Navicular Fracture 

  • Author: Michael J Ameres, MD; Chief Editor: Sherwin SW Ho, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 28, 2010
 

Background

The navicular plays an important role in maintaining the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Commonly, fractures of the navicular are not evident on plain radiographs. This often leads to a delay in diagnosis, which may result in prolonged disabling foot pain in individuals, particularly young athletes. The 4 types of navicular fractures are (1) cortical avulsion, (2) tuberosity, (3) body, and (4) stress.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Cortical and tuberosity avulsion fractures

Avulsion fracture, the most common fracture of the navicular, is often associated with ligamentous injuries and results from twisting forces on the mid foot. These fractures are commonly treated conservatively, except for avulsion of the posterior tibial tendon insertion (tuberosity fracture), which may be repaired operatively, especially if a proximal dislocation of 1 cm or more is present. An avulsion of the posterior tibial tendon insertion must be differentiated from an accessory navicular (see Other Problems to Be Considered).

Fractures of the navicular body

Fractures of the body are commonly associated with other injuries of the midtarsal joint. Sangeorzan et al categorized navicular body fractures into 3 types, as follows[6] :

  • Type 1 is a coronal fracture with no dislocation.
  • Type 2 is a dorsolateral to plantomedial fracture with medial forefoot displacement.
  • Type 3 is a comminuted fracture with lateral forefoot displacement and carries the worst prognosis.

All navicular body fractures with 1 mm or more of displacement require open reduction and internal fixation.

Stress fractures

The rest of this article primarily discusses the diagnosis and treatment of navicular stress fractures, which are usually sports-related injuries.

In 1855, Brehaulpt first described stress fractures in military recruits who were subjected to long marches. As more civilians took up physically demanding sports, the incidence of stress fractures has increased in the general population. Towne et al first described stress fracture of the tarsal navicular in 1970.[7]

In athletes, navicular stress fractures are of particular concern because they are underdiagnosed and can lead to significant disability if the diagnosis is delayed.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8] In a study by Torg et al in 1982, the average time between the fracture and diagnosis was estimated to be 7 months.[9] Given the significant improvement in outcome with early diagnosis and proper treatment, navicular stress fractures should be considered in any athlete with midfoot pain. In a 2006 study by Saxena and Fullem, navicular stress fractures took up to 4 months to heal posttreatment.[10]

Fracture-dislocation of the navicular may occur in athletes.[11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18] This uncommon injury generally requires reduction and examination for stability via fluoroscopy, with the patient under general anesthesia. If the postreduction examination findings confirm stability of the navicular, treatment with a non–weight-bearing cast may be sufficient; otherwise, internal fixation is required.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Foot, Ankle, Knee, and Hip Center, Fractures and Broken Bones Center, Breaks, Fractures, and Dislocations Center, and Sports Injury Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Broken Foot and Cast Care.

Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Navicular stress fractures may account for up to 35% of stress fractures in athletes. Because navicular stress fractures are not easily observed on plain radiographs, the reported incidence rates vary widely. The overall incidence may appear to be increasing due to advances in imaging.[19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]

Among track-and-field athletes, up to 21% may experience a stress fracture in the course of a year.[26, 27] In these athletes, up to 15% of stress fractures are of the navicular.[26] Other studies have demonstrated similar findings.[28, 29, 30, 31] The highest incidence of stress fractures is in jumping and sprinting events.

Among military recruits, the incidence is approaching that of athletes, as the training of military recruits more closely mirrors the training of athletes.[28, 32, 33, 34]

International

Worldwide, the incidence of navicular stress fracture is related to the sport of participation and to the training that is involved rather than to geographic location.

Previous
Next

Functional Anatomy

The tarsal navicular is a disk-shaped bone that articulates distally with the 3 cuneiforms, proximally with the talar head, and, occasionally, laterally with the cuboid. The distal articulation with the 3 cuneiforms is by means of 3 facets that have a common synovial cavity. The plantar and dorsal cuneonavicular ligaments reinforce the distal articulation.

On the lateral side are the plantar, dorsal, and interosseous cuboideonavicular ligaments and, occasionally, a syndesmotic joint with the cuboid. Medially, the distal articulation serves as an attachment for the posterior tibial tendon and the spring, or plantar calcaneonavicular, ligament. On the proximal side, it envelops the talar head completely. The thickened talonavicular ligaments reinforce the talonavicular joint in a plantar and dorsal orientation. Medially, the anterior fibers of the deltoid ligament add support.

