult establish airway control rapidly

Precautions

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachycardias; vagolytic action may increase the ventricular response rate
Black Box Warning
Abuse potential: Opioid agonist schedule II controlled substance

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

  • Surgeons must be skilled at microvascular reanastomosis and be able to achieve a 90% patency rate in a 1-mm-diameter vessel in laboratory animals.10
  • If the vessels of partial or complete finger amputations are suitable for anastomosis, a successful replantation with excellent functional and esthetic recovery can be achieved. 
  • Repair may be performed with an axillary nerve block with bupivacaine, which provides anesthesia lasting 12-16 hours. However, children must have general anesthesia because they do not tolerate axillary block well.
  • The surgical sequence for replantation varies slightly with amputations distal and those proximal to the wrist and with the mechanism of injury (clean cut, crush, avulsion). Since injury distal to the wrist is more common, the following surgical sequence is delineated:
    • With tourniquet-induced ischemia and use of a microscope, the stump is debrided of all crushed tissue, foreign bodies are removed, and the vessels and nerves are identified and tagged. The amputated part then is similarly debrided, with irrigation of the cut end, while maintaining cooling. Vessels and nerves are identified and tagged.11
    • Bones are fixed with K wires, intramedullary screws or pegs, or small plates with screws.
    • The extensor tendon is repaired by using horizontal mattress 4-0 polyester sutures. A tendon graft may also be necessary if a sufficient length of tendon is not available. Finally, if extension is deemed expendable, arthrodesis (joint fusion) may be performed. Then, the flexor tendon is repaired with sutures.
    • Arterial repair is performed next. Brisk blood flow from the proximal vessel should be confirmed prior to vascular anastomosis. Restoration of proximal blood flow may require relief of vascular compression, warming of the patient, administration of adequate blood volume, elevation of the patient's blood pressure, irrigation of the proximal part with warmed lactated Ringer solution, intraluminal flushing with papaverine solution, and correction of systemic metabolic acidosis.
    • Even with a technically successful arterial/venous anastomosis, hemodynamic compromise or insufficient anticoagulation may lead to digital ischemia. As soon as the diagnosis of "no reflow phenomenon" is confirmed, an intra-arterial catheter should be considered followed by an antithrombotic protocol.12
    • To avoid thrombosis, reconnect only normal intima visualized under the microscope. A vein graft may be necessary.13,11
    • Tourniquet-induced ischemia may be continued until the anastomosis is complete, although bolus injection of heparin is recommended to prevent thrombosis.
    • Ideally, two veins should be repaired for each artery. No tension should be present on the vessels. Perform nerve repair next, with fascicular or bundle repair. A nerve graft may be necessary.
    • Skin coverage with grafts or flaps is the final step.

After two-digit replantation.

After two-digit replantation.



Surgical amputation of a left big toe.

Surgical amputation of a left big toe.



Toe-to-thumb transfer.

Toe-to-thumb transfer.



  • Postoperative anticoagulation with heparin, aspirin, and occasionally dextrans is commonly used to prevent thrombosis. A survey of surgeons in the United Kingdom showed that the use of dextran is not uniform and not necessarily beneficial for outcome.14 Because of their adverse effects profile, dextrans are less commonly used than aspirin.
  • Patients are encouraged to avoid smoking and caffeine for a month because these may enhance vasoconstriction.
  • Viability of the replanted limb is no longer the sole determinant of success; functional recovery, preoperative and postoperative risks, and duration of treatment are vital factors in making the decision to perform replantation.
  • The duration of treatment, including rehabilitation, should not exceed 2 years; if it does, the replantation is not thought worthwhile. Amputation with early fitting of a prosthesis is a viable alternative in these cases.

Inpatient & Outpatient Medications

  • Postoperative anticoagulation with aspirin and dextrans is recommended to prevent thrombosis. Patients are encouraged to avoid smoking and caffeine for a month because these may enhance vasoconstriction.

