eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Laryngology
Percutaneous Tracheostomy: Treatment
Updated: Sep 10, 2008
Treatment
Surgical Therapy
Numerous investigative reports show that all techniques for percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) (eg, guidewire dilating forceps [GWDF], Rapitrach, percutaneous dilational tracheostomy [PDT]) have similar success rates. All techniques are based on the use of a needle guidewire to gain airway access. However, each method requires unique equipment and follows a different intraoperative procedural sequence. For example, all techniques that are conducted by serial dilatations of the stoma with commercial dilatators could be classified under PDT.
Preoperative Details
Equipment
- PDT kit (Cook Critical Care Inc, Bloomington, IN): 22-gauge needle and syringe; 11-F short punch dilator; 1.32-mm guidewire; 8-F guiding catheter; 18-F, 21-F, 24-F, 28-F, 32-F, 36-F, and 38-F dilators; Shiley size 8 double-cannula tracheostomy tube; fiberoptic bronchoscope
- GWDF kit (Sims Portex): 14-gauge needle and syringe, guidewire (J-tipped Seldinger wire type), scalpel, Howard-Kelly forceps modified to produce a pair of GWDF (see Image 1), Shiley size 8 double-cannula tracheostomy tube with curved obturator, fiberoptic bronchoscope
- Rapitrach kit (Fresenius, Runcorn, Cheshire, UK): 12-gauge needle and syringe, short guidewire, scalpel, Rapitrach PCT dilator (see Image 2), standard Portex 8-mm tracheostomy tube with curved obturator, fiberoptic bronchoscope
- Ciaglia Blue Rhino kit (Cook Critical Care Inc, Bloomington, IN): 14-gauge catheter introducer needle and syringe, guidewire (J-tipped Seldinger wire type), guiding catheter, introducer dilator, loading dilators, single tapering Blue Rhino dilator, Shiley size 8 double-cannula tracheostomy tube with curved obturator; fiberoptic bronchoscope
Anesthesia
- Intravenous sedation with the type and dosage of medications dictated by the clinical needs of the patient
- Place the patient on 100% oxygen throughout the procedure.
- Hyperextend the patient's neck if no contraindications exist. Before preparation of the surgical area begins, withdrawal of the endotracheal tube under direct vision of bronchoscope is recommended to place the balloon just under the vocal cords. The respiratory therapist then protects the tube against any further movement during the procedure.
- Infiltrate the incision site with a solution of 1-2 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
Intraoperative Details
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy technique
The neck is cleansed with antiseptic solution and properly draped. The cricoid cartilage is identified, and the skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine below the cricoid cartilage. A 1.5- to 2-cm transverse skin incision is made on the level of the first and second tracheal rings. Then, the blunt dissection of the midline is performed. A 22-gauge needle is inserted between the first and second or the second and third tracheal rings (see Image 3).
When air is aspirated into the syringe, the guidewire is introduced (see Image 4). After the guidewire is protected, the dilators are introduced (see Image 5). All dilators are inserted in a sequential manner from small to large diameter. The tracheostomy tube is then introduced along the dilator and guidewire (see Image 6). The guidewire and dilator are removed, the cuff of the tracheostomy tube is inflated, and the breathing circuit is connected. The ET tube is removed.
Guidewire dilating forceps technique
The neck is cleansed with antiseptic solution and properly draped. The neck is palpated, and the cricoid cartilage is identified. The skin below this level is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution. A 1.5- to 2-cm midline transverse cutaneous incision is made at this level. A 14-gauge IV needle with syringe is inserted in the midline of the incision. The needle is directed to pass between the first and second or the second and third tracheal rings. As soon as air begins to bubble into the syringe, the outer plastic cannula is advanced into the lumen of the trachea and the inner needle is removed. A J-tipped Seldinger wire is introduced into the trachea, and the plastic cannula is removed. The tip of the Seldinger wire is passed through the closed GWDF (see Image 1).
The forceps are advanced through the soft tissues of the neck until resistance is felt. The GWDF are opened to dilate the soft tissues anterior to the trachea. The forceps are then closed and reinserted over the wire into the trachea. A slight loss of resistance occurs as the tracheal membrane is pierced (see Image 7). To prepare the stoma of the tracheostomy, the GWDF are opened to the same diameter as the skin incision (see Image 8). A tracheostomy tube with obturator is inserted over the guidewire and advanced into the trachea. The obturator and guidewire are removed, the cuff of the tracheostomy tube is inflated, and the appropriate breathing circuit is connected. The ET tube is removed.
