eMedicine Specialties > Emergency Medicine > Warfare - Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosives

CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene: Treatment & Medication

Author: Joy C Wethern, DO, Resident Physician PGY3, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center, Ft Hood, Texas
Coauthor(s): Kermit D Huebner, MD, FACEP, Research Director, Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 27, 2009

Treatment

Prehospital Care

No specific antidote exists for phosgene poisoning, but supportive care options are numerous.

  • Rescuer safety is paramount. Little risk exists of secondary exposure or contamination from patients who have been exposed only to phosgene gas, but any patient exposed to liquid phosgene requires decontamination to protect prehospital and in-hospital care providers and resources. Knowing the ambient temperature is important. If the environment where exposure occurred is warmer than the boiling point of phosgene (47°F), then it is likely that exposure was only to the gas form, and extensive decontamination should not be required. The patient should be removed from further exposure to the gas (taken upwind of the exposure source).
  • To care for patients with liquid phosgene exposure, prehospital or HAZMAT personnel should be attired in at least level B protection (full face mask with either supplied air respirator or preferably self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), butyl rubber gloves, chemical protective suit, chemical resistant protective overboots). NIOSH recommends this level of protection for known phosgene concentrations in excess of 1 ppm or any situation with unknown phosgene levels. Decontamination of patients exposed to liquid phosgene should start with clothing removal and bagging/tagging of contaminated apparel. Patients should use soap and water to wash their hair and all body surfaces, with care to avoid unnecessary hypothermic stress. Warm water, warm blankets, and dry uncontaminated clothing are essential. Also see CBRNE - Chemical Decontamination.
  • Because of the latency of symptom onset, all patients with suspected phosgene exposure should be transported to a medical facility for evaluation.
  • Priorities for care remain airway, breathing, and circulation. If patients are being treated and transported shortly after the exposure incident, it is unlikely that that they will be severely symptomatic due the latent period associated with phosgene. If the patient reports dyspnea or chest tightness, begin therapy with supplemental oxygen. Enforce rest (litter evacuation, not walking) since any exertion shortens the latent period and worsens toxicity. Keep patients calm, warm, and quiet to minimize the work of breathing.
  • Any patient with ocular exposure to phosgene should begin eye flushes with copious amounts of saline or plain water for at least 15 minutes. This treatment should be started in the prehospital setting. Contact lenses should be removed.

