eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > External Ear Diseases
External Ear, Aural Atresia: Treatment
Updated: Nov 25, 2008
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Nonsurgical options for the treatment of microtia include simple coverage of the microtic ear with the patient's hair. This way, the affected child may decide for or against having surgery at a future date. A prosthetic ear is another alternative and is used more frequently following total auriculectomy for cutaneous malignancies. More advanced models use bone-anchored devices and provide an excellent aesthetic appearance with minimal surgical procedure. Disadvantages of prosthetic ears relate to the daily care needed and the concern over inadvertent dislodgement, particularly in social situations.
Surgical Therapy
Silastic-Dacron implants (see Image 7) were once often used because of their reproducible framework and lack of donor site morbidity. Unfortunately, most alloplastic materials are prone to extrusion when placed under such thin skin coverage, and they have low tolerance to trauma. Recent enthusiasm has developed for the use of porous, high-density, polyethylene implants (eg, Medpor). These implants must be buried under a thicker layer of vascular tissue, usually a transposed temporal parietal fascia flap.
In animal models, these grafts have the capability to heal by secondary intention or by skin grafting if they become exposed to the environment. Although this more recent generation of alloplastic implants may be less problematic than silicone, these implants maintain a risk of extrusion and infection that limits their applicability in primary microtia repair. One must also bear in mind that the external ear is subject to repeated minor trauma that the alloplastic implant must be expected to withstand over a lifetime. More importantly, failure of alloplastic implants may complicate future autogenous costal cartilage reconstruction by violating the delicate mastoid skin.
Preoperative Details
Use an exposed radiograph film to trace the outline of the contralateral normal ear and to serve as a template for reproducing auricular details, especially the contour of the triangular fossa and scaphoid fossa. When bilateral microtia exists, use the ear from a parent as a template. The radiograph film is also useful for determining the amount of costal cartilage needed during harvest, thereby avoiding any excessive resection and morbidity.
Careful measurements are needed to ensure symmetry of the new auricle in terms of vertical height, posterior position, and oblique orientation. A malpositioned ear is often more conspicuous than one that is properly located but lacking in fine definition. Important landmarks for reference include the lateral canthus, alar lobule, and oral commissure. Use exposed radiograph film for positioning the ear with respect to these reference points.
Intraoperative Details
The classic microtia repair with autogenous costal cartilage involves the following 4 stages, each separated by 3 months:
- Cartilage harvest and implantation
- Lobule transfer
- Lateralization with skin graft
- Creation of the tragus
The fourth stage is often not required because a rudimentary tragus may be found.
Cartilage harvest and implantation
This initial stage is the most involved and requires a few days of hospitalization. The contralateral chest, at the confluence of the sixth and seventh ribs for the primary platform of the ear and the floating eighth rib for the helical rim, is used to obtain the donor costal cartilage. When the cartilage is obtained, great care is taken to split the rectus muscle rather than cut it, thus greatly reducing the postoperative pain and splinting. Further chest deformities may be reduced by retaining a rim of the upper margin of the sixth rib cartilage, thus tethering the remaining rib framework to the sternum and preventing outward flaring of the posterior rib border.
The cartilage graft is carved with traditional woodworking gauges and scalpels (see Image 8). Power instrumentation is not used, since its forces may damage the cartilage. The preoperatively prepared radiographic tracing serves as a template for carving and building the framework (see Image 9A). The contours of the helix and antihelix are exaggerated to accommodate the thicker skin flap that invariably blunts these details after implantation. The eighth rib cartilage is carved and secured to the framework with 4-0 clear nylon (see Image 9B).
An accurate outline for the position of the new ear is made with respect to the contralateral normal ear and relative to the lateral canthus, nasal ala, and oral commissure. Relatively small discrepancies of vertical height can be detected when both ears are in view simultaneously (ie, frontal view). A low anterior hairline should not influence the position of the graft. With bilateral microtia, refer to absolute numbers rather than symmetry; an understanding of the standard ideal auricular position in the head is imperative. The superior aspect is usually at the level of the supratarsal crease, the inferior lobule is at the subnasale, the root of the helix is 6.5-7 cm posterior to the lateral canthus, and the long axis of the ear is roughly 15° off the vertical plane.
