Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Saddle Nose Rhinoplasty Treatment & Management

  • Author: A John Vartanian, MD, MS, FACS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  more...
 
Updated: Mar 22, 2016
 

Medical Therapy

Medical treatment applies only to limiting the progression of those disease states that lead to cartilage destruction and eventual saddling. Diseases such as Wegener granulomatosis and relapsing polychondritis should be managed with the help of medical specialists (rheumatologists). In most individuals with saddle-nose deformities, treatment is aimed at surgical reconstruction of functional and aesthetic deficits.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Depending on the degree of saddling, different reconstructive options can be used. Decisions regarding nasal reconstruction are concerned both with the choice of materials to be used and the type of reconstruction needed.

The history of nasal reconstruction is full of nasal implants and grafts taken from a variety of sources. The interesting list of grafts and implants used in reconstructing the nose seems almost limitless. Some historic grafts and implants used in the human nose include the following:

  • Autografts - Auricular cartilage, rib, patient's finger [7]
  • Homografts - Irradiated rib, pooled acellular dermis
  • Xenografts - Leather, duck's sternum, bovine cartilage
  • Precious metals - Titanium, gold, silver, metal alloys
  • Inert bioimplants - Coral, ivory
  • Synthetic compounds - Silicone, polytetrafluoroethylenes, polyamide mesh

Variable rates of success and failure have been noted with different implants and grafts. The selection of material in nasal reconstruction should center on balancing long-term biocompatibility, infection rates, extrusion rates, graft resorption rates, graft harvest site morbidity, and material availability. The ideal implant's profile satisfies all of these concerns. The ideal nasal implant has yet to be developed.

The ideal nasal implant should have certain characteristics, as follows:

  • It is noncarcinogenic.
  • It is nonimmunogenic (no foreign body or inflammatory reaction).
  • It is nonresorbable.
  • It is easy to work with and malleable.
  • It has a tactile feel similar to that of tissue (cartilage).
  • It has a low or zero extrusion rate.
  • It allows biointegration of the implant with the surrounding tissue.
  • It is cost effective.

Autogenous materials

Autogenous materials are always preferred to alloplastic implants as far as infection rates, extrusion rates, and biocompatibility issues are concerned. Septal cartilage is the best choice but is often not present in sufficient quantity. Secondary sources of autogenous cartilage include auricular and rib cartilage. Cartilage harvested from the ear is especially well suited for use in the nose. Bone grafts harvested from calvarial, iliac, and tibial bone sources can be used. Autogenous soft tissue materials include dermis and fascia.

Homografts

Homografts are harvested from healthy screened donors. Irradiated cartilage and sheets of pooled acellular dermal allografts (AlloDerm; LifeCell Corp, Houston, Texas) are the homografts most commonly used in nasal dorsal reconstruction.

Alloplasts

Synthetic implants offer the advantages of ready availability. However, in the nose, alloplasts have a tendency to behave like foreign bodies, with higher rates of infection, extrusion, and inflammatory reactions, as compared with those of autogenous grafts. Moreover, although alloplasts are well suited as filler material, most do not provide significant structural support to the nose.

Commonly available alloplasts include polyamide mesh (Mersilene; Ethicon, Sommerville, New Jersey), silicone-based implants (Silastic; Dow Corning, Midland, Michigan), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) (Gore-Tex; WL Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona), and porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE) (Medpor; Porex Surgical, Newnan, Georgia).[8]

Proponents of alloplasts note that autogenous cartilage grafts are fraught with problems that must be considered. As mentioned before, septal cartilage is often of low quantity or nonexistent. Auricular cartilage is available; however, it is curved, it can potentially warp with time, it is of limited quantity, and it involves the morbidity of a second operative site. Rib cartilage is susceptible to warping and involves the morbidity of a second operative site. Also, some surgeons may be uncomfortable with the possible risks related to the thoracic surgical site. Bone grafts have been reported to undergo resorption. They are hard and can also result in donor-site morbidities.

At times, because of a number of factors, including strong patient preference against a second operative site, alloplastic implants may be used. ePTFE has been in use for a number of years, and positive reports have encouraged their wider use. Outcomes pertaining to synthetic implants are discussed in the Outcome and Prognosis section.

PHDPE implants have pore sizes of 125-250 µm, which allow access to immune cells and fibrovascular ingrowth. Sclafani, Thomas, and colleagues (1997) demonstrated the ingrowth of fibrovascular tissue into these porous implants, which confers increased resistance toward implant infection.[9] This ingrowth also anchors the implant to the surrounding native tissue.