Emergency Department Care

  • Triage
    • Triage is a relatively simple matter when only a few patients are involved, but in the event of a CBRNE attack or large-scale industrial accident, triage becomes much more difficult since any one medical facility would rapidly be overwhelmed by large patient volumes.
    • The numbers of "worried well" who have not actually been exposed are likely to be large in any CBRNE event, but they create a particular problem for triage of phosgene exposures because the "worried well" and the "soon to be sick" who are in the latent phase before pulmonary edema may appear identical on presentation.
    • Asymptomatic patients require a minimum of 6 hours of observation, and many authors recommend 12-24 hours of observation before discharge. Patients who are eligible for discharge after this observation time should be asymptomatic with a clear lung ausculatory examination, normal respiratory rate, normal oxygen saturation, and normal chest radiograph.
    • While triage is always a dynamic process, this statement is particularly true for the triage of phosgene-exposed persons, who require frequent reassessment and retriage (every 1-2 h). Some authors recommend repeating vital signs and lung ausculatory examinations every 30 minutes. The first physical sign of pulmonary edema, crackles on the ausculatory examination, typically appears at half the time of the greatest symptomatic involvement (ie, a patient who develops crackles at 3 h postexposure can be expected to be severely ill at 6 h postexposure).
    • Triage depends on the availability of high-level critical care and ventilators for patients with severe pulmonary edema. If the number of patients who require ventilators outstrips the number of available ventilators, then patients who present with symptomatic pulmonary edema would likely be triaged as expectant.
    • When a true mass casualty situation exists, one triage scheme that has been recommended for phosgene exposed persons is as follows:
      • Minimal: Asymptomatic patients - Observe, retriage every 2 hours
      • Delayed: Symptoms of dyspnea without any signs on physical examination (normal vital signs, normal oxygen saturation) - Observe, retriage every hour
      • Immediate (if critical care resources are available): Signs of pulmonary edema (crackles on lung ausculatory examination, vital sign abnormalities, chest radiograph infiltrate)
      • Expectant: Patients with pulmonary edema accompanied by hypotension or cyanosis
  • Ensure patients have been decontaminated in the prehospital setting. If patients exposed to liquid phosgene present for care before decontamination, ensure that they are decontaminated outside of the emergency department by staff members in appropriate protective equipment (level B or higher).
  • Focus on airway, breathing, and circulation. For a stridorous patient who appears to have phosgene-induced laryngospasm, proceed rapidly to pharmacologically facilitated endotracheal intubation. If orotracheal intubation is impossible, be prepared for a surgical airway. Intubated patients may have copious airway secretions that require frequent suctioning. For patients not in need of emergent intubation, provide supplemental oxygen if they have symptoms of dyspnea and/or signs of tachypnea, hypoxia, or crackles on lung ausculatory examination.
  • Enforce rest for all patients exposed to phosgene to minimize work of breathing since exertion shortens the latent period and worsens the clinical course.
  • For patients with pulmonary edema and worsening respiratory status (hypoxemia, hypercapnia, increased work of breathing), provide airway support with positive pressure ventilation. Initially alert patients may do well with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), but if their clinical status declines further, they may require intubation and mechanical ventilation for support. Frequently high inspired concentrations of oxygen and high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings are required to treat the severe hypoxemia associated with phosgene-induced noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. This therapeutic measure is intended to recruit collapsed alveoli to participate in gas exchange, thereby decreasing V/Q mismatch and improving oxygenation. However, patients will require careful monitoring of cardiovascular status because high PEEP settings may depress cardiac output by decreasing venous return.
  • For patients with significant wheezing or preexisting reactive airway disease and bronchospasm, treat with standard doses of inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled anticholinergic agents such as albuterol and ipratropium bromide.
  • For patients with ocular exposures to phosgene, continue the irrigation begun in the prehospital setting for a total time of at least 15 minutes. Test the patient's visual acuity and perform a slit lamp examination. Topical anesthetics may be required to attenuate blepharospasm and permit an adequate examination. Stain the corneas with fluorescein to check for any corneal epithelial defects. Refer the patient to an ophthalmologist.

Consultations

  • Notify the local/state health department.
  • If decontamination needs surpass hospital capabilities, request help from the local hazardous materials team.
  • Discuss management with the regional poison control center.
  • Notify law enforcement if industrial sabotage or an intentional release of phosgene is suspected. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the lead agent for investigating possible terrorist actions and weapons of mass destruction events.
  • Internet sources for more information include the following: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chemical Emergencies; and National Response Center (for reporting chemical spills).

Medication

Most of the data regarding medication use in phosgene poisoning are derived either from anecdotal experience in case reports or from studies involving animal models. Case reports are plagued by the absence of a control group and frequently by the lack of any documentation regarding level of phosgene exposure. Animal studies are useful for elucidating pathophysiological mechanisms and providing initial measures of treatment efficacy, but the applicability of such studies to the treatment of human phosgene toxicity is unknown. Human phosgene toxicity cases occur in too sporadic and sudden a fashion to allow randomized clinical trials, and clearly intentional exposure of human subjects to phosgene would be unethical.

Multiple authors agree on the need for aerosolized bronchodilator therapy for patients with reactive airway disease or asthma diagnoses prior to phosgene exposure and for patients who are actively wheezing.

