Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection Workup

  • Author: Antonio Riera March, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: Mar 2, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

  • CBC count and differential
  • Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and international normalized ratio (INR) measurements: These studies are especially important in patients with preexisting bleeding diathesis, with hepatitis, or who are taking anticoagulants. Prolonged study results may need to be reversed preoperatively.
  • Platelet count
  • Electrolyte tests
  • Liver enzyme profile
  • Glucose test
  • BUN and creatinine tests
  • Blood type and screen: Because of refinements in the surgical techniques, blood loss has been significantly reduced in these procedures. In situations in which blood loss is expected to be significant, either typing and screening or typing and cross-matching are necessary.
  • Urinalysis
Next

Imaging Studies

  • An esophagogram can be helpful in evaluating an occult primary tumor.
  • Perform CT scan and MRI accordingly if they would help to define node status and treatment planning further.
    • CT scanning with contrast can depict excellent anatomic details.
    • In general, CT scan is the radiologic technique most commonly used to stage the primary lesion; therefore, also include the neck in the examination.
    • Criteria for assessing nodal metastases with CT are (1) increased size (>1.5-cm diameter), (2) poorly defined irregular borders or a rounder shape, (3) presence of central necrosis, (4) nodal grouping, and (5) central hypolucency.
    • The most accurate CT scan criterion for the presence of metastatic adenopathy is central necrosis. The node periphery is usually thick and enhances with contrast. CT scanning also reveals extracapsular spread by enhancement of the nodal capsule.
    • Some radiologists feel that CT scanning demonstrates paratracheal node involvement better than MRI.
    • MRI reveals tumor necrosis and extracapsular spread with less precision than CT scan, but MRI is better for assessing enlarged LNs that are not necessarily metastatic.
    • MRI may also be used in patients who are allergic to iodinated contrast.
    • According to some radiologists, MRI also appears to reveal retropharyngeal node involvement better than CT scan.
  • Some institutions use ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology to determine cervical neck metastasis. Ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology has a specificity of nearly 100%.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) has recently emerged as an adjunct in the diagnosis of LN metastasis.
    • In recent studies, PET has shown positive findings for lymph node metastasis when CT scan and MRI findings were negative. An FDG-PET scan provides physiologic and biochemical data. Glucose metabolism in neoplastic cells produces increased uptake on FDG-PET scanning, which correlates strongly with viable tumor cells. Therefore, FDG-PET may be helpful in the assessment of neck metastasis and even distant metastasis.
    • Additionally, PET scanning has shown the ability to differentiate active tumors from chronic fibrotic changes. Therefore, PET may become more useful than CT scan and MRI in the detection of recurrent head and neck cancer. Furthermore, the dual use of the PET and CT scanners produces fused PET and CT scan images, which can further enhance the results of the PET scan. The definitive role of PET and PET/CT scans is evolving and showing great potential in the assessment of metastatic neck disease, the early diagnosis of recurrent head and neck cancer, and the status of the neck after chemoradiotherapy.
  • Perform chest radiography to exclude metastatic disease.
Previous
Next

Other Tests

  • A complete physical examination is mandatory and includes evaluation of neurologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory status.
    • Palpate the patient's neck to define size, location, mobility, and degree of softness or hardness of any mass.
    • Evaluate the patient's weight and nutritional status.
  • Perform ECG as indicated.
  • Perform other evaluations, with further medical consultations and recommendations, as indicated.
Previous
Next

Diagnostic Procedures

  • Supplement the examination with mirror laryngoscopy, flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy, or both.
  • When the primary tumor is known, perform a panendoscopy to exclude a second primary tumor. Performing biopsy of the primary lesion is necessary. When the primary tumor is not known, perform panendoscopy to look for the primary tumor. Obtain random biopsy samples of the pyriform sinus, base of tongue, tonsillar area, and nasopharynx to exclude occult malignancies.
  • When the patient has a neck mass, a fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for pathology evaluation is indicated.
  • Open biopsy of the neck is indicated only when results of previous physical examination measures (eg, FNAB, random biopsies, endoscopy) are inconclusive.
  • Frozen section can be used intraoperatively to assess neck metastasis of suggestive nodes.
Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Biopsies of the primary site reveal the etiology of the initial mass and the characteristics of the tumor involved (eg, SCC of the upper aerodigestive tract, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, thyroid carcinomas, head and neck skin cancer). FNAB findings of the neck metastasis confirms the pathology findings of the primary tumor. FNAB findings also help determine the etiology of the cervical adenopathy when the patient has a neck metastasis from an occult primary tumor. Frozen section can be used intraoperatively for suggestive nodes to confirm cervical metastasis.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Antonio Riera March, MD, FACS  Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine

Antonio Riera March, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, and Society for Ear, Nose and Throat Advances in Children

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Juan Trinidad Pinedo, MD, FACS  Ad-Honorem Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Puerto Rico Medical School

Juan Trinidad Pinedo, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, and Puerto Rico Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Benoit J Gosselin, MD, FRCSC  Associate Professor of Surgery, Dartmouth Medical School; Director, Comprehensive Head and Neck Oncology Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center; Staff Otolaryngologist, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Benoit J Gosselin, MD, FRCSC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, New Hampshire Medical Society, North American Skull Base Society, and Ontario Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Karen H Calhoun, MD, FACS, FAAOA  Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Karen H Calhoun, MD, FACS, FAAOA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Head and Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, Southern Medical Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Private Practice in Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Consulting; Headwatersmb Consulting fee Consulting; Venturequest Royalty Consulting

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference wish to acknowledge Joan Flaherty, RN, for her editorial assistance and Gustavo Díaz, MD, for taking the digital surgical photos.

References
  1. Suarez O. El problema de las metastasis linfaticas y alejadas del cancer de laringe e hipofaringe. Rev. Otorrinolaringol. 1963;23:83-99.

  2. Bocca E, Pignataro O. A conservation technique in radical neck dissection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Dec 1967;76(5):975-87. [Medline].

  3. Robbins KT. Pocket Guide to Neck Dissection Classification and TNM Staging of Head and Neck Cancer. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc.;1991:7-9.

  4. Robbins KT. Pocket Guide to Neck Dissection and Classification and TNM Staging of Head and Neck Cancer, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. 2001;8-38.

  5. Ferlito A, Silver CE, Rinaldo A. Elective management of the neck in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: current concepts supported by prospective studies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Jan 2009;47(1):5-9. [Medline].

  6. Kos M, Engelke W. Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. Jan 2007;35(1):10-14. [Medline].

  7. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Bavazzano M, Crippa B, Mora F, Mora R. New trends in head and neck surgery: a prospective evaluation of the Harmonic Scalpel. Med Sci Monit. 2008/05;14 (5):PI1-5. [Medline].

  8. Adams S, Baum RP, Stuckensen T, Bitter K, Hör G. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. Sep 1998;25(9):1255-60. [Medline].

  9. Andersen PE, Warren F, Spiro J, Burningham A, Wong R, Wax MK. Results of selective neck dissection in management of the node-positive neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 2002;128(10):1180-4. [Medline].

  10. Argiris A, Eng C. Epidemiology, staging, and screening of head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2003;114:15-60. [Medline].

  11. Aygun Nafi, Oliverio PJ, Zinreich S J. Overview of Diagnostic Imaging of the Head and Neck, chapter 2 in Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Volume One. Fourth Edition. Elsevier Mosby; 2005:25-92.

  12. Bier-Laning CM. Surgical Complications of the Neck, chapter 117 in Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Fourth Edition, Volume Three. 2005;Elsevier Mosby:2646-2657.

  13. Byers RM, Weber RS, Andrews T, McGill D, Kare R, Wolf P. Frequency and therapeutic implications of "skip metastases" in the neck from squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue. Head Neck. Jan 1997;19(1):14-9. [Medline].

  14. Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP. Patterns of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck. May-Jun 1990;12(3):197-203. [Medline].

  15. Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille M, Jerin J. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med. Nov 2000;25(11):905-10. [Medline].

  16. Crean SJ, Hoffman A, Potts J, Fardy MJ. Reduction of occult metastatic disease by extension of the supraomohyoid neck dissection to include level IV. Head Neck. Sep 2003;25(9):758-62. [Medline].

  17. Farber LA, Benard F, Machtay M, Smith RJ, Weber RS, Weinstein GS. Detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after radiation therapy with 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Laryngoscope. Jun 1999;109(6):970-5. [Medline].

  18. Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Robbins KT, Silver CE. Neck dissection: past, present and future?. J Laryngol Otol. Feb 2006;120(2):87-92. [Medline].

  19. Gavilan C, Gavilan J, Monux. Vaciamiento glanglionar cervical funcional, capitulo XXIV. Gil Carcedo LM, ed. El Abordaje en el Tratamiento Quirúrgico de los Tumores de Cabeza y Cuello. 1992;361-372.

  20. Gavilan J, Gavilan C, Herranz J. Functional neck dissection: three decades of controversy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Apr 1992;101(4):339-41. [Medline].

  21. Gavilan J, Herranz J, DeSanto L W, Gavilan C. Functional and Selective Neck Dissection, Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2002;1-143.

  22. Hanasono MM, Kunda LD, Segall GM, Ku GH, Terris DJ. Uses and limitations of FDG positron emission tomography in patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. Jun 1999;109(6):880-5. [Medline].