Despite several promising reports, the long-term viability of these implants has yet to be evaluated. Alloplasts must be recommended only as a last resort and not as a convenient substitute for autogenous grafts. One significant disadvantage of nasal implants includes the changes to the surrounding tissue (scarring, skin atrophy), which may render less-than-optimal results in subsequent rhinoplasties. The authors' hesitancy to use any foreign materials in the nose is based on the authors' and other colleagues' experience with the removal of displaced, infected, or extruding nasal implants placed by other surgeons.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Nasal dorsal reconstruction using autogenous materials

For patients with no nasal airway obstruction and minor-to-moderate nasal dorsal saddling, onlay grafting techniques can be used. These grafts can be fashioned from septal cartilage or auricular cartilage. Onlay grafting can be used to augment the dorsum or to camouflage localized areas of depression. As Tardy described, auricular cartilage grafts can be individually placed as morselized pieces or as laminated or layered grafts. Small-to-medium dorsal depressions can also be camouflaged by using layers of laminated, or sandwiched, ear cartilage placed on the dorsum. Such layered or sandwiched grafts can be used to reconstruct not only the dorsum but also the caudal septum (see the image below).

Conchal cartilage can be used as layered or sandwi Conchal cartilage can be used as layered or sandwich grafts to fill defects on the nasal dorsum and to reconstruct columellar support.

Grafts can be placed via endonasal or external (transcolumellar) rhinoplastic approaches. The precise creation of the subperiosteal pocket can help stabilize the graft placement site. Transcutaneous suture fixation can be used to prevent graft migration. The aesthetic look and the dorsal tactile regularity of the nose can be improved by morselizing the graft edges and by placing a layer of acellular dermis (AlloDerm) on top of the grafts. AlloDerm can be used for camouflaging small dorsal imperfections by providing a layer of cushioning. Alternatively, a layer of crushed cartilage or fascia can also provide a smoother reconstructed dorsum. A properly performed targeted osteotomy can result in the elevation of flat or depressed nasal bones.

Taş described the use of a diced cartilage flap to correct saddle nose deformity when a diced cartilage graft fails. The procedure, which was performed on seven patients with a gap of less than 1 cm in the lower third of the dorsum, involved undermining the nasal dorsum through the supraperichondrial and subperiosteal plane, with distal release of the diced cartilage island connected to the nasal dorsal skin and transposition of the island to the tip region. The island, in the form of an advancement flap, was moved caudally and sutured to the posterior dome area.[10]

Larger defects and deformities affecting the middle vault or the nasal dorsum require a more structural reconstructive approach. Fundamental to reconstructing the moderate-to-severe saddle nose is restoring middle vault function, reversing any internal valve narrowing, and reinforcing nasal tip and dorsal support mechanisms. The placement of spreader grafts is usually sufficient to address the internal nasal valve and middle vault collapse (see the image below).

Spreader grafts are rectangular sculpted pieces of Spreader grafts are rectangular sculpted pieces of cartilage placed between the upper lateral cartilages and septum. They serve to widen the internal nasal valve, widen the middle vault, and prevent collapse of flail upper lateral cartilages. Also, they can provide additional support to the dorsum.

More substantial dorsal augmentation (too great for placement of conchal or septal cartilage grafts) can be achieved by using a boat-shaped onlay graft fashioned from rib cartilage (see the image below). The cartilage is carved from the central core of the rib (as opposed to peripheral area) to minimize warping. Adams et al have demonstrated this phenomenon in their elegant studies measuring cartilage warping with time and location of harvest.[11] The sculpted graft is placed in a precise pocket and can be suture fixated for additional stability. If nasal tip projection and support structures are deficient, new support structure must be reconstructed.

Rib cartilage can be sculpted to serve as an onlay Rib cartilage can be sculpted to serve as an onlay graft to augment the nasal dorsal contour.

L-shaped strut reconstruction

The reconstitution of dorsal-caudal and tip support structures can be achieved using the concept of the dorsal L-shaped strut. The L-shaped strut refers to the L-shaped dorsal-caudal nasoseptal support structure that should be present in the nose. An intact septum in the normal nontraumatized nose sufficiently serves this function. In the structurally compromised nose, new support structures must be constructed. A number of methods can be used to reconstruct a dorsal L-shaped strut.

