Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Clinical Presentation

  • Author: Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: Apr 16, 2012
 

History

  • Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) develops slowly after many years of exposure. Susceptibility varies quite widely, but 10 years or more of exposure is generally required for significant hearing loss to occur. In 1990, Dobie listed criteria for the diagnosis of occupation noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL), as follows:[11]
    • ONIHL is always a neurosensory loss.
    • ONIHL is almost always bilateral.
    • High-frequency losses rarely exceed 75 dB, and low-frequency losses rarely exceed 40 dB.
    • Hearing loss does not progress after noise exposure is discontinued.
    • As hearing loss progresses, the rate of hearing loss decreases.
    • Loss is always greater at the frequencies 3000-6000 Hz than at 500-2000 Hz. Loss is usually greatest at 4000 Hz. The 4000-Hz notch is often preserved even in advanced stages.
    • In stable exposure conditions, losses at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz usually reach a maximum level in 10-15 years.
  • When hearing loss is limited to the high frequencies, individuals are unlikely to have difficulty in quiet conversational situations. The first difficulty the patient usually notices is trouble understanding speech when a high level of ambient background noise is present. As NIHL progresses, individuals may have difficulty understanding high-pitched voices (eg, women's, children's) even in quiet conversational situations. Conversation on the telephone is generally unimpaired because telephones do not use frequencies above 3000 Hz.
  • The aforementioned symptoms are nonspecific symptoms of high-frequency neurosensory hearing loss and do not help to distinguish among etiologies. Consequently, clinical presentation is of no use in distinguishing NIHL from early ototoxicity, genetically mediated progressive losses, or presbycusis.
  • Clinically, NIHL begins with a temporary threshold shift (TTS). A TTS is defined by Dobie as a temporary neurosensory hearing loss that recovers almost completely once the noxious stimulus is removed. The amount of time over which recovery occurs is unclear and controversial. Sixteen hours has been used in the past, but some people with TTS require longer periods to recover. Dobie uses a 24-hour threshold; however, some argue that days or months may be required to recover TTS, especially if the case is associated with acoustic trauma. Nonetheless, as a practical matter, Dobie's time limit of 24 hours is commonly used.
  • The extent of a TTS is predictable on the basis of the causative noise's intensity, frequency, content, and temporal pattern of exposure (ie, intermittent or continuous). Pure-tone and narrow-band stimuli result in a maximum TTS at or slightly above the center frequency of the noise producing it. However, in occupational situations, TTSs are almost always greatest between 3000-6000 Hz and are often quite narrowly focused at 4000 Hz.
  • High-frequency noise is much more damaging than low-frequency noise; therefore, intensity alone cannot predict risk. For this reason, a special scale has been developed for measuring environmental noise when the purpose is to assess its potential to produce hearing loss.
  • Continuous stimuli are more damaging than interrupted stimuli. Intermittent noise is more protective for apical lesions induced by low frequencies than for basal lesions induced by high frequencies.
  • A clinically important feature of TTS is that it is rarely apparent to the subject because of its relatively low magnitude and relatively high frequency. Repeated TTSs over weeks, months, and years fail to recover completely and thereby become a permanent threshold shift (PTS).
  • ONIHL begins with selective loss of hearing at around 4000 Hz. Thresholds are better at both higher and lower frequencies. This is recognized on an audiogram as a notch centered around 4000 Hz and, although not pathognomonic, it is the characteristic audiometric pattern of early NIHL. If exposure is continued, the notch gradually deepens and widens. Eventually, retention of good hearing in the higher frequencies is lost, and the resulting hearing loss appears only as a relatively steep high-frequency loss beginning at 3000 Hz and becoming more severe at each higher frequency over a period of many years. Persistent noise exposure progressively encroaches on the middle frequencies. In the most severe cases, even the lower frequencies may eventually become involved.
  • Many patients experience tinnitus associated with both TTS and PTS. Individuals who reliably have ringing in their ears after noise exposure probably have experienced an injury to the auditory system in the form of at least a TTS. Because repeated TTS slowly converts to PTS, postexposure tinnitus and TTS serve as warning signs of impending permanent NIHL.
  • Evidence is strong that a significant amount of individual variability exists with respect to susceptibility to NIHL. The auditory system of some individuals seems to be able to withstand longer exposure times to higher loudness levels than the auditory system of others. Thus, norms established for hearing conservation programs, although protecting the group as whole, may not protect the most sensitive individuals. The symptoms of individuals with postexposure tinnitus or hearing loss should be taken seriously. Audiograms immediately after exposure and again 24 hours later should be attained to establish the presence or absence of TTS or PTS. From time to time, such testing may need to be repeated on several occasions.
  • The 4-kHZ notch appears to be a consequence of several factors: (1) the fact that human hearing is more sensitive at 1-5 kHz, (2) the fact that the acoustic reflex attenuates loud noises below 2 kHz (as demonstrated by Borg), and (3) nonlinear middle ear function as a result of increased intensities.
  • NIHL, especially ONIHL, is generally symmetrical. Occasionally, a work environment results in asymmetrical noise exposure, as seen in tractor drivers with ONIHL in which the left ear is more frequently affected than the right ear. As tractor operators have to monitor equipment mounted on the rear side, most operators look over their right shoulder, exposing their left ear to the noise of the prime mover and exhaust while their right ear is shielded by head shadow.
    • However, work environments, especially indoor environments, have sufficient reverberation so as to produce essentially equal stimulation of both ears.
    • The most common cause of asymmetric NIHL is exposure to firearms, particularly long guns. Right-handed shooters have a more severe hearing loss in the left ear because the left ear faces the barrel while the right ear is tucked into the shoulder and is in the acoustic shadow of the head.
Next

