eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial Surgery
Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis: Follow-up
Updated: Jun 30, 2009
Outcome and Prognosis
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) holds great potential for various osseous defects that can be encountered within the craniofacial skeleton.8 Numerous advantages seem to be emerging with the technique. The initial osteotomy procedure is less invasive and does not carry the attendant limitations and complications that may be associated with conventional bony mobilization and repositioning. Furthermore, the potential for substantially larger movements and greater postoperative stability exists. Surgical intervention is possible in the very young patient and, apparently, much earlier than with standard craniofacial technique.
DO, however, does not correct underlying growth disturbances in craniofacial patients. DO does not reduce the need for orthodontic intervention, and it carries the disadvantage of requiring a second procedure to remove the distraction appliances. As experience with DO accumulates, this technique is becoming established as an essential tool in the craniofacial surgeon's armamentarium. The indications in which it is the standard of care are slowly being defined.
Future and Controversies
Several new developments are on the horizon in the field of craniofacial DO. A successful combination of endoscopic techniques to create osteotomies and insert distraction devices will move distraction into the field of minimally invasive surgery. New work using bioresorbable materials may lead to the implementation of devices that do not require a second surgical procedure to remove them and following resorption leave no trace that they had ever been inserted. In addition, use of microprocessors and miniature motorized distraction devices may provide the ability to insert submerged appliances capable of auto-distraction according to preprogrammed data.
More on Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Overview: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Workup: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Treatment: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
Follow-up: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
| Multimedia: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis |
| References |
| Further Reading |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Ilizarov GA. The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. Spring 1988;48(1):1-11. [Medline].
Costantino PD, Friedman CD, Shindo ML, et al. Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis. Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 1993;119(5):511-6. [Medline].
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1992;89(1):1-8; discussion 9-10. [Medline].
Tibesar RJ, Sidman JD. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric patient. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2008;16(6):548-54. [Medline].
Higuera S, Cole P, Stephenson JB, Hollier L. Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of paediatric maxillary distraction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Nov 5 2008;[Medline].
Reddy LV, Elhadi HM. Maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. Sep 2008;16(2):237-47. [Medline].
Dauria D, Marsh JL. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for Pierre Robin sequence: what percentage of neonates need it?. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2008;19(5):1237-43. [Medline].
Al-Daghreer S, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T. Long-term stability after craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Sep 2008;66(9):1812-9. [Medline].
[Guideline] Persing J, James H, Swanson J, Kattwinkel J. Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Plastic Surgery and Section on Neurological Surgery. Pediatrics. Jul 2003;112(1 Pt 1):199-202. [Medline].
Cohen SR, Rutrick RE, Burstein FD. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 1995;6(5):368-74. [Medline].
Imola MJ. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Current Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;9:238-248.
Imola MJ, Hamlar DD, Thatcher G, et al. The versatility of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Jan-Mar 2002;4(1):8-19. [Medline].
Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to majorosteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1995;96(4):825-40; discussion 841-2. [Medline].
Toth BA, Kim JW, Chin M, Cedars M. Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes. J Craniofac Surg. Mar 1998;9(2):100-13; discussion 119-22. [Medline].
Further Reading
Clinical guideline
Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. 9 American Academy of Pediatrics - Medical Specialty Society. 2003 Jul. 4 pages. NGC:003254
Clinical trials
Bone Regeneration Using Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
3D Imaging of Hard and Soft Tissue in Orthognathic Surgery
Related eMedicine topics
Craniofacial, Distraction Osteogenesis
Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible
Distraction Osteogenesis of the Maxilla
Manifestations of Craniofacial Syndromes
Craniosynostosis Management
Keywords
craniofacial distraction osteogenesis, distraction osteogenesis, craniofacial DO, DO, bone distraction, craniofacial deformities
Follow-up: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis