eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Inner Ear

Superior Canal Dehiscence

Author: Wayne T Shaia, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Otology/Neurotology, Medical College of Virginia
Coauthor(s): Jack M Kartush, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University; Director of Otology, Neurotology, and Skull Base Surgery, Providence Hospital; President, Michigan Ear Institute; President, American NeuroMonitoring
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Sep 2, 2009

Introduction

Background

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a newly described condition in which vestibular symptoms are elicited by sound or pressure secondary to a dehiscent superior semicircular canal. More than 70 years have passed since Tullio and Hennebert described their findings of sound-induced and pressure-induced vestibular activation.

Since then, the Tullio phenomenon, wherein vestibular symptoms are induced by loud sounds, has been associated with syphilis, perilymphatic fistula, congenital deafness, Ménière disease, head trauma, Lyme disease, cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistula, and fenestration operations. The Hennebert sign of vestibular symptoms due to changes in external auditory canal pressure is frequently found in conjunction with the Tullio phenomenon (as in perilymphatic fistula, syphilis, Ménière disease).

In 2000, Minor found a series of patients with positive Tullio and Hennebert signs.1 He was the first to relate these positive findings directly to an anatomical defect of the superior semicircular canal that was detected with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; see Image 1). Minor theorized that, when the bone over the canal becomes thin or dehiscent, it acts as an additional window for the vestibular system, allowing pressure and noise changes to induce vestibular activity. SCDS, as it has become known, is now recognized and treated by otolaryngologists and neurootologists throughout the world.

Coronal high-resolution computed tomography scan ...

Coronal high-resolution computed tomography scan (1-mm sections) that demonstrates the presence of the superior semicircular canal (figure A, black arrow). As the scan is followed posteriorly (figures B, C, D), the bony dehiscence over the superior canal (black arrow) becomes more apparent.

Coronal high-resolution computed tomography scan ...

Coronal high-resolution computed tomography scan (1-mm sections) that demonstrates the presence of the superior semicircular canal (figure A, black arrow). As the scan is followed posteriorly (figures B, C, D), the bony dehiscence over the superior canal (black arrow) becomes more apparent.

Pathophysiology

The cochleovestibular system has 2 functional windows. The oval window, which houses the footplate of the stapes, allows sound to enter the inner ear (vestibule) and to be carried via hydroacoustic waves through the perilymph. This allows the mechanical wave to be transduced into neural activity, and, thus, sound is perceived.

The function of the round window is more controversial. It is thought to have several roles. Its first role is thought to involve the release of sound and mechanical energy from the scala tympani. Another proposed role is its participation in the secretion and absorption of substances in the inner ear. The round window may also play a role as a defense mechanism of the inner ear.

These 2 windows of the inner ear work together to regulate hearing and balance. When a dehiscence in the superior semicircular canal is created, a third-window effect is thought to take place. As a result, endolymph within the labyrinthine system continues to move in relation to sound or pressure, which causes an activation of the vestibular system. The intracranial pressure transmission to the round window may also result in increased compliance of the inner ear from stretching of the round window membrane. This pressure transmission may also result in a frank round window (or oval window) fistula.

Frequency

United States

The true incidence of persons with symptomatic SCDS is currently unknown. One study of 1000 cadaveric temporal bones revealed that a dehiscence of bone that overlies the superior canal was present in approximately 0.5% of temporal bone specimens. In an additional 1.4% of the specimens, the bone was markedly thin (≤ 0.1 mm) compared with the normal bone.

Race

SCDS has no racial bias.

Sex

SCDS appears to affect males and females equally.

Age

In 2000, Minor reported that, in his original series of 17 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 40 years (range, 27-70 y).1

Clinical

History

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) usually present with symptoms of sound- or pressure-induced dizziness. Chronic imbalance is another symptom of SCDS. The patient's symptoms may be re-created when sound or pressure is presented to the affected ear. Patients often control these symptoms with strict avoidance of noisy environments. In addition, some patients may hear a swishing noise when they move their eyes in a certain direction. This gaze-evoked tinnitus can be found in almost 25% of patients with SCDS. Hyperacusis is defined as an unusual sensitivity to normal everyday sounds. Although not specific, this condition is found in a high percentage of patients with SCDS.

Physical

After a general head and neck examination is performed, a detailed neurootological examination should be performed in all patients with vertigo. Other, more common, causes of vertigo and imbalance must be eliminated before SCDS can be diagnosed.