Rapitrach technique
The neck is cleansed with antiseptic solution and properly draped. The skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine below the cricoid cartilage. A 1.5- to 2-cm skin incision is performed at the level of the first and second tracheal rings. Subcutaneous layers are then bluntly dissected with a pair of forceps. Blunt dissection is continued until the tracheal rings can be palpated with a finger. A 12-gauge needle is inserted into the trachea between the first and second or the second and third rings. A short, flexible guidewire is inserted into the trachea, and the needle is removed.
The Rapitrach dilator (see Image 2) is introduced into the trachea over the guidewire. The dilator is opened when its tip lies in the trachea. A tracheotomy tube with obturator is inserted through the dilator jaws to the trachea. The dilator and guidewire are removed, the cuff of the tracheostomy tube is inflated, and the breathing circuit is connected. The ET tube is removed.
Bronchoscopic guidance of the gauge needle and the guidewire insertion is optional but strongly recommended, especially for less-experienced operators.17 A large number of paratracheal cannula insertions and pneumothoraces can be avoided if endoscopic monitoring is employed. Bronchoscopic monitoring also allows patients with short, fat necks to undergo PCT. However, bronchoscopic guidance during PCT appears to be the most important factor responsible for the hypercarbia that develops during the procedure. Therefore, bronchoscopic guidance should be limited to initial dilatation steps only.
Ciaglia blue rhino technique
The neck is cleansed with antiseptic solution and properly draped. The cricoid cartilage is identified, and the skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine below the cricoid cartilage. A 1-1.5 cm transverse skin incision is made on the level of the first and second tracheal rings. Then, the blunt dissection of the midline is performed. A 14-gauge angiocatheter is inserted between the first and second or the second and third tracheal rings.
When air is aspirated into the syringe, the guidewire is introduced. After the guidewire is protected, the Blue Rhino single tapering dilator is introduced over the guidewire until the stoma is dilated to an adequate diameter (36-F to 38-F). Once dilation is achieved, the tracheostomy cannula is assembled with 1 of the 3 intermediate dilators. Once assembled, it is advanced over the guidewire until the cannula is in place within the tracheal lumen. The intermediate dilator and guidewire is removed, the cuff of the tracheostomy tube is inflated, and the breathing circuit is connected.
Postoperative Details
- Air entry into the lungs is checked by chest auscultation and respiratory plethysmography.
- Excess secretions or blood should be suctioned to prevent a drop in oxygen saturation and to provide good bronchopulmonary hygiene.
- Everyday antiseptic wound care must be provided. A tracheostomy tube with an inner cannula facilitates care and hygiene and ensures added safety (due to easy removal) if obstruction from secretions occurs.
- In the event of accidental decannulation within 5-7 days of the procedure, the patient may need to be reintubated orally if the tracheostomy tube cannot be immediately reinserted because the tracheostomy tract is still relatively immature.
Follow-up
- Monitor the patient to prevent dislodgment of the tracheostomy tube.
- Deliver oxygen and/or mechanical ventilation as needed to maintain the patient's oxygen saturation and maintain appropriate ventilation.
- If using a cuffed tracheostomy tube, monitor cuff pressure carefully because prolonged inflation and/or overinflation can lead to tracheal mucosal injury.
- Clean the inner cannula as much as needed to clear secretions at least once every 8 hours.
- Suction the trachea as needed.
Complications
Numerous articles have been published comparing several techniques of percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) with open surgical tracheostomy, as well as with one another. In general, most have shown similar complication rates. Four meta-analysis studies have been published in the last decade comparing percutaneous and open tracheostomy methods.
In a meta-analysis of studies (1985-1996), Dulguerov et al found more frequent perioperative complications in the percutaneous cohort (10% vs 3%) but more postoperative complications with the surgical approach (10% vs 7%).18 Also noted was a higher incidence of perioperative death (0.44 vs 0.03%) and serious cardiorespiratory events (0.33% vs 0.06%) in the percutaneous group.
