eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Head & Neck Surgery
Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy: Follow-up
Updated: Jul 2, 2008
Outcome and Prognosis
Voice quality
In approximately 86% of cases, voice quality following near-total laryngectomy (NTL) was deemed good; voice quality was assessed as suboptimal in less than 10% of cases.
Speech and swallowing
In addition, follow-up studies ranging from 6 months to 6 years show adequate pouch speech, such that patients use it as their primary mode of communication. It can be argued that quality and ease of speech exceeds that of fistula speech, allowing patients to whistle or emote.
Speech, swallowing, and aspiration results in patients after NTL are similar to those in patients who have had tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) following total laryngectomy (TL).
Wound healing and aspiration
Major problems associated with NTL include wound healing issues, degree of aspiration, and need for revision shunt surgery. Indeed, if aspiration is severe, reversing the shunt may be necessary.
Recurrence
With NTL, most recurrences occur during the first 2 years of observation. Local recurrence was noted in an average of 7% of patients. Neck recurrence was noted in approximately 11% of patients as well. Distant metastasis has been noted on average in 19% of patients, based on a meta-analysis by Suits et al.5
Future and Controversies
Over the years attempts have been made at creating tracheo-esophageal shunts, or neoglottis to allow phonation after resection of laryngeal cancer. The near-total laryngectomy (NTL) has been shown to be a sound oncologic surgery and can have many advantages over more aggressive techniques. For example, NTL removes the tumor with clear margins and provides the patient with a lung-powered voice without the need for prosthesis. As such, NTL does not exclude the possibility of using other approaches to vocal rehabilitation, including esophageal speech, an electrolarynx, or subsequent tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP).
In addition, the voice quality of patients undergoing NTL is equal, if not at times superior, to that achieved through TEP. For voice quality, the surgical outcome appears to depend in part on the surgeon’s skill and the extent of resection and subsequent reconstruction. According to DeSanto et al, the sphincteral function and size of the shunt may also play a role in acoustic quality.6
But NTL is not without its drawbacks. With NTL, postradiation patients have an increased risk of fistula formation. If the patient has a high likelihood of developing a pharyngocutaneous fistula (because of previous irradiation, poor nutritional status, or severe atherosclerotic disease), Suits et al argue that a total laryngectomy (TL) with TEP should be strongly considered instead.5 This is because many patients who develop fistula often go on to develop irreversible aspiration.
Another tradeoff of NTL is a greater risk of protracted hospital stays resulting from both the surgery and a greater risk of aspiration. Yet, because the voice is such an important human attribute, patients are often willing to have a longer recovery if it promises the possibility of voice restoration.
Indeed, on the whole, advances in partial laryngeal surgery, notably NTL, can in certain cases provide a more satisfying outcome for the patient while ensuring that the cancer is properly treated.
Conclusion
NTL is an effective alternative to TL in carefully selected patients. Conservation laryngeal surgery aims to extirpate laryngeal malignancy, while maintaining the functional capacity to breath, swallow, and speak. In many cases, NTL allows excellent voice function and does not exclude the possibility of other vocal rehabilitation techniques. NTL is a sound oncologic procedure for tumors, which can result in a single-stage reconstruction, without the need for prosthesis.
More on Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy |
| Overview: Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy |
| Workup: Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy |
| Treatment: Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy |
Follow-up: Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy |
| References |
| « Previous Page |
References
Pressman JJ. Submucosal compartmentalization of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1956;65:766-1.
Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med. Jun 13 1991;324(24):1685-90. [Medline].
Wenig BL, Stegnjajic A, Abramson AL. Glottic reconstruction following conservation laryngeal surgery. Laryngoscope. Sep 1989;99(9):983-5. [Medline].
Maceri DR, Lampe HB, Makielski KH, Passamani PP, Krause CJ. Conservation laryngeal surgery. A critical analysis. Arch Otolaryngol. Jun 1985;111(6):361-5. [Medline].
Suits GW, Cohen JI, Everts EC. Near-total laryngectomy. Patient selection and technical considerations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 1996;122(5):473-5. [Medline].
DeSanto LW. Cancer of the supraglottic larynx: a review of 260 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 1985;93(6):705-11. [Medline].
Akbas Y, Demireller A. Oncologic and functional results of supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 2005;132(5):783-7. [Medline].
Ambrosch P, Kron M, Steiner W. Carbon dioxide laser microsurgery for early supraglottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Aug 1998;107(8):680-8. [Medline].
Andrade RP, Kowalski LP, Vieira LJ, Santos CR. Survival and functional results of Pearson's near-total laryngectomy for larynx and pyriform sinus carcinoma. Head Neck. Jan 2000;22(1):12-6. [Medline].
Brasnu D, Laccourreye H, Dulmet E, Jaubert F. Mobility of the vocal cord and arytenoid in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: an anatomical and clinical comparative study. Ear Nose Throat J. May 1990;69(5):324-30. [Medline].
Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, Flanders WD, Kepner J, Stewart A, et al. Changes in treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer 1985-2001. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2006;135(6):831-7. [Medline].
Chevalier D, Laccourreye O, Brasnu D, Laccourreye H, Piquet JJ. Cricohyoidoepiglottopexy for glottic carcinoma with fixation or impaired motion of the true vocal cord: 5-year oncologic results with 112 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. May 1997;106(5):364-9. [Medline].
DeSanto LW, Pearson BW, Olsen KD. Utility of near-total laryngectomy for supraglottic, pharyngeal, base-of-tongue, and other cancers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jan 1989;98(1 Pt 1):2-7. [Medline].
Dumich PS, Pearson BW, Weiland LH. Suitability of near-total laryngopharyngectomy in piriform carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol. Oct 1984;110(10):664-9. [Medline].
Genden EM, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Fagan JJ, Suárez C, et al. Recent changes in the treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. Jan 2008;30(1):103-10. [Medline].
Herranz-González J, Gavilán J, Martínez-Vidal J, Gavilán C. Supraglottic laryngectomy: functional and oncologic results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jan 1996;105(1):18-22. [Medline].
Iro H, Waldfahrer F, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Weidenbecher M, Sauer R, Steiner W. Transoral laser surgery of supraglottic cancer: follow-up of 141 patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 1998;124(11):1245-50. [Medline].
Jepsen MC, Gurushanthaiah D, Roy N, Smith ME, Gray SD, Davis RK. Voice, speech, and swallowing outcomes in laser-treated laryngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. Jun 2003;113(6):923-8. [Medline].
Kirchner JA, Som ML. Clinical significance of fixed vocal cord. Laryngoscope. Jul 1971;81(7):1029-44. [Medline].
Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jun 1990;99(6 Pt 1):421-6. [Medline].
Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Brasnu D, Trotoux J, Laccourreye H. Vertical partial laryngectomy: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jan 1991;100(1):68-71. [Medline].
Lee NY, O'Meara W, Chan K, Della-Bianca C, Mechalakos JG, Zhung J, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Oct 1 2007;69(2):459-68. [Medline].
Levine PA, Debo RF, Reibel JF. Pearson near-total laryngectomy: a reproducible speaking shunt. Head Neck. Jul-Aug 1994;16(4):323-5. [Medline].
Lima RA, Freitas EQ, Kligerman J, Paiva FP, Dias FL, Barbosa MM, et al. Near-total laryngectomy for treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer. Am J Surg. Nov 1997;174(5):490-1. [Medline].
Motta G, Esposito E, Testa D, Iovine R, Motta S. CO2 laser treatment of supraglottic cancer. Head Neck. May 2004;26(5):442-6. [Medline].
Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, et al. Complications and functional outcome after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1998;118(1):124-9. [Medline].
Pearson BW, Salassa JR, Hinnir ML. Transoral Laser Micro Resection of Advanced Laryngeal Tumors. In: Cummings, CW, Flint PW, et al. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005:2326-2345.
Pradhan SA, Pai PS, Neeli SI, et al. Transoral laser surgery for early glottic cancers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 2003;129(6):623-5. [Medline].
Rademaker AW, Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Bowman JB, Lazarus CL, Sisson GA, et al. Recovery of postoperative swallowing in patients undergoing partial laryngectomy. Head Neck. Jul-Aug 1993;15(4):325-34. [Medline].
Robbins KT, Michaels L. Feasibility of subtotal laryngectomy based on whole-organ examination. Arch Otolaryngol. Jun 1985;111(6):356-60. [Medline].
Steiner W, Ambrosch P. Endoscopic Laser Surgery of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract. New York, NY: Thieme, 2000.
Tufano RP. Organ preservation surgery for laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Oct 2002;35(5):1067-80. [Medline].
Tufano RP, Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O. Conservation Laryngeal Surgery. In: Cummings, CW, Flint PW, et al. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005:2346-2380.
Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O, Brasnu D, Yousem DM. The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in planning for conservation laryngeal surgery. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. May 1996;6(2):497-504. [Medline].
Yu L, Syms C 3rd, Dietz W. Laryngeal compartmentalization after radiation therapy in a canine model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 2001;125(4):385-92. [Medline].
Zhang B, Xu ZG, Tang PZ. Elective lateral neck dissection for laryngeal cancer in the clinically negative neck. J Surg Oncol. May 1 2006;93(6):464-7. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
conservation laryngeal surgery, laryngeal cancer, laryngeal organ preservation surgery, near-total laryngectomy, Pearson laryngectomy, cancer surgery, near total laryngectomy, sub-total laryngectomy, laryngectomy, NTL, laryngeal cancer, neck cancer, laryngeal carcinoma, glottic cancer, glottic carcinoma, supraglottic cancer, base of tongue cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, tongue cancer, larynx cancer, glottic tumor, laryngeal tumor, tracheoesophageal puncture, TEP
Follow-up: Conservation Laryngeal Surgery, Near-Total Laryngectomy