eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Laryngology

Dynamic Voice Evaluation Using Flexible Endoscopy

Thomas L Carroll, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine
Robert A Nunez, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh; Clark A Rosen, MD, Director, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center; Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Updated: Aug 1, 2008

Introduction

Indirect mirror laryngoscopy is the traditional modality used to perform laryngeal examinations on dysphonic patients. It may be inadequate for the diagnosis of mass lesions when patient gagging does not permit adequate visualization. Because of the gagging and the unnatural position of the larynx during the examination, mirror laryngoscopy is not practical for the diagnosis of voice disorders that relate to physiologic and functional pathology.

The rod lens telescope, introduced by Hopkins, has several advantages over the traditional indirect laryngoscope. It produces a magnified, recordable image of the larynx that is superior for the diagnosis of mass lesions and mucosal wave abnormalities, especially when performing stroboscopy.

However, its use requires one to grasp the tongue and advance it forward, which can lead to a variable degree of gagging in susceptible patients and has the potential for altering the normal laryngeal anatomy due to the tethering effect of the tongue on the larynx. These factors decrease its use for the diagnosis of functional and movement disorders of the larynx because findings can be subtle and require a physiologic laryngeal position for examination.¹

The flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope, introduced by Sawashima and Hirose in 1968, allows visualization of the larynx with the patient in a comfortable, natural position.² Therefore, indirect laryngoscopy and the rod lens telescope for dynamic voice evaluation is preferable. This article describes an appropriate method of performing a comprehensive dynamic voice evaluation using flexible laryngoscopy.

Preparation

The following equipment should be available for this examination:

• Flexible laryngoscope (2.8-4.2 mm diameter)
• Light source (halogen or xenon)
• Video camera with C-mount adapter
• Video recorder/monitor
• Stroboscopic light source

The procedure should be explained, and the patient should be seated comfortably prior to commencing the examination. Gentle reassurance is often necessary. Anterior rhinoscopy is performed, and then a topical decongestant is applied to both sides of the nasal cavity in anticipation of a potentially difficult posterior nasal anatomy. Several choices of topical decongestants are available (eg, phenylephrine hydrochloride [Neo-Synephrine], ephedrine, oxymetazoline, epinephrine). Following or concurrently with decongestion, topical anesthesia is applied. Once again, several choices are available, including 4% lidocaine and 2% tetracaine. The preferred practice is to wait for several minutes after the application of topical medicines to allow for maximum effect.

Examination

Nasal cavity

With the patient seated upright and leaning forward slightly from the waist with their chin protruded (sniffing position), pass a flexible laryngoscope into the nasal cavity. Examine the nasal cavity for nasal septal deviation, polyposis, and other causes of nasal obstruction that could contribute to the voice disorder. Two areas that often allow for easy passage through the nasal cavity include the floor of the nose and between the inferior and middle turbinates.

Nasopharynx

After passage through the nasal cavity, visualize the nasopharynx. Examine the nasopharynx for evidence of adenoid hypertrophy or other obstructive masses. Evaluate patency of the eustachian tubes bilaterally. At this time, direct attention to the soft palate. First, ask the patient to produce a prolonged "EE" sound. During this sustained phonation, observe the soft palate for evidence of tremor. The differential diagnosis of such a tremor includes a variety of neurologic conditions including Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and pseudobulbar palsy.

Observe the free edge of the soft palate for adequacy of contact with the Passavant ridge along the posterior wall of the nasopharynx. A gap between them or observation of a lack of lateral pharyngeal squeeze is diagnostic of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The differential diagnosis for VPI includes a vagal nerve injury or other neurologic weakness, cleft palate (both overt and submucous), stroke, and iatrogenic injury from a previous soft palate or tonsil surgery.

Subtler VPI can be diagnosed during sustained phonation. This manifests as bubbling at the junction of the soft palate and posterior pharyngeal wall resulting from air leakage across the velopharyngeal junction. Perform this further evaluation of velopharyngeal closure by having the patient say "Coca Cola" and sustain a hissing "S" sound.  

Oropharynx

Upon completion of the nasopharyngeal examination, ask the patient to breathe slowly through the nose. As the soft palate pulls away from the Passavant ridge, advance the tip of the flexible laryngoscope into the oropharynx. First observe the base of tongue at rest to look for fasciculations and asymmetry. Instruct the patient to protrude the tongue. Examine the base of the tongue and vallecula for evidence of tremor, weakness, or pooling of secretions. Also observe for neoplasms, retention cysts, or lingual tonsillitis.

Hypopharynx

Ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver by puffing out their cheeks. This allows examination of piriform sinuses for pooling of secretions or a neoplasm.

Larynx

Position the tip of the laryngoscope just above the level of the epiglottis. If the glottis is not clearly visualized because of posterior displacement of the epiglottis, remind the patient to lean forward and protrude the chin. Instruct the patient to breathe quietly. Observe the glottis for evidence of inappropriate adduction during inspiration or expiration that could be consistent with paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder if their history is also contributory.

Ask the patient to produce a sustained "EE" sound. Carefully examine the glottis for lesions, vocal fold mobility, and vocal fold atrophy. Common glottic lesions include nodules, cysts, papilloma, leukoplakia, and neoplasms. Common vocal cord movement abnormalities include paresis (reduced vocal fold motion), paralysis, tremor, and hyperfunctional voice disorders (eg, muscle tension dysphonia [MTD]). Atrophic vocal folds are associated with a prominence of the vocal process of the arytenoid due to a loss of the muscle bulk of the membranous portion of the vocal fold and deepening of the laryngeal ventricle. An elliptical closure pattern is often seen in atrophic vocal folds.

Ask the patient to phonate continuously and slide from a low-pitch to a high-pitch on an "EE" vowel and then slide back down from high to low pitch in the same fashion. The vocal folds should lengthen symmetrically when going from low to high and shorten symmetrically when going from high to low. Unilateral paralysis manifests as an inability to lengthen the ipsilateral vocal cord. If both vocal folds fail to lengthen, this may indicate bilateral superior laryngeal nerve palsies. In patients with vocal fold paralysis, the atrophic paralyzed vocal fold may lie cranial or caudal to the healthy vocal cord. The detection of such a level of mismatch may be important in optimizing the results of vocal fold medialization. 

An evaluation of vocal fold paralysis should include vocal fold position, bulk, and length/tension. Perform further assessment of vocal fold mobility by requesting the patient say "HEE - HEE - HEE" with a breath between each "HEE" sound or having the patient alternate between an "EE" and a sniff through the nose. This produces alternating maximal adduction and abduction of the vocal folds, allowing for the detection of subtle movement abnormalities. For example, a person with recovered vocal fold paralysis may demonstrate a subtle decrease in abduction that could otherwise be missed. Having the patient perform 3-5 sniffs in a row without the intermittent sustained vowel can also show symmetry in posterior cricoarytenoid muscle function.¹

In situations in which a lack of vocal fold movement is observed during attempts at phonation and a functional etiology is suggested, ask the patient to cough. Alternately, the tip of the laryngoscope may be used to touch the tip of epiglottis in order to stimulate the cough reflex. Adduction of the vocal folds in this situation confirms a functional etiology.

Hyperfunctional speech (eg, MTD) is accentuated through the production of "EE" and "OO" sounds. Ask the patient to repeat one (or more) of the following sentences: "We see 3 green trees; you should use new blue shoes," or "You could need 2 new shoes if these don't fit."

MTD is a form of laryngeal hyperfunction characterized by an inappropriate use of laryngeal musculature that is either primary, without an obvious laryngeal pathology, or secondary due to overcompensation for glottic insufficiency (eg, immobility, vocal fold lesion). Other synonyms for MTD include hyperfunctional dysphonia, muscle misuse dysphonia, hyperkinetic dysphonia, musculoskeletal tension dysphonia, mechanical voice disorder, functional hypertensive dysphonia, laryngeal tension-fatigue syndrome, and laryngeal isometric dysphonia.³

MTD often manifests as adduction of the false vocal cords or the anteroposterior shortening of the larynx during connected speech production or both. The voice is generally rough or strained with an effortful phonation. Primary MTD can often result after a URI or other temporary laryngeal insult (eg, mild paresis, transient overuse lesion) and manifests as residual, incorrect use of the laryngeal apparatus; it is often corrected with speech therapy. 

In certain cases, subtle MTD missed with the above exercises may be demonstrated by having the patient engage in normal daily speech. For example, a teacher may be asked to start a lecture or a salesperson asked to start a sales talk. This exercise is particularly useful for planning speech therapy and for evaluating progress in those patients who are already undergoing therapy.

Sometimes, having the patients sing is useful. In a patient without professional voice training, singing a simple song, such as "Happy Birthday," may produce useful information regarding the ability of the patient to change pitch and may demonstrate spasms or tremors. In a patient who has professional voice training, singing their normal repertoire under laryngoscopic visualization often elucidates findings useful for guiding voice therapy.