Diuretics were recommended for many years, but most recent authors seem disinclined to recommend their use and note that they may actually be harmful in phosgene toxicity. Volume overload is not a feature of phosgene-related noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. In fact, patients are often hypotensive and intravascularly dry, since they are losing fluid from the vascular space into the lung interstitium due to the breakdown of the alveolar-capillary interface. Positive pressure ventilation may further depress venous return and decrease cardiac preload and may require vigorous support with isotonic crystalloid.

Recommendations for steroid use in phosgene toxicity vary widely. No data support the use of steroids to treat human phosgene exposure, but one animal study demonstrated that intravenous methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg completely blocked pulmonary edema and the associated increased leukotriene synthesis in phosgene-exposed rabbits. Two caveats about this study are that this protocol involved pretreatment with methylprednisolone before phosgene exposure rather than the postexposure scenario, which practicing clinicians face, and that this study was not designed to test whether the methylprednisolone actually resulted in a survival benefit.

Medical management guidelines for phosgene exposure from the CDC through the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)5 recommend starting intravenous corticosteroids in cases of severe exposure even if the patient is asymptomatic. Some authors recommend both inhaled and systemic steroids for all phosgene-exposed patients, while others recommend steroids only if the patient has a prior diagnosis of reactive airway disease. Dosing recommendations from authors who advocate steroids suggest methylprednisolone 1 g IV on the day of exposure, followed by a taper over the following several days.

Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in phosgene-induced pulmonary edema. Antibiotic therapy should be reserved for patients who have clinical findings consistent with pneumonia such as a sputum culture with a likely culprit organism.

A variety of studies have been completed in rabbits and mice using postexposure administration of intratracheal isoproterenol, parenteral ibuprofen, intratracheal N -acetylcysteine, parenteral aminophylline, subcutaneous terbutaline, colchicine, and parental leukotriene receptor blockers. While many of these agents and delivery routes show promise in terms of decreased pulmonary edema, increased levels of reduced glutathione, decreased production of lipid peroxidation products, decreased leukotriene production, and maintenance of tissue cAMP levels, these favorable laboratory end points have not necessarily been tied to clinical end points of improved survival. None of these agents has Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema associated with toxic inhalations.

Systemic corticosteroids

These agents have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. Corticosteroids modify the body's immune system to diverse stimuli.


Methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrol, Medrol, Solu-Medrol)

Decreases inflammation by suppressing migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reversing increased capillary permeability.

Adult

Day 1: 1000 mg IV
Days 2-3: 800 mg IV
Days 4-5: 700 mg IV
Day 6: Reduce dose quickly if chest radiograph remains clear

Pediatric

Not established

Coadministration with digoxin may increase digitalis toxicity secondary to hypokalemia; estrogens may increase levels of methylprednisolone; phenobarbital, phenytoin and rifampin may decrease levels of methylprednisolone (adjust dose); monitor patients for hypokalemia when taking medication concurrently with diuretics; grapefruit juice increases prednisolone concentrations; methylprednisolone and cyclosporine mutually inhibit one another, resulting in increased plasma levels of each drug

Documented hypersensitivity; viral, fungal, or tubercular skin infections

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Hyperglycemia, edema, osteonecrosis, peptic ulcer disease, hypokalemia, osteoporosis, euphoria, psychosis, growth suppression, myopathy, and infections are possible complications of glucocorticoid use
Depo-Medrol contains benzyl alcohol, which is potentially toxic when administered locally to neural tissue; administration of Depo-Medrol by other than indicated routes, including the epidural route, has been associated with reports of serious medical events including arachnoiditis, meningitis, paraparesis/paraplegia, sensory disturbances, bowel/bladder dysfunction, seizures, visual impairment including blindness, ocular and periocular inflammation, and residue or slough at injection site

Aerosolized bronchodilator therapy

Patients with hyperactive airways usually benefit from aerosolized bronchodilator therapy.


Albuterol (Proventil, Ventolin)

Relaxes bronchial smooth muscle by action on beta 2-receptors with little effect on cardiac muscle contractility.

Adult

Nebulizer: Dilute 0.5 mL (2.5 mg) of 0.5% inhalation solution in 1-2.5 mL normal saline; administer 2.5-5 mg q4-6h, diluted in 2-5 mL sterile saline or water

Pediatric

<5 years (nebulizer): Dilute 0.25-0.5 mL (1.25-2.5 mg) of 0.5% inhalation solution in 1-2.5 mL normal saline and administer q4-6h in equally divided doses
>5 years (nebulizer): Administer as in adults

Beta-adrenergic blockers antagonize effects; inhaled ipratropium may increase duration of bronchodilatation by albuterol; cardiovascular effects may increase with MAOIs, inhaled anesthetics, TCAs, and sympathomimetic agents

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disorders

More on CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene

Overview: CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene
Treatment & Medication: CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene
Follow-up: CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene
Multimedia: CBRNE - Lung-Damaging Agents, Phosgene
References

References

  1. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Safety and Health Topics: Phosgene. Revised October 10, 2003. Available at http://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_262200.html. Accessed May 27, 2009.

  2. Sciuto AM, Clapp DL, Hess ZA, Moran TS. The temporal profile of cytokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in mice exposed to the industrial gas phosgene. Inhal Toxicol. Jun 2003;15(7):687-700. [Medline].

  3. Qin XJ, Li YN, Liang X, Wang P, Hai CX. The dysfunction of ATPases due to impaired mitochondrial respiration in phosgene-induced pulmonary edema. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Feb 29 2008;367(1):150-5. [Medline].

  4. Chen HL, Hai CX, Liang X, Zhang XD, Liu R, Qin XJ. Correlation between sPLA2-IIA and phosgene-induced rat acute lung injury. Inhal Toxicol. Feb 2009;21(4):374-80. [Medline].

  5. [Guideline] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Medical management guidelines for phosgene. Accessed March 29, 2006;[Full Text].

  6. Borak J, Diller WF. Phosgene exposure: mechanisms of injury and treatment strategies. J Occup Environ Med. Feb 2001;43(2):110-9. [Medline].

  7. Bradley BL, Unger KM. Phosgene inhalation: a case report. Tex Med. May 1982;78(5):51-3. [Medline].

  8. Cucinell SA. Review of the toxicity of long-term phosgene exposure. Arch Environ Health. May 1974;28(5):272-5. [Medline].

  9. Diller WF. Early diagnosis of phosgene overexposure. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):73-80. [Medline].

  10. Diller WF. Late sequelae after phosgene poisoning: a literature review. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):129-36. [Medline].

  11. Diller WF. Pathogenesis of phosgene poisoning. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):7-15. [Medline].

  12. Diller WF. Therapeutic strategy in phosgene poisoning. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):93-9. [Medline].

  13. Diller WF, Zante R. A literature review: therapy for phosgene poisoning. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):117-28. [Medline].

  14. Everett ED, Overholt EL. Phosgene poisoning. JAMA. Jul 22 1968;205(4):243-5. [Medline].

  15. Glass WI, Harris EA, Whitlock RM. Phosgene poisoning: case report. N Z Med J. Dec 1971;74(475):386-9. [Medline].

  16. Guo YL, Kennedy TP, Michael JR, Sciuto AM, Ghio AJ, Adkinson NF Jr, et al. Mechanism of phosgene-induced lung toxicity: role of arachidonate mediators. J Appl Physiol. Nov 1990;69(5):1615-22. [Medline].

  17. Karalliedde L, Wheeler H, Maclehose R. Possible immediate and long-term health effects following exposure to chemical warfare agents. Public Health. Jul 2000;114(4):238-48. [Medline].

  18. Kennedy TP, Michael JR, Hoidal JR. Dibutyryl cAMP, aminophylline, and beta-adrenergic agonists protect against pulmonary edema caused by phosgene. J Appl Physiol. Dec 1989;67(6):2542-52. [Medline].