Transfer

  • The prevalence of severe associated injuries is 0.8%. Prior to considering transfer, ensure that the patient has no life-threatening conditions other than the amputation, if applicable. Transfer is indicated in the following cases:
    • Amputations of thumbs and/or multiple digits
    • Amputations in children
    • Amputations of individual digits distal to the superficialis insertion
    • Complete amputations that might benefit from acute microsurgical reconstruction (eg, revascularization, coverage of free flap)
    • Clean amputations at the palm, wrist, or forearm
  • Use of the Internet to transmit high-resolution images, including photographs and radiographs, of potential cases for replantation and use of a digital camera in the ED to facilitate replantation consultation might prevent unnecessary transfer of patients.
  • Contraindications to transfer include the following:
    • Significant associated injuries
    • Coexisting medical problems (eg, recent stroke, myocardial infarction) that prohibit surgery
    • Prolonged warm ischemia time (>12 h), especially with limb amputations
  • Relative contraindications to transfer include the following:
    • Amputation of single digits in adults through or proximal to the proximal interphalangeal joint
    • Multilevel injuries
    • Injuries caused by a severe crush-avulsion mechanism
    • Severe contamination
    • Wide segmental tissue injury
  • Use of bulky dressings should be avoided during transport because these can conceal bleeding. Bleeding should be controlled before applying the dressing or before cooling the distal extremity without perfusion.

Complications

  • Arterial insufficiency is one of the most common causes for replantation failure. Other causes include venous congestion and thrombosis.
  • Detection of perfusion disturbances in digit replantation can be achieved by using near-infrared spectroscopy and serial quantitative fluoroscopy. Near-infrared spectroscopy measurement of tissue oxygenation correlates with fluorescein monitoring and digit perfusion. This noninvasive monitoring is easy, reliable, safe, and useful in postoperative monitoring of digit replantation.15
  • Infection may occur
  • Systemically, myonecrosis leading to rhabdomyolysis and renal insufficiency may occur if significant muscle mass that was transiently ischemic is replanted. These occur with forearm or lower leg replantations but not with finger replantations.
  • Osteomyelitis may occur.
  • Function may be limited after replantation.
  • Cold intolerance of the replanted limb is a universal problem. Similarly, cold-induced vasospasm occurs in essentially all patients.
  • Sensitivity to light touch and 2-point discrimination frequently is impaired, while limitations in the flexion of joints distal to the replantation vary.
  • Cosmetic deformity may occur.

Prognosis

  • Success rates as high as 90% have been reported for complete and incomplete amputations.
  • Multivariate analysis of factors that favor functional recovery after finger replantation or revascularization showed better recovery for patients younger than 40 years compared with older patients. Injuries caused by a sharp mechanism have a better prognosis than those caused by a crush mechanism; injuries caused by a crush mechanism have a better prognosis than those caused by avulsion; and injuries at the middle phalangeal level have a better prognosis than those at the proximal level. A meta-analysis showed that smoking, diabetes, and avulsion or crush injury are poor prognostic factors in replantation of amputated digits.5

Multimedia

Complete amputation of two digits.

Media file 1: Complete amputation of two digits.

Radiologic appearance of a hand with two-digit am...

Media file 2: Radiologic appearance of a hand with two-digit amputation.

After two-digit replantation.

Media file 3: After two-digit replantation.

Complete thumb amputation.

Media file 4: Complete thumb amputation.

Radiologic appearance of a complete thumb amputat...

Media file 5: Radiologic appearance of a complete thumb amputation.

Complete thumb amputation.

Media file 6: Complete thumb amputation.

After thumb replantation.

Media file 7: After thumb replantation.

Surgical amputation of a left big toe.

Media file 8: Surgical amputation of a left big toe.

Toe-to-thumb transfer.

Media file 9: Toe-to-thumb transfer.

References

  1. Shen XQ, Wang C, Xu JH, Wu SC. Successful microsurgical replantation of a child's completely amputated ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Dec 2008;61(12):e19-22. [Medline].

  2. Ihrai T, Balaguer T, Monteil MC, et al. [Surgical management of traumatic ear amputations: literature review]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. Apr 2009;54(2):146-51. [Medline].

  3. Salah MM, Khalid KN. Replantation of multiple digits and hand amputations: four case reports. Cases J. Oct 23 2008;1(1):266. [Medline].

  4. Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. Sep 2006;10(3):124-9. [Medline].

  5. Li J, Guo Z, Zhu Q, et al. Fingertip replantation: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 2008;122(3):833-9. [Medline].

  6. Schumer E, Friedman FD. Pulse oximetry for preoperative vascular assessment in a thumb near-amputation. J Emerg Med. Nov-Dec 1995;13(6):753-5. [Medline].

  7. Wilhelmi BJ, Lee WP, Pagenstert GI, Pagensteert GI, May JW Jr. Replantation in the mutilated hand. Hand Clin. Feb 2003;19(1):89-120. [Medline].