Physical

The physical examination is not important in the evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) except to rule out other causes. The physical examination should include evaluation of the tympanic membranes and external auditory canals. A neurologic examination should be performed to rule out neurologic diseases.

Previous
Next

Causes

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is caused by high levels of ambient noise. OSHA has determined that exposure to loudness levels lower than 85 dBA continuously for an 8-hour workday is unlikely to cause harm. However, sensitive individuals may experience hearing loss even at this or slightly lower levels.

  • Experimental data suggest that when exposure is continuous, injury is a consequence of the total amount of energy to which cochlear tissues are exposed. Thus, if sound energy is doubled, the risk of injury can be kept constant if the exposure time is cut roughly in half. Because each 3 dB of loudness increase represents a doubling of sound energy, the amount of damage expected from 8 hours of exposure to 100 dB should be about the same as the amount of damage sustained from 4 hours of exposure to 105 dB. However, this relationship applies only when exposure is constant. Even relatively brief interruptions significantly decrease the amount of damage that is to be expected.
  • Moreover, this trade-off between intensity and duration becomes meaningless once the elastic limit of inner ear tissue is exceeded. At this point, rules governing impulse noise come into play. The point at which this occurs in humans is unclear. Available data suggest that brief exposure to relatively high-intensity impulse noise produces less damage than expected from extrapolating the intensity-duration curves established for steady-state noise. For example, young healthy air force personnel exposed for 0.4 seconds to a noise of 153 dB suffered only very slight TTS, much less damage than would have been expected from data obtained from continuous-exposure studies.
  • Causative acoustic stimuli can be divided into continuous and intermittent stimuli, which are usually associated with classic NIHL. Intermittent noise is defined as loudness levels that fluctuate more than 20 dBA.
  • Acoustic trauma is an extremely loud noise usually resulting in immediate, permanent hearing loss. Such transient noise stimuli are generally less than 0.2 seconds in duration. The 2 types of transient noises are impulse noise, which is usually the result of an explosion, and impact noise, which results from a collision (usually metal on metal). Impact noises are often associated with echoes and reverberations, which produce acoustic peaks and troughs.
  • Assessing the degree of noise exposure an individual experiences can be extremely difficult. In most working environments, noise is not continuously sustained and is therefore intermittent. Moreover, many individuals are mobile and move through noise environments of different intensities for various periods during the workday. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Organization for Standards (ISO) have set detailed standards for measuring environmental noise.
  • Overall, the degree of NIHL is influenced by the following:
    • Intensity of the noise (dBA)
    • The temporal pattern of the noise (continuous, intermittent, transient)
    • The spectral pattern of the noise (frequency content)
    • The duration of exposure to the noise (time weighted average [TWA])
    • Individual susceptibility to the noise
  • Continuous exposure to 100 dBA can be expected to produce, on average, the following levels of hearing loss:
    • Five years, 5 dB
    • Twenty years, 14 dB
    • Forty years, 19 dB
  • Various nonoccupational noises can produce hearing loss. However, these exposures generally produce minor losses because the exposure times are short. These include the following:
    • Leaf blowers
    • Lawn mowers
    • Chain saws
    • Rock concerts
    • Jet noise
    • Private aircraft
    • Snowmobiles
    • Jet skis
    • Motorcycles
  • A study of impulse noise in soldiers exposed to weapon-related noise levels (1.6-16 kHz) found that, after their military service, the soldiers' hearing had significantly deteriorated (an average of 6 dB exclusively at 10 and 12 kHz). Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) reduction was registered predominantly at 2, 3, and 4 kHz, with greatest decrease at 2 kHz (P < 0.02). Reduced TEOAE levels in soldiers exposed to noise may be the first sign of potential hearing loss.
  • Although portable radios and cassette, CD, or MP3 players are capable of producing loudness levels greater than 85 dB, they are not commonly adjusted to such high levels, even by adolescents; when they are, exposure times are generally short compared with an 8-hour workday. Dobie has noted an exception to this observation. When portable cassette players are used in the workplace, exposure from the cassette player may be added to the workplace noise and increase the potential for injury.
  • Most nonoccupational NIHL is the result of firearm noise. Firearms can produce noise levels of up to 170 dB. Men who had a quiet work environment and engaged in shooting sports had, on average, hearing loss equivalent to that of individuals who had worked for 20 years in a factory with an 89-dBA noise level.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS  Professor, Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Associated Safdarjang Hospital; Professor, Delhi University and Indraprastha University, India

Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Association of Otolaryngologists of India, Cochlear Implant Group of India, Indian Medical Association, National Academy of Medical Sciences, India, Neuro-Otologic and Equlibriometric Society of India, and Royal Society of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Peter S Roland, MD  Professor, Department of Neurological Surgery, Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Director of Clinical Center for Auditory, Vestibular and Facial Nerve Disorders, Chief of Pediatric Otology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Adjunct Professor of Communicative Disorders, University of Texas School of Human Development

Peter S Roland, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Auditory Society, American Laryngological Rhinological and Otological Society, American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, North American Skull Base Society, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons

Disclosure: Alcon Labs Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Advanced Bionics Honoraria Board membership; Cochlear Corp Honoraria Board membership; Med El Corp travel grants Consulting; Foresight Consulting fee Consulting

Specialty Editor Board

S Valentine Fernandes, MBBS, MCPS, FRCSEd, FRACS, FACS, LLB  Conjoint Senior Clinical Lecturer, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Newcastle University; Senior Consultant Surgeon, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, John Hunter, Warners Bay Private Hospitals, Australia

S Valentine Fernandes, MBBS, MCPS, FRCSEd, FRACS, FACS, LLB is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Gerard J Gianoli, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine; Vice President, The Ear and Balance Institute; Chief Executive Officer, Ponchartrain Surgery Center

Gerard J Gianoli, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, and Triological Society

Disclosure: Vesticon, Inc. None Board membership

Christopher L Slack, MD  Private Practice in Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Consulting; Headwatersmb Consulting fee Consulting; Venturequest Royalty Consulting

References
  1. Melamed S, Rabinowitz S, Green MS. Noise exposure, noise annoyance, use of hearing protection devices and distress among blue-collar workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. Aug 1994;20(4):294-300. [Medline].

