eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Cosmetic Surgery
Microdermabrasion: Follow-up
Updated: May 22, 2008
Outcome and Prognosis
In appropriately selected patients, microdermabrasion can be a very effective technique. Patients with photodamage, fine rhytides, age spots, acne, and enlarged pores can experience significant improvement in the quality and uniformity of the appearance of their skin. This improvement is accomplished with little risk and essentially no downtime, excluding the treatments themselves. Therefore, microdermabrasion is well suited to the patient with a busy lifestyle and superficial skin conditions. The number and frequency of treatments can be tailored to the individual patient, depending on the condition and desired result.
Microdermabrasion is not effective for deep wrinkles and scars or ice-pick acne scars because these lesions extend into the deeper layers of the dermis. Similarly, microdermabrasion is not effective for pigmentary problems, such as melasma or postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, because this treatment does not effectively address the dermis where these problems arise. Patients with these problems are best treated with more traditional resurfacing modalities, such as chemical peeling, dermabrasion, and laser resurfacing.
Future and Controversies
The advantages of rapid recovery and low risk have led to the widespread popularity and use of the microdermabrasion technique. In patients with fine lines and early photoaging, microdermabrasion serves as an effective technique with little or no impact on their lifestyle. The effectiveness of microdermabrasion is limited for deeper skin conditions, such as deep wrinkles and scars, which are currently best treated with other resurfacing modalities. Deeper injury increases complications and recovery time along with effectiveness. Techniques that allow dermal injury and rejuvenation without a degree of epidermal injury currently do not exist, but such techniques may be the future of resurfacing technology.
More on Microdermabrasion |
| Overview: Microdermabrasion |
| Treatment: Microdermabrasion |
Follow-up: Microdermabrasion |
| References |
| « Previous Page |
References
Freedman BM, Rueda-Pedraza E, Waddell SP. The epidermal and dermal changes associated with microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(12):1031-3. [Medline].
Alam M, Omura NE, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Glycolic acid peels compared to microdermabrasion: a right-left controlled trial of efficacy and patient satisfaction. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(6):475-9. [Medline].
Bernard RW, Beran SJ, Rusin L. Microdermabrasion in clinical practice. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 2000;27(4):571-7. [Medline].
Bhalla M, Thami GP. Microdermabrasion: Reappraisal and brief review of literature. Dermatol Surg. June 2006;32(6):809-14. [Medline].
Brody HJ. Glycolic Acid peels compared to microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(7):xvi. [Medline].
Coimbra M, Rohrich RJ, Chao J, Brown SA. A prospective controlled assessment of microdermabrasion for damaged skin and fine rhytides. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(5):1438-43. [Medline].
Coopman SA, Garmyn M, Gonzalez-Serva A. Photodamage and photoaging. In: Arndt KA, ed. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:. 732-50.
Freeman MS. Microdermabrasion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. May 2001;9(2):257-66, viii. [Medline].
Grimes PE. Microdermabrasion.bb. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(Part 2):1160-5. [Medline].
Hernandez-Perez E, Ibiett EV. Gross and microscopic findings in patients undergoing microdermabrasion for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(7):637-40. [Medline].
Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion with and without aluminum oxide crystal abrasion: a comparative molecular analysis of dermal remodeling. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(3):405-10. [Medline].
Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. February 2005;52(2):215-23. [Medline].
Koch RJ, Hanasono MM. Microdermabrasion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;9(3):377-82. [Medline].
Lawrence N. New and emerging treatments for photoaging. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 2001;28(1):235-48.
Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, Voorhees JJ, Fisher G, Karimipour DJ, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(2):215-23. [Medline].
Shim EK, Barnette D, Hughes K, Greenway HT. Microdermabrasion: a clinical and histopathologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(6):524-30. [Medline].
Shpall R, Beddingfield FC, Watson D, Lask GP. Microdermabrasion: a review. Facial Plast Surg. 2004;20(1):47-50. [Medline].
Spencer JM. Microdermabrasion. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(2):89-92. [Medline].
Spencer JM, Kurtz ES. Approaches to document the efficacy and safety of microdermabrasion procedure. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2006;32(11):1353-7. [Medline].
Tan MH, Spencer JM, Pires LM, Ajmeri J, Skover G. The evaluation of aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion for photodamage. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(11):943-9. [Medline].
Tsai RY, Wang CN, Chan HL. Aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion. A new technique for treating facial scarring. Dermatol Surg. Jun 1995;21(6):539-42. [Medline].
White CR, Bigby M, Sangueza OP. What is normal skin? In: Arndt KA, ed. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:. 3-41.
Further Reading
Keywords
microdermabrasion, dermabrasion, exfoliation, power peel, skin resurfacing, Parisian peel, skin revitalization, age spots, acne scars, chemical peeling, chemical peel, laser resurfacing, skin resurfacing procedure, epidermal ablation, dermal ablation, facial scars, facial wrinkles, facial rhytid, facial rhytids, facial rhytide, facial rhytides, photo-aging, photoaging, photodamage, photo-damage, aging, chronological aging
Follow-up: Microdermabrasion