eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Cosmetic Surgery

Microdermabrasion: Treatment

Author: Elizabeth Whitaker, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Atlanta Surgical Group, PC
Coauthor(s): John M Yarborough, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Tulane University and Louisiana State University
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 22, 2008

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The results achieved with microdermabrasion can be enhanced with medical therapies in the form of topical skin treatments. Common adjuncts to microdermabrasion include tretinoin, alpha-hydroxy acids, retinoic acid, and topical vitamin C. In patients being treated for hyperpigmentation, the application of hydroquinone between treatments can be useful. Liberal use of sunscreen and moisturizers is also beneficial. Postoperatively, these products serve to address exfoliation and photosensitization. Long-term benefits include reduction of sun damage and photoaging and improved skin moisture.

Surgical Therapy

A variety of microdermabraders are available on the market. Several components are common to all systems and include a pump that generates a high-pressure stream of aluminum oxide or salt crystals, a connecting tube that delivers the crystals to the handpiece, a handpiece, and a vacuum to remove the crystals and exfoliated skin. The crystals are then discarded. Handpieces are available in disposable and reusable types. The reusable handpieces must be resterilized after each use. Microdermabrasion can be performed by a physician, nurse, or licensed aesthetician.

The most commonly treated area is the face, but microdermabrasion can be used effectively on the neck, hands, and chest. The depth of the treatment depends on the strength of flow of the crystals, the rate of movement of the handpiece against the skin, and the number of passes over the treatment area. Slower movement of the handpiece (allowing longer contact of the abrasive crystals with the skin) and more passes achieves deeper abrasion.

Preoperative Details

No premedication is necessary, unless desired. Prior to the procedure, the skin is cleaned of all makeup and oil. No topical or local anesthetic is necessary, although its use is not precluded. Contact lenses are removed, and eye protection is placed to prevent injury from stray particles.

Intraoperative Details

The technical key to microdermabrasion is placing the skin under tension so that an effective vacuum is achieved. Typically, stretching the treatment area with the nondominant hand and using the dominant hand to guide the handpiece is the method used to achieve this effect. When treating the neck, the neck is placed in extension to assist in skin tension.

The handpiece is moved over the treatment area in a single, smooth stroke, which can then be repeated. The pressure of the crystal stream is controlled with a foot pedal. Thicker skin, such as that on the forehead, chin, and nose, can be treated more aggressively (ie, adjust the speed of handpiece movement or number of passes). Decrease the pressure when treating the thinner skin of the lower eyelids and upper cheek. Vertically orient all strokes when treating the neck. This approach differs from the approach used in treating the face, upon which a second treatment perpendicular to the first treatment is generally performed.

Between treatments, the face is cleaned of any residual crystals. Usually, 2 treatments per session are sufficient for the face. The desired endpoint of treatment is erythema. Specific areas, such as acne scars or age spots, can be focally treated more aggressively with additional passes. Treatment sessions generally last approximately 30-40 minutes for the face and 20 minutes for the neck.

Postoperative Details

The treated area is cleaned with a wet cloth to remove any residual crystals. After drying, a moisturizer or ointment is applied. Continue the application of moisturizer or ointment postoperatively because exfoliation may occur. Erythema generally resolves within hours after treatment, but the patient may experience a mild sunburnlike sensation for a couple of days. Sunscreen should be used liberally because photosensitivity may be increased.

Follow-up

Effective microdermabrasion usually requires a series of 5-12 treatments. The series can be significantly longer, particularly with acne scarring. Initially, treatments are weekly or biweekly for several treatments, followed by monthly to biannually for maintenance treatments, depending on the patient.

Complications

The great advantage of microdermabrasion is its lack of complications. In early years of use, reports cited redness of the eyes, photophobia, and epiphora after examination by an ophthalmologist. The examination revealed conjunctival congestion, crystals adherent to the cornea, and superficial punctate keratopathy. Using eye protection virtually eliminates ocular complications, but corneal abrasion from stray crystals remains a theoretic risk.

The erythema generally resolves within hours after treatment, allowing patients a rapid return to their usual activities. Scarring has not been documented from microdermabrasion, although scarring is theoretically possible when producing any injury to the skin. However, microdermabrasion barely extends through the epidermis, so the depth of injury is very superficial. This fact is both its advantage and its limitation. Superficial injury means rapid healing and recovery with little risk; however, only superficial skin conditions, such as fine lines, quality of the skin, and shallow scars, can be addressed.

