Inner Ear, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Follow-up
- Author: Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA more...
Deterrence/Prevention
- Oxidative stress plays a substantial role in the genesis of noise-induced cochlear injury that causes permanent hearing loss.
- In adults with healthy audiograms, ear vulnerability to noise can be elicited and predicted by the use of objective DPOAE measurements. DPOAEs rely on the contractile properties of the outer hair cells. In response to tonal sound stimuli, these cells can generate retrograde wave sounds, the intensity of which can be captured and recorded by a very sensitive probe microphone in the external auditory canal. Any subclinical dysfunction of the middle ear or cochlea outer hair cells could slightly reduce DPOAEs and could influence the hearing performance in individuals exposed to noise and thus finding reduced DPOAEs in individuals with otherwise healthy pure-tone audiograms could be used in identifying them for their increased vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss.[12]
- In chinchillas, noise-induced cochlear oxidative stress (NICOS) can be reduced by the following means:
- Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) is an endogenous mitochondrial membrane compound that helps maintain mitochondrial bioenergetics and biogenesis in the face of oxidative stress.
- Carbamathione is a glutamate antagonist.
- D-methionine (MET) can enhance cellular reduced glutathione (GSH) levels (ie, improve cochlear GSH deficiency state).
- MET’s otoprotective action has a documented role, in a variety of species, against a variety of ototoxic insults including cisplatin-, carboplatin-, aminoglycoside- and noise-induced auditory threshold elevations and cochlear hair cell loss. Also MET can rescue individuals from permanent noise-induced hearing loss when MET is initiated 1 h after noise exposure.[13]
- The studies reveal the potential for the use of NAC in a clinical population exposed to noise.[14] However, as seen experimentally in chinchillas, l-NAC treatments (N -acetyl-l-cysteine) designed to reduce or prevent NIHL has a limited effectiveness. Long-duration exposures at levels that lead to PTS in excess of 50 dB or more with severe loss of OHCs and IHCs in the basal half of the cochlea may lead to the chronic production of excessively high levels of ROS or other free radicals that not only overwhelm the cells endogenous defense mechanisms but also the ability of antioxidant drugs to combat the ROS assault.[15]
- In an animal study on guinea pigs, alpha tocopherol has been found to significantly decrease noise-induced auditory brainstem response threshold shifts and attenuate noise-induced outer hair cell stereocilia loss. This also supports the notion that reactive oxygen species (ROS) is involved in metabolic damage of the organ of Corti.
- In a study of guinea pigs, direct infusion of dexamethasone into the perilymphatic space was observed to have a protective effect against noise-induced trauma.
- Deterrence is the only accepted management method for NIHL. OSHA requires hearing conservation programs if noise exposures in the workplace exceed 85 dBA. The Walsh-Haley noise standard requires that engineering or administrative controls be used to ensure that noise levels do not exceed the PEL. If noise levels cannot be brought down to the PEL, hearing protection must be provided. Its use must be enforced.
- Noise levels must be monitored, either with area monitoring or personal dosimetry. Personal dosimetry is required if workers are exposed to variable noise levels.
- Noise levels must be posted in work areas.
- The following features are essential for an adequate hearing conservation program:
- Hearing conservation programs must include a baseline audiometry performed within 6 months of onset of exposure for all employees. The audiogram must be obtained when the employee has not been exposed to hazardous noise for at least 14 hours.
- Annual audiometric testing should be performed for workers whose TWAs equal or exceed 85 dBA.
- Workers exposed to TWA of 85 dBA or higher are required to have annual training about the effects of noise on hearing and the purpose of audiometric testing and hearing protective devices (HPDs).
- A large number of additional recording and reporting requirements are included in OSHA regulations.
- If exposure to loud environmental noises cannot be avoided, hearing protection should be used. Unfortunately, enforcement has been sporadic. HPDs vary considerably in their effectiveness, comfort, and cost. The following information should be taken into consideration when considering HPDs:
- Only devices that are designed for hearing protection and tested for efficacy should be used. Items such as cotton, tissue paper, and expended cartridge casings provide no meaningful noise attenuation.
- Earplugs are available with attenuation levels from as low as 10 dB to as high as 32 dB. They can be purchased over the counter or custom made. Earplugs can be as effective as earmuffs. However, earplugs are effective only when properly inserted. When earplugs are improperly inserted, noise attenuation may be eliminated or greatly reduced. Earplugs are especially useful when noise exposure is continuously sustained.
- Earmuffs can provide as much attenuation as can earplugs. An advantage of earmuffs is that they are easy to correctly place: whether they are properly inserted or installed is not an issue. Earmuffs are especially useful when exposure to noise is relatively intermittent. Runway workers may need to put on and take off earmuffs many dozens of times a shift. These workers would not likely put earplugs in and out that frequently; if they did, many of those installations would probably be imperfect.
- Earmuffs that permit normal hearing in the absence of a loud noise are now available. The muffs are able to detect the presence of a loud noise and attenuate it before it reaches the human ear. These devices have achieved a much higher level of acceptability among sports shooters because they permit normal hearing except when a firearm is discharged. Sports shooters often worry that their efficiency is impaired if they cannot hear environmental sounds and that their safety is imperiled if they cannot understand what others around them are saying.
- The most effective ear protection is the ear protection the person is willing to wear.
Prognosis
- TTS are reversible, but PTSs are not. No method of treatment is available, and no recovery is expected once a PTS has occurred.
- However, hearing loss should not progress if exposure to the injurious noise is eliminated. Moreover, as the severity of the hearing loss increases, the rate of progression decreases, provided the injurious stimulus remains constant.
Patient Education
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Ear, Nose, and Throat Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.
Melamed S, Rabinowitz S, Green MS. Noise exposure, noise annoyance, use of hearing protection devices and distress among blue-collar workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. Aug 1994;20(4):294-300. [Medline].
Tornabene SV, Sato K, Pham L, Billings P, Keithley EM. Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Dec 2006;222(1-2):115-24. [Medline].
Abrashkin KA, Izumikawa M, Miyazawa T, et al. The fate of outer hair cells after acoustic or ototoxic insults. Hear Res. Aug 2006;218(1-2):20-9. [Medline].
Jin DX, Lin Z, Lei D, Bao J. The role of glucocorticoids for spiral ganglion neuron survival. Brain Res. Jun 24 2009;1277:3-11. [Medline].
Konings A, Van Laer L, Wiktorek-Smagur A, et al. Candidate gene association study for noise-induced hearing loss in two independent noise-exposed populations. Ann Hum Genet. Mar 2009;73(2):215-24. [Medline].
Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure. Hear Res. Apr 2003;178(1-2):70-8. [Medline].
Dobie RA. The relative contributions of occupational noise and aging in individual cases of hearing loss. Ear Hear. Feb 1992;13(1):19-27. [Medline].
Dobie RA. A method for allocation of hearing handicap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 1990;103(5 (Pt 1)):733-9. [Medline].
Fakhry N, Rostain JC, Cazals Y. Hyperbaric oxygenation with corticoid in experimental acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Aug 2007;230(1-2):88-92. [Medline].
Suckfuell M, Canis M, Strieth S, Scherer H, Haisch A. Intratympanic treatment of acute acoustic trauma with a cell-permeable JNK ligand: a prospective randomized phase I/II study. Acta Otolaryngol. Sep 2007;127(9):938-42. [Medline].
Parker MA, Corliss DA, Gray B, et al. Neural stem cells injected into the sound-damaged cochlea migrate throughout the cochlea and express markers of hair cells, supporting cells, and spiral ganglion cells. Hear Res. Oct 2007;232(1-2):29-43. [Medline].
Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M, et al. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hear Res. May 2009;251(1-2):10-6. [Medline].
Campbell KC, Meech RP, Klemens JJ, et al. Prevention of noise- and drug-induced hearing loss with D-methionine. Hear Res. Apr 2007;226(1-2):92-103. [Medline].
Bielefeld EC, Kopke RD, Jackson RL, Coleman JK, Liu J, Henderson D. Noise protection with N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) using a variety of noise exposures, NAC doses, and routes of administration. Acta Otolaryngol. Sep 2007;127(9):914-9. [Medline].
Hamernik RP, Qiu W, Davis B. The effectiveness of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (L-NAC) in the prevention of severe noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. May 2008;239(1-2):99-106. [Medline].
American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1993.