Finally, advance the tip of the flexible laryngoscope past the tip of the epiglottis so that it lies just above the false vocal folds. Perform video stroboscopy as the patient produces a sustained "EE" sound. Abnormalities in the mucosal wave and the vocal fold vibration may be detected. Subtle lesions also may be noted. If a subtle mucosal lesion is detected that requires further characterization, a rod lens telescope, which yields a clearer, larger view of the glottis, may be used.  In cases with significant MTD and difficulty visualizing the true vocal folds during stroboscopy, asking the patient to say "EE" in a soft, sung, higher pitch or having them hum in a high pitch with the chin extended often allows partial if not complete visualization of the true vocal folds.¹

Physical Diagnosis

Muscle tension dysphonia

• Signs and symptoms
  • Patients have a rough voice with a variable pitch.
  • They may have anterior neck pain or tenderness due to tension in the strap muscles.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • Patients demonstrate inappropriate false cord approximation.
  • Additionally or as a separate finding, patients have apparent anteroposterior shortening of the larynx with anterior tilting of the arytenoids.
• Verbal tasks ("EE" or "OO" sounds)
  • "We see 3 green trees."
  • "You could use new blue shoes."
  • "You could need 2 new shoes if these don't fit."

Spasmodic dysphonia

• Signs and symptoms
  • Regarding the adductor, patients have strained voice breaks, generally at the onset of speech. This is accentuated by plosives or stops.
  • Regarding the abductor, patients have breathy voice breaks, generally at onset of speech. This is accentuated by plosives or stops.
  • Voice symptoms may be associated with dystonias in other groups (eg, blepharospasm).
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • Patients demonstrate dramatic and forceful glottic adduction, including supraglottic findings similar to muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), with voice breaks.
  • Patients demonstrate crisp vocal fold abduction with voice breaks.
• Verbal tasks
  • "Buy Bob a baseball."
  • "Pay Paul a penny."

Paradoxical vocal fold movement

• Signs and symptoms
  • The voice may be normal. However, patients with this disorder often have dysphonia from other causes.
  • Dysphonia may be secondary to vocal cord trauma from a chronic cough.
  • Dysphonia may be due to reflux-induced laryngitis.
  • Patients may have a breathy voice due to a functional voice disorder.
  • Dysphonia is generally observed in conjunction with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The usual cluster of associated laryngopharynx manifestations can be observed.
  • Chronic cough is common.
  • Patients with severe cases of paradoxical vocal cord movement may present with stridor and dyspnea and a history of ER visits and/or airway interventions is not uncommon.
  • Strong odors such as perfumes, gasoline, and cleaning products often set the patient into a spasms.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • While watching quiet breathing, the patient demonstrates paradoxical vocal fold adduction during inspiration and/or expiration.
  • The patient may have findings of reflux laryngitis, such as a diffusely erythematous larynx, posterior glottic erythema, or pachyderma larynges.
  • The significance of expiratory closure during quiet respiration is unclear and may represent a physiologic finding.  The history is often more telling than the examination findings.
• Verbal tasks
  • The patient is asked to breathe quietly.
  • The patient is asked to maximally inspire and exhale.
  • Asking the patient to breathe perfume may demonstrate the otherwise subtle findings.

Atrophic vocal cords

• Signs and symptoms
  • The patient's voice is sometimes breathy.
  • The voice is sometimes rough from associated MTD.
  • Patients often complain of loss of volume or endurance of their voice.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • The patient demonstrates a thinned vocal cord with prominence of the vocal process, which is often referred to as a "bowed" vocal cord.
  • This is often associated with secondary MTD.

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis/paresis

• Signs and symptoms
  • The voice ranges from breathy to normal depending on the position of the immobile cord and the degree of atrophy.
  • The voice may be rough from associated MTD.
  • In cases in which the vocal cord is lateralized, patients may have dysphagia and aspiration.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • Associated vocal cord atrophy may be present.
  • Care should be taken to ascertain the level of vocal cords. The paralyzed cord may lie more cranially or caudally than the normal cord, which could affect the results of surgical medialization.
  • A displaced arytenoid may be indicative of arytenoid dislocation and EMG should be obtained to confirm nerve-muscle interaction.
• Verbal task
  • Vocal fold immobility is accentuated by having the patient say "EE" and then sniff many times in a row.  This vocalization followed by deep inspiration produces maximal adduction followed by maximal abduction.

Functional voice disorder

• Signs and symptoms
  • The voice is breathy and sometimes aphonic.
  • The patient may have paradoxical vocal fold movement.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings: Nonatrophic cords with significant bowing may be seen during attempts to phonate.
• Verbal tasks: Appropriate adduction and glottic closure may occur with coughing, laughing, or singing.

Essential tremor

• Signs and symptoms
  • The voice is tremulous.
  • Symptoms may be associated with spasmodic dysphonia.
  • They are often observed in conjunction with vocal cord atrophy.
  • A tremor in other muscle groups may be present.
• Dynamic voice analysis findings
  • During the nasopharyngeal examination, tremor of the soft palate may be noted as the patient makes a prolonged "EE" sound.
  • Upon tongue protrusion, a tremor of the tongue base can be seen.
  • A tremor in the strap muscles may produce a rhythmic elevation of the larynx.
  • Rhythmic involuntary vocal cord adduction or abduction is diagnostic.

References

1. Rubin AD. Neurolaryngologic evaluation of the performer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Oct 2007;40(5):971-89, vi. [Medline].

2. Sawashima M, Hirose H. New laryngoscopic technique by use of fiber optics. J Acoust Soc Am. Jan 1968;43(1):168-9. [Medline].

3. Franco RA, Andrus JG. Common diagnoses and treatments in professional voice users. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Oct 2007;40(5):1025-61, vii. [Medline].

4. Hawkins DB, Clark RW. Flexible laryngoscopy in neonates, infants, and young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jan-Feb 1987;96(1 Pt 1):81-5. [Medline].

5. Lancer JM, Jones AS. Flexible fibreoptic rhinolaryngoscopy. Results of 338 consecutive examinations. J Laryngol Otol. Aug 1985;99(8):771-3. [Medline].

6. Lancer JM, Moir AA. The flexible fibreoptic rhinolaryngoscope. J Laryngol Otol. Aug 1985;99(8):767-70. [Medline].

7. Sataloff RT, Spiegel JR, Hawkshaw MJ. Strobovideolaryngoscopy: results and clinical value. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep 1991;100(9 Pt 1):725-7. [Medline].

8. Selkin SG. Clinical use of the pediatric flexible fiberscope. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Oct 1985;10(1):75-80. [Medline].

9. Silberman HD, Wilf H, Tucker JA. Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscope. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep-Oct 1976;85(5 Pt.1):640-5. [Medline].

10. Stiles CM, Stiles QR, Denson JS. A flexible fiber optic laryngoscope. JAMA. Sep 11 1972;221(11):1246-7. [Medline].

11. Södersten M, Lindestad PA. A comparison of vocal fold closure in rigid telescopic and flexible fiberoptic laryngostroboscopy. Acta Otolaryngol. 1992;112(1):144-50. [Medline].

12. Welch AR. The practical and economic value of flexible system laryngoscopy. J Laryngol Otol. Dec 1982;96(12):1125-9. [Medline].

13. White JF, Knight RE. Office videofiberoptic laryngoscopy. Laryngoscope. Sep 1984;94(9):1166-9. [Medline].

14. Yanagisawa E, Owens TW, Strothers G, et al. Videolaryngoscopy. A comparison of fiberscopic and telescopic documentation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep-Oct 1983;92(5 Pt 1):430-6. [Medline].

15. Yanagisawa E, Yanagisawa K. Stroboscopic videolaryngoscopy: a comparison of fiberscopic and telescopic documentation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Apr 1993;102(4 Pt 1):255-65. [Medline].

Keywords

dynamic voice evaluation using flexible endoscopy, dysphonia, voice analysis, voice evaluation, DVE, voice disorder, speaking disorder, larynx lesions, mass lesions of the larynx, mucosal wave abnormality, functional larynx disorder, movement disorders of the larynx, flexible fiberoptic laryngoscope, flexible laryngoscopy, flexible laryngoscope, adenoid hypertrophy, larynx mass, velopharyngeal insufficiency, VPI, velopharyngeal incompetence, nasopharyngeal examination, nasopharyngeal exam, larynx examination, larynx exam, oropharynx neoplasm, oropharynx retention cysts, lingual tonsillitis, oropharynx examination, nasopharynx examination, hypopharynx examination, oropharynx exam, nasopharynx exam, hypopharynx exam, paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder, vocal fold mobility, and vocal fold atrophy, hyperfunctional voice disorder, muscle tension dysphonia, MTD, spasmodic dysphonia, atrophic vocal cords

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Thomas L Carroll, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine
Thomas L Carroll, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Robert A Nunez, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh
Robert A Nunez, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Clark A Rosen, MD, Director, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center; Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Clark A Rosen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Pennsylvania Medical Society
Disclosure: Bioform Medical  Consulting fee Consulting

Medical Editor

Hassan H Ramadan, MD, MSc, Professor and Vice-Chair, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, West Virginia University
Hassan H Ramadan, MD, MSc is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, and American Rhinologic Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

Robert M Kellman, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University
Robert M Kellman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Neurotology Society, American Rhinologic Society, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Society of the State of New York, and Triological Society
Disclosure: GE Healthcare Honoraria Review panel membership

CME Editor

Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders
Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society
Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation unstricted gift unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo  Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)