eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Cosmetic Surgery
Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift: Follow-up
Updated: Nov 10, 2008
Outcome and Prognosis
With careful patient selection and proper surgical technique, patients should expect a good cosmetic result from deep plane rhytidectomy (facelift).
Long-term studies have not clearly demonstrated a significant advantage of the deep plane technique over other more conservative rhytidectomy (facelift) techniques. The surgeon must carefully select those patients with significant malar sagging and deep melolabial folds who would most benefit from this procedure. The surgeon must be comfortable with the anatomy and somewhat longer healing times associated with the deep plane rhytidoplasty.
Future and Controversies
The benefit of a deep plane rhytidectomy (facelift) is still debated and has strong advocates and detractors. Other procedures are available, such as the subperiosteal midfacelift, to address aging face changes in the mid face and melolabial fold area. Surgical techniques will continue to evolve in order to find safer approaches to correct aging face changes in the mid face.
The use of adjuvant therapies such as platelet gel or fibrin glue to promote hemostasis and wound healing is still debated.1
More on Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift |
| Overview: Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift |
| Workup: Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift |
| Treatment: Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift |
Follow-up: Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift |
| References |
| « Previous Page |
References
Kamer FM, Nguyen DB. Experience with fibrin glue in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2007;120(4):1045-51; discussion 1052. [Medline].
Baker DC. Deep dissection rhytidectomy: a plea for caution. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1994;93(7):1498-9. [Medline].
Gassner HG, Rafii A, Young A, et al. Surgical anatomy of the face: implications for modern face-lift techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Jan-Feb 2008;10(1):9-19. [Medline].
Godin MS, Johnson CM Jr. Deep-plane/composite rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg. Jul 1996;12(3):231-9. [Medline].
Hamra ST. A study of the long-term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: short-term success but long-term failure. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1 2002;110(3):940-51; discussion 952-9. [Medline].
Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1992;90(1):1-13. [Medline].
Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1990;86(1):53-61; discussion 62-3. [Medline].
Kamer FM. One hundred consecutive deep plane face-lifts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1996;122(1):17-22. [Medline].
Kamer FM, Mingrone MD. Deep plane rhytidectomy: a personal evolution. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Feb 2005;13(1):115-26. [Medline].
Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1976;58(1):80-8. [Medline].
Pastorek N, Bustillo A. Deep plane face-lift. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Aug 2005;13(3):433-49. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
deep plane facelift, rhytidectomy, facelift, face lift, facelifts, face lift surgery, facelift surgery, ptosis of midface structures, superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication, SMAS imbrication, plication rhytidectomy, lifting face, deep nasolabial folds
Follow-up: Rhytidectomy, Deep Plane Facelift