eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Middle Ear & Mastoid
Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma: Follow-up
Updated: Jun 29, 2009
Outcome and Prognosis
Eliminating a cholesteatoma is almost always possible; however, multiple operations may be required. Because surgery is generally successful, complications from uncontrolled cholesteatoma growth are now relatively uncommon.
Canal-wall-down tympanomastoidectomy offers a very low rate of recurrence or persistence of a cholesteatoma. Reoperation for cholesteatomas occurs in 5% or fewer patients. This compares quite favorably to the 20-40% recurrence rates associated with closed-cavity techniques11 .
Nonetheless, because the ossicular chain and/or tympanic membrane cannot always be completely restored to normal, cholesteatomas remain a relatively common cause of permanent conductive hearing loss.
Future and Controversies
Controversies
The routine use of facial nerve monitoring remains controversial. A survey of practicing otologists in 1990 showed that most experienced otologists do not believe that facial nerve monitoring is obligatory. Many experienced otologists only use it occasionally. Facial nerve monitoring requires experience and is unlikely to provide meaningful protection to an inexperienced surgeon.
On the other hand, some surgeons believe that predicting the cases in which the facial nerve is at risk is impossible and, consequently, believe monitoring should be performed in every case. These surgeons see facial nerve monitoring as a precaution, much like ECG monitoring, that may be potentially useful in any given case.
A large percentage of surgeons do not use facial nerve monitoring for all cases but, instead, monitor only selected cases. Such cases often include revision operations or situations in which the patient has had perioperative facial nerve weakness in the past or when imaging studies show facial nerve anomalies.
Future
The applicability of using small otoendoscopes as part of the surgical management of cholesteatomas is being explored. To date, they have only an adjunctive role; however, their role may expand in the future.
The author is grateful for the expert help of Pam Henderson in the preparation of this manuscript.
More on Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
| Overview: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
| Workup: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
| Treatment: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
Follow-up: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
| Multimedia: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Ottaviani F, Neglia CB, Berti E. Cytokines and adhesion molecules in middle ear cholesteatoma. A role in epithelial growth?. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(4):462-7. [Medline].
De la Cruz A, Fayad JN. Detection and management of childhood cholesteatoma. Pediatr Ann. Jun 1999;28(6):370-3. [Medline].
Kemppainen HO, Puhakka HJ, Laippala PJ, et al. Epidemiology and aetiology of middle ear cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(5):568-72. [Medline].
Golz A, Goldenberg D, Netzer A, et al. Cholesteatomas associated with ventilation tube insertion. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 1999;125(7):754-7. [Medline].
Thompson JW. Cholesteatomas. Pediatr Rev. Apr 1999;20(4):134-6. [Medline].
Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP, Bowdler DA. An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic 'second look' in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. Aug 1999;24(4):274-6. [Medline].
Gaurano JL, Joharjy IA. Middle ear cholesteatoma: characteristic CT findings in 64 patients. Ann Saudi Med. Nov-Dec 2004;24(6):442-7. [Medline].
Joel Swartz, H. Harnsberger. Imaging of the Temporal Bone. 3 Sub edition. New York: George Thieme Verlag; Oct 1, 1997.
Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M, et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol. Mar 3 2006;[Medline].
Dubrulle F, Souillard R, Chechin D, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging sequence in the detection of postoperative recurrent cholesteatoma. Radiology. Feb 2006;238(2):604-10.
Roland PS, Meyerhoff WL. Open-cavity tympanomastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Jun 1999;32(3):525-46. [Medline].
Graham MD, Delap TG, Goldsmith MM. Closed tympanomastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Jun 1999;32(3):547-54. [Medline].
Roth TN, Haeusler R. Inside-out technique cholesteatoma surgery: a retrospective long-term analysis of 604 operated ears between 1992 and 2006. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2009;30(1):59-63. [Medline].
Sanna M, Facharzt AA, Russo A, Lauda L, Pasanisi E, Bacciu A. Modified Bondy's technique: refinements of the surgical technique and long-term results. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2009;30(1):64-9. [Medline].
Busaba NY. Clinical presentation and management of labyrinthine fistula caused by chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. May 1999;108(5):435-9. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
keratoma, cholesteatoma, middle ear cholesteatoma, canal-wall-down otologic surgery, canal-wall-up otologic surgery, canal-wall-down technique, canal-wall-up technique, ear lesion, ear mass, congenitally acquired cholesteatoma, primarily acquired cholesteatoma, secondarily acquired cholesteatoma, congenital cholesteatoma, primary cholesteatoma, secondary cholesteatoma, chronic middle ear fluid, conductive hearing loss, tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane trauma, tympanic membrane injury, acute otitis media, AOM, OM, acute OM, tympanic membrane perforation, painless otorrhea, otorrhea, hearing loss, deafness
Follow-up: Middle Ear, Cholesteatoma