  8. Azzopardi EA, Whitaker IS, Laing H. Perceptions of correct preoperative storage and transfer of amputated digits: a national survey of referring emergency departments. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Nov 2008;61(11):1418-9. [Medline].

  9. Lloyd MS, Teo TC, Pickford MA, Arnstein PM. Preoperative management of the amputated limb. Emerg Med J. Jul 2005;22(7):478-80. [Medline].

  10. Chai Y, Kang Q, Yang Q, Zeng B. Replantation of amputated finger composite tissues with microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery. 2008;28(5):314-20. [Medline].

  11. Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Abe Y, Dhawan V. Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2003;111(3):1151-8. [Medline].

  12. Oufquir A, Bakhach J, Panconi B, Guimberteau JC, Baudet J. [Salvage of digits replantations by direct arterial antithrombotic infusion]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. Dec 2006;51(6):471-81. [Medline].

  13. Yan H, Jackson WD, Songcharoen S, et al. Vein grafting in fingertip replantations. Microsurgery. 2009;29(4):275-81. [Medline].

  14. Ridha H, Jallali N, Butler PE. The use of dextran post free tissue transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(9):951-4. [Medline].

  15. Colwell AS, Buntic RF, Brooks D, Wright L, Buncke GM, Buncke HJ. Detection of perfusion disturbances in digit replantation using near-infrared spectroscopy and serial quantitative fluoroscopy. J Hand Surg Am. Mar 2006;31(3):456-62. [Medline].

  16. Adani R, Castagnetti C, Landi A. Degloving injuries of the hand and fingers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. May 1995;19-25. [Medline].

  17. Askari M, Fisher C, Weniger FG, Bidic S, Lee WP. Anticoagulation therapy in microsurgery: a review. J Hand Surg Am. May-Jun 2006;31(5):836-46. [Medline].

  18. Battiston B, Tos P, Clemente A, Pontini I. Actualities in big segments replantation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):849-55. [Medline].

  19. Brooks D, Buntic RF, Kind GM, Schott K, Buncke GM, Buncke HJ. Ring avulsion: injury pattern, treatment, and outcome. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2007;34(2):187-95, viii. [Medline].

  20. Buntic RF, Brooks D, Buncke GM. Index finger salvage with replantation and revascularization: revisiting conventional wisdom. Microsurgery. 2008;28(8):612-6. [Medline].

  21. Buntic RF, Siko PP, Buncke GM, Ruebeck D, Kind GM, Buncke HJ. Using the Internet for rapid exchange of photographs and X-ray images to evaluate potential extremity replantation candidates. J Trauma. Aug 1997;43(2):342-4. [Medline].

  22. Chiu HY, Shieh SJ, Hsu HY. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the functional recovery after finger replantation or revascularization. Microsurgery. 1995;16(10):713-7. [Medline].

  23. Datiashvili RO, Knox KR, Kaplan GM. Solutions to challenging digital replantations. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2007;34(2):167-75, vii. [Medline].

  24. Dautel G, Barbary S. Mini replants: fingertip replant distal to the IP or DIP joint. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):811-5. [Medline].

  25. Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Yamasaki H, Wahegaonkar A, Addosooki A. Fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg [Am]. Apr 2007;32(4):548-55. [Medline].

  26. Hierner R, Berger AK. Long-term results after vascularised joint transfer for finger joint reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Nov 2008;61(11):1338-46. [Medline].

  27. Hierner R, Berger AK, Frederix PR. Lower leg replantation--decision-making, treatment, and long-term results. Microsurgery. 2007;27(5):398-410. [Medline].

  28. Hoang NT, Staudenmaier R, Hoehnke C. Case reports: thumb reconstruction using amputated fingers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Aug 2008;466(8):1996-2001. [Medline].

  29. Hyza P, Vesely J, Drazan L, Stupka I, Ranno R, Castagnetti F. Primary vein grafting in treatment of ring avulsion injuries: a 5-year prospective study. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 2007;59(2):163-7. [Medline].

  30. Kocher MS. History of replantation: from miracle to microsurgery. World J Surg. May-Jun 1995;19(3):462-7. [Medline].

  31. Medling BD, Bueno RA Jr, Russell RC, Neumeister MW. Replantation outcomes. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 2007;34(2):177-85, vii-viii. [Medline].

