Neck, Cervical Metastases, Surgery 

  • Author: Pankaj Chaturvedi, MBBS, MS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: Oct 22, 2010
 

Background

Approximately 300 lymph nodes are located in the head and neck, and they comprise 30% of the total 800 lymph nodes in the human body. In 1880, Kocher and Uber reported the detrimental effect of neck metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer. In 1906, George Washington Crile reported his experience with 132 neck dissections in JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. The advent of functional neck dissections, aimed at reducing morbidity and maintaining function, was made possible with the further advancement of understanding of the lymphatic spread in the 1960s.[1]

Cervical metastasis has a tremendous impact on the prognosis in patients with carcinomas of the head and neck. The presence of neck metastasis is known to reduce survival by 50%, and the frequency of such spread is greater than 20% for most squamous cell carcinomas (SCCAs). The presence of extra capsular spread further halves the chances of cure. Predictive factors of cervical metastasis are primary site, primary tumor size, degree of differentiation of tumor, perineural invasion, perivascular invasion, inflammatory response, and tumor DNA content (ploidy).

Advantages of modified neck dissection (MND) over radical neck dissection (RND) are preservation of neck and shoulder functions, better cosmetic results, protection of the internal carotid artery (ICA), and availability of simultaneous bilateral surgeries.[2] MND offers the same survival rate and disease-free survival benefits as classic RND.

Next

History of the Procedure

  • 1906: Crile developed the en bloc cervical lymphadenectomy known as the RND. In his classic series, spinal accessory and hypoglossal nerves were preserved.
  • 1945: Dargent and Papillon proposed the preservation of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in clinically node-negative necks.
  • 1950: Martin popularized the RND without preserving the spinal accessory nerve.
  • 1963: Suarez demonstrated, based on his necropsy studies, that a complete cervical lymphadenectomy could be accomplished while sparing the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, the internal jugular vein (IJV), and the SAN.
  • 1967: Bocca and Pignataro popularized functional/conservative neck dissections.
  • 1969-1981: Roy and Beahrs, Carenfelt, and Eliasson advocated the possibility of preservation of SAN in clinically node-positive necks as well.[3, 4, 5]
  • 1972: Lindberg's classic study of carcinomas of various upper aerodigestive tracts indicated consistent patterns of lymphatic drainage.[6]
  • 1986-1994: Byers, Medina, and Spiro reported their satisfactory results with selective neck dissection (SLD).[7, 8]
Previous
Next

Problem

Management of a neck mass requires understanding of anatomic, pathologic, and oncologic characteristics of the tumor. Differential diagnoses of neck masses are vast and need careful consideration in all patients who present with a neck mass. Imaging is an important tool to identify cervical metastasis; however, it may not clearly identify metastatic disease in early cancers. The management of neck masses has undergone a paradoxical shift from radical neck dissections, which were performed for N0 neck masses in the early 1900s, to the present era, in which chemoradiotherapy is advocated for advanced neck disease. This change in management has been brought about by several factors, such as morbidity of the procedure, better understanding of the tumor biology, patterns of spread, and advances in radio therapy.

To bring uniformity to the nomenclature for various neck dissections, the classification adopted today is the one adopted by the subcommittee for neck dissection terminology and classification of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery in 2002.[9] Cervical metastases, most of which originate in the aerodigestive tract, are strong prognostic factors in head and neck cancers.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

In the United States, the frequency of metastatic disease for the upper aerodigestive tract varies widely from 1-85%, depending on the site, size, and differentiation of the tumor. For example, larger tumors have a greater likelihood of cervical spread, and pharyngeal lesions metastasize more frequently than those in the larynx or oral cavity.

Ipsilateral metastatic disease occurs in approximately 50% of patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or supraglottis. Bilateral and/or contralateral metastatic disease occurs in 2-35% of these patients.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma manifests as a neck metastasis in approximately 50% of patients.

Metastatic neck disease in individuals with thyroid gland tumors occurs as follows: papillary (55%), medullary (50%), and follicular (25%).

Tumors localized in the oral cavity, oral mucosa, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and supraglottis have a higher frequency of metastasis compared to areas such as the superior gingiva, hard palate, and glottis.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Most cervical metastases are SCCAs that originate from primary sites in the aerodigestive tract. Other sources of cervical metastasis include neoplasms of the skin, salivary glands, thyroid, lung, kidney, prostate, gonads, stomach, and breast. In some individuals, no primary cancer can be detected. In this situation, the carcinoma is labeled a metastasis from unknown origin.

Within the aerodigestive tracts, various factors contribute to the risk of neck metastasis. Young patients with oral carcinoma have a higher risk of developing nodal metastasis than older patients. Risk of neck involvement by metastasis increases with an increase of tumor size. Carcinomas in anterior portions of the oral cavity are less likely to metastasize to the neck than carcinomas in posterior portions. Perineural and perivascular invasion are associated with a high risk of nodal metastasis. Poorly differentiated tumors are associated with a higher risk of neck metastasis than well-differentiated tumors. Patterns of lymphatic metastasis are as follows:

With oral, tongue, retromolar trigone, and tonsillar fossa subsites, the jugulodigastric, submandibular, and midjugular lymph node stations are involved.

With the floor of the mouth as the subsite, the submandibular and jugulodigastric lymph node stations are involved.

With the soft palate, base of the tongue, oropharynx, supraglottis, and hypopharynx subsites, the jugulodigastric, midjugular, and contralateral lymph node stations are involved.

With the nasopharynx as the subsite, lymph node stations of the widest nodal distribution are involved.

Contralateral metastasis is found in the supraglottis, the base of the tongue, and the posterior pharyngeal wall palate.

Bilateral metastasis is found in the nasopharynx, the base of the tongue, the soft palate, the floor of mouth, and the supraglottis.

The highest rate of occult cervical metastasis is found in the oral cavity, pyriform sinus, tonsil, supraglottis, and pharyngeal wall.

Multiple cervical metastases (adenocarcinoma) occur with thyroid carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Involvement of particular groups of neck nodes includes the following:

  • Posterior cervical nodes in nasopharyngeal and tonsillar carcinoma
  • Tracheoesophageal nodes in thyroid, pyriform sinus, and subglottic carcinoma
  • Periparotid and parotid nodes in SCCA of the skin of the temporal region and the cheek
Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

A detailed understanding of the pathophysiology is mandatory step in the management of neck metastasis.

The intrinsic behavior of any malignant tumor in the body is to grow, invade, and metastasize. Head and neck SCCs predominantly metastasize via lymphatic channels to the lymph nodes as tumor emboli. In addition, they also spread through a venolymphatic pathway. The metastatic process largely depends on various tumor factors, such as expression of adhesion molecules like CD44 by the tumor cells or host immune factors.

Advances in molecular biology have given a better insight into the mechanisms involved in head and neck cancer.

Multiple gene products are involved in angiogenesis, all of which are critical for regulating the angiogenic phenotype. This has raised the need for comprehensive analysis of the angiogenic phenotype using microarray analysis and global proteomic approaches.[2] A complex interplay between positive and negative regulators determines the degree of neovascularization in and around the tumor.

Various markers assessing the role of regulators have been studied.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) have the ability to degrade connective tissue such as the basement membrane, which is a crucial step in the initiation of metastatic process. Thus it serves as a negative regulator of metastasis. Similarly, E-cadherin is an important molecule that promotes cell-to-cell adhesion and serves as a positive regulator of metastasis. A study by Weiss et al indicated that angiogenesis and MMP and E-cadherin (M/E) ratio were specific predictors for metastases of renal cell carcinoma, especially to the lung or lymph node.[10] Therefore, MMP and E-cadherin are considered relevant targets for novel therapeutic strategies to control or prevent the metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. These results support exploring the role of angiogenetic regulators in head and neck cancer.

Expression levels of molecules involved in tissue remodeling and cell–extra cellular matrix (ECM) adhesion, especially MMP-1 and integrin-3 , can provide an accurate biomarker system for predicting the risk of cervical lymph node metastasis in oral SCC.[11] Low expression of E-cadherin should be considered a high risk for late cervical metastasis when a wait-and-see policy for the neck is adopted.[12]

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis in many different tumor types. VEGF is a highly potent angiogenic agent that acts to increase vessel permeability and enhance endothelial cell growth, proliferation, migration, and differentiation.[13] VEGF levels may affect tumor growth, metastatic potential, and response to radiotherapy. VEGF positivity was the most significant predictor of poor prognosis. VEGF status may prove to be an important prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. In addition, the potent role of VEGF in angiogenesis has spurred interest in using this molecule as a therapeutic target in antiangiogenetic therapy.

Previous
Next

Presentation

History

Most of the probable primary carcinomas can be elicited in the history taking. Probable primary carcinoma sites and symptoms are as follows:

  • Oral - Bleeding or painful ulcer in the mouth
  • Nasopharynx - Nasal fullness, epistaxis, change in voice resonance, sinusitis
  • Maxillary - Patch of anesthesia over cheek, toothache, epistaxis, sinusitis, change in the visual field
  • Larynx, hypopharynx - Change in voice, cough, dysphagia, referred otalgia, hemoptysis, airway obstruction
  • Tongue, base of tongue - Painful lesion, oral bleeding, odynophagia, ankyloglossia
  • Esophageal - Dysphagia, weight loss, hoarseness, regurgitation
  • Stomach - Dyspepsia, vomiting, epigastric pain
  • Pancreatic head - Jaundice, epigastric pain, white stools
  • Testicular - Painless testicular enlargement
  • Lung - Cough, hemoptysis
  • Breast - Breast lump
  • Thyroid - Neck swelling

Review of the medical history should include allergies to medications, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary disease, other chronic illnesses, previous surgeries, and radiation therapy. Reviewing the use of tobacco products (smoked and chewed), consumption of alcohol, and use of betel nuts is also important.

Physical examination

Clinical staging of cervical metastasis is accurate in 65% of cases. It understages in 28% and overstages in 8% of cases. Short neck, obesity, and prior radiotherapy reduce the physician's ability to detect metastasis.

Clinical examination of the neck mass is the most sensitive parameter for assessing the operability of a neck node metastasis. The physical examination includes assessment and documentation of site and size of node, contralaterality and bilaterality, mobility, and skin involvement. In addition, examine the oral cavity and mucous membranes of the pharynx. Careful examination of the thyroid gland is essential to assess the presence of a primary carcinoma. Perform an indirect laryngoscopic examination of the larynx and the hypopharynx. If a lesion is noted in the aerodigestive tract, an evaluation under anesthesia further documents the location and size of the lesion, and it allows for a biopsy.

  • Periabdominal examination should be performed to look for primary carcinomas in the abdomen.
  • Perirectal/perivaginal examination should be performed in persons in whom primary carcinoma is suspected in the gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary tract.
  • Perform a breast examination in selected individuals.
  • Auscultate the chest to detect a possible pulmonary primary carcinoma.
  • Perform a testicular examination.
Previous
Next

Indications

Radical neck dissection

Indications for a radical neck dissection (RND) are N2 or N3 cervical adenopathy with or without bulky disease in the upper jugular region, presence of multiple lymph nodes, and residual or recurrent disease after radiation therapy.

Modified radical neck dissection

Modified RND indications are N0 neck (especially if the primary tumor is in the larynx or hypopharynx) in SCCA or melanoma, N1 neck disease, and papillary and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid.