Cheng and Fee (2000) analyzed 4 studies showing PCT required shorter operative times (8 minutes vs 20.9 minutes for the ST group), produced less intraoperative minor bleeding (9% vs 25%), and postoperative bleeding (7% vs 18%), and resulted in fewer overall postoperative complications (14% vs 60%), which included stomal infection (4% vs 29%), pneumothorax (1% vs 4%), and death (0% vs 3%).19
Freeman et al (2000) analyzed 5 studies (n=236 patients) and found that percutaneous method was associated with shorter operative time (absolute difference 9.84 minutes), less perioperative bleeding (OR with 95% CI, 0.14), lower overall postoperative complication rate (OR 0.14), and lower postoperative incidence of bleeding (OR 0.39) and stomal infection (OR 0.02).20 No difference was identified in overall operative complications, days intubated prior to tracheostomy, or death.
Higgins and Punthakee (2007) recently published a meta-analysis comparing complication rates in 15 prospective, randomized-controlled trials involving 973 patients (490 percutaneous, 483 open).21 See the table below for a summary of the results. This meta-analysis showed no significant difference when comparing overall complications, with a trend toward favoring percutaneous method. However, the more serious and life-threatening complication of decannulation/obstruction was more likely to occur with the percutaneous technique and false passage trended toward favoring the open procedure. Nevertheless, no significant difference was shown between the 2 methods in regards to death.
As PCT gains more widespread exposure, studies comparing complications of the various PCT techniques have appeared. In a recent study comparing PercuTwist to PDT and guidewire dilating forceps (GWDF) techniques, the PercuTwist was found to require shorter procedure times (5.4 minutes +/- 1.2 minutes vs 9.9+/-1.1 and 6.2+/-1.4, respectively) and similarly acceptable complication rates.22 Sheu et al reported a modification of the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR) technique using a guidewire dilating forceps (GWDF) for initial dilation.23 In their case series comparing GWDF-CBR (n=114) with standard CBR (n=120), they found shorter procedure times (4.5 +/- 1.6 minutes vs 5.7 +/- 3.0 minutes, P<0.001), as well as fewer overall procedure-related complications (13.1% vs 27.5%, P=0.006). As time goes on, similar comparative studies will be performed, perhaps better elucidating optimal methods of PCT.
Summary of comparative studies results
Open table in new window
Table
| Complication | Pooled OR | 95% CI | P value |
| Decannulation/obstruction | 2.79 | 1.29-6.03 | 0.009 |
| False passage | 2.70 | 0.89-8.22 | 0.08 |
| Minor hemorrhage | 1.09 | 0.61-1.97 | 0.77 |
| Major hemorrhage | 0.60 | 0.28-1.26 | 0.17 |
| Wound infection | 0.37 | 0.22-0.62 | 0.0002 |
| Unfavorable scarring | 0.44 | 0.23-0.83 | 0.01 |
| Subglottic stenosis | 0.59 | 0.27-1.29 | 0.19 |
| Death | 0.70 | 0.24-2.01 | 0.50 |
| Overall complications | 0.75 | 0.56-1.00 | 0.05 |
| Complication | Pooled OR | 95% CI | P value |
| Decannulation/obstruction | 2.79 | 1.29-6.03 | 0.009 |
| False passage | 2.70 | 0.89-8.22 | 0.08 |
| Minor hemorrhage | 1.09 | 0.61-1.97 | 0.77 |
| Major hemorrhage | 0.60 | 0.28-1.26 | 0.17 |
| Wound infection | 0.37 | 0.22-0.62 | 0.0002 |
| Unfavorable scarring | 0.44 | 0.23-0.83 | 0.01 |
| Subglottic stenosis | 0.59 | 0.27-1.29 | 0.19 |
| Death | 0.70 | 0.24-2.01 | 0.50 |
| Overall complications | 0.75 | 0.56-1.00 | 0.05 |
When comparing costs, procedure time, and personnel involved, the percutaneous method appears to have the advantage ($461 USD less, 4.59 minutes less, 1 individual less). The decreased amount of time and personnel required for the percutaneous method is possibly because it is more likely to be performed by more experienced personnel, while trainees were more likely to perform the open technique.