To obtain optimal definition of the new ear, elevate the subcutaneous pocket as thinly as possible. Resect and bank all rudimentary auricular cartilage in the postauricular scalp for use during the third stage. Place 2 microsuction drains behind and over the graft, keeping the cartilage in position and maintaining close apposition between the framework and overlying skin. To maximize auricular contours (see Image 10), tight adherence of the skin to the cartilage is essential. In most cases, remove drains on the fourth or fifth postoperative day.
Lobule transfer
The second stage of reconstruction is the lobule transfer. Perform this procedure approximately 2-3 months after stage I. The remnant lobule is typically found in a superior and anterior position and is moved to the inferior border of the reconstructed framework as an inferiorly based transposition flap. Partially fillet the lobule open to cover the medial and lateral surfaces of the cartilage graft (see Image 11).
Lateralization with skin graft
Perform stage III 3 months later. Stage III consists of the elevation of the framework from the mastoid and the creation of a postauricular sulcus. Make an incision along the posterior periphery of the cartilage graft with care to minimize bringing hair-bearing scalp onto the lateral surface of the ear. As the ear is lifted, preserve a layer of soft tissue on the cartilage to support the skin graft. Undermine the posterior mastoid skin and advance it forward to resurface the new scalp defect. The banked cartilage from the first stage is then harvested and carved into a wedge for placement as a support buttress behind the ear to augment projection (see Image 12B). Create a small pocket for this graft so that it is not exposed to the skin graft. Alternatively, elevate a sleeve of temporalis fascia and rotate it inferiorly for coverage of the cartilage. Secure a split-thickness skin graft to the posterior surface of the framework (see Image12C).
Creation of the tragus
The final stage is construction of the tragus and conchal bowl. For unilateral microtia, obtain a composite graft from the concha cymba of the contralateral normal ear. Insert the graft through a small J-shaped incision in the area of the anticipated tragus (see Image 13A). The reconstructed tragus produces a shadow that mimics an external auditory meatus until atresia repair is performed (see Image 13A). In cases of bilateral microtia, in which contralateral conchal cartilage is not available, build the tragus using residual costal cartilage and wrap the preauricular skin around the graft. Brent described a technique of incorporating the tragus during the initial stage by securing an additional cartilage graft to the main framework.5 This method is particularly advantageous in patients with bilateral microtia.
Bilateral microtia is characterized by several other unique considerations. The first stage to each side is separated by several months to minimize postoperative splinting from bilateral chest wounds during cartilage harvesting. Conversely, subsequent stages may be performed simultaneously. Lastly, tragal reconstruction is modified, as discussed above.
Several surgeons have recently modified the standard 4-stage repair and have advocated a combined 1- to 2-stage approach. This concept is appealing because it decreases hospitalization, accomplishes the procedure with fewer patients in the operating room, and eases the patient's anxiety. Song and Song described a 1-stage repair that involved an ultrathin skin flap and a subcutaneous tissue flap.10 This technique allowed for creation of the sulcus simultaneously with the framework construction. Two of 15 patients (13.3%) had complications that required an additional 1-month hospitalization. Also, this procedure still required patients to pursue secondary procedures (eg, tragal construction, lobule repositioning) to obtain a more aesthetically pleasing reconstruction.
Other authors have described techniques that transpose the lobule during the creation of the framework; that is, stages I and II are combined. These techniques include the building of a tragus with the initial framework, thus completing the microtia repair in 2 stages. Brent advocates lobule transfer and elevation of the framework if the remnant lobe is short. A small vestigial lobule allows for preservation of a significant skin bridge and an adequate blood supply to the lobule.