Along with the calcaneocuboid joint, the talonavicular joint forms the transverse tarsal joint, which allows motion of the forefoot on the hindfoot. The ligamentous structure is such that when the hind part of the foot is everted, the joint is mobile, and when the hind part of the foot is inverted, the joint is fixed.

The blood supply of the navicular comes from small branches of the posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries. This supply leaves the medial and lateral areas of the navicular relatively well supplied compared with the central section of the navicular. This relative difference correlates with the common site of stress fractures.

Previous
Next

Sport-Specific Biomechanics

The navicular is part of 2 important structures that are essential for normal gait: (1) the medial longitudinal arch and (2) the transverse tarsal joint (also called the midtarsal or Chopart joint).

The medial longitudinal arch is composed of the navicular, calcaneus, talus, 3 cuneiforms, and 3 medial metatarsals. This arch provides support for normal gait, in particular from mid stance until push-off.

The transverse tarsal joint is essential for normal gait and is composed of the talonavicular joint and the calcaneocuboid joint. At heel strike, this joint is flexible and plays an important role in absorbing ground impact and accommodating the foot to the ground. At push-off, the transverse tarsal joint is locked and is helpful in forward propulsion.

Previous
Proceed to Clinical Presentation
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Michael J Ameres, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Southampton Hospital

Michael J Ameres, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Greg Montalbano, MD  Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, New York University Medical School

Greg Montalbano, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Sierra Cascade Trauma Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Benson Yeh  MD, Vice President, Designated Institutional Official, Chief Academic Officer, Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine in Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical School

Benson Yeh is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, New York Academy of Medicine, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Andrew L Sherman, MD, MS  Associate Professor of Clinical Rehabilitation Medicine, Vice Chairman, Chief of Spine and Musculoskeletal Services, Program Director, SCI Fellowship and PMR Residency Programs, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Miami, Leonard A Miller School of Medicine

Andrew L Sherman, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Medical Association, and Association of Academic Physiatrists

Disclosure: Pfizer Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Jon B Whitehurst, MD  Clinical Instructor of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine; Partner, Rockford Orthopedic Associates; Orthopedic Chairman, Rockford Memorial Hospital

Jon B Whitehurst, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Sherwin SW Ho, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago

Sherwin SW Ho, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America, and Herodicus Society

Disclosure: Breg, Inc. Consulting fee Consulting; Biomet, Inc. Consulting fee Consulting; GMV, Inc. Arthroscopy Simulator Evaluation and teaching; Smith and Nephew Grant/research funds Fellowship funding; DJ Ortho Grant/research funds Course funding; Athletico Physical Therapy Grant/research funds Course, research funding

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthor Rafat Farouqui, MBBS, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Thordarson DB. Fractures of the midfoot and forefoot. In: Myerson MS, Leonard ME, eds. Foot and Ankle Disorders. 2nd ed. Orlando, Fla: Harcourt; 2000:1265-85.

  2. Dunjey M. Stress fractures in athletes. Department of Podiatry Encyclopedia. Perth, Australia: Curtln Health Science, Curtin University. 1999;1-14.

  3. Ho K, Abu-Laban RB. Ankle and foot. In: Rosen P, Barkin RM, eds. Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1998:836-56.

  4. Marder RA, Lian GJ, eds. Midfoot: tarsal navicular stress fracture. Sports Injuries of the Ankle and Foot. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1997:64-8.

  5. Heckman JD. Fractures and dislocations of the foot. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996:2355-62.

  6. Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen ST Jr. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1989;71(10):1504-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. Towne LC, Blazina ME, Cozen LN. Fatigue fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1970;52(2):376-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Simons SM. Foot injuries of the recreational athlete. Phys Sportsmed. Jan 1999;27(1):57-70. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  9. Torg JS, Pavlov H, Cooley LH, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A retrospective review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1982;64(5):700-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  10. Saxena A, Fullem B. Navicular stress fractures: a prospective study on athletes. Foot Ankle Int. Nov 2006;27(11):917-21. [Medline].

  11. Cohen M, Roman A, Lovins JE. Totally implanted direct current stimulator as treatment for a nonunion in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Jul-Aug 1993;32(4):375-81. [Medline].

  12. Samoladas E, Fotiades H, Christoforides J, Pournaras J. Talonavicular dislocation and nondisplaced fracture of the navicular. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Feb 2005;125(1):59-61. [Medline].

  13. Pinney SJ, Sangeorzan BJ. Fractures of the tarsal bones. Orthop Clin North Am. Jan 2001;32(1):21-33. [Medline].

  14. Garland DE, Moses B, Salyer W. Long-term follow-up of fracture nonunions treated with PEMFs. Contemp Orthop. Mar 1991;22(3):295-302. [Medline].