More on Microdermabrasion

Overview: Microdermabrasion
Treatment: Microdermabrasion
Follow-up: Microdermabrasion
References
[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

References

  1. Freedman BM, Rueda-Pedraza E, Waddell SP. The epidermal and dermal changes associated with microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(12):1031-3. [Medline].

  2. Alam M, Omura NE, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Glycolic acid peels compared to microdermabrasion: a right-left controlled trial of efficacy and patient satisfaction. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(6):475-9. [Medline].

  3. Bernard RW, Beran SJ, Rusin L. Microdermabrasion in clinical practice. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 2000;27(4):571-7. [Medline].

  4. Bhalla M, Thami GP. Microdermabrasion: Reappraisal and brief review of literature. Dermatol Surg. June 2006;32(6):809-14. [Medline].

  5. Brody HJ. Glycolic Acid peels compared to microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(7):xvi. [Medline].

  6. Coimbra M, Rohrich RJ, Chao J, Brown SA. A prospective controlled assessment of microdermabrasion for damaged skin and fine rhytides. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(5):1438-43. [Medline].

  7. Coopman SA, Garmyn M, Gonzalez-Serva A. Photodamage and photoaging. In: Arndt KA, ed. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:. 732-50.

  8. Freeman MS. Microdermabrasion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. May 2001;9(2):257-66, viii. [Medline].

  9. Grimes PE. Microdermabrasion.bb. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(Part 2):1160-5. [Medline].

  10. Hernandez-Perez E, Ibiett EV. Gross and microscopic findings in patients undergoing microdermabrasion for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(7):637-40. [Medline].

  11. Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion with and without aluminum oxide crystal abrasion: a comparative molecular analysis of dermal remodeling. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(3):405-10. [Medline].

  12. Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. February 2005;52(2):215-23. [Medline].

  13. Koch RJ, Hanasono MM. Microdermabrasion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;9(3):377-82. [Medline].

  14. Lawrence N. New and emerging treatments for photoaging. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 2001;28(1):235-48.

  15. Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, Voorhees JJ, Fisher G, Karimipour DJ, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(2):215-23. [Medline].

  16. Shim EK, Barnette D, Hughes K, Greenway HT. Microdermabrasion: a clinical and histopathologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(6):524-30. [Medline].

  17. Shpall R, Beddingfield FC, Watson D, Lask GP. Microdermabrasion: a review. Facial Plast Surg. 2004;20(1):47-50. [Medline].

  18. Spencer JM. Microdermabrasion. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(2):89-92. [Medline].

  19. Spencer JM, Kurtz ES. Approaches to document the efficacy and safety of microdermabrasion procedure. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2006;32(11):1353-7. [Medline].

  20. Tan MH, Spencer JM, Pires LM, Ajmeri J, Skover G. The evaluation of aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion for photodamage. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(11):943-9. [Medline].

  21. Tsai RY, Wang CN, Chan HL. Aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion. A new technique for treating facial scarring. Dermatol Surg. Jun 1995;21(6):539-42. [Medline].

  22. White CR, Bigby M, Sangueza OP. What is normal skin? In: Arndt KA, ed. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:. 3-41.

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Further Reading

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Keywords

microdermabrasion, dermabrasion, exfoliation, power peel, skin resurfacing, Parisian peel, skin revitalization, age spots, acne scars, chemical peeling, chemical peel, laser resurfacing, skin resurfacing procedure, epidermal ablation, dermal ablation, facial scars, facial wrinkles, facial rhytid, facial rhytids, facial rhytide, facial rhytides, photo-aging, photoaging, photodamage, photo-damage, aging, chronological aging

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Elizabeth Whitaker, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Atlanta Surgical Group, PC
Elizabeth Whitaker, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John M Yarborough, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Tulane University and Louisiana State University
John M Yarborough, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

J David Kriet, MD, FACS, Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Director of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine
J David Kriet, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, AO Foundation, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Keith A LaFerriere, MD, Clinical Professor, Fellowship Director, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Missouri at Columbia
Keith A LaFerriere, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Missouri State Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders
Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society
Disclosure: Advanced Headache Intervention Consulting fee Consulting; Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.