Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures Treatment & Management

  • Author: Travis T Tollefson, MD, MPH, FACS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  more...
 
Updated: Mar 11, 2015
 

Medical Therapy

Patients with a nondisplaced or minimally displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture and normal findings on ophthalmologic examination can be treated conservatively. Medical management includes a soft diet, analgesia, and close follow-up care.

Next

Surgical Therapy

The ultimate goal in treating zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures is to obtain an accurate stable reduction while minimizing external scars and functional deformity. These goals are accomplished more easily several days after the injury, when much of the tissue edema has resolved and any residual deformity can be appreciated more readily.

After induction of general endotracheal anesthesia, the surgeon should evaluate any existing lacerations that may be used for fracture reduction or application of plates and screws. Common surgical approaches to the ZMC buttresses include sublabial, lateral orbit, lower eyelid, and scalp incisions. These incisions should be used in a hierarchical fashion starting with the sublabial incision.

The sublabial incision is well camouflaged and is associated with minimal morbidity, including mild trigeminal paresthesias. It can be used to reduce and plate the zygomaticomaxillary buttress (and, at times, the inferior orbital rim). Lateral orbital incisions are indicated for those fractures that cannot be adequately reduced and fixated via the sublabial approach. Lower eyelid incisions are well hidden but can result in postoperative lower eyelid malposition and corneal exposure (entropion or ectropion). They should generally be reserved for moderately-to-severely displaced fractures requiring exposure of 3 buttresses for adequate repair (obviously, an isolated, comminuted, inferior orbital rim fracture will likely require a lid incision for repair).

Finally, for severely comminuted ZMC fractures with disruption of the zygomatic arch, a coronal scalp incision is required. Scalp incisions are associated with little morbidity, but often result in apparent scars and scalp anesthesia. As a general rule, the surgeon should continue to expose the fracture until adequate reduction is obtained and functionally stable fixation can be achieved.

Zygomaticomaxillary buttress

The zygomaticomaxillary buttress is commonly fractured in tetrapod injuries. Use a transverse buccal sulcus incision to expose this area. The incision is well hidden, results in no external scar, and exposes the entire face of the maxilla. Incise the mucosa 1.5-2 cm above the gingiva using guarded electrocautery. This technique facilitates wound closure. Carry the incision from the midline to the second maxillary molar and extend as necessary. Take care to avoid entering the buccal fat pad posteriorly because this will result in fat prolapse, which obscures the surgical field. After the fracture is carefully reduced, apply an L-shaped 2-mm miniplate to fixate the ZMC to the palate. The image below shows the fixation of the ZMC. Apply at least 2 screws on each side of the fracture. Finally, irrigate the wound with antibiotic solution and close it with running, locking, 3-0 chromic suture.[#targetF1]

Intraoperative photograph of a titanium plating fo Intraoperative photograph of a titanium plating for rigid fixation of a zygomatic-maxillary buttress fracture in a complex maxillary fracture.

Frontozygomatic buttress

With more severe injuries, the frontozygomatic buttress is usually the second buttress to be exposed. Comminution at this site is uncommon, and fractures can often be reduced and plated through a limited incision.[14] Although a visible scar results, incisions at this site are well hidden and associated with little morbidity. The 3 most common approaches to the frontozygomatic buttress are the lateral upper lid blepharoplasty, lateral brow, and hemicoronal incisions.

Lateral upper lid blepharoplasty

A lateral upper lid blepharoplasty incision provides excellent access to the frontozygomatic suture line with better aesthetic results than the lateral brow incision. Mark a 2- to 3-cm skin incision in a natural crease on the lateral third of the upper eyelid. Then, retract the eyelid skin laterally over the frontozygomatic suture line. Incise the skin and orbicularis oculi muscle with a scalpel. Place retractors in the incision to lateralize the upper lid soft tissue over the frontozygomatic buttress. This protects the lacrimal gland or orbital fat. The levator aponeurosis is quite thin laterally and at low risk for injury. Use a guarded needlepoint electrocautery to incise the edematous subcutaneous tissue and periosteum exposing the fracture.

After the fracture is reduced, apply a 5-hole, 1.5- to 1.7-mm, low profile miniplate. Irrigate the wound with antibiotic solution, and close the subcutaneous tissues and orbicularis oculi muscle with 3-0 resorbable suture. Close the skin with interrupted 6-0 monofilament nonabsorbable suture, which is removed 5-7 days after the operation. Tissue glue can also be used for skin closure; however, extra caution must be used to avoid contact with the globe.

Lateral brow incision

The lateral brow incision is time tested and has been used by many surgeons. However, it has few if any advantages over the upper eyelid approach described above and results in a higher risk of visible postoperative scaring, alopecia of the lateral eyebrow, or both. Place the incision within or just below the lateral brow and carry it onto the frontozygomatic buttress (described above under blepharoplasty incision). Meticulous closure of the incision with eversion of the soft tissues will optimize the postoperative result.

Hemicoronal incision

The hemicoronal incision provides wide surgical exposure to the zygoma and frontal bone. Indications for this approach include superior orbital rim fractures and comminuted fractures of the ZMC, including the zygomatic arch. When possible, this approach should be avoided in patients with male pattern baldness.

Prior to incision, part or shave the hair between the vertex and the superior helical root. Place the incision at least 5 cm behind the hairline. A zigzag or "w" pattern can be used to help camouflage the incision. This is most effective in patients with straight hair that falls over the suture line. If necessary, the incision can be extended across the midline for additional exposure.

After injection with local anesthetic, incise the skin with a scalpel, starting at the vertex and moving toward the helical root. Carry the incision through the galea aponeurosis, leaving the pericranium and temporalis muscle fascia (deep temporal fascia) intact. Apply Raney clips to control blood loss. Special care must be taken to avoid injury to the temporal branch of the facial nerve that lies in the temporoparietal fascia (superficial temporal fascia).