When the microtia repair is complete, a preexisting low hairline may result in varying amounts of hair overlying the elevated framework. This hair may be addressed simply with trimming, electrolysis, laser hair removal, or adequate coverage of the auricle with the patient's hairstyle. If these conservative measures fail to address the problem, the skin may be excised and the graft resurfaced with a skin graft. To create good color match, a full-thickness skin graft from the posterior surface of the contralateral ear is used to cover the framework. Depilation may also be performed preoperatively in the anticipated surgical area to create hairless skin prior to any framework implantation.
Postoperative Details
Postoperatively, patients are instructed to refrain from contact sports for 6 weeks, after which they are allowed to participate in all reasonable activities without restriction. The reconstructed ear with autogenous costal cartilage tolerates trauma relatively well, including blows from soccer balls, abrasion from wrestling matches, and insect stings.
Follow-up
Routine follow-up care is indicated for postoperative wound healing. Once the atresia portion is complete, observing the patient annually may be worthwhile; however, no additional problems are anticipated.
Complications
During stage I, operation on the chest wall may result in pneumothorax, chest wall deformity, and atelectasis secondary to limited inspiration due to pain. A postoperative chest radiograph is obtained in the recovery area to confirm the absence of a pneumothorax. Pneumothorax, chest wall deformity, or atelectasis, if present, can usually be managed conservatively rather than requiring a chest tube because the source of air is from violation of the parietal pleura and not the visceral pleura with continued air leak from the lungs. When encountered intraoperatively, the wound is closed over a small red rubber tube set to suction, and it is withdrawn during a Valsalva maneuver.
Procedures with framework implantation may result in hematomas, seromas, chondritis, and graft or skin ischemia. Skin necrosis is an unusual complication, but it must be recognized promptly and managed aggressively to minimize subsequent cartilage resorption, infection, and permanent loss of definition. A small area of skin necrosis may heal with meticulous wound care and gentle debridement (see Image 14). However, a larger area may require mobilization of a vascularized temporoparietal fascial flap to cover the cartilage and to support a skin graft. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is recommended as soon as impaired vascularity is noted postoperatively.
Despite adequate measures to obtain projection during stage III, the reconstructed ear may lack sufficient protrusion compared with the contralateral ear. An alternative to further manipulation of the framework is an otoplasty to the normal ear. The projection of the unaffected ear may be reduced to create a more symmetric appearance. A rare but significant complication of this procedure is facial nerve injury. In 25-30% of patients with atresia, the facial nerve takes a sharp turn anteriorly at the level of the second genu. The nerve crosses the lower third of the middle ear, exits the glenoid fossa, and is vulnerable to injury in the preauricular area. Also, the facial nerve may lack a vertical segment in patients with low-set ears and a course in the soft tissue over the mastoid.
More on External Ear, Aural Atresia |
| Overview: External Ear, Aural Atresia |
| Workup: External Ear, Aural Atresia |
 Treatment: External Ear, Aural Atresia |
| Follow-up: External Ear, Aural Atresia |
| Multimedia: External Ear, Aural Atresia |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
McDowell F. The classic reprint. Ancient ear-lobe and rhinoplastic operations in India. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1969;43(5):515-22. [Medline].
Gillies H. Plastic Surgery of the Face. London: 1920.
Gillies H. Reconstruction of the external ear with special reference to the use of maternal ear cartilages as the supporting structure. Rev Chir Structive. 1937;7:169.
Tanzer RC. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1977.
Brent B. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1999;104(2):319-34; discussion 335-8. [Medline].
Marx H. Dies Missbildungen des Ohres. In: Denker A, Kahler O, eds. Handbuch der Hals-Nasen und Ohrenheilkunde: Bd VI. 1026. 131-169.
Weerda H. Classification of congenital deformities of the auricle. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1988;5(5):385-8. [Medline].
