Superior Canal Dehiscence Workup
- Author: Wayne T Shaia, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA more...
Laboratory Studies
No specific laboratory studies confirm the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). Laboratory tests may be obtained to rule out other pathological causes of vertigo (ie, multiple sclerosis, syphilis).
Imaging Studies
Imaging studies are critical in the diagnosis of SCDS. A high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan of the temporal bones without contrast is required to make a definitive diagnosis. Views that are oblique to the temporal bone must be obtained with a HRCT scan in order to properly see the superior semicircular canal. The image below displays the typical findings in a patient with SCDS.
Coronal high-resolution computed tomography scan (1-mm sections) that demonstrates the presence of the superior semicircular canal (figure A, black arrow). As the scan is followed posteriorly (figures B, C, D), the bony dehiscence over the superior canal (black arrow) becomes more apparent. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot be used to confirm the diagnosis of SCDS; however, it may be of benefit in ruling out a retrocochlear process.
Other Tests
Audiometric testing
Comprehensive audiometric evaluation is indicated in any patient with vestibular symptoms. In a patient with SCDS, key factors may be revealed. One key is the presence of normal symmetrical hearing, which helps eliminate a retrocochlear process as a cause of vertigo.
Patients with SCDS may have conductive hearing loss. The air-bone gaps are typically greatest at frequencies below 1 kHz.
The conductive hearing loss is believed to be due to the third mobile window of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence, resulting in elevation of thresholds of air-conduction sounds and a reduction of thresholds for bone-conduction sounds.
Acoustic reflex testing is preserved in a patient with SCDS as a cause of conductive hearing loss, as opposed to a loss of the reflex with other conductive or mixed hearing loss conditions such as otosclerosis.
Electronystagmography testing
Routine electronystagmography (ENG) testing reveals no objective or pathognomonic signs of SCDS. All patients with suspicion of the disorder should undergo ENG to further eliminate other potential causes.
Video-oculography can be valuable in recording the vertical and torsional eye movements specific to SCDS.
Caloric test results are usually unaffected in patients with SCDS; however, when the dehiscence is large (>0.5 mm), reduced caloric test results may be demonstrated on the affected side.
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) have recently been suggested to help with the diagnosis of SCDS. The inferior vestibular nerve innervates the saccule, which has some sound sensitivity. The inferior vestibular nerve has its main input to the lateral vestibular nucleus (Deiter nucleus), where the 2 main postural tracts originate. The medial vestibulospinal tract is responsible for postural control of the neck, whereas the lateral vestibulospinal tract is dedicated to the lower trunk and limbs.
For the most part, sound-evoked VEMPs are considered completely unilateral. This test is performed by placing electrodes on the sternocleidomastoid neck muscle. Patients hold their head up unsupported, using only their anterior neck muscles. Patients are instructed to tense the muscle during acoustic stimulation and to relax after the stimulation stops. Loud clicks or tone bursts (95-100 dB nHL) are repeatedly presented to each ear.[3] If the neck muscles are activated at this level, a VEMP is produced.
In patients with SCDS, a response at very low thresholds (< 65 dB) can be noted to produce a VEMP on the affected side. This is thought to occur secondary to the hypercompliance of the vestibular system on the affected sided secondary to the third-window effect. A low-threshold VEMP raises the suspicion of SCDS
Vibration-induced nystagmus
Most recently, patients with known SCDS underwent a series of cranial vibratory tests. A 100 Hz oscillator was placed against the cranium at different places for 10-15 seconds. Nystagmus was digitally recorded by infrared video oculography. All patients demonstrated distinct torsional vibration-induced nystagmus that was especially prominent with suboccipital vibration. Vibration of the suboccipital region and the demonstration of torsional nystagmus is an emerging technique for the diagnosis of SCDS.[4]
Minor LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Am J Otol. Jan 2000;21(1):9-19. [Medline].
Tsunoda A, Terasaki O. Dehiscence of the bony roof of the superior semicircular canal in the middle cranial fossa. J Laryngol Otol. Jul 2002;116(7):514-8. [Medline].
