eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Cosmetic Surgery
Chin Implants: Workup
Updated: Jan 8, 2009
Workup
Imaging Studies
- Photodocumentation
- This is a basic need for all facial plastic surgery procedures.
- In chin analysis, photography can be helpful to evaluate the patient for chin retrusion. The chin should be considered in its relation to the face shape and length and in reference to the nose. The basic views, full face, oblique, profile, and base, are adequate for this evaluation.
- From the lateral view, the 0° meridian and other types of analysis can be used to determine the grade of retrusion and the desired augmentation. The lateral view is emphasized, but the full-face view is mandatory to evaluate chin width.
- Photographs should be taken with the patient smiling and in repose. This provides additional information and documentation of labial competence.
- Cephalometric study
- This is an excellent method to document skeletal configurations.
- Population-based comparison data are available.
- This analysis may be more applicable to the osteoplastic technique.
Staging
- Gonzalez-Ulloa bases his staging system on the 0° meridian.2
- First-degree retraction describes the pogonion at less than 10 mm behind the 0° meridian.
- Second-degree retraction is in the range of 10-20 mm.
- Third-degree retraction is more than 20 mm.
More on Chin Implants |
| Overview: Chin Implants |
Workup: Chin Implants |
| Treatment: Chin Implants |
| Follow-up: Chin Implants |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Aufricht, G. Combined plastic surgery of the nose and chin; resume of twenty-seven years'' experience. Am J Surg. Feb 1958;95(2):231-6. [Medline].
Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profiloplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;29:186-198.
Gonzalez-Ulloa M, Stevens E. The role of chin correction in profileplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1968;41(5):477-86. [Medline].
Gibson FB, Calhoun KH. Chin position in profile analysis. Comparison of techniques and introduction of the lower facial triangle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1992;118(3):273-6. [Medline].
Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod. May 1982;81(5):351-70. [Medline].
Pitanguy I. Augmentation mentoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1968;42(5):460-4. [Medline].
Cohen SR, Mardach OL, Kawamoto HK Jr. Chin disfigurement following removal of alloplastic chin implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1991;88(1):62-6; discussion 67-70. [Medline].
Costantino PD. Synthetic biomaterials for soft-tissue augmentation and replacement in the head and neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Feb 1994;27(1):223-62. [Medline].
Costantino PD, Friedman CD. Soft-tissue augmentation and replacement in the head and neck. General considerations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Feb 1994;27(1):1-12. [Medline].
Garner WL. Gore-Tex facial implants. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1997;100(7):1899-900. [Medline].
Gross EJ, Hamilton MM, Ackermann K, et al. Mersilene mesh chin augmentation. A 14-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Jul-Sep 1999;1(3):183-9; discussion 190. [Medline].
Li KK, Cheney ML. The use of sliding genioplasty for treatment of failed chin implants. Laryngoscope. Mar 1996;106(3 Pt 1):363-6. [Medline].
Maas CS, Merwin GE, Wilson J, et al. Comparison of biomaterials for facial bone augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 1990;116(5):551-6. [Medline].
Mahler D. Chin augmentation--a restrospective study. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 1982;8(6):468-73. [Medline].
Matarasso A, Elias AC, Elias RL. Labial incompetence: a marker for progressive bone resorption in silastic chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1996;98(6):1007-14; discussion 1015. [Medline].
McCarthy JG. Microgenia: a logical surgical approach. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1981;8(2):269-78. [Medline].
McCarthy JG, Ruff GL. The chin. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1988;15(1):125-37. [Medline].
McCarthy JG, Ruff GL, Zide BM. A surgical system for the correction of bony chin deformity. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1991;18(1):139-52. [Medline].
Moenning JE, Wolford LM. Chin augmentation with various alloplastic materials: a comparative study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1989;4(3):175-87. [Medline].
Morganroth GS. Combining chin-jowl implants with local anesthesia facial rejuvenation. Skin Therapy Lett. Jul-Aug 2005;10(6):6-9. [Medline].
Pitanguy I, Martello L, Caldeira AM, et al. Augmentation mentoplasty: a critical analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986;10(3):161-9. [Medline].
Rosen HM. Aesthetic guidelines in genioplasty: the role of facial disproportion. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1995;95(3):463-9; discussion 470-2. [Medline].
Sclafani AP, Thomas JR, Cox AJ, et al. Clinical and histologic response of subcutaneous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) implants to acute and early infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1997;123(3):328-36. [Medline].
Strauss RA, Abubaker AO. Genioplasty: a case for advancement osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Jul 2000;58(7):783-7. [Medline].
Zide BM, Pfeifer TM, Longaker MT. Chin surgery: I. Augmentation--the allures and the alerts. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1999;104(6):1843-53; discussion 1861-2. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
chin implants, chin implant, chin augmentation, augmentation mentoplasty, genioplasty, osteoplastic genioplasty, ptotic chin pad, chin ptosis, prejowl sulcus, pre-jowl sulcus, microgenia, retrusion of the chin, chin retrusion, chin deformity, small chin, profile-plasty, profile plasty, mentoplasty, chin mentoplasty
Workup: Chin Implants