Aguilar EA 3rd, Jahrsdoerfer RA. The surgical repair of congenital microtia and atresia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1988;98(6):600-6. [Medline].
Fukuda O, Yamada A. Reconstruction of the microtic ear with autogenous cartilage. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1978;5(3):351-66. [Medline].
Song Y, Song Y. An improved one-stage total ear reconstruction procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1983;71(5):615-23. [Medline].
Brent B. Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1992;90(3):355-74; discussion 375-6. [Medline].
Peer LA. Reconstruction of the auricle with diced cartilage grafts in a Vitallium ear mold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 3:653.
Aase JM, Tegtmeier RE. Microtia in New Mexico: evidence for multifactorial causation. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3A):113-6. [Medline].
Aguilar EF 3rd. Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia (grade III). Laryngoscope. Dec 1996;106(12 Pt 2 Suppl 82):1-26. [Medline].
Bennun RD, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB, et al. Microtia: a microform of hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1985;76(6):859-65. [Medline].
Britt JC, Park SS. Autogenous tissue-engineered cartilage: evaluation as an implant material. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1998;124(6):671-7. [Medline].
Cao Y, Vacanti JP, Paige KT, et al. Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1997;100(2):297-302; discussion 303-4. [Medline].
Davis J. Auricle reconstruction. In: Saad MN, Lichtveld P, eds. Reviews in Plastic Surgery: General Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1994:109-140.
Eavey RD, Monroy A, Nicolau Y, et al. Microtia repair: the case for surgical reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Nov 2006;64(11):1655-63. [Medline].
Farkas LG. Anthropometry of normal and anomalous ears. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1978;5(3):401-12. [Medline].
Farkas LG. Growth of normal and reconstructed auricles. In: Tanzer RC, Edgerton MT, eds. Symposium on Reconstruction of the Auricle. 1974:24-31.
Firmin F. Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience based on 352 microtic ear corrections. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. Mar 1998;32(1):35-47. [Medline].
Fukuda O. The microtic ear: survey of 180 cases in 180 cases in 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1974;53(4):458-63. [Medline].
Gion GG. Surgical versus prosthetic reconstruction of microtia: the case for prosthetic reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Nov 2006;64(11):1639-54. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1995;11(4):274-7. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, et al. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. Jan 1992;13(1):6-12. [Medline].
Kaye CI, Rollnick BR, Hauck WW, et al. Microtia and associated anomalies: statistical analysis. Am J Med Genet. Dec 1989;34(4):574-8. [Medline].
Lucente FE, Lawson W, Noveck NL. The External Ear. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1995.
Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part I. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for lobule-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1994;93(2):221-30; discussion 267-8. [Medline].
Park C, Mun HY. Use of an expanded temporoparietal fascial flap technique for total auricular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2006;118(2):374-82. [Medline].
Park SS, Wang TD. Temporoparietal fascial flap in auricular reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1995;11(4):330-7. [Medline].
Quatela VC, Goldman ND. Microtia repair. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1995;11(4):257-73. [Medline].
Rueckert F, Brown FE. Microtia. In: Stark RB, ed. Plastic Surgery of the Head and Neck. NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.
Tai Y, Tanaka S, Fukushima J, et al. Refinements in the elevation of reconstructed auricles in microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2006;117(7):2414-23. [Medline].
Trigg DJ, Applebaum EL. Indications for the surgical repair of unilateral aural atresia in children. Am J Otol. Sep 1998;19(5):679-84; discussion 684-6. [Medline].
Williams JD, Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, et al. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1997;123(6):578-83. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
aural atresia, auricular atresia, congenital auricular deformity, small auricle, microtia, anotia, lop ear, cup ear, Stahl ear, peanut ear, anotic ear, peanut deformity, hypoplasia, hypoplastic ear, prominent ear, hemifacial microsomia, Goldenhar syndrome, Treacher Collins syndrome, Franceschetti syndrome, oculoauricular vertebral dysplasia, ear deformity, aural atresia, ear reconstruction