  19. Lazarus AA, Devereaux A. Potential agents of chemical warfare. Worst-case scenario protection and decontamination methods. Postgrad Med. Nov 2002;112(5):133-40. [Medline].

  20. Lim SC, Yang JY, Jang AS, Park YU, Kim YC, Choi IS, et al. Acute lung injury after phosgene inhalation. Korean J Intern Med. Jan 1996;11(1):87-92. [Medline].

  21. Parrish JS, Bradshaw DA. Toxic inhalational injury: gas, vapor and vesicant exposure. Respir Care Clin N Am. Mar 2004;10(1):43-58. [Medline].

  22. Peters PL. Phosgene medical information. J Ark Med Soc. Oct 1977;74(5):193-5. [Medline].

  23. Polednak AP, Hollis DR. Mortality and causes of death among workers exposed to phosgene in 1943-45. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):137-51. [Medline].

  24. Regan RA. Review of clinical experience in handling phosgene exposure cases. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):69-72. [Medline].

  25. Sciuto AM, Hurt HH. Therapeutic treatments of phosgene-induced lung injury. Inhal Toxicol. Jul 2004;16(8):565-80. [Medline].

  26. Sciuto AM, Moran TS, Narula A, Forster JS. Disruption of gas exchange in mice after exposure to the chemical threat agent phosgene. Mil Med. Sep 2001;166(9):809-14. [Medline].

  27. Sidell FR. Triage of chemical casualties. In: Zajtchuk R, Bellamy RF, eds. Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. 1997:337-49.

  28. Smart JK. History of chemical and biological warfare: an American perspective. In: Zajtchuk R, Bellamy RF, eds. Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. 1997;9-86.

  29. Snyder RW, Mishel HS, Christensen GC. Pulmonary toxicity following exposure to methylene chloride and its combustion product, phosgene. Chest. Mar 1992;101(3):860-1. [Medline].

  30. Snyder RW, Mishel HS, Christensen GC 3rd. Pulmonary toxicity following exposure to methylene chloride and its combustion product, phosgene. Chest. Dec 1992;102(6):1921. [Medline].

  31. Urbanetti JS. Toxic inhalational injury. Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. 1997;247-270.

  32. US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense. 3rd ed. Medical Management of Chemical Casualties Handbook. 1999.

  33. Wang YT, Lee LK, Poh SC. Phosgene poisoning from a smoke grenade. Eur J Respir Dis. Feb 1987;70(2):126-8. [Medline].

  34. Warden CR. Respiratory agents: irritant gases, riot control agents, incapacitants, and caustics. Crit Care Clin. Oct 2005;21(4):719-37, vi. [Medline].

  35. Wells BA. Phosgene: a practitioner's viewpoint. Toxicol Ind Health. Oct 1985;1(2):81-92. [Medline].

  36. Wyatt JP, Allister CA. Occupational phosgene poisoning: a case report and review. J Accid Emerg Med. Sep 1995;12(3):212-3. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

phosgene, phosgene exposure, treatment, symptoms, causes, chemical weapon, CG, COCl2, carbonyl chloride, WMD, weapons of mass destruction, chemical warfare, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, toxic inhalation, lung-damaging agents, irritant pulmonary toxin, frostbite injuries

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Joy C Wethern, DO, Resident Physician PGY3, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center, Ft Hood, Texas
Joy C Wethern, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians and American Osteopathic Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Kermit D Huebner, MD, FACEP, Research Director, Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center
Kermit D Huebner, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Society of USAF Flight Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Mark Keim, MD, Senior Science Advisor, Office of the Director, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Mark Keim, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Rick Kulkarni, MD, Medical Director, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital
Rick Kulkarni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: WebMD Salary Employment

CME Editor

John D Halamka, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D Halamka, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Robert G Darling, MD, FACEP, Clinical Assistant Professor of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F Edward Hebert School of Medicine; Associate Director, Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine
Robert G Darling, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, and Association of Military Surgeons of the US
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED MEDSCAPE ARTICLES
Articles
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.