  32. Merle M, Dautel G. Advances in digital replantation. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1997;24(1):87-105. [Medline].

  33. Mihara M, Nakanishi M, Nakashima M, Narushima M, Gonda K, Koshima I. Distal phalanx replantation using the delayed venous method: a high success rate in 21 cases without specialised technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(1):88-93. [Medline].

  34. Molski M. Replantation of fingers and hands after avulsion and crush injuries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):748-54. [Medline].

  35. Narushima M, Mihara M, Koshima I, et al. Intravascular stenting (IVaS) method for fingertip replantation. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 2009;62(1):38-41. [Medline].

  36. Paavilainen P, Nietosvaara Y, Tikkinen KA, Salmi T, Paakkala T, Vilkki S. Long-term results of transmetacarpal replantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):704-9. [Medline].

  37. Partington MT, Lineaweaver WC, O'Hara M, Kitzmiller J, Valauri FA, Oliva A. Unrecognized injuries in patients referred for emergency microsurgery. J Trauma. Feb 1993;34(2):238-41. [Medline].

  38. Povlsen B, Nylander G, Nylander E. Natural history of digital replantation: a 12-year prospective study. Microsurgery. 1995;16(3):138-40. [Medline].

  39. Rockwell WB, Haidenberg J, Foreman KB. Thumb replantation using arterial conduit graft and dorsal vein transposition. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 2008;122(3):840-3. [Medline].

  40. Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bharathi RR, Dheenadhayalan J, Bhat VR, Rajasekaran S. Technical considerations and functional outcome of 22 major replantations (The BSSH Douglas Lamb Lecture, 2005). J Hand Surg Eur Vol. Oct 2007;32(5):488-501. [Medline].

  41. Schlenker JD, Koulis CP. Amputations and replantations. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Aug 1993;11(3):739-53. [Medline].

  42. Shah AK, Schreuder FB. Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation: reconstruction or reduction?. J Hand Surg [Am]. Mar 2009;34(3):579; author reply 580. [Medline].

  43. Sharma S, Lin S, Panozzo A, Tepper R, Friedman D. Thumb replantation: a retrospective review of 103 cases. Ann Plast Surg. Oct 2005;55(4):352-6. [Medline].

  44. Sood R, Bentz ML, Shestak KC, Browne EZ Jr. Extremity replantation. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1991;71(2):317-29. [Medline].

  45. Sudhagar G, Le Blanc M. A thermoplastic thumb splint after amputation of the thumb. J Hand Ther. Jan-Mar 2009;22(1):88-91. [Medline].

  46. Tian L, Tian F, Tian F, Li X, Ji X, Wei J. Replantation of completely amputated thumbs with venous arterialization. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 2007;32(7):1048-52. [Medline].

  47. Troum S, Floyd WE 3rd. Upper extremity replantation at a regional medical center: a six-year review. Am Surg. Sep 1995;61(9):836-9. [Medline].

  48. Wang H. Secondary surgery after digit replantation: its incidence and sequence. Microsurgery. 2002;22(2):57-61. [Medline].

  49. Woon CY, Lee JY, Teoh LC. Resurfacing hemipulp losses of the thumb: the cross finger flap revisited: indications, technical refinements, outcomes, and long-term neurosensory recovery. Ann Plast Surg. Oct 2008;61(4):385-91. [Medline].

  50. Zhang X, Wen S, Wang B, Wang Q, Li C, Zhu H. Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation. J Hand Surg [Am]. Nov 2008;33(9):1597-601. [Medline].

Keywords

replantation, amputated digits, amputated finger, amputated toe, amputation injury, amputation, amputated, digital replantation, severed finger, severed limb, severed toe, red-line sign, ribbon sign, avulsion, crush avulsion, toe-to-thumb transfer

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Mark I Langdorf, MD, MHPE, FAAEM, FACEP, RDMS, Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Department Chair, Associate Residency Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine
Mark I Langdorf, MD, MHPE, FAAEM, FACEP, RDMS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

J Akiva Kahn, MA, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine
J Akiva Kahn, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Student Association/Foundation, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Assaad J Sayah, MD, Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance
Assaad J Sayah, MD is a member of the following medical societies: National Association of EMS Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Eric L Legome, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Manhattan; Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Medical College
Eric L Legome, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Rick Kulkarni, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital
Rick Kulkarni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: WebMD Salary Employment

Acknowledgments

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Ziad N Kazzi, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

Further Reading

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)