More on Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
| Overview: Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
| Workup: Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
Treatment: Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
| Follow-up: Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
| Multimedia: Percutaneous Tracheostomy |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. Jun 1985;87(6):715-9. [Medline].
Ben-Nun A, Altman E, Best LA. Emergency percutaneous tracheostomy in trauma patients: an early experience. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 2004;77(3):1045-7. [Medline].
Freeman BD, Isabella K, Cobb JP, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. May 2001;29(5):926-30. [Medline].
Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, et al. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope. Mar 2001;111(3):494-500. [Medline].
Shelden CH, Pudenz RH, Freshwater DB. A new method for tracheostomy. J Neurosurg. 1955;12:428-31.
Toye FJ, Weinsten JD. A percutaneous tracheostomy device. Surgery. 1969;65:384-9.
Schachner A, Ovil Y, Sidi J, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy--a new method. Crit Care Med. Oct 1989;17(10):1052-6. [Medline].
Griggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, et al. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Jun 1990;170(6):543-5. [Medline].
Fantoni A, Ripamonti D. A non-derivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the translaryngeal method. Intensive Care Med. Apr 1997;23(4):386-92. [Medline].
Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. Oct 2000;91(4):882-6. [Medline].
Frova G, Quintel M. A new simple method for percutaneous tracheostomy: controlled rotating dilation. A preliminary report. Intensive Care Med. Mar 2002;28(3):299-303. [Medline].
Blankenship DR, Kulbersh BD, Gourin CG, et al. High-risk tracheostomy: exploring the limits of the percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. Jun 2005;115(6):987-9. [Medline].
Kluge S, Meyer A, Kuhnelt P, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Chest. Aug 2004;126(2):547-51. [Medline].
Gravvanis AI, Tsoutsos DA, Iconomou TG, et al. Percutaneous versus Conventional Tracheostomy in Burned Patients with Inhalation Injury. World J Surg. Dec 2005;29(12):1571-5. [Medline].
Ben Nun A, Orlovsky M, Best LA. Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine fractures--feasible and safe. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. Aug 2006;5(4):427-9. [Medline].
Tabaee A, Geng E, Lin J, Kakoullis S, McDonald B, Rodriguez H, et al. Impact of neck length on the safety of percutaneous and surgical tracheotomy: a prospective, randomized study. Laryngoscope. Sep 2005;115(9):1685-90. [Medline].
Kost KM. Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope. Oct 2005;115(10 Pt 2):1-30. [Medline].
Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, et al. Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. Aug 1999;27(8):1617-25. [Medline].
Cheng E, Fee WE Jr. Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep 2000;109(9):803-7. [Medline].
Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, et al. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest. Nov 2000;118(5):1412-8. [Medline].
Higgins KM, Punthakee X. Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. Mar 2007;117(3):447-54. [Medline].
Yurtseven N, Aydemir B, Karaca P, et al. PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia's techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol. Jun 2007;24(6):492-7. [Medline].
Sheu CC, Tsai JR, Hung JY, et al. A simple modification of Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique for tracheostomy: using a guidewire dilating forceps for initial dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Jan 2007;31(1):114-9. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, et al. Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized trial with 1-yr double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med. May 2005;33(5):1015-20. [Medline].
Barba CA. The intensive care unit as an operating room. Surg Clin North Am. Jun 2000;80(3):957-73, xi. [Medline].
Benjamin B, Kertesz T. Obstructive suprastomal granulation tissue following percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. Dec 1999;27(6):596-600. [Medline].
Berrouschot J, Oeken J, Steiniger L, et al. Perioperative complications of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. Nov 1997;107(11 Pt 1):1538-44. [Medline].
Bodenham A, Cohen A, Webster N. A clinical evaluation of the 'Rapitrach'. A bedside percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Anaesthesia. Apr 1992;47(4):332-4. [Medline].
Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Lischke V, et al. Translaryngeal tracheostomy: two modified techniques versus the basic technique--early experience in 75 critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. Apr 2000;26(4):457-61. [Medline].
Caldicott LD, Oldroyd GJ, Bodenham AR. An evaluation of a new percutaneous tracheostomy kit. Anaesthesia. Jan 1995;50(1):49-51. [Medline].