Selective neck dissection

SND indications include the following:

  • Lateral neck dissection is indicated in a tumor of the larynx, oropharynx, and/or hypopharynx staged T2-4, N0-1, and/or T1 N1 node within level I-II.
  • Supraomohyoid neck dissection is indicated in SCCA of the oral cavity staged T2-4, N0/Tx N1 within level I-II.
  • Bilateral procedure is indicated in anterior tongue and base of tongue cancers as well as T3-T4 carcinomas of the supraglottis.
  • Posterolateral neck dissection is indicated in melanoma, SCCA, or another skin tumor with metastatic potential from the occipital scalp.
  • Anterior neck dissection is indicated for thyroid, subglottic larynx, trachea, and cervical esophagus cancers.
  • Mediastinal dissection is indicated in thyroid cancers, stomal recurrence, and postcricoid and esophageal invasion.
Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Lymph nodes of the head are located in the occipital, posterior auricular (postauricular), anterior auricular (preauricular), parotid, facial, deep facial, and lingual regions.

Lymph nodes of the neck are located in the superficial cervical, anterior cervical, submental, submaxillary, deep cervical, retropharyngeal, jugular, superior, inferior, spinal accessory, and transverse cervical node regions.

The skin of the neck derives its blood supply from the descending branches of the facial occipital arteries and from ascending branches of the transverse cervical and suprascapular arteries; therefore, the incisions most likely to safeguard the blood supply to the skin flaps are superiorly based apronlike incisions.

The following division of the neck nodes into regions as described at Memorial Sloan-Kettering is accepted universally (see the image below):

Levels of neck nodes. Levels of neck nodes.
  • Level 1 contains the submental and submandibular nodes.
  • Level 2 is the upper third of the jugular nodes medial to the SCM, and the inferior boundary is the plane of the hyoid bone (clinical) or the bifurcation of the carotid artery (surgical).
  • Level 3 describes the middle jugular nodes and is bounded inferiorly by the plane of the cricoid cartilage (clinical) or the omohyoid (surgical).
  • Level 4 is defined superiorly by the omohyoid muscle and inferiorly by the clavicle.
  • Level 5 contains the posterior cervical triangle nodes.
  • Level 6 includes the paratracheal and pretracheal nodes.

The platysma is a wide quadrangular sheetlike muscle extending obliquely from the upper chest to the lower face. The skin flap is raised in a plane deep to the platysma. If the disease involves the platysma or is close to it, the platysma may be left attached to the specimen and the skin flap raised superficial to it.

The SAN exits the jugular foramen (medial to the digastric and styloid muscles) and lies lateral and immediately posterior to the IJV. The nerve can also be medial to the IJV in 30% of the cases. It runs obliquely inferiorly and posteriorly to reach the SCM near the junction of its upper and middle thirds or within 1 cm of the Erb point (where the greater auricular nerve curves around the posterior border of the SCM).

The digastric muscle originates from the digastric ridge in the mastoid process. The marginal mandibular nerve (a branch of the facial nerve) is the only structure superficial to the posterior belly of the digastric muscle that must be identified and preserved. It lies superficial to the 11th nerve, IJV, ICA, hypoglossal nerve, and the branches of the external carotid artery (ECA). When raising the upper skin flap or while incising the deep cervical fascia, care must be taken to identify the marginal mandibular nerve. It is located 1 cm in front of or below the angle of the mandible, deep to the superficial layer of the deep cervical fascia that envelops the submandibular gland.

The omohyoid muscle has 2 bellies and is the anatomic landmark separating levels III and IV. The posterior belly lies superficial to the brachial plexus, phrenic nerve, and transverse cervical artery and vein. The anterior belly lies immediately superficial to the IJV.

The posterior boundary of neck dissection is the anterior border of the trapezius muscle. The levator scapula is commonly mistaken for the trapezius, placing the 11th nerve and the nerve to the levator at risk. Dissection must be kept superficial to the fascia of the levator muscle to preserve the cervical nerves.