Brantberg K, Verrecchia L. Testing vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials with 90-dB clicks is effective in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Audiol Neurootol. Sep 2009;14(1):54-8. [Medline].
White JA, Hughes GB, Ruggieri PN. Vibration-induced nystagmus as an office procedure for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. Oct 2007;28(7):911-6. [Medline].
Lee GS, Zhou G, Poe D, Kenna M, Amin M, Ohlms L, et al. Clinical experience in diagnosis and management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in children. Laryngoscope. Oct 2011;121(10):2256-61. [Medline].
Brantberg K, Bergenius J, Mendel L, Witt H, Tribukait A, Ygge J. Symptoms, findings and treatment in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 2001;121(1):68-75. [Medline].
Kartush JK. Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome symptoms resolved by reinforcement of the oval and round windows. Unpublished data. 2002.
Gianoli GJ, Soileau JS. The dehiscent middle fossa: prevalence, manifestations, associated findings and results of 24 surgical explorations for superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Publication pending: presented as triologic thesis, 2005.
Banerjee A, Whyte A, Atlas MD. Superior canal dehiscence: review of a new condition. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;Feb 30(1):9-15. [Medline].
Brantberg K, Ishiyama A, Baloh RW. Drop attacks secondary to superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Neurology. Jun 28 2005;64(12):2126-8. [Medline].
Carey JP, Minor LB, Nager GT. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;Feb;126(2):137-47. [Medline].
Cremer PD, Minor LB, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal. Neurology. 2000;55:1833-41. [Medline].
Deutschländer A, Strupp M, Jahn K, Jäger L, Quiring F, Brandt T. Vertical oscillopsia in bilateral superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Neurology. Mar 9 2004;62(5):784-7. [Medline].
Friedland DR, Wackym PA. A critical appraisal of spontaneous perilymphatic fistulas of the inner ear. Am J Otol. 1999;20:261-276. [Medline].
Hennebert C. A new syndrome in hereditary syphilis of the labyrinth. Presse Med Belg Brux. 1911;63:467.
Hillman TA, Kertesz TR, Hadley K, Shelton C. Reversible peripheral vestibulopathy: the treatment of superior canal dehiscence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 2006;134(3):431-6. [Medline].
Martin JE, Neal CJ, Monacci WT, Eisenman DJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a new indication for middle fossa craniotomy. Case report. J Neurosurg. Jan 2004;100(1):125-7. [Medline].
Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, McKenna MJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence mimicking otosclerotic hearing loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;65:137-45. 2007;65:137-45. [Medline].
Mikulec AA, McKenna MJ, Ramsey MJ, Rosowski JJ, Herrmann BS, Rauch SD. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo. Otol Neurotol. Mar 2004;25(2):121-9. [Medline].
Mikulec AA, Poe DS, McKenna MJ. Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Mar 115(3):501-7. [Medline].
Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Oct 15(10):1717-27. [Medline].
Minor LB, Carey JP, Cremer PD, Lustig LR, Streubel SO, Ruckenstein MJ. Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. Mar 2003;24(2):270-8. [Medline].
Minor LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 2005;Oct;115(10):1717-27. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Ostrowski VB, Byskosh A, Hain TC. Tullio phenomenon with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2001;22(1):61-5. [Medline].
Smullen JL, Andrist EC, Gianoli GJ. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a new cause of vertigo. J La State Med Soc. Aug 1999;151(8):397-400. [Medline].
Streubel SO, Cremer PD, Carey JP, Weg N, Minor LB. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2001;545:41-9. [Medline].
Teixido MT, Artz GJ, Kung BC. Clinical experience with symptomatic superior canal dehiscence in a single neurotologic practice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 2008;139(3):405-13. [Medline].
Tullio P. Das Ohr und die Entstehung der Sprache und Schrift Berlin. Urban & Schwarzenberg,. 1929.
[Best Evidence] [Guideline] Vlastarakos PV, Proikas K, Tavoulari E, Kikidis D, Maragoudakis P, Nikolopoulos TP. Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. FEB;266(2):177-86. [Medline].

