eMedicine Specialties > Sports Medicine > Foot and Ankle
Navicular Fracture: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Feb 11, 2008
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
- Multimedia
Differential Diagnoses
Ankle Fracture
Ankle Sprain
Athletic Foot Injuries
Contusions
Metatarsal Stress Fracture
Metatarsalgia
Other Problems to Be Considered
Accessory navicular: This condition manifests clinically as a painful bump of the medial navicular and is usually treated conservatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), activity modification, and/or orthotics. It may require excision for persistent pain.
Avascular necrosis of the navicular
Calcaneus bone injury
Köhler disease38,39,40 : Osteochondrosis of the navicular usually manifests in children younger than 6 years and is treated with short leg cast for up to 8 weeks.
Other midfoot fractures or dislocations
Planovalgus foot41
Workup
Imaging Studies
- Radiograph
- A plain radiograph of the foot rarely demonstrates the presence of a navicular stress fracture. For this reason, negative radiographic findings cannot be used to rule out the presence of a navicular fracture.
- The tarsal navicular is frequently underpenetrated during routine standing anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and oblique views of foot; however, a coned-down AP radiograph that is centered on the tarsal navicular may help in visualization. The continuity of the cortical bone, especially on an AP radiograph, should be carefully examined because when a fracture is present, the lateral fragment may resemble a separate tarsal bone and can be easily overlooked. However, even with special techniques and a careful examination, a radiograph is not sufficient to rule out a stress fracture of the tarsal navicular.
- Technetium (99m Tc) bone scanning
- This study is useful for making the diagnosis of a navicular stress fracture.
- Increased radionuclide uptake occurs at the navicular.
- This modality is sensitive to, but not specific for, a fracture; therefore, a computed tomography (CT) scan is necessary for a definitive diagnosis.
- CT scanning
- These studies are useful for making and confirming the diagnosis of navicular stress fractures.
- In addition, a CT scan helps to more precisely define the location and extent of the fracture. Saxena et al proposed a classification system based on CT scan findings as follows42 :
- Type 1 involves a dorsal cortical break.
- Type 2 involves fracture propagation into the navicular body.
- Type 3 consists of fracture propagation into another cortex.
- Types 2 and 3 may benefit from early surgical intervention.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Ultrasound20
- Currently, ultrasound is not sensitive enough to be useful in the diagnosis of stress fractures. However, experience with this imaging technique for stress fractures is very limited.
- The standard caveats for ultrasound apply. The technique is noninvasive but operator dependent. The role of ultrasound in diagnosing navicular stress fractures remains to be determined.
More on Navicular Fracture |
| Overview: Navicular Fracture |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Navicular Fracture |
| Treatment & Medication: Navicular Fracture |
| Follow-up: Navicular Fracture |
| Multimedia: Navicular Fracture |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Thordarson DB. Fractures of the midfoot and forefoot. In: Myerson MS, Leonard ME, eds. Foot and Ankle Disorders. 2nd ed. Orlando, Fla: Harcourt; 2000:1265-85.
Dunjey M. Stress fractures in athletes. Department of Podiatry Encyclopedia. Perth, Australia: Curtln Health Science, Curtin University. 1999;1-14.
Ho K, Abu-Laban RB. Ankle and foot. In: Rosen P, Barkin RM, eds. Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1998:836-56.
Marder RA, Lian GJ, eds. Midfoot: tarsal navicular stress fracture. Sports Injuries of the Ankle and Foot. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1997:64-8.
Heckman JD. Fractures and dislocations of the foot. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996:2355-62.
Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen ST Jr. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1989;71(10):1504-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Towne LC, Blazina ME, Cozen LN. Fatigue fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1970;52(2):376-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Torg JS, Pavlov H, Cooley LH, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A retrospective review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1982;64(5):700-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Saxena A, Fullem B. Navicular stress fractures: a prospective study on athletes. Foot Ankle Int. Nov 2006;27(11):917-21. [Medline].
Cohen M, Roman A, Lovins JE. Totally implanted direct current stimulator as treatment for a nonunion in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jul-Aug 1993;32(4):375-81. [Medline].