The brachial plexus exits between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. It extends inferiorly deep to the clavicle, under the posterior belly of the omohyoid muscle. The transverse cervical artery and vein lie superficial to it.

The phrenic nerve lies superficial to the anterior scalene muscle and derives its cervical supply from C3-5. Cervical rootlets must be transected only anteriorly to their contribution to the phrenic nerve.

The thoracic duct is located in the lowermost part of the left neck and arises immediately posterior to the lower end of the jugular vein and anterior to the phrenic nerve and transverse cervical artery. Care must be taken to handle it gently during ligation to avoid avulsion or tearing of walls.

The hypoglossal nerve exits via the hypoglossal canal, passes over the ICA and ECA, under the IJV, and loops deep to the posterior belly of digastric, where it is enveloped by a ranine venous plexus. It then travels under the fascia of the submandibular triangle before entering the tongue.

The neck is divided into the anterior and the posterior triangle, each of which is divided into smaller triangles. The anterior triangle is divided into the submental triangle, submandibular triangle, superior carotid triangle, and inferior carotid triangle. The posterior triangle is subdivided into the occipital triangle and subclavian triangle.

Classification of lymph nodes

The submental node is located in the submental triangle and receives afferent flow from superficial lymphatics from the cheek, lower lip, and chin.

The submandibular node is located between the anterior and posterior bellies of digastric muscle and receives afferent flow from the lower lip, sublingual area, ipsilateral oral cavity, eyelid, cheek, and nasal mucosa.

The facial node is located superficial to the facial muscle and along the facial vein and receives afferent flow from facial skin, palate, and buccal mucosa.

The parotid node is located in the intraglandular or extraglandular part of the parotid, and it receives afferent flow from the scalp, auricle, external auditory canal (EAC), eardrum, and the eustachian tube (E-tube).

The retropharyngeal node is located posterior to the pharyngeal wall, between the prevertebral fascia and the pharyngeal wall, and it receives afferent flow from the posterior nasal cavity, palate, nasopharynx, and eustachian tube.

The anterior cervical node is located in the superficial anterior jugular chain, and pretracheal, prelaryngeal, and paratracheal regions, and it receives afferent flow from the larynx, upper trachea, and esophagus.

The spinal accessory node is located along the SAN and receives afferent flow from the occipital, mastoid, and maxillary sinus.

The supraclavicular node is located at the jugulosubclavian junction and receives afferent flow from the spinal accessory, lower neck, upper chest, lung, and GI tract.

The internal jugular node is located along the internal jugular chain and receives afferent flow from the superior nodal group, mucosal site in the head and neck, and thoracic and axillary nodes.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

General contraindications to surgery include too great a surgical risk because of cardiopulmonary disease and cases in which the patient cannot be optimized preoperatively.

RND contraindications include the inability to control the primary tumor or distant metastasis, a fixed neck mass through the deep cervical fascia, a mass in the supraclavicular triangle, and the inability of the surgeon to completely remove all gross disease from the neck, including the skull base, vertebral fascia, carotid artery, deep muscle, phrenic nerve, and brachial plexus.

Contraindications for SND are N2 and N3 disease, recurrence or previous treatment with radiation therapy, involvement of spinal accessory chain, and melanoma of clinically positive nodes.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Pankaj Chaturvedi, MBBS, MS  Associate Professor, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, India

Pankaj Chaturvedi, MBBS, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Head and Neck Society, Association of Surgeons of India, and Indian Academy of Tropical Parasitology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Uma Chaturvedi, MD, MBBS, DPB  Lecturer, Department of Pathology, KJ Somaiya Hospital and Research Center, India

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Thabet Abbarah, MD, FACS  Consulting Staff, Department of Otolaryngology, North Oakland Medical Centers

Thabet Abbarah, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nafisa K Kuwajerwala, MD  Staff Surgeon, Breast Care Center, William Beaumont Hospital