  • Gait test: Determine whether the patient staggers or is off-balance with gait. Typically, patients with SCDS demonstrate a normal gait pattern.
  • Oculomotor examination: All patients must be assessed for an intranuclear ophthalmoplegia and other signs of multiple sclerosis. In addition, gaze-dependent nystagmus must be eliminated as a cause of the imbalance. Nystagmus of peripheral (ie, labyrinthine) origin is usually unidirectional. Nystagmus of central origin (ie, brainstem) is usually bidirectional. Patients with SCDS do not typically demonstrate nystagmus upon routine examination. Nystagmus can be induced with loud sounds or with a pressure fistula test.
  • Romberg test: This test is used to evaluate peripheral sensation, dorsal column function, and midline cerebellar function. The results of this test are usually abnormal in patients with a central pathologic condition. Patients with SCDS demonstrate normal Romberg test results.
  • Fukuda test: Patients who undergo this test are asked to step in place for 20-30 seconds with their eyes closed. Rotation of the patient may indicate a unilateral loss of vestibular function. The results of this nonspecific test are typically normal in patients with SCDS.
  • Dix-Hallpike maneuver: The Dix-Hallpike maneuver is performed by laying a patient back suddenly with the patient's head turned to one side. The test results are considered abnormal (or positive) if the examiner sees geotropic or ageotropic rotatory nystagmus that typically lasts less than 60 seconds. An abnormal or positive Dix-Hallpike examination result is most likely due to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (see the eMedicine article Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo). Patients with SCDS do not typically have positive Dix-Hallpike test results.
  • Head-shake test: The patient wears Frenzel lenses, and the examiner shakes the patient's head at approximately 1 Hz in the horizontal plane for 20 seconds. After the shaking is stopped, the eyes are observed for nystagmus. This test can reveal latent nystagmus and indicate which labyrinth is malfunctioning. In this test, the fast phase of nystagmus is directed toward the normal (or better-performing) labyrinth. The results of this nonspecific test may be abnormal in patients with SCDS.
  • Head-thrust test: The patient is asked to gaze steadily at a target in the room while the examiner briskly moves the patient's head from side to side. If the patient's eyes remain fixed on the target, the test result is normal. When the eyes make a compensatory movement after the head is stopped to reacquire the target (a refixation saccade), the test results are abnormal. This test can indicate if the output of one or both labyrinths is depressed. This is usually not a typical finding in SCDS.
  • Visual dynamic acuity test: Before and during vigorous vertical shaking, followed by horizontal head shaking, the patient is asked to read the smallest visible line on the Snellen eye chart. A normal result is the ability to maintain acuity within 2 lines of the acuity at rest. An abnormal visual acuity test suggests bilateral vestibulopathy, which is most commonly observed in ototoxicity. The dynamic visual acuity test results are normal in patients with SCDS.
  • Fistula test: The fistula test is designed to elicit symptoms and signs of an abnormal connection between the labyrinth and the surrounding structures. This is usually performed while the patient wears Frenzel lenses. Pressure can be applied to the patient's ear by pushing the tragus over the ear canal or with the use of a Bruening otoscope. If vertiginous symptoms are elicited or if nystagmus is seen the patient has positive fistula test results. In SCDS, the superior canal can be thought of as a fistula with connection to the middle cranial fossa. With SCDS, the direction of the nystagmus, as a result of pressure applied to the ear, results in vertical-torsional nystagmus with slow waves directed away from the labyrinth suspected of being dehiscent. Other tests, such as the pinched nostril test, can demonstrate similar findings, whereas a Valsalva maneuver produces nystagmus in the opposite direction.
  • Eye movements evoked by sound are found in most patients with SCDS. These sound-induced eye movements are typically found at frequencies of 500-2000 Hz, with an intensity of 100-110 dB. The eye movements are typically vertical and torsional, away from the side of the stimulus.
  • A Barany noise box can also be used to help elicit the noise-induced vertigo (Tullio phenomenon). This commercially available box simply makes a loud (100 dB) noise. When the box is slowly moved towards the patient's symptomatic ear, the vertiginous symptoms may be re-created.

Causes

An embryological etiology of SCDS has been proposed; this theory involves a postnatal failure of bone formation over the superior semicircular canal. Tsunoda and Terasaki, with the use of a computer simulation model, determined that the cause of bony dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal was due to a malpositioned primitive otocyst.2 When this otocyst lies too close to the developing brain, the migratory patterns of the loose reticular cells are altered. These mesenchymal cells are thought to be necessary for completion of the bony development of the labyrinthine structures. This region may be left with incomplete or thin bony development over the superior semicircular canal.

More on Superior Canal Dehiscence

Overview: Superior Canal Dehiscence
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Superior Canal Dehiscence
Treatment & Medication: Superior Canal Dehiscence
Follow-up: Superior Canal Dehiscence
Multimedia: Superior Canal Dehiscence
References

References

  1. Minor LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Am J Otol. Jan 2000;21(1):9-19. [Medline].

  2. Tsunoda A, Terasaki O. Dehiscence of the bony roof of the superior semicircular canal in the middle cranial fossa. J Laryngol Otol. Jul 2002;116(7):514-8. [Medline].

  3. Brantberg K, Verrecchia L. Testing vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials with 90-dB clicks is effective in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Audiol Neurootol. Sep 2009;14(1):54-8. [Medline].

  4. White JA, Hughes GB, Ruggieri PN. Vibration-induced nystagmus as an office procedure for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. Oct 2007;28(7):911-6. [Medline].