  2. Tornabene SV, Sato K, Pham L, Billings P, Keithley EM. Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Dec 2006;222(1-2):115-24. [Medline].

  3. Hu BH, Guo W, Wang PY, Henderson D, Jiang SC. Intense noise-induced apoptosis in hair cells of guinea pig cochleae. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2000;120(1):19-24. [Medline].

  4. Abrashkin KA, Izumikawa M, Miyazawa T, et al. The fate of outer hair cells after acoustic or ototoxic insults. Hear Res. Aug 2006;218(1-2):20-9. [Medline].

  5. Jin DX, Lin Z, Lei D, Bao J. The role of glucocorticoids for spiral ganglion neuron survival. Brain Res. Jun 24 2009;1277:3-11. [Medline].

  6. Konings A, Van Laer L, Wiktorek-Smagur A, et al. Candidate gene association study for noise-induced hearing loss in two independent noise-exposed populations. Ann Hum Genet. Mar 2009;73(2):215-24. [Medline].

  7. Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure. Hear Res. Apr 2003;178(1-2):70-8. [Medline].

  8. Mahboubi H, Zardouz S, Oliaei S, Pan D, Bazargan M, Djalilian HR. Noise-induced hearing threshold shift among US adults and implications for noise-induced hearing loss: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. Mar 3 2012;[Medline].

  9. Dobie RA. The relative contributions of occupational noise and aging in individual cases of hearing loss. Ear Hear. Feb 1992;13(1):19-27. [Medline].

  10. Dell SM, Holmes AE. The effect of a hearing conservation program on adolescents' attitudes towards noise. Noise Health. Jan-Feb 2012;14(56):39-44. [Medline].

  11. Dobie RA. A method for allocation of hearing handicap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 1990;103(5 (Pt 1)):733-9. [Medline].

  12. Fakhry N, Rostain JC, Cazals Y. Hyperbaric oxygenation with corticoid in experimental acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Aug 2007;230(1-2):88-92. [Medline].

  13. Suckfuell M, Canis M, Strieth S, Scherer H, Haisch A. Intratympanic treatment of acute acoustic trauma with a cell-permeable JNK ligand: a prospective randomized phase I/II study. Acta Otolaryngol. Sep 2007;127(9):938-42. [Medline].

  14. Parker MA, Corliss DA, Gray B, et al. Neural stem cells injected into the sound-damaged cochlea migrate throughout the cochlea and express markers of hair cells, supporting cells, and spiral ganglion cells. Hear Res. Oct 2007;232(1-2):29-43. [Medline].

  15. Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M, et al. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hear Res. May 2009;251(1-2):10-6. [Medline].

  16. Campbell KC, Meech RP, Klemens JJ, et al. Prevention of noise- and drug-induced hearing loss with D-methionine. Hear Res. Apr 2007;226(1-2):92-103. [Medline].

  17. Bielefeld EC, Kopke RD, Jackson RL, Coleman JK, Liu J, Henderson D. Noise protection with N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) using a variety of noise exposures, NAC doses, and routes of administration. Acta Otolaryngol. Sep 2007;127(9):914-9. [Medline].

  18. Hamernik RP, Qiu W, Davis B. The effectiveness of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (L-NAC) in the prevention of severe noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. May 2008;239(1-2):99-106. [Medline].

  19. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1993.

  20. Arslan E, Orzan E. Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:131-45. [Medline].

  21. Boettcher FA, Henderson D, Gratton MA, Danielson RW, Byrne CD. Synergistic interactions of noise and other ototraumatic agents. Ear Hear. Aug 1987;8(4):192-212. [Medline].