Nafisa K Kuwajerwala, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Breast Disease, and American Society of Breast Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vishal U S Rao, MBBS, MS  Assistant Professor, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology; Consultant Oncologist-Head and Neck Surgeon, Fortis-Wockhardt Hospital and Apollo Hospital, India

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Benoit J Gosselin, MD, FRCSC  Associate Professor of Surgery, Dartmouth Medical School; Director, Comprehensive Head and Neck Oncology Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center; Staff Otolaryngologist, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Benoit J Gosselin, MD, FRCSC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, New Hampshire Medical Society, North American Skull Base Society, and Ontario Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Nader Sadeghi, MD, FRCS(C)  Professor of Surgery, Director of Head and Neck Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

Nader Sadeghi, MD, FRCS(C) is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society, Federation of Medical Specialists in Quebec, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation unstricted gift unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Honoraria Consulting; GYRUS ACMI Honoraria Consulting

References
  1. Bocca E, Pignataro O, Sasaki CT. Functional neck dissection. A description of operative technique. Arch Otolaryngol. Sep 1980;106(9):524-7. [Medline].

  2. Bocca E, Pignataro O. A conservation technique in radical neck dissection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Dec 1967;76(5):975-87. [Medline].

  3. Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, et al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the Academy's Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1991;117(6):601-5. [Medline].

  4. Carenfelt C, Eliasson K. Occurrence, duration and prognosis of unexpected accessory nerve paresis in radical neck dissection. Acta Otolaryngol. Nov-Dec 1980;90(5-6):470-3. [Medline].

  5. Carenfelt C, Eliasson K. Cervical metastases following radical neck dissection that preserved the spinal accessory nerve. Head Neck Surg. Jan-Feb 1980;2(3):181-4. [Medline].

  6. Kowalski LP, Magrin J, Waksman G, et al. Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of head and neck tumors. Survival results in 212 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 1993;119(9):958-63. [Medline].

  7. Byers RM, Wolf PF, Ballantyne AJ. Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg. Jan-Feb 1988;10(3):160-7. [Medline].

  8. Sobol S, Jensen C, Sawyer W 2nd, et al. Objective comparison of physical dysfunction after neck dissection. Am J Surg. Oct 1985;150(4):503-9. [Medline].

  9. Rassekh CH, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Accuracy of intraoperative staging of the NO neck in squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. Dec 1995;105(12 Pt 1):1334-6. [Medline].

  10. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS. Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 1994;120(7):699-702. [Medline].

  11. Paleri V. Sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oral pharynx: A diagnostic Meta-analysis. Head Neck [serial online]. 27:739– 747. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.20228/full.

  12. Mozzillo N, Chiesa F, Caracò C, Botti G, Lastoria S, Longo F, et al. Therapeutic implications of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the staging of oral cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. Mar 2004;11(3 Suppl):263S-6S. [Medline].

  13. Ross G.L.,Soutar D.S. Sentinel Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Trial'. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 11(7):690–696. [Medline].

  14. Medina JE, Byers RM. Supraomohyoid neck dissection: rationale, indications, and surgical technique. Head Neck. Mar-Apr 1989;11(2):111-22. [Medline].

  15. Shah JP, Candela FC, Poddar AK. The patterns of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer. Jul 1 1990;66(1):109-13. [Medline].

  16. Brizel DM, Prosnitz RG, Hunter S, Fisher SR, Clough RL, Downey MA. Necessity for adjuvant neck dissection in setting of concurrent chemoradiation for advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Apr 1 2004;58(5):1418-23. [Medline].

  17. Brizel DM, Prosnitz RG, Hunter S, et al. Necessity for adjuvant neck dissection in setting of concurrent chemoradiation for advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Apr 1 2004;58(5):1418-23. [Medline].

  18. Connell CA, Corry J, Milner AD, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. Nov 2007;29(11):986-95. [Medline].

  19. Wee JT, Anderson BO, Corry J, D'Cruz A, Soo KC, Qian CN. Management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancers in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009. Lancet Oncol. Nov 2009;10(11):1086-92. [Medline].