Cheng E, Fee WE Jr. Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep 2000;109(9):803-7. [Medline].
Ciaglia P, Graniero KD. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Results and long-term follow-up. Chest. Feb 1992;101(2):464-7. [Medline].
Cobean R, Beals M, Moss C, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure. Arch Surg. Mar 1996;131(3):265-71. [Medline].
Cole IE. Elective percutaneous (Rapitrac) tracheotomy: results of a prospective trial. Laryngoscope. Oct 1994;104(10):1271-5. [Medline].
Escarment J, Suppini A, Sallaberry M, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy by forceps dilation: report of 162 cases. Anaesthesia. Feb 2000;55(2):125-30. [Medline].
Fernandez L, Norwood S, Roettger R, et al. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance in critically ill patients. Arch Surg. Feb 1996;131(2):129-32. [Medline].
Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest. Aug 1996;110(2):480-5. [Medline].
Friedman Y, Franklin C. The technique of percutaneous tracheostomy. Using serial dilation to secure an airway with minimal risk. J Crit Illn. Feb 1993;8(2):289-97. [Medline].
Friedman Y, Mayer AD. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest. Aug 1993;104(2):532-5. [Medline].
Futran ND, Dutcher PO, Roberts JK. The safety and efficacy of bedside tracheotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 1993;109(4):707-11. [Medline].
Gaukroger MC, Allt-Graham J. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Dec 1994;32(6):375-9. [Medline].
Goldenberg D, Golz A, Huri A, et al. Percutaneous dilation tracheotomy versus surgical tracheotomy: our experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 2003;128(3):358-63. [Medline].
Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Scheid EH Jr, et al. Tracheostomy placement in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injuries: American Spinal Injury Association Grade A. J Neurosurg. Jan 2004;100(1 Suppl Spine):20-3. [Medline].
Hazard PB, Garrett HE, Adams JW, et al. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: experience with 55 elective procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. Jul 1988;46(1):63-7. [Medline].
Heffner JE. Timing of tracheotomy in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. Mar 1993;147(3):768-71. [Medline].
Heyrosa MG, Melniczek DM, Rovito P, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: a safe procedure in the morbidly obese. J Am Coll Surg. Apr 2006;202(4):618-22. [Medline].
Hill BB, Zweng TN, Maley RH, et al. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: report of 356 cases. J Trauma. Aug 1996;41(2):238-43; discussion 243-4. [Medline].
Jackson C. Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. 1909;19:285-90.
Johnson JL, Cheatham ML, Sagraves SG, et al. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a comparison of single- versus multiple-dilator techniques. Crit Care Med. Jun 2001;29(6):1251-4. [Medline].
Kahveci SF, Goren S, Kutlay O, et al. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy experience with 72 critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. Nov 2000;17(11):688-91. [Medline].
Kearney PA, Griffen MM, Ochoa JB, et al. A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Ann Surg. May 2000;231(5):701-9. [Medline].
Kollig E, Heydenreich U, Roetman B, et al. Ultrasound and bronchoscopic controlled percutaneous tracheostomy on trauma ICU. Injury. Nov 2000;31(9):663-8. [Medline].
Leonard RC, Lewis RH, Singh B, et al. Late outcome from percutaneous tracheostomy using the Portex kit. Chest. Apr 1999;115(4):1070-5. [Medline].
Lin JC, Maley RH Jr, Landreneau RJ. Extensive posterior-lateral tracheal laceration complicating percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. Oct 2000;70(4):1194-6. [Medline].
MacCallum PL, Parnes LS, Sharpe MD, et al. Comparison of open, percutaneous, and translaryngeal tracheostomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 2000;122(5):686-90. [Medline].
Manara AR. Experience with percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care: the technique of choice?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Jun 1994;32(3):155-60. [Medline].
Mansharamani NG, Koziel H, Garland R, et al. Safety of bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in obese patients in the ICU. Chest. May 2000;117(5):1426-9. [Medline].
Marelli D, Paul A, Manolidis S, et al. Endoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy: early results of a consecutive trial. J Trauma. Apr 1990;30(4):433-5. [Medline].
Marx WH, Ciaglia P, Graniero KD. Some important details in the technique of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy via the modified Seldinger technique. Chest. Sep 1996;110(3):762-6. [Medline].
Massick DD, Powell DM, Price PD, et al. Quantification of the learning curve for percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope. Feb 2000;110(2 Pt 1):222-8. [Medline].
McFarlane C, Denholm SW, Sudlow CL, et al. Laryngotracheal stenosis: a serious complication of percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesthesia. Jan 1994;49(1):38-40. [Medline].
McHenry CR, Raeburn CD, Lange RL, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: a cost-effective alternative to standard open tracheostomy. Am Surg. Jul 1997;63(7):646-51; discussion 651-2. [Medline].
Melloni G, Muttini S, Gallioli G, et al. Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A prospective-randomized study with long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). Feb 2002;43(1):113-21. [Medline].
Muhammad JK, Major E, Wood A, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: haemorrhagic complications and the vascular anatomy of the anterior neck. A review based on 497 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Jun 2000;29(3):217-22. [Medline].
O'Keeffe T, Goldman RK, Mayberry JC, et al. Tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine fixation. J Trauma. Oct 2004;57(4):855-60. [Medline].
Petros S, Engelmann L. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in a medical ICU. Intensive Care Med. Jun 1997;23(6):630-4. [Medline].
Porter JM, Ivatury RR. Preferred route of tracheostomy--percutaneous versus open at the bedside: a randomized, prospective study in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg. Feb 1999;65(2):142-6. [Medline].
Powell DM, Price PD, Forrest LA. Review of percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. Feb 1998;108(2):170-7. [Medline].
Reilly PM, Sing RF, Giberson FA, et al. Hypercarbia during tracheostomy: a comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, percutaneous Doppler, and standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med. Aug 1997;23(8):859-64. [Medline].
Rodriguez JL, Steinberg SM, Luchetti FA, et al. Early tracheostomy for primary airway management in the surgical critical care setting. Surgery. Oct 1990;108(4):655-9. [Medline].
Rosenbower TJ, Morris JA Jr, Eddy VA, et al. The long-term complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Am Surg. Jan 1998;64(1):82-6; discussion 86-7. [Medline].
Smith I, Fleming S, Cernaianu A. Mishaps during transport from the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. Mar 1990;18(3):278-81. [Medline].
Sustic A, Krstulovic B, Eskinja N, et al. Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in patients with anterior cervical spine fixation: preliminary report. Spine. Sep 1 2002;27(17):1942-5; discussion 1945. [Medline].
van Heerbeek N, Fikkers BG, van den Hoogen FJ, et al. The guide wire dilating forceps technique of percutaneous tracheostomy. Am J Surg. Apr 1999;177(4):311-5. [Medline].
van Heurn LW, van Geffen GJ, Brink PR. Clinical experience with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: report of 150 cases. Eur J Surg. Jul 1996;162(7):531-5. [Medline].
Van Natta TL, Morris JA, Eddy VA, et al. Elective bedside surgery in critically injured patients is safe and cost-effective. Ann Surg. May 1998;227(5):618-24; discussion 624-6. [Medline].
Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Boicey CM, et al. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective evaluation of a modification of the current technique in 100 patients. World J Surg. Sep 2000;24(9):1109-15. [Medline].
Walz MK, Peitgen K, Thurauf N, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--early results and long-term outcome of 326 critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. Jul 1998;24(7):685-90. [Medline].
Wang MB, Berke GS, Ward PH, et al. Early experience with percutaneous tracheotomy. Laryngoscope. Feb 1992;102(2):157-62. [Medline].
Winkler WB, Karnik R, Seelmann O, et al. Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: experience with 71 ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. Aug 1994;20(7):476-9. [Medline].
Wu JJK, Huang MS, Tang GJ, et al. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Chin Med Assoc. 2003;66:467-473.
Further Reading
Keywords
percutaneous tracheostomy, tracheostomy, PCT, percutaneous dilational tracheostomy, PDT, guidewire dilating forceps, GWDF, Rapitrach method, mechanical ventilation, airway obstruction, inflammatory disease, benign laryngeal pathology, webs, cysts, papilloma, malignant laryngeal tumors, laryngeal trauma, laryngeal stenosis, tracheal stenosis, pulmonary toilet, obstructive sleep apnea
Treatment: Percutaneous Tracheostomy