Samoladas E, Fotiades H, Christoforides J, Pournaras J. Talonavicular dislocation and nondisplaced fracture of the navicular. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Feb 2005;125(1):59-61. [Medline].
Pinney SJ, Sangeorzan BJ. Fractures of the tarsal bones. Orthop Clin North Am. Jan 2001;32(1):21-33. [Medline].
Garland DE, Moses B, Salyer W. Long-term follow-up of fracture nonunions treated with PEMFs. Contemp Orthop. Mar 1991;22(3):295-302. [Medline].
Fitch KD, Blackwell JB, Gilmour WN. Operation for non-union of stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jan 1989;71(1):105-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Orava S, Hulkko A. Delayed unions and nonunions of stress fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1988;16(4):378-82. [Medline].
Rymaszewski LA, Robb JE. Mechanism of fracture-dislocation of the navicular: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1988;70(3):492. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Coughlin L, Kwok D, Oliver J. Fracture dislocation of the tarsal navicular. A case report. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1987;15(6):614-5. [Medline].
Wall J, Feller JF. Imaging of stress fractures in runners. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2006;25(4):781-802. [Medline].
Lee S, Anderson RB. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. Foot Ankle Clin. Mar 2004;9(1):85-104. [Medline].
Craig JG, Jacobson JA, Moed BR. Ultrasound of fracture and bone healing. Radiol Clin North Am. Jul 1999;37(4):737-51, ix. [Medline].
Knapp TP, Garrett WE Jr. Stress fractures: general concepts. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):339-56. [Medline].
Arendt EA, Griffiths HJ. The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):291-306. [Medline].
Alfred RH, Belhobek G, Bergfeld JA. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A case report. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1992;20(6):766-8. [Medline].
Kiss ZS, Khan KM, Fuller PJ. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1993;160(1):111-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1996;24(2):211-7. [Medline].
Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, et al. Risk factors for stress fractures in track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1996;24(6):810-8. [Medline].
Rome K, Handoll HH, Ashford R. Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD000450. [Medline].
Brukner P, Bradshaw C, Khan KM, White S, Crossley K. Stress fractures: a review of 180 cases. Clin J Sport Med. Apr 1996;6(2):85-9. [Medline].
Khan KM, Fuller PJ, Brukner PD, Kearney C, Burry HC. Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes. Eighty-six cases proven with computerized tomography. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1992;20(6):657-66. [Medline].
Ting A, King W, Yocum L, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular in long-distance runners. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1988;7(1):89-101. [Medline].
Sanders TG, Williams PM, Vawter KW. Stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. Mil Med. Jul 2004;169(7):viii-xiii. [Medline].
Armstrong DW 3rd, Rue JP, Wilckens JH, Frassica FJ. Stress fracture injury in young military men and women. Bone. Sep 2004;35(3):806-16. [Medline].
Bennell KL, Brukner PD. Epidemiology and site specificity of stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):179-96. [Medline].
Macintyre J, Joy E. Foot and ankle injuries in dance. Clin Sports Med. Apr 2000;19(2):351-68. [Medline].
Knapp T, Mandelbaum B, Garrett W Jr. Why are stress injuries so common in the soccer player?. Clin Sports Med. Oct 1998;17(4):835-53.
Zetaruk MN. The young gymnast. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2000;19(4):757-80. [Medline].
Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. Skeletal effects of menstrual disturbances in athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. Oct 1997;7(5):261-73. [Medline].
Borges JL, Guille JT, Bowen JR. Köhler's bone disease of the tarsal navicular. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):596-8. [Medline].
Ippolito E, Ricciardi Pollini PT, Falez' F. Köhler's disease of the tarsal navicular: long-term follow-up of 12 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. Aug 1984;4(4):416-7. [Medline].
Williams GA, Cowell HR. Köhler's disease of the tarsal navicular. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jul-Aug 1981;158:53-8. [Medline].
Staheli LT. Planovalgus foot deformity. Current status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Feb 1999;89(2):94-9. [Medline].