  5. Brantberg K, Bergenius J, Mendel L, Witt H, Tribukait A, Ygge J. Symptoms, findings and treatment in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2001;121(1):68-75. [Medline].

  6. Kartush JK. Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome symptoms resolved by reinforcement of the oval and round windows. Unpublished data. 2002.

  7. Gianoli GJ, Soileau JS. The dehiscent middle fossa: prevalence, manifestations, associated findings and results of 24 surgical explorations for superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Publication pending: presented as triologic thesis, 2005.

  8. Banerjee A, Whyte A, Atlas MD. Superior canal dehiscence: review of a new condition. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;Feb 30(1):9-15. [Medline].

  9. Brantberg K, Ishiyama A, Baloh RW. Drop attacks secondary to superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Neurology. Jun 28 2005;64(12):2126-8. [Medline].

  10. Carey JP, Minor LB, Nager GT. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;Feb;126(2):137-47. [Medline].

  11. Cremer PD, Minor LB, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal. Neurology. 2000;55:1833-41. [Medline].

  12. Deutschländer A, Strupp M, Jahn K, Jäger L, Quiring F, Brandt T. Vertical oscillopsia in bilateral superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Neurology. Mar 9 2004;62(5):784-7. [Medline].

  13. Friedland DR, Wackym PA. A critical appraisal of spontaneous perilymphatic fistulas of the inner ear. Am J Otol. 1999;20:261-276. [Medline].

  14. Hennebert C. A new syndrome in hereditary syphilis of the labyrinth. Presse Med Belg Brux. 1911;63:467.

  15. Hillman TA, Kertesz TR, Hadley K, Shelton C. Reversible peripheral vestibulopathy: the treatment of superior canal dehiscence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 2006;134(3):431-6. [Medline].

  16. Martin JE, Neal CJ, Monacci WT, Eisenman DJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a new indication for middle fossa craniotomy. Case report. J Neurosurg. Jan 2004;100(1):125-7. [Medline].

  17. Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, McKenna MJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence mimicking otosclerotic hearing loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;65:137-45. 2007;65:137-45. [Medline].

  18. Mikulec AA, McKenna MJ, Ramsey MJ, Rosowski JJ, Herrmann BS, Rauch SD. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo. Otol Neurotol. Mar 2004;25(2):121-9. [Medline].

  19. Mikulec AA, Poe DS, McKenna MJ. Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Mar 115(3):501-7. [Medline].

  20. Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Oct 15(10):1717-27. [Medline].

  21. Minor LB, Carey JP, Cremer PD, Lustig LR, Streubel SO, Ruckenstein MJ. Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. Mar 2003;24(2):270-8. [Medline].

  22. Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Oct;115(10):1717-27. [Medline][Full Text].

  23. Ostrowski VB, Byskosh A, Hain TC. Tullio phenomenon with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2001;22(1):61-5. [Medline].

  24. Smullen JL, Andrist EC, Gianoli GJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a new cause of vertigo. J La State Med Soc. Aug 1999;151(8):397-400. [Medline].

  25. Streubel SO, Cremer PD, Carey JP, Weg N, Minor LB. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2001;545:41-9. [Medline].

  26. Teixido MT, Artz GJ, Kung BC. Clinical experience with symptomatic superior canal dehiscence in a single neurotologic practice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 2008;139(3):405-13. [Medline].

  27. Tullio P. Das Ohr und die Entstehung der Sprache und Schrift Berlin. Urban & Schwarzenberg,. 1929.

  28. [Best Evidence] [Guideline] Vlastarakos PV, Proikas K, Tavoulari E, Kikidis D, Maragoudakis P, Nikolopoulos TP. Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. FEB;266(2):177-86. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

superior canal dehiscence, Hennebert sign, Hennebert's sign, Tullio phenomenon, Tullio's phenomenon, sound-induced vertigo, pressure-induced vertigo, vertigo, dizziness, chronic imbalance, hyperacusis, SCDS, superior canal dehiscence syndrome, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, VEMPs, hearing loss, dehiscent superior semicircular canal, vestibular symptoms, syphilis, perilymphatic fistula, congenital deafness, Ménière disease, head trauma, Lyme disease, cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistula, fenestration operations, malpositioned primitive otocyst

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Wayne T Shaia, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Otology/Neurotology, Medical College of Virginia
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jack M Kartush, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University; Director of Otology, Neurotology, and Skull Base Surgery, Providence Hospital; President, Michigan Ear Institute; President, American NeuroMonitoring
Jack M Kartush, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Neurotology Society, and American Otological Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Robert A Battista, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Medical School; Physician, Ear Institute of Chicago, LLC
Robert A Battista, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Neurotology Society, and Illinois State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Gerard J Gianoli, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine; Vice President, The Ear and Balance Institute; Chief Executive Officer, Ponchartrain Surgery Center
Gerard J Gianoli, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, and Triological Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders
Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society
Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation unstricted gift unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo  Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.