  15. Fitch KD, Blackwell JB, Gilmour WN. Operation for non-union of stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jan 1989;71(1):105-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. Orava S, Hulkko A. Delayed unions and nonunions of stress fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1988;16(4):378-82. [Medline].

  17. Rymaszewski LA, Robb JE. Mechanism of fracture-dislocation of the navicular: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1988;70(3):492. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Coughlin L, Kwok D, Oliver J. Fracture dislocation of the tarsal navicular. A case report. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1987;15(6):614-5. [Medline].

  19. Wall J, Feller JF. Imaging of stress fractures in runners. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2006;25(4):781-802. [Medline].

  20. Lee S, Anderson RB. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. Foot Ankle Clin. Mar 2004;9(1):85-104. [Medline].

  21. Craig JG, Jacobson JA, Moed BR. Ultrasound of fracture and bone healing. Radiol Clin North Am. Jul 1999;37(4):737-51, ix. [Medline].

  22. Knapp TP, Garrett WE Jr. Stress fractures: general concepts. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):339-56. [Medline].

  23. Arendt EA, Griffiths HJ. The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):291-306. [Medline].

  24. Alfred RH, Belhobek G, Bergfeld JA. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A case report. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1992;20(6):766-8. [Medline].

  25. Kiss ZS, Khan KM, Fuller PJ. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1993;160(1):111-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  26. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1996;24(2):211-7. [Medline].

  27. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, et al. Risk factors for stress fractures in track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1996;24(6):810-8. [Medline].

  28. Rome K, Handoll HH, Ashford R. Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD000450. [Medline].

  29. Brukner P, Bradshaw C, Khan KM, White S, Crossley K. Stress fractures: a review of 180 cases. Clin J Sport Med. Apr 1996;6(2):85-9. [Medline].

  30. Khan KM, Fuller PJ, Brukner PD, Kearney C, Burry HC. Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes. Eighty-six cases proven with computerized tomography. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1992;20(6):657-66. [Medline].

  31. Ting A, King W, Yocum L, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular in long-distance runners. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1988;7(1):89-101. [Medline].

  32. Sanders TG, Williams PM, Vawter KW. Stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. Mil Med. Jul 2004;169(7):viii-xiii. [Medline].

  33. Armstrong DW 3rd, Rue JP, Wilckens JH, Frassica FJ. Stress fracture injury in young military men and women. Bone. Sep 2004;35(3):806-16. [Medline].

  34. Bennell KL, Brukner PD. Epidemiology and site specificity of stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):179-96. [Medline].

  35. Macintyre J, Joy E. Foot and ankle injuries in dance. Clin Sports Med. Apr 2000;19(2):351-68. [Medline].

  36. Knapp T, Mandelbaum B, Garrett W Jr. Why are stress injuries so common in the soccer player?. Clin Sports Med. Oct 1998;17(4):835-53.

  37. Zetaruk MN. The young gymnast. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2000;19(4):757-80. [Medline].

  38. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. Skeletal effects of menstrual disturbances in athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. Oct 1997;7(5):261-73. [Medline].

  39. Borges JL, Guille JT, Bowen JR. Köhler's bone disease of the tarsal navicular. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep-Oct 1995;15(5):596-8. [Medline].

  40. Ippolito E, Ricciardi Pollini PT, Falez F. Kohler's disease of the tarsal navicular: long-term follow-up of 12 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. Aug 1984;4(4):416-7. [Medline].

  41. Williams GA, Cowell HR. Köhler's disease of the tarsal navicular. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jul-Aug 1981;158:53-8. [Medline].

  42. Staheli LT. Planovalgus foot deformity. Current status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. Feb 1999;89(2):94-9. [Medline].

  43. Brockwell J, Yeung Y, Griffith JF. Stress fractures of the foot and ankle. Sports Med Arthrosc. Sep 2009;17(3):149-59. [Medline].

  44. de Clercq PF, Bevernage BD, Leemrijse T. Stress fracture of the navicular bone. Acta Orthop Belg. Dec 2008;74(6):725-34. [Medline].

  45. Saxena A, Fullem B, Hannaford D. Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed radiographic classification system. J Foot Ankle Surg. Mar-Apr 2000;39(2):96-103. [Medline].

  46. Diehl JJ, Best TM, Kaeding CC. Classification and return-to-play considerations for stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. Jan 2006;25(1):17-28, vii. [Medline].

  47. Brukner P, Bradshaw C, Bennell K. Managing common stress fractures: let risk level guide treatment. Phys Sportsmed. Aug 1998;26(8):39-47. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  48. Potter NJ, Brukner PD, Makdissi M, et al. Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management. Br J Sports Med. Aug 2006;40(8):692-5; discussion 695. [Medline].