The patient's own septal cartilage is readily available and well suited for reconstructing caudal and dorsal septal deficits. In patients lacking adequate septal cartilage, other cartilage sources can be used. Costochondral (rib) cartilage from the patient (harvested at the time of nasal reconstruction) can be used to re-create a dorsal L-shaped strut. This L-shaped strut usually has 2 components: a dorsal boat-shaped graft (for dorsal profile) and a columellar support pillar or strut (for nasal tip support; see the image below). The placement of a notch in the dorsal graft to fit the columellar strut can stabilize this connection. The 2 components are suture fixated together. The rest of the nose is reconstructed based on this new support structure.

A columellar strut can be assembled with a boat-sh A columellar strut can be assembled with a boat-shaped dorsal graft to reconstruct dorsal-columellar L-shaped strut. Rib cartilage can be used to carve both components of the graft.

In a similar manner, bone can also be used for reconstruction. Gerow et al and others describe using bone harvested from a rib to reconstruct the dorsal L-shaped strut and to augment the premaxilla.[12]

Irradiated cartilage homografts can also be used to reconstruct articulated dorsal and caudal nasal support structures, although long-term resorption may be encountered with irradiated cartilage (as reported by Welling et al).[13] As such, the use of irradiated cartilage may be more appropriate in older patients in whom long-term resorption may be less of an issue.

The flying buttress graft combines a single or paired spreader grafts with a columellar strut. In this manner, the newly created L-shaped support structure can address middle vault collapse and internal valve incompetency and can increase tip and dorsal projection. This technique, combined with dorsal onlay grafting, may be used to fix slight-to-moderate middle vault defects along with improving nasal function. Naficy and Baker (1998) describe the use of the flying buttress in lengthening the short nose (a condition often present in the saddle-nose deformities).[14] A modified flying-wing procedure has met with success.[15]

Remember that the nasoseptal reconstruction must be sufficiently strong and stable to last the entire lifetime of the patient. These goals can be realized in a higher percentage of patients by reinforcing structural and soft tissue elements of the nose in ways that correspond to the defects present and respond to predictable forces of long-term scarring.

Previous
Next

Complications

Complications encountered after saddle-nose reconstruction can be categorized as medical, functional, or aesthetic. Complications vary with the amount and duration of surgery, the surgical approach to the nose, the amount of dissection, the number of previous surgeries, the use and choice of reconstruction materials, and the intrinsic patient factors.

  • Medical complications
    • Infection - Localized cellulitis, abscess formation, infected implant, or infected graft harvest site
    • Perioperative medical events - Atelectasis or pneumothorax with rib cartilage harvest
    • Anesthesia related - Intubation-related injuries
  • Functional complications – Nasal obstruction due to inferior migration of spreader grafts, restenosis of the internal nasal valve, iatrogenic septal perforation, or synechia
  • Aesthetic complications
    • Graft related - Migration or displacement, warping, visibility of graft through thin skin or with time, or resorption of graft
    • Alloplast implant related - Extrusion, displacement, or unnatural implant contours
    • Transcolumellar incision related - Prolonged localized erythema, stitch granuloma, scarring (rare), or nasal tip ischemia (very rare)
    • General rhinoplasty related - Loss tip definition or symmetry, polly beak deformity or loss of favorable supratip break, inappropriate columellar show, alar-columellar disproportion, crooked nose deformity, or other well-recognized rhinoplasty complications
Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Long-term outcomes at 10 years or longer are the standards by which rhinoplasty and nasoseptal reconstruction procedures should be judged and evaluated. Most available studies are limited by short follow-up, small numbers of patients, outcomes influenced by the surgeon's experience with a particular approach or technique, variability in intrinsic patient factors, and patient selection. Nevertheless, reviewing the available, albeit imperfect, data on the use alloplasts and the application of autogenous grafts is useful.

Alloplasts

The infection and extrusion rates of synthetic implants are of prime concern regarding their wider nonselective use in rhinoplasty. Most published studies reveal alloplast infection rates of 2-4%. True implant extrusion rates are difficult to ascertain because of variable patient follow-up intervals, patients lost to follow-up, and the lack of substantial long-term studies. On the basis of available studies, implant extrusion rates range from 0% to 9%.

Conrad and Gillman evaluated the use of ePTFE implants in 189 patients undergoing rhinoplasty.[16] Follow-up intervals varied from 3 months to 6 years (average, 17.5 mo) with 5 cases (2.6%) of implant removal secondary to infection. Two implants were removed because of chronic inflammation and soft tissue reaction. No cases of implant extrusion, migration, or resorption were reported.

Godin et al reviewed 309 patients who received ePTFE implants for a 10-year period.[17] With an average follow-up of 40.4 months (range, 5 mo-10 y), 10 implants (3.2%) were removed secondary to infection.

Niechajev's review of 23 nasal reconstructions using PHDPE nasal implants revealed successful aesthetic outcomes in all patients, with a mean follow-up of 2 years (range, 1-3 y).[18] In this study, 2 implant extrusions (9%) were treated with minor revision surgery, and 1 case of implant infection (4%) was treated with antibiotics.

Turegun et al used PHDPE implants in reconstructing the noses of 36 individuals with saddle-nose deformities and reported that no cases required implant removal.[19] However, the follow-up in this study was generally short (8-18 mo), and the aesthetic and functional outcomes were poorly defined.

Romo et al used PHDPE nasal implants in 15 saddle-nose reconstructions and noted 1 major complication because of a twisted dorsal implant at 1-year follow-up. Of the 15 patients, 14 (93%) were pleased with their aesthetic outcomes (follow-up duration unknown). Despite attempts at precise contouring of the implant prior to its placement, the investigators noted demarcation of the lateral borders of a number of implants placed on the dorsum.

In another study, Romo et al applied PHDPE implants in 121 cases involving revision rhinoplasty and in 66 platyrrhine noses.[20] In most cases, the implant was used to augment the dorsum and reinforce the columella. From a total of 187 cases, 5 implants (2.7%) needed to be removed because of 3 early and 2 delayed implant infections.

Beekhuis' report of 70 patients with various degrees of nasal dorsal saddling who were all treated with rhinoplasty and polyamide mesh placement revealed 3 cases (4%) of implant removal (all because of infection).[21]

Autogenous material

In a review article about surgical correction of the saddle-nose deformity, Tardy describes his 20-year experience in using various autogenous grafts in nasal reconstruction with gratifying results and no major complications.[22] Infection rates with autogenous cartilage are low, and infections can be successfully treated with antibiotics. Rates of auricular cartilage warping are variable but approximately 4-7%. Cartilage extrusion rates are less than 5%, with most cases of extrusion resolving spontaneously.

Sherris treated 21 patients requiring caudal and dorsal septal reconstruction by using only autogenous material. Material used included septal cartilage; autogenous rib grafts; ethmoid bone; and, in one case, calvarial bone grafts. With an average follow-up of 19.8 months (range, 12-29 mo), no cases of infection, graft extrusion, or warping were noted. He noted one case (5%) of partial (rib) graft exposure, which resolved spontaneously without any sequelae, and one case (5%) in which (calvarial bone) graft resorption in the nasal tip area had been noted at 2-year follow-up. Aesthetic outcomes were "much improved" in 76% of the cases and "improved" in the remaining 24%.

Murakami et al used irradiated rib cartilage to reconstruct 18 saddle-nose deformities.[23] With a follow-up of 1-6 years (mean, 2.8 y), no cases of infection, extrusion, or noticeable resorption were noted. One (6%) graft had to be removed secondary to warping, and 2 (11%) displaced caudal struts had to be repositioned under local anesthesia. Long-term evaluation of irradiated cartilage grafts by Welling et al revealed progressive graft resorption with time.[13] Animal studies by Donald have also demonstrated the steady resorption of irradiated cartilage with time.[24] This resorption may discourage the use of irradiated cartilage in younger patients, in whom long-term resorption may limit the lifespan of the nasal reconstruction.

Adams et al have demonstrated decreased rib cartilage warping rates when the cartilages were carved from central portion rather than peripheral portions of the harvested cartilage.[11] Gunter and colleagues significantly reduced their postoperative cartilage warping rates by internally stabilizing rib cartilage grafts by using Kirschner wires (K-wires).[25] Toriumi describes minimizing the risk of long-term warping by performing adequate symmetric carving of the graft, by not leaving any perichondrium on the graft, and by dissecting a precise subperiosteal graft insertion pocket.[26]

Ozturan et al described the use of an “accordion” technique for preventing costal cartilage warping in saddle-nose repair. In the surgery, on 23 patients with severe saddle-nose deformity, a horizontal transection was made every 2 mm along the length of the costal cartilage graft (on alternate sides) prior to graft implantation. None of the patients experienced postoperative warping. In contrast, seven of 18 patients (39%) with comparable saddle-nose deformity who underwent costal cartilage repair without use of the accordion technique suffered early and/or late postoperative warping.[27]