  23. Johnson J. Cervical metastases. In: Gludkman, Gullane, Johnson, eds. Practical Approach to Head and Neck Tumors. Raven Book; 1994:chap 4.

  24. Khafif A, Lopez-Garza JR, Medina JE. Is dissection of level IV necessary in patients with T1-T3 N0 tongue cancer?. Laryngoscope. Jun 2001;111(6):1088-90. [Medline].

  25. Kowalski LP, Carvalho AL. Feasibility of supraomohyoid neck dissection in N1 and N2a oral cancer patients. Head Neck. Oct 2002;24(10):921-4. [Medline].

  26. Lonneux M, Lawson G, Ide C, Bausart R, Remacle M, Pauwels S. Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient. Laryngoscope. Sep 2000;110(9):1493-7. [Medline].

  27. Lowe VJ, Boyd JH, Dunphy FR, Kim H, Dunleavy T, Collins BT. Surveillance for recurrent head and neck cancer using positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. Feb 2000;18(3):651-8. [Medline].

  28. Lowe VJ, Stack Jr BC, Watson Jr RE. Head and Neck Cancer Imaging, chapter 3 in Head and Neck Cancer, Emerging Perspectives (Ensley J. F, Gutkind J.S., Jacobs J. R., Lippman S. M., editors). 2003;23-33.

  29. Medina J E. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck, chapter 22 in Head and Neck Cancer, Emerging Perspectives (Ensley J. F, Gutkind J.S., Jacobs J. R., Lippman S. M., editors). 2003;317-327.

  30. Medina J E, Houck Jr JR, O'Malley B B. Management of Cervical Lymph Nodes in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, chapter 16, Head and Neck Cancer, A Multidisciplinary Approach (Harrison L. B., Sessions R. B., Hong W. K., editors). 1999;353-377.

  31. Medina JE. A rational classification of neck dissections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1989;100(3):169-76. [Medline].

  32. Medina JE. Neck Dissection, chapter 113, in Head & Neck Surgery-Otolryngology, (Bailey B.J. & Johnson J. T.,editors),. Volume Two. Fourth Edition. Lippincoott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1585-1609.

  33. Medina JE. Selective Neck Dissection [videotape]. Continuing Education with Television (CETV). 1987.

  34. Medina JE, Byers RM. Supraomohyoid neck dissection: rationale, indications, and surgical technique. Head Neck. Mar-Apr 1989;11(2):111-22. [Medline].

  35. Medina JE, Lore Jr J M. The Neck, chapter 16 in An Atlas of Head and Neck Surgery, (Lore & Medina, editor), Fourth Edition. Elsevier Saunders, 2005;780-817.

  36. Medina JE, Weisman RA. The Otolaryngology Clinics of North America. Vol 1. August 1998:585-686.

  37. Myers EN. Chapter 78, Neck Dissection. In: Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Vol 1. 2nd Edition. Elsevier; 2008:679-708.

  38. Myers LL, Wax MK, Nabi H, Simpson GT, Lamonica D. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of the N0 neck. Laryngoscope. Feb 1998;108(2):232-6. [Medline].

  39. Rassekh CH, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Accuracy of intraoperative staging of the NO neck in squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. Dec 1995;105(12 Pt 1):1334-6. [Medline].

  40. Robbins K T. Neck Dissection, chapter 116 in Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Volume Three. Fourth Edition. Elsevier Mosby,; 2005:2614-2645.

  41. Robbins KT. Neck Dissection. In: Cummings, Fredrickson, Harker, Krause, Richardson, Schuller. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery. Vol 3. 3rd ed. Mosby Book; 1998:1787-1810.

  42. Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg. Oct 1990;160(4):405-9. [Medline].

  43. Shah JP, Andersen PE. The impact of patterns of nodal metastasis on modifications of neck dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. Nov 1994;1(6):521-32. [Medline].