  49. Raasch WG, Hergan DJ. Treatment of stress fractures: the fundamentals. Clin Sports Med. Jan 2006;25(1):29-36, vii. [Medline].

  50. Trock DH. Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Feb 2000;26(1):51-62, viii. [Medline].

  51. Scott G, King JB. A prospective, double-blind trial of electrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1994;76(6):820-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  52. Gossling HR, Bernstein RA, Abbott J. Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). Orthopedics. Jun 1992;15(6):711-9. [Medline].

  53. Mann JA, Pedowitz DI. Evaluation and treatment of navicular stress fractures, including nonunions, revision surgery, and persistent pain after treatment. Foot Ankle Clin. Jun 2009;14(2):187-204. [Medline].

  54. Gillespie WJ, Grant I. Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000450. [Medline].

  55. Bayramoglu A, Demiryürek D, Firat A, Oznur A, Ozsoy MH. Differential diagnosis in a professional basketball player with foot pain: is it an avulsion fracture or an os supranaviculare?. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2009;20(1):59-61. [Medline].

  56. Brockwell J, Yeung Y, Griffith JF. Stress fractures of the foot and ankle. Sports Med Arthrosc. Sep 2009;17(3):149-59. [Medline].

  57. Brukner P, Bennell K. Overuse injuries: where to now?. Br J Sports Med. Mar 1997;31(1):2. [Medline].

  58. Bruns W, Maffulli N. Lower limb injuries in children in sports. Clin Sports Med. Oct 2000;19(4):637-62. [Medline].

  59. DiGiovanni CW, Patel A, Calfee R, Nickisch F. Osteonecrosis in the foot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Apr 2007;15(4):208-17. [Medline].

  60. Haverstock BD. Foot and ankle imaging in the athlete. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. Apr 2008;25(2):249-62, vi-vii. [Medline].

  61. Hochman MG, Min KK, Zilberfarb JL. MR imaging of the symptomatic ankle and foot. Orthop Clin North Am. Oct 1997;28(4):659-83. [Medline].

  62. Hoffinger SA. Evaluation and management of pediatric foot deformities. Pediatr Clin North Am. Oct 1996;43(5):1091-111. [Medline].

  63. Hunter LY. Stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. More frequent than we realize?. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1981;9(4):217-9. [Medline].

  64. Isikan UE. The values of talonavicular angles in patients with pes planus. J Foot Ankle Surg. Sep-Oct 1993;32(5):514-6. [Medline].

  65. Khan KM, Brukner PD, Kearney C, et al. Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes. Sports Med. Jan 1994;17(1):65-76. [Medline].

  66. Lyon RM, Street CC. Pediatric sports injuries: when to refer or x-ray. Pediatr Clin North Am. Feb 1998;45(1):221-44. [Medline].

  67. Maitra RS, Johnson DL. Stress fractures. Clinical history and physical examination. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1997;16(2):259-74. [Medline].

  68. Mann JA, Pedowitz DI. Evaluation and treatment of navicular stress fractures, including nonunions, revision surgery, and persistent pain after treatment. Foot Ankle Clin. Jun 2009;14(2):187-204. [Medline].

  69. Manusov EG, Lillegard WA, Raspa RF, Epperly TD. Evaluation of pediatric foot problems: part I. The forefoot and the midfoot. Am Fam Physician. Aug 1996;54(2):592-606. [Medline].

  70. Nielsen RG, Rathleff MS, Simonsen OH, Langberg H. Determination of normal values for navicular drop during walking: a new model correcting for foot length and gender. J Foot Ankle Res. May 7 2009;2:12. [Medline].

  71. Omey ML, Micheli LJ. Foot and ankle problems in the young athlete. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jul 1999;31(7 suppl):S470-86. [Medline].

  72. Orava S, Karpakka J, Hulkko A, Takala T. Stress avulsion fracture of the tarsal navicular. An uncommon sports-related overuse injury. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1991;19(4):392-5. [Medline].

  73. Sims EL, Hardaker WM, Queen RM. Gender differences in plantar loading during three soccer-specific tasks. Br J Sports Med. Apr 2008;42(4):272-7. [Medline].

  74. Thordarson DB. Detecting and treating common fractures of the foot and ankle part 2: the midfoot and forefoot. Phys Sportsmed. Oct 1996;24(10):58-64. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  75. Wedmore IS, Charette J. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of ankle and foot injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 2000;18(1):85-113, vi. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Palpation of the N spot.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.