  22. Canlon B. Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning. Ear Nose Throat J. Apr 1997;76(4):248-50, 253-5. [Medline].

  23. Chen GD, Liu Y. Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss potentiation by hypoxia. Hear Res. Feb 2005;200(1-2):1-9. [Medline].

  24. Conference report. Consensus conference. Noise and hearing loss. JAMA. Jun 20 1990;263(23):3185-90. [Medline].

  25. DiBiase P, Arriaga MA. Post-traumatic hydrops. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 1997;30(6):1117-22. [Medline].

  26. Harris KC, Hu B, Hangauer D, Henderson D. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss with Src-PTK inhibitors. Hear Res. Oct 2005;208(1-2):14-25. [Medline].

  27. Hone SW, Norman G, Keogh I, Kelly V. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 2003;128(2):257-62. [Medline].

  28. Hou F, Wang S, Zhai S, Hu Y, Yang W, He L. Effects of alpha-tocopherol on noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Hear Res. May 2003;179(1-2):1-8. [Medline].

  29. Hu BH, Guo W, Wang PY, Henderson D, Jiang SC. Intense noise-induced apoptosis in hair cells of guinea pig cochleae. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2000;120(1):19-24. [Medline].

  30. Konopka W, Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Grzanka A, Zalewski P. Effects of impulse noise on transiently evoked otoacoustic emission in soldiers. Int J Audiol. Jan 2005;44(1):3-7. [Medline].

  31. Kumar A, Mathur NN, Varghese M, Mohan D, Singh JK, Mahajan P. Effect of tractor driving on hearing loss in farmers in India. Am J Ind Med. Apr 2005;47(4):341-8. [Medline].

  32. Lamm K, Lamm H, Arnold W. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in comparison to conventional or placebo therapy or no treatment in idiopathic sudden hearing loss, acoustic trauma, noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus. A literature survey. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;54:86-99. [Medline].

  33. Lusk SL. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss. AAOHN J. Aug 1997;45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. [Medline].

  34. Madigan J. Beyond hearing loss. Occup Health Saf. Oct 1998;67(10):84-9. [Medline].

  35. Morata TC. Assessing occupational hearing loss: beyond noise exposures. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:111-6. [Medline].

  36. Perez R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Effect of an initial noise induced hearing loss on subsequent noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res. Jun 2004;192(1-2):101-6. [Medline].

  37. Picard M, Banville R, Barbarosie T, Manolache M. Speech audiometry in noise-exposed workers: the SRT-PTA relationship revisited. Audiology. Jan-Feb 1999;38(1):30-43. [Medline].

  38. Prasher D, Sulkowski W. The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1999;12(2):183-92. [Medline].

  39. Sataloff RT, Sataloff J. Audiologic testing: an overview for occupational physicians. Occup Med. Jul-Sep 1997;12(3):433-47. [Medline].

  40. Sohmer H. Pathophysiological mechanisms of hearing loss. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;8(3):113-25. [Medline].

  41. Stewart M, Konkle DF, Simpson TH. The effect of recreational gunfire noise on hearing in workers exposed to occupational noise. Ear Nose Throat J. Jan 2001;80(1):32-4, 36, 38-40. [Medline].

  42. Subratty AH, Hooloman NK. Role of circulating inflammatory cytokines in patients during an acute attack of bronchial asthma. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. Jan-Mar 1998;40(1):17-21. [Medline].

  43. Takemura K, Komeda M, Yagi M, et al. Direct inner ear infusion of dexamethasone attenuates noise-induced trauma in guinea pig. Hear Res. Oct 2004;196(1-2):58-68. [Medline].

  44. Teie PU. Noise-induced hearing loss and symphony orchestra musicians: risk factors, effects, and management. Md Med J. Jan 1998;47(1):13-8. [Medline].

  45. Tornabene SV, Sato K, Pham L, Billings P, Keithley EM. Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Dec 2006;222(1-2):115-24. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
empty para to satisfy content model
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.