Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Workup
- Author: Richard Paula, MD; Chief Editor: Rick Kulkarni, MD more...
Approach Considerations
Laboratory studies and abdominal computed tomography scan are part of the workup for abdominal compartment syndrome. Measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) if abdominal compartment syndrome is suspected. IAP can be easily monitored by measuring bladder pressure.[5]
The following lab studies may be indicated:
- Comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP)
- Complete blood cell count (CBC)
- Amylase and lipase assessment
- Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) if the patient is heparinized
- Cardiac marker assays
- Urinalysis and urine drug screen
- Measurement of serum lactate levels (at many institutions, the sample must be kept on ice)
- Arterial blood gas (ABG): This is a quick way to measure the pH, lactate, and base deficit
CT and Other Imaging Studies
Abdominal CT scanning can reveal many subtle findings. Pickhardt et al found the following in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome[6] :
- Round-belly sign: Abdominal distention with an increased ratio of anteroposterior-to-transverse abdominal diameter (ratio >0.80)
- Collapse of the vena cava
- Bowel wall thickening with enhancement
- Bilateral inguinal herniation
Plain abdominal radiographic studies are often useless in identifying abdominal compartment syndrome, although they may show evidence of free air or bowel obstruction. Abdominal ultrasonography may reveal an aortic aneurysm, particularly with large aneurysms, but bowel gas or obesity makes performing the study difficult.
Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement
IAP can be easily monitored by measuring bladder pressure. Measurement of intraluminal bladder pressure consists of instilling about 50 mL of saline into the urinary bladder through the Foley catheter. The tubing of the collecting bag is clamped, and a needle is inserted into the specimen-collecting port of the tubing proximal to the clamp and is attached to a manometer. Bladder pressure (measured in mm Hg) is the height at which the level of the saline column stabilizes with the symphysis pubis as the zero point.[5]
Grading
In an excellent group of articles, Burch et al developed a grading system.[7] Patients with higher-grade abdominal compartment syndrome have end-organ damage, which is evidenced by splenic hypercarbia and elevated lactate levels, even if they appear clinically stable. The following grading system has become accepted if IAH is present:
- Grade I: 10-15 cm H2 O
- Grade II: 15-25 cm H2 O
- Grade III: 25-35 cm H2 O
- Grade IV, greater than 35 cm H2 O
End-organ damage has been observed with IAP as low as 10 cm H2 O, and multiple studies have found damage at values ranging from 20-40 cm H2 O. Disparity exists because abdominal compartment syndrome never occurs as an isolated event.
Cheatham et al found abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) to be a much better predictor of end-organ injury than lactate, pH, urine output, or base deficit.[8] The APP is equal to the mean arterial pressure minus the IAP.
Simon RJ, Friedlander MH, Ivatury RR, et al. Hemorrhage lowers the threshold for intra-abdominal hypertension-induced pulmonary dysfunction. J Trauma. Mar 1997;42(3):398-403; discussion 404-5. [Medline].
Hobson KG, Young KM, Ciraulo A. Release of abdominal compartment syndrome improves survival in patients with burn injury. J Trauma. Dec 2002;53(6):1129-33; discussion 1133-4. [Medline].
Eddy V, Nunn C, Morris JA Jr. Abdominal compartment syndrome. The Nashville experience. Surg Clin North Am. Aug 1997;77(4):801-12. [Medline].
Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Bihari D, Innes R, Ranieri VM. Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study. Crit Care Med. Feb 2005;33(2):315-22. [Medline].
Ivatury RR, Diebel L, Porter JM, Simon RJ. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. Aug 1997;77(4):783-800. [Medline].
Pickhardt PJ, Shimony JS, Heiken JP, et al. The abdominal compartment syndrome: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Sep 1999;173(3):575-9. [Medline].
Burch JM, Moore EE, Moore FA, Franciose R. The abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. Aug 1996;76(4):833-42. [Medline].
Cheatham ML, White MW, Sagraves SG, et al. Abdominal perfusion pressure: a superior parameter in the assessment of intra-abdominal hypertension. J Trauma. Oct 2000;49(4):621-6; discussion 626-7. [Medline].
Madigan MC, Kemp CD, Johnson JC, Cotton BA. Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome after severe extremity injury: are early, aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies to blame?. J Trauma. Feb 2008;64(2):280-5. [Medline].
Cheatham ML, Safcsak K. Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival?. Crit Care Med. Feb 2010;38(2):402-7. [Medline].
Chen RJ, Fang JF, Lin BC, Kao JL. Laparoscopic decompression of abdominal compartment syndrome after blunt hepatic trauma. Surg Endosc. Oct 2000;14(10):966. [Medline].
Agusti M, Elizalde JI, Adalia R. Dobutamine restores intestinal mucosal blood flow in a porcine model of intra-abdominal hyperpressure. Crit Care Med. Feb 2000;28(2):467-72. [Medline].
O'Mara MS, Slater H, Goldfarb IW, Caushaj PF. A prospective, randomized evaluation of intra-abdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients. J Trauma. May 2005;58(5):1011-8. [Medline].
Oda J, Ueyama M, Yamashita K, Inoue T, Noborio M, Ode Y. Hypertonic lactated saline resuscitation reduces the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely burned patients. J Trauma. Jan 2006;60(1):64-71. [Medline].
Print