  44. Shockley WW, Pillsbury III HC. The Neck: Diagnosis and Surgery. Mosby Book; 1994:413-429.

  45. Stokkel MP, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ, van Rijk PP. The detection of local recurrent head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. Jul 1999;26(7):767-73. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Bilateral inverted hockey stick incision. This skin incision is ideal for a wide exposure of all levels of nodes in both sides of the neck. The skin incision is made through the platysma, and the flap is elevated in the subplatysmal plane, leaving the external jugular vein (EJV) and the greater auricular nerve on the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle. Elevation posterior to the SCM muscle is unnecessary. The subplatysmal flap is elevated to the level of the body of the mandible. The marginal mandibular nerve is identified (circle).
The submental fatty tissue, submandibular nodes, and submandibular gland are dissected and displaced inferiorly. The mylohyoid muscle is retracted and elevated anteriorly. The anterior belly of the digastric muscle is exposed.
The fascia over the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, along with the ligated external jugular vein (EJV), is grasped and peeled from the muscle. The accessory nerve is localized in the upper portion of the SCM muscle during the peeling maneuver.
View of the upper portion of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle and the accessory nerve during dissection.
A close view of the relationship between the accessory nerve and the upper portion of the internal jugular vein (IJV). In one third of patients, the accessory nerve passes medial to the IJV.
The carotid sheath and vagus are identified. The node-containing tissue is peeled over the carotid axis in an inferior-to-superior direction. Rolling over the fascia of the internal jugular vein (IJV) is best performed using a sharp knife with a No. 10 surgical blade. Traction and countertraction are crucial.
The final aspect of the surgical wound after removal of the operative specimen.
Surgical technique modification. The level I dissection is completed first and displaced inferiorly. The carotid triangle is then dissected. The ranine veins are carefully ligated. The superior thyroid artery and the superior laryngeal nerve are preserved. The exposure and identification of the carotid-internal jugular axis help in understanding the depth perception in the different planes (arrow 1). The dissection then proceeds as described previously from lateral to medial (arrow 2).
Surgical technique modification. Exposure and identification of the carotid-internal jugular axis has been accomplished. Finally, the dissection proceeds in the usual fashion, from lateral to medial, until the entire specimen is removed.
Table 1. Surgical Steps in Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection
Procedure StepSurgical Steps and Pearls
Supraomohyoid neck dissection/definitionIt is also called anterolateral neck dissection.



It consists of removal of cervical lymphatic nodes contained in neck levels I, II and III.



It is generally used as a selective neck dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, T1-T4 and N0, if the primary lesion is not to be treated with radiation therapy. In this manner, the supraomohyoid neck dissection is both diagnostic and therapeutic.



In the N+ neck, standardization is lacking; see text for a detailed description of indications and contraindications.



Incision designTry not to use trifurcation incisions.



The recommended incisions for unilateral neck dissection are the modified apron incision or the inverted hockey stick incision.



The recommended incisions for bilateral neck dissection are the apron incision or the bilateral inverted hockey stick incision.



Skin incision and skin and subplatysmal flap elevationElevate the skin and subplatysmal flap to the level of the body of the mandible.



Expose the anatomy of the submandibular, submental, and carotid triangles.



Leave the external jugular vein and the greater auricular nerve on the SCM muscle.



Elevation posterior to the SCM muscles is unnecessary.



level I dissectionIdentify the mandibular nerve and elevate it, along with the surrounding tissue, in its own plane.



Remove the submental fatty tissue and identify the anterior belly of the digastric muscle.



Follow the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and identify the mylohyoid muscle.



Retract anteriorly the mylohyoid and expose the submandibular ganglion, lingual nerve, and submandibular duct. Divide and ligate the submandibular duct.



Clamp, divide, and ligate the facial artery.



Remove the submandibular gland and the submandibular lymph nodes.



Identify the hypoglossal nerve deep into the fascia of the submandibular triangle.



Identify and expose completely the posterior belly of the digastric muscle up to the mastoid tip.



If the facial artery is reencountered at this point, tie it and ligate it.



After completion of all of the above, dissect and displace inferiorly the submental fatty tissue, submandibular nodes, and submandibular gland.



Fascial peeling of SCMLigate the external jugular vein.



Grasp the fascia over the SCM and peel it from the muscle.



The accessory nerve is encountered in the upper portion of the SCM during the peeling maneuver. Identify the accessory nerve directly by sight or indirectly with nerve stimulation.



Dissection posterior and inferior to the SCMContinue inferiorly the dissection of fibroadipose tissue along the posterior border of the SCM muscle to the level of the omohyoid muscle.



Identify and follow the sensory branches of the cervical plexus and continue the dissection lateral to these nerves.



Follow the sensory branches of the cervical plexus from posterior to anterior in order to reach the carotid sheath.



Identify and protect the cervical plexus and the phrenic and vagus nerves.



Carotid sheath, vagus nerve, internal jugular veinIdentify the carotid sheath, the vagus nerve, and the internal jugular vein.



Unwrap the carotid sheath, freeing it of tissue containing nodes, working in an inferior to superior direction.



Identify the vagus nerve and preserve it.



Do the same with the internal jugular vein.



Identify, clamp, and ligate the branches of the internal jugular vein.



Completion and removal of specimenFollow the superior belly of the omohyoid muscle to the hyoid bone.



Divide and ligate the ranine veins.



Identify and preserve the superior thyroid artery and the hypoglossal nerve.



Complete the dissection at this point by removing the specimen.



Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.