eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Craniofacial Surgery

Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis: Treatment

Author: Mario J Imola, MD, DDS, FRCSC, FACS, Consulting Staff, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Center for Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jun 30, 2009

Treatment

Preoperative Details

Although opinion differs regarding the timing of intervention and the type of device to use in distraction osteogenesis (DO), careful preoperative planning and proper case selection are critical to a successful outcome. Initially, acquire all of the necessary preoperative data and analyze data to precisely define existing deformities. Then, identify the various subunits of the craniofacial skeleton that need mobilization and repositioning to determine the nature of the desired osteotomies and the desired vector of displacement to be applied to the osteotomized segment(s) during the distraction phase. Consider both the magnitude and direction of the distraction vector prior to device selection, osteotomy design, and device placement.

Preoperative considerations for mandibular distraction include (1) the preexisting shape of the lower jaw (eg, ramus height, body length, gonial angle), (2) its position relative to the maxilla and cranial base, (3) the presence of asymmetry and mandibular and occlusal plane angles, and (4) the occlusion (eg, anteroposterior relationships, transverse relationships, open bite deformities).

Considerations during planning for procedures involving the mid face include (1) the degree of exorbitism, (2) the presence of anteroposterior deficiency within the midfacial bony structures and their position relative to the cranial base (SNA) and the mandible (ANB), (3) the vertical midfacial deficiency or elongation, (4) the maxillary plane and occlusal plane angles, and (5) the occlusal relationships described above.

Selection of the proper distraction device is another important consideration prior to surgery. In general, 2 basic devices are available: internal and external.

  • Internal devices
    • For the most part, internal devices are buried (with both the fixation components and the distraction mechanism) under soft tissue cover. A small rod extrudes through skin or mucosa, which allows turning of the distraction mechanism. Internal devices are suitable in large bones and have the advantage of being less obtrusive and visible during the distraction and consolidation phase. Their point of application is closer to the point of distraction resistance; and, therefore, internal devices carry a mechanical advantage.
    • However, applying internal devices to small bone segments in the younger patient is technically difficult. Furthermore, early editions of internal devices required a second major surgical procedure to remove them following the consolidation phase. Newer models are being designed whereby the transport mechanism is removed through small incisions following disengagement from the fixation components, which are left in situ.
  • External devices: These have the distraction mechanism located outside the skin or mucosa and attach to the bone segments by either transcutaneous pins or wires. External devices tend to have greater flexibility in their range of movement and allow alteration of the distraction vector during the distraction phase. They can be applied to smaller bone segments, and removal is relatively easy. They are cumbersome and visible when in situ, however, and depending on the application, can produce significant soft tissue scars at the pin tracts.

The planning phase requires careful cooperation between surgeon and orthodontist if skeletal movements affect dentition. At the initial surgery, appropriate bone cuts are performed and the distraction appliances are secured.

Intraoperative Details

Use of the distraction technique requires the same operative exposure as conventional craniofacial surgery. Recent studies, however, are looking at less-invasive surgery using endoscopic techniques to complement DO. Completion of the osteotomies is performed as per the preoperative plan. However, prior to complete mobilization of the segments, the distraction appliance is secured to either end of the osteotomy in the predetermined direction of the distraction vector. After loosening the segments, a test distraction should be performed to ensure that the appliances are working and that the bone segments are sufficiently mobilized. The appliances are then returned to the neutral position.

Postoperative Details

Depending on the procedure, patients generally require a 1- to 5-day postsurgical in-hospital course. Place patients on prophylactic antibiotics and allow a suitable waiting period or latency phase to elapse prior to commencing the distraction phase. During the distraction phase, frequently see patients in the office to ensure that they are advancing the devices. (Periodic plain radiography is useful for this purpose.) After distraction, allow consolidation to occur and subsequently remove the distraction devices.

Complications

A number of problems can arise with the distraction process (eg, patient noncompliance, device failure, premature fusion of the segments undergoing distraction). These problems necessitate a repeat surgical procedure to reosteotomize the bone segments. Infection at the distraction site may impair the osteogenesis process. During the consolidation phase, nonunion or delayed union results if micromovement across the regenerate occurs. Excessive scarring is also possible, particularly when using external devices. Finally, a relative lack of control in repositioning the bone segments exists compared with conventional surgery, which leads to a less-than-ideal final position.

More on Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Overview: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
Workup: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
Treatment: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
Follow-up: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
Multimedia: Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Ilizarov GA. The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. Spring 1988;48(1):1-11. [Medline].

  2. Costantino PD, Friedman CD, Shindo ML, et al. Experimental mandibular regrowth by distraction osteogenesis. Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 1993;119(5):511-6. [Medline].

  3. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1992;89(1):1-8; discussion 9-10. [Medline].

  4. Tibesar RJ, Sidman JD. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric patient. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2008;16(6):548-54. [Medline].

  5. Higuera S, Cole P, Stephenson JB, Hollier L. Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of paediatric maxillary distraction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Nov 5 2008;[Medline].

  6. Reddy LV, Elhadi HM. Maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. Sep 2008;16(2):237-47. [Medline].

  7. Dauria D, Marsh JL. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for Pierre Robin sequence: what percentage of neonates need it?. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 2008;19(5):1237-43. [Medline].

  8. Al-Daghreer S, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T. Long-term stability after craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Sep 2008;66(9):1812-9. [Medline].

  9. [Guideline] Persing J, James H, Swanson J, Kattwinkel J. Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Plastic Surgery and Section on Neurological Surgery. Pediatrics. Jul 2003;112(1 Pt 1):199-202. [Medline].

  10. Cohen SR, Rutrick RE, Burstein FD. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg. Sep 1995;6(5):368-74. [Medline].

  11. Imola MJ. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Current Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;9:238-248.

  12. Imola MJ, Hamlar DD, Thatcher G, et al. The versatility of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Jan-Mar 2002;4(1):8-19. [Medline].

  13. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to majorosteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1995;96(4):825-40; discussion 841-2. [Medline].

  14. Toth BA, Kim JW, Chin M, Cedars M. Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes. J Craniofac Surg. Mar 1998;9(2):100-13; discussion 119-22. [Medline].

Keywords

craniofacial distraction osteogenesis, distraction osteogenesis, craniofacial DO, DO, bone distraction, craniofacial deformities

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Mario J Imola, MD, DDS, FRCSC, FACS, Consulting Staff, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Center for Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery
Mario J Imola, MD, DDS, FRCSC, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American Head and Neck Society, American Laryngological Rhinological and Otological Society, American Medical Association, AO Foundation, Canadian Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Colorado Medical Society, and North American Skull Base Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS, Consulting Staff, Private Practice
Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Allergan Honoraria Consulting

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

David W Stepnick, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center
David W Stepnick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders
Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society
Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation unstricted gift unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo  Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.