In the study by Gerow et al, the use of rib bone grafts for 16 saddle-nose reconstructions yielded good aesthetic results with no significant complications.[12] Some of the cases described had continued good aesthetic results at long-term follow-up (7-10 y). Bone absorption was noted in all cases, but in no cases did the deformities recur.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The future of nasoseptal reconstruction continues to evolve on the basis of long-term results, the introduction of new techniques, and the use of increasingly biocompatible homografts and implants. The ideal alloplasts are yet to be found, but the search for new compounds may facilitate the development of an ideal alloplast. Future developments in bioengineering may allow the production of autologous soft tissue products (eg, cartilage). This advancement will eliminate the importance of material as a limiting factor in complicated nasal reconstructions. Until then, the intelligent and creative use of autogenous grafts can allow the surgeon to address an almost limitless array of nasal deformities, including the saddle nose.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

A John Vartanian, MD, MS, FACS Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Head and Neck, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine; Instructor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine

A John Vartanian, MD, MS, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

J Regan Thomas, MD 

J Regan Thomas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

David W Stepnick, MD Associate Professor, Departments of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center

David W Stepnick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;SymbiaAllergySolutions<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Symbia<br/>Received from Allergy Solutions, Inc for board membership; Received honoraria from RxRevu for chief medical editor; Received salary from Medvoy for founder and president; Received consulting fee from Corvectra for senior medical advisor; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for consulting; Received consulting fee from Essiahealth for advisor; Received consulting fee from Carespan for advisor; Received consulting fee from Covidien for consulting.

Additional Contributors

S Valentine Fernandes, MBBS, MCPS, FRCSEd, FRACS, FACS, LLB Conjoint Senior Clinical Lecturer, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Newcastle University; Senior Consultant Surgeon, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, John Hunter, Warners Bay Private Hospitals, Australia

S Valentine Fernandes, MBBS, MCPS, FRCSEd, FRACS, FACS, LLB is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges his mentors (Dr. Dean Toriumi, Dr. Gene Tardy, Dr. Frank Kamer, Dr. Gary Burget, and Dr. J. Regan Thomas) for their gift of knowledge and practical surgical know-how.

References
  1. Roe JO. The deformity termed "Pug-Nose" and its correction, by a simple operation. New York Medical Record. 1887. 31:621.

  2. Weir RF. On restoring sunken noses without scarring the face. New York Medical Record: 1892.

  3. Durbec M, Disant F. Saddle nose: classification and therapeutic management. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014 Apr. 131 (2):99-106. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Won TB, Kang JG, Jin HR. Management of post-traumatic combined deviated and saddle nose deformity. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Jun. 132 Suppl 1:S44-51. [Medline].

  5. Jalaludin MA. Nasal septal abscess--retrospective analysis of 14 cases from University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur. Singapore Med J. 1993 Oct. 34(5):435-7. [Medline].

  6. Tzadik A, Gilbert SE, Sade J. Complications of submucous resections of the nasal septum. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1988. 245(2):74-6. [Medline].

  7. Young K, Rowe-Jones J. Current approaches to septal saddle nose reconstruction using autografts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug. 19(4):276-82. [Medline].

  8. Razmpa E, Saedi B, Mahbobi F. Augmentation rhinoplasty with combined use of Medpor graft and irradiated homograft rib cartilage in saddle nose deformity. Arch Iran Med. 2012 Apr. 15(4):235-8. [Medline].

  9. Sclafani AP, Thomas JR, Cox AJ, Cooper MH. Clinical and histologic response of subcutaneous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) implants to acute and early infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Mar. 123(3):328-36. [Medline].

  10. Tas S. A New Technique to Correct Saddle Nose Deformity in Failure of Diced Cartilage Grafts: Diced Cartilage Flap. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Oct. 39 (5):764-70. [Medline].

  11. Adams WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, et al. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jan. 103(1):265-70. [Medline].

  12. Gerow FJ, Stal S, Spira M. The totem pole rib graft reconstruction of the nose. Ann Plast Surg. 1983 Oct. 11(4):273-81. [Medline].

  13. Welling DB, Maves MD, Schuller DE, et al. Irradiated homologous cartilage grafts. Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Mar. 114(3):291-5. [Medline].

  14. Naficy S, Baker SR. Lengthening the short nose. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Jul. 124(7):809-13. [Medline].

  15. Ozakpinar HR, Gökrem S. A "modified-flying wing" procedure for the treatment of saddle nose and supratip pathologies. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2011 Jan-Feb. 21(1):25-31. [Medline].

  16. Conrad K, Gillman G. A 6-year experience with the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 May. 101(6):1675-83; discussion 1684. [Medline].

  17. Godin MS, Waldman SR, Johnson CM Jr. Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999 Apr-Jun. 1(2):118-21; discussion 122. [Medline].

  18. Niechajev I. Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec. 23(6):395-402. [Medline].

  19. Turegun M, Sengezer M, Güler M. Reconstruction of saddle nose deformities using porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998 Jan-Feb. 22(1):38-41. [Medline].

  20. Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, Sabini P. Use of porous high-density polyethylene in revision rhinoplasty and in the platyrrhine nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998 May-Jun. 22(3):211-21. [Medline].

  21. Beekhuis GJ. Surgical correction of saddle nose deformity. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975 Nov-Dec. 80(6):596-607. [Medline].

  22. Tardy ME Jr, Schwartz M, Parras G. Saddle nose deformity: autogenous graft repair. Facial Plast Surg. 1989 Winter. 6(2):121-34. [Medline].

  23. Murakami CS, Cook TA, Guida RA. Nasal reconstruction with articulated irradiated rib cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Mar. 117(3):327-30; discussion 331. [Medline].

  24. Donald PJ. Cartilage grafting in facial reconstruction with special consideration of irradiated grafts. Laryngoscope. 1986 Jul. 96(7):786-807. [Medline].

  25. Gunter JP, Clark CP, Friedman RM. Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Jul. 100(1):161-9. [Medline].

  26. Toriumi DM. Autogenous grafts are worth the extra time. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr. 126(4):562-4. [Medline].

  27. Ozturan O, Aksoy F, Veyseller B, et al. Severe saddle nose: choices for augmentation and application of accordion technique against warping. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Feb. 37(1):106-16. [Medline].

  28. Dieffenbach JF. Die Operative Chirugie. Brockhaus FA: Leipzig; 1845.

  29. Kim DW, Toriumi DM. Management of posttraumatic nasal deformities: the crooked nose and the saddle nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Feb. 12(1):111-32. [Medline].

  30. Riechelmann H, Rettinger G. Three-step reconstruction of complex saddle nose deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar. 130(3):334-8. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Findings typical of a moderate-to-severe saddle nose include nasal dorsal concavity, shortened vertical nasal length, and loss of nasal tip support and projection.
Patient (former boxer) with moderate-to-severe (type 3) saddle-nose deformity.
Patient with a history of relapsing polychondritis and severe saddle-nose deformity (type 4).
Close-up view of auricular cartilage damage secondary to relapsing polychondritis with a saddle nose in the background.
Saddle-nose classification based on anatomic deficits. (1) Normal nose, appropriate nasal dorsal height, tip projection, and vertical nasal height. (2) Type 1 saddle-nose deformity, minor supratip or nasal dorsal depression, with normal projection of lower third of the nose. (3) Type 2 saddle-nose deformity, depressed nasal dorsum (moderate to severe) with relatively prominent lower third. (4) Type 3 saddle-nose deformity, depressed nasal dorsum (moderate to severe) with loss of tip support and structural deficits of the lower third of the nose. (5) Type 4 saddle-nose deformity, catastrophic (severe) nasal dorsal loss with significant loss of the nasal structures in the lower and upper thirds of the nose.
Nasal anatomy. The shape and function of the middle and lower thirds of the nose depend on the integrity of the nasal septum and on the quality and shape of the upper and lower lateral cartilages.
Lateral view of the nasal septum. The primary support for nasal dorsal height and tip projection is determined by the size and integrity of the nasal septum.
Conchal cartilage can be used as layered or sandwich grafts to fill defects on the nasal dorsum and to reconstruct columellar support.
Spreader grafts are rectangular sculpted pieces of cartilage placed between the upper lateral cartilages and septum. They serve to widen the internal nasal valve, widen the middle vault, and prevent collapse of flail upper lateral cartilages. Also, they can provide additional support to the dorsum.
Rib cartilage can be sculpted to serve as an onlay graft to augment the nasal dorsal contour.
A columellar strut can be assembled with a boat-shaped dorsal graft to reconstruct dorsal-columellar L-shaped strut. Rib cartilage can be used to carve both components of the graft.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.