Arslan E, Orzan E. Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:131-45. [Medline].
Boettcher FA, Henderson D, Gratton MA, Danielson RW, Byrne CD. Synergistic interactions of noise and other ototraumatic agents. Ear Hear. Aug 1987;8(4):192-212. [Medline].
Canlon B. Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning. Ear Nose Throat J. Apr 1997;76(4):248-50, 253-5. [Medline].
Chen GD, Liu Y. Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss potentiation by hypoxia. Hear Res. Feb 2005;200(1-2):1-9. [Medline].
Conference report. Consensus conference. Noise and hearing loss. JAMA. Jun 20 1990;263(23):3185-90. [Medline].
DiBiase P, Arriaga MA. Post-traumatic hydrops. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 1997;30(6):1117-22. [Medline].
Harris KC, Hu B, Hangauer D, Henderson D. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss with Src-PTK inhibitors. Hear Res. Oct 2005;208(1-2):14-25. [Medline].
Hone SW, Norman G, Keogh I, Kelly V. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 2003;128(2):257-62. [Medline].
Hou F, Wang S, Zhai S, Hu Y, Yang W, He L. Effects of alpha-tocopherol on noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Hear Res. May 2003;179(1-2):1-8. [Medline].
Hu BH, Guo W, Wang PY, Henderson D, Jiang SC. Intense noise-induced apoptosis in hair cells of guinea pig cochleae. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2000;120(1):19-24. [Medline].
Konopka W, Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Grzanka A, Zalewski P. Effects of impulse noise on transiently evoked otoacoustic emission in soldiers. Int J Audiol. Jan 2005;44(1):3-7. [Medline].
Kumar A, Mathur NN, Varghese M, Mohan D, Singh JK, Mahajan P. Effect of tractor driving on hearing loss in farmers in India. Am J Ind Med. Apr 2005;47(4):341-8. [Medline].
Lamm K, Lamm H, Arnold W. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in comparison to conventional or placebo therapy or no treatment in idiopathic sudden hearing loss, acoustic trauma, noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus. A literature survey. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;54:86-99. [Medline].
Lusk SL. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss. AAOHN J. Aug 1997;45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. [Medline].
Madigan J. Beyond hearing loss. Occup Health Saf. Oct 1998;67(10):84-9. [Medline].
Morata TC. Assessing occupational hearing loss: beyond noise exposures. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:111-6. [Medline].
Perez R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Effect of an initial noise induced hearing loss on subsequent noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res. Jun 2004;192(1-2):101-6. [Medline].
Picard M, Banville R, Barbarosie T, Manolache M. Speech audiometry in noise-exposed workers: the SRT-PTA relationship revisited. Audiology. Jan-Feb 1999;38(1):30-43. [Medline].
Prasher D, Sulkowski W. The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1999;12(2):183-92. [Medline].
Sataloff RT, Sataloff J. Audiologic testing: an overview for occupational physicians. Occup Med. Jul-Sep 1997;12(3):433-47. [Medline].
Sohmer H. Pathophysiological mechanisms of hearing loss. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;8(3):113-25. [Medline].
Stewart M, Konkle DF, Simpson TH. The effect of recreational gunfire noise on hearing in workers exposed to occupational noise. Ear Nose Throat J. Jan 2001;80(1):32-4, 36, 38-40. [Medline].
Subratty AH, Hooloman NK. Role of circulating inflammatory cytokines in patients during an acute attack of bronchial asthma. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. Jan-Mar 1998;40(1):17-21. [Medline].
Takemura K, Komeda M, Yagi M, et al. Direct inner ear infusion of dexamethasone attenuates noise-induced trauma in guinea pig. Hear Res. Oct 2004;196(1-2):58-68. [Medline].
Teie PU. Noise-induced hearing loss and symphony orchestra musicians: risk factors, effects, and management. Md Med J. Jan 1998;47(1):13-8. [Medline].
Tornabene SV, Sato K, Pham L, Billings P, Keithley EM. Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hear Res. Dec 2006;222(1-2):115-24. [Medline].
Hu BH, Guo W, Wang PY, Henderson D, Jiang SC. Intense noise-induced apoptosis in hair cells of guinea pig cochleae. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2000;120(1):19-24. [Medline].

