eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Cosmetic Surgery
Malar and Submalar Implants: Follow-up
Updated: Dec 20, 2006
Outcome and Prognosis
Alloplastic facial augmentation produces permanent and effective 3-dimensional changes that result in a more youthful-appearing midface. Silastic implants have demonstrated consistent results and remain the implant of choice for the senior author. In 2003, a prospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous augmentation material (SAM) preformed facial implants for malar augmentation. One implant became infected and required removal. The infection rate (3.8%) was consistent with that previously reported in the literature. No implant migration was reported. The aesthetic results of the implants were evaluated by a panel of facial plastic surgeons and demonstrated a satisfactory-to-good aesthetic result. Results from studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ePTFE in the malar region have demonstrated similar results. Yaremchuk performed a retrospective study of malar augmentation with porous polyethylene (Medpor); his long-term results demonstrated no
evidence of late complications.
Malar and submalar augmentation with alloplastic implants can be used to enhance and restore facial harmony and balance. Defects that have developed as a result of aging or trauma as well as congenital defects may be addressed. Strong skeletal contours enhance beauty. Redraping, reshaping, and redistributing the soft tissue over a strong facial skeleton enhance restoration and rejuvenation of the face. Successful malar and submalar augmentation results from proper patient and implant selection as well as appropriate facial analysis and surgical technique. Alloplastic facial augmentation produces reliable, durable, predictable results with little morbidity and high patient satisfaction.
More on Malar and Submalar Implants |
| Overview: Malar and Submalar Implants |
| Treatment: Malar and Submalar Implants |
Follow-up: Malar and Submalar Implants |
| References |
| « Previous Page |
References
Batniji RK, Hutchison JL, Dahiya R, et al. Tissue response to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and silicone implants in a rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Apr-Jun 2002;4(2):111-3. [Medline].
Binder WJ, Schoenrock LD, Terino EO. Augmentation of the malar-submalar/midface. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1994;2:265-283.
Binder WJ. A comprehensive approach for aesthetic contouring of the midface in rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1993;1:231-255.
Binder WJ, Bloom DC. The use of custom-designed midfacial and submalar implants in the treatment of facial wasting syndrome. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Nov-Dec 2004;6(6):394-7. [Medline].
Brennan HG. Augmentation malarplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. Jul 1982;108(7):441-4. [Medline].
Constantinides MS, Galli SK, Miller PJ, Adamson PA. Malar, submalar, and midfacial implants. Facial Plast Surg. 2000;16(1):35-44. [Medline].
Flowers RS. Tear trough implants for correction of tear trough deformity. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1993;20(2):403-15. [Medline].
Friedman O. Changes associated with the aging face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Aug 2005;13(3):371-80. [Medline].
Goldman ND, Alsarraf R, Nishioka G, Larrabee WF. Malar augmentation with self-drilling single-screw fixation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Jul-Sep 2000;2(3):222-5. [Medline].
Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Building out the malar prominences as an addition to rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1974;53(3):293-6. [Medline].
Hinderer UT. Malar implants for improvement of the facial appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1975;56(2):157-65. [Medline].
Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ. Malar augmentation with silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1995;96(1):63-8; discussion 69-70. [Medline].
Metzinger SE, McCollough EG, Campbell JP, Rousso DE. Malar augmentation: a 5-year retrospective review of the silastic midfacial malar implant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 1999;125(9):980-7. [Medline].
Panossian A, Garner WL. Polytetrafluoroethylene facial implants: 15 years later. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2004;113(1):347-9. [Medline].
Powell NB, Riley RW, Laub DR. A new approach to evaluation and surgery of the malar complex. Ann Plast Surg. Mar 1988;20(3):206-14. [Medline].
Prendergast M, Schoenrock LD. Malar augmentation. Patient classification and placement. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 1989;115(8):964-9. [Medline].
Schoenrock LD, Repucci AD. GORE-TEX in facial plastic surgery. International Journal of Aesthetic and Restorative Surgery. 1993;1:63-68.
Silver WE. Malar augmentation. Facial Plast Surg. Jul 1992;8(3):133-9. [Medline].
Terino EO. Facial contouring with alloplastic implants: aesthetic surgery that creates three dimensions. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;7:55-83.
Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis. Crouzon''s and Apert''s diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1971;48(5):419-42. [Medline].
Wang TD. Multicenter evaluation of subcutaneous augmentation material implants. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Mar-Apr 2003;5(2):153-4. [Medline].
Wilkinson TS. Complications in aesthetic malar augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1983;71(5):643-9. [Medline].
Yaremchuk MJ. Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 2003;111(6):1818-27. [Medline].
Zim S. Skeletal volume enhancement: implants and osteotomies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 2004;12(4):349-56. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
malar and submalar implants, midfacial contouring, facial augmentation, malarplasty, malar augmentation, submalar augmentation, rhytidectomy, rhinoplasty surgery, silastic implants, facial contour, craniofacial reconstruction, malar deficiency, submalar deficiency, malar eminence, malar mound, malar defect, submalar defect, malar-submalar implant, malar-submalar augmentation, malar implants
Follow-up: Malar and Submalar Implants