  20. van der Putten L, van den Broek GB, de Bree R, et al. Effectiveness of salvage selective and modified radical neck dissection for regional pathologic lymphadenopathy after chemoradiation. Head Neck. May 2009;31(5):593-603. [Medline].

  21. Rao VU, Shenoy AM. Adjuvant neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. Mar 2010;11(3):223-4. [Medline].

  22. Andersen PE, Shah JP, Cambronero E, Spiro RH. The role of comprehensive neck dissection with preservation of the spinal accessory nerve in the clinically positive neck. Am J Surg. Nov 1994;168(5):499-502. [Medline].

  23. Bailey BJ. Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md:. Lippincott-Raven;1998.

  24. Clayman GL, Johnson CJ 2nd, Morrison W, et al. The role of neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer with advanced nodal disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 2001;127(2):135-9. [Medline].

  25. Don DM, Anzai Y, Lufkin RB, et al. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. Jul 1995;105(7 Pt 1):669-74. [Medline].

  26. Hart RD, Nasser JG, Trites JR, Taylor SM, Bullock M, Barnes D. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 2005;131(1):34-8. [Medline].

  27. Henick DH, Silver CE, Heller KS, et al. Supraomohyoid neck dissection as a staging procedure for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Head Neck. Mar-Apr 1995;17(2):119-23. [Medline].

  28. Houck JR, Medina JE. Management of cervical lymph nodes in squamous carcinomas of the head and neck. Semin Surg Oncol. May-Jun 1995;11(3):228-39. [Medline].

  29. Johnson JT. Carcinoma of the larynx: selective approach to the management of cervical lymphatics. Ear Nose Throat J. May 1994;73(5):303-5. [Medline].

  30. Kligerman J, Lima RA, Soares JR, et al. Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of T1/T2 squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity. Am J Surg. Nov 1994;168(5):391-4. [Medline].

  31. Lindberg R. Distribution of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer. Jun 1972;29(6):1446-9. [Medline].

  32. McGuirt WF Jr, Johnson JT, Myers EN, et al. Floor of mouth carcinoma. The management of the clinically negative neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1995;121(3):278-82. [Medline].

  33. Medina JE. A rational classification of neck dissections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1989;100(3):169-76. [Medline].

  34. Mendenhall WM, Million RR, Cassisi NJ. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiation therapy: the role of neck dissection for clinically positive neck nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. May 1986;12(5):733-40. [Medline].

  35. Meyers EN. Operative Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa:. WB Saunders Co;1997.

  36. Nieuwenhuis EJ, van der Waal I, Leemans CR, et al. Histopathologic validation of the sentinel node concept in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. Feb 2005;27(2):150-8. [Medline].

  37. Ramadan HH, Allen GC. The influence of elective neck dissection on neck relapse in NO supraglottic carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol. Jul-Aug 1993;14(4):278-81. [Medline].

  38. Roy PH, Beahrs OH. Spinal accessory nerve in radical neck dissections. Am J Surg. Nov 1969;118(5):800-4. [Medline].

  39. Schwartz DL, Ford E, Rajendran J, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for preradiotherapy staging of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jan 1 2005;61(1):129-36. [Medline].

  40. Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg. Oct 1990;160(4):405-9. [Medline].

  41. Shah JP, Andersen PE. The impact of patterns of nodal metastasis on modifications of neck dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. Nov 1994;1(6):521-32. [Medline].

  42. Spiro RH, Gallo O, Shah JP. Selective jugular node dissection in patients with squamous carcinoma of the larynx or pharynx. Am J Surg. Oct 1993;166(4):399-402. [Medline].

  43. Spiro RH, Strong EW, Shah JP. Classification of neck dissection: variations on a new theme. Am J Surg. Nov 1994;168(5):415-8. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Anatomy following a Type III modified neck dissection.
Levels of neck nodes.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.