Saxena A, Fullem B, Hannaford D. Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed radiographic classification system. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 2000;39(2):96-103. [Medline].
Diehl JJ, Best TM, Kaeding CC. Classification and return-to-play considerations for stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. Jan 2006;25(1):17-28, vii. [Medline].
Brukner P, Bradshaw C, Bennell K. Managing common stress fractures: let risk level guide treatment. Phys Sportsmed [serial online]. Aug 1998;26(8):Accessed February 8, 2008. Available at www.physsportsmed.com/issues/1998/08aug/brukner.htm.
Potter NJ, Brukner PD, Makdissi M, et al. Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management. Br J Sports Med. Aug 2006;40(8):692-5; discussion 695. [Medline].
Raasch WG, Hergan DJ. Treatment of stress fractures: the fundamentals. Clin Sports Med. Jan 2006;25(1):29-36, vii. [Medline].
Trock DH. Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Feb 2000;26(1):51-62, viii. [Medline].
Scott G, King JB. A prospective, double-blind trial of electrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1994;76(6):820-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Gossling HR, Bernstein RA, Abbott J. Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). Orthopedics. Jun 1992;15(6):711-9. [Medline].
Gillespie WJ, Grant I. Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000450. [Medline].
Brukner P, Bennell K. Overuse injuries: where to now?. Br J Sports Med. Mar 1997;31(1):2. [Medline].
Bruns W, Maffulli N. Lower limb injuries in children in sports. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2000;19(4):637-62. [Medline].
DiGiovanni CW, Patel A, Calfee R, Nickisch F. Osteonecrosis in the foot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Apr 2007;15(4):208-17. [Medline].
Hochman MG, Min KK, Zilberfarb JL. MR imaging of the symptomatic ankle and foot. Orthop Clin North Am. Oct 1997;28(4):659-83. [Medline].
Hoffinger SA. Evaluation and management of pediatric foot deformities. Pediatr Clin North Am. Oct 1996;43(5):1091-111. [Medline].
Hunter LY. Stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. More frequent than we realize?. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1981;9(4):217-9. [Medline].
Isikan UE. The values of talonavicular angles in patients with pes planus. J Foot Ankle Surg. Sep-Oct 1993;32(5):514-6. [Medline].
Khan KM, Brukner PD, Kearney C, et al. Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes. Sports Med. Jan 1994;17(1):65-76. [Medline].
Lyon RM, Street CC. Pediatric sports injuries: when to refer or x-ray. Pediatr Clin North Am. Feb 1998;45(1):221-44. [Medline].
Maitra RS, Johnson DL. Stress fractures. Clinical history and physical examination. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):259-74. [Medline].
Manusov EG, Lillegard WA, Raspa RF, Epperly TD. Evaluation of pediatric foot problems: part I. The forefoot and the midfoot. Am Fam Physician. Aug 1996;54(2):592-606. [Medline].
Omey ML, Micheli LJ. Foot and ankle problems in the young athlete. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jul 1999;31(7 suppl):S470-86. [Medline].
Orava S, Karpakka J, Hulkko A, Takala T. Stress avulsion fracture of the tarsal navicular. An uncommon sports-related overuse injury. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1991;19(4):392-5. [Medline].
Simons SM. Foot injuries of the recreational athlete. Phys Sportsmed [serial online]. Jan 1999;27(1):Accessed February 11, 2008. Available at http://www.physsportsmed.com/issues/1999/01_99/simons.htm.
Thordarson DB. Detecting and treating common fractures of the foot and ankle: part 2: the midfoot and forefoot. Phys Sportsmed [serial online]. Oct 1996;24(10):Available at http://www.physsportsmed.com/issues/1996/10_96/thordar2.htm.
Wedmore IS, Charette J. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of ankle and foot injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 2000;18(1):85-113, vi. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
tarsal navicular fracture, midfoot fracture, mid-foot fracture, navicular stress fracture, navicular stress fractures, navicular cortical avulsion fracture, navicular tuberosity fracture, navicular body fracture, heel fracture, foot fracture, broken foot, navicular bone fracture, foot pain, N-spot, N spot
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Navicular Fracture