Peripheral Vascular Injuries Follow-up
- Author: Niels Rathlev, MD, FACEP; Chief Editor: Rick Kulkarni, MD more...
Further Inpatient Care
- Surgical exploration and repair is performed as soon as possible for patients with "hard" signs of vascular injury, refractory hypotension, and obvious limb ischemia. Conventional arteriography to further define the injury may be performed preoperatively at the discretion of the vascular surgeon.
- Patients with "soft" signs of injury should preferentially be further evaluated by MDCT angiography, or, alternatively by duplex ultrasonography. Certain high-risk injuries, such as shotgun wounds and major vessel proximity injuries, may undergo MDCT or conventional arteriography despite the absence of "hard" or "soft" signs. Low-risk injuries without "hard" and "soft" signs should be observed for possible progression of injury either in the hospital or on an outpatient basis. Major venous injuries of the lower extremities are typically repaired because this improves wound healing and decreases the incidence of compartment syndrome, venous thrombosis, and chronic edema.
Further Outpatient Care
- Low-risk injuries without "hard" or "soft" signs may be managed on an outpatient basis with careful follow-up and a strict schedule for repeat evaluations.
- All other patients should be admitted for either definitive repair or further evaluation or observation.
Complications
Delayed diagnosis and treatment may result in thrombosis, embolization, or rupture with exsanguinating hemorrhage.
Risk factors for amputation include elevated compartment pressure, arterial transection, concomitant open fractures, and the combination of injuries above and below the elbow or knee in the same extremity.[12]
Non-occlusive injuries do not disrupt flow and include the following:
- Arteriovenous fistulae typically take months to mature and often require surgical repair. (See the image below)
Arteriovenous fistula between common femoral artery and vein. - Intimal tears and flaps generally heal spontaneously over time.
- Segmental narrowing can cause diminished flow, but pulses may remain intact. This injury may resolve spontaneously with fluids and rest, or, rarely may require surgical intervention.
Prognosis
- Most non-occlusive injuries presenting without "hard" signs resolve over time.[15] Long-term follow-up with scheduled, repeat physical examinations is a safe and effective approach.
Patient Education
- Patients must be given explicit instructions to present for neurovascular checks of the extremities on a scheduled basis. Instruct patients to return to the ED if they experience increased pain, edema, or active bleeding from the wound or if any weakness, numbness, or paresthesias develops in the injured extremity.
White JM, Stannard A, Burkhardt GE, Eastridge BJ, Blackbourne LH, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of vascular injury in the wars in iraq and afghanistan. Ann Surg. Jun 2011;253(6):1184-9. [Medline].
Nassoura ZE, Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, et al. A reassessment of Doppler pressure indices in the detection of arterial lesions in proximity penetrating injuries of extremities: a prospective study. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 1996;14(2):151-6. [Medline].
Espinosa GA, Chiu JC, Samett EJ. Clinical assessment and arteriography for patients with penetrating extremity injuries: a review of 500 cases with the Veterans Affairs West Side Medical Center. Mil Med. Jan 1997;162(1):19-23. [Medline].
Gahtan V, Bramson RT, Norman J. The role of emergent arteriography in penetrating limb trauma. Am Surg. Feb 1994;60(2):123-7. [Medline].
Knudson MM, Lewis FR, Atkinson K, Neuhaus A. The role of duplex ultrasound arterial imaging in patients with penetrating extremity trauma. Arch Surg. Sep 1993;128(9):1033-7; discussion 1037-8. [Medline].
Hood DB, Weaver FA, Yellin AE. Changing perspectives in the diagnosis of peripheral vascular trauma. Semin Vasc Surg. Dec 1998;11(4):255-60. [Medline].
Busquets AR, Acosta JA, Colon E, et al. Helical computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of traumatic arterial injuries of the extremities. J Trauma. Mar 2004;56(3):625-8. [Medline].
Rieger M, Mallouhi A, Tauscher T, et al. Traumatic arterial injuries of the extremities: initial evaluation with MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 2006;186(3):656-64. [Medline].
Soto JA, Munera F, Morales C, et al. Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis. Radiology. Jan 2001;218(1):188-94. [Medline].
Seamon MJ, Smoger D, Torres DM, Pathak AS, Gaughan JP, Santora TA. A prospective validation of a current practice: the detection of extremity vascular injury with CT angiography. J Trauma. Aug 2009;67(2):238-43; discussion 243-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Miller-Thomas MM, West OC, Cohen AM. Diagnosing traumatic arterial injury in the extremities with CT angiography: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics. Oct 2005;25 Suppl 1:S133-42. [Medline].
Hafez HM, Woolgar J, Robbs JV. Lower extremity arterial injury: results of 550 cases and review of risk factors associated with limb loss. J Vasc Surg. Jun 2001;33(6):1212-9. [Medline].
Criado E, Marston WA, Ligush J, et al. Endovascular repair of peripheral aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, and arteriovenous fistulas. Ann Vasc Surg. May 1997;11(3):256-63. [Medline].
Dennis JW, Frykberg ER, Veldenz HC, et al. Validation of nonoperative management of occult vascular injuries and accuracy of physical examination alone in penetrating extremity trauma: 5- to 10-year follow-up. J Trauma. Feb 1998;44(2):243-52; discussion 242-3. [Medline].
Hoffer EK, Sclafani SJ, Herskowitz MM, Scalea TM. Natural history of arterial injuries diagnosed with arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Jan-Feb 1997;8(1 Pt 1):43-53. [Medline].