The galea aponeurosis elevates easily from the pericranium. Use careful blunt dissection to elevate the temporoparietal fascia free from the temporalis muscle fascia. Join the 2 dissection planes sharply at the temporal line. The incision can be carried across the midline to the contralateral ear for more exposure or for access to the frontal sinus and orbital rims. To expose any fracture of the frontozygomatic buttress or orbital rim, the periosteum can be incised and elevated. Alternatively, the pericranium can be incised at the vertex with the skin incision and carry out the entire central dissection in a subperiosteal plane. If there is any risk of frontal sinus or nasoorbitoethmoid injury, maintain the pericranial flap intact for possible closure of CSF leaks.

Reduce the fractures and apply 1.5- to 1.7-mm miniplates. Using resorbable monofilament sutures, resuspend the soft tissues to the flap and the temporalis muscle fascia. This reduces the risk of postoperative ptosis of the facial soft tissues. Close the galea aponeurosis with a 3-0 resorbable polyglycolic suture and the scalp with staples. Leave a 0.25- inch Penrose drain in place for 24 hours, and apply a pressure dressing for 3-5 days.

Infraorbital buttress

The orbital rim, transconjunctival, and subciliary incisions are 3 common surgical approaches to the orbital rim. An endoscopic approach may also be useful.

Orbital rim incision

Position a 3- to 4-cm incision directly over the bony orbital rim approximately 1.5-2.0 cm below the lower lid margin. Carry the incision directly through the skin, orbicularis oculi muscle, subcutaneous tissue, and periosteum. While this approach is faster than eyelid incisions and is associated with minimal risk of postoperative eyelid malposition, it results in a visible cutaneous scar and can be associated with lower eyelid edema. Consequently, most surgeons avoid this incision except in patients with significant rhytides and minimal concerns of an external scar.

Transconjunctival approach

This approach requires a thorough understanding of lower eyelid anatomy. The technique offers a well-concealed incision, has a low risk of lower lid ectropion, and provides excellent exposure to the orbital rim and floor.[6, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19] The dissection can be performed in a preseptal or postseptal (retroseptal) plane.

For a preseptal approach, place a corneal shield over the globe. Inject a small amount (0.5-1.0 mL) of local anesthetic into the conjunctival incision line. The incision runs along the inferior border of the tarsal plate between the punctum and the lateral commissure. Place two 6-0 silk retraction sutures through the gray line of the lower eyelid and retract them inferiorly to expose the palpebral conjunctiva.

Use a guarded needlepoint or bipolar cautery to gently cauterize the incision site. Incise the mucosa and the capsulopalpebral fascia just below the tarsal plate with a number 15 blade. Place a 6-0 retraction suture through the free inferior margin of the palpebral conjunctiva. Retract the free margin superiorly over the globe to expose the dissection plane.

Carry the dissection inferiorly between the orbital septum (deep) and the orbicularis oculi muscle (superficial) along an avascular plane. Once a small pocket has been formed, use a Sewall retractor to gently elevate the globe and a Desmarres retractor to depress the lower eyelid. Take care to keep the orbital septum intact, and avoid exposure of orbital fat or injury of the inferior oblique muscle.

Once the orbital rim periosteum is exposed, use a guarded-needlepoint cautery to expose the bony rim and fracture. A periosteal elevator can then be used to raise the orbital floor periosteum and evaluate the extent of any orbital blowout fracture. Handle the periosteal edges carefully and keep them intact to assist with the closure.

Repair large orbital blowout fractures with an onlay graft covering the orbital defect and resting securely on a stable rim of bone at the periphery of the defect. Take great care to view the posterior aspect of the defect and insert the implant onto the posterior shelf of orbital floor bone (see Endoscopy). Implant materials may range from calvarial bone, septal/auricular cartilage, or porous polyethylene. Nonporous materials such as silicone sheeting are more prone to migration, infection, and extrusion.

When greater medial or posterior orbital exposure is anticipated, a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis can be performed. Before the lower lid conjunctival incision, place a scalpel or scissor on the lateral commissure. Initiate the canthotomy at the junction of the upper and lower lids and carry it approximately 5 mm laterally. Place the incision in a crows-foot wrinkle, if present. Placing anterior traction on the raw surface of the lower lid exposes the inferior crus of the lateral canthal tendon. Then use scissors to sever this tendon close to the bony insertion. When adequate mobility is achieved, the lower lid freely moves away from the globe. Then complete the dissection as previously described.

Once the orbital rim fractures are completely exposed, the injuries are reduced and plated with 1.0- to 1.3-mm microplates. Caution must be used to avoid catching periorbital fat on the drill shaft. A 5-hole miniplate is used with isolated fractures. For comminuted injuries, longer plates are required. In these instances, the reduction is approximated with a central defect, and the plate is applied. The small intervening segments then are lagged up to the plate, reapproximating their premorbid location. The surgeon must be aware that this adds a certain level of error into the reduction. Confirm accurate reduction of the other buttresses before application of the spanning plate.

Repair of the orbital floor should be delayed until the anterior orbital rim fractures have been reduced. Reduction of the rim fractures provides landmarks for the anterior margin of the orbital floor and a stable ledge for fixation of any implant. After all fractures are repaired, close the periosteum over the orbital rim with 5-0 resorbable sutures. Reapproximate the palpebral conjunctiva with running 6-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures. A 5-0 polydioxanone suture on a half round needle is then passed through the lateral free edge of the tarsal plate. The suture is then passed (from deep to superficial) through the periosteum overlying the lateral orbital tubercle of Whitnall.

Make an attempt to place this suture high and slightly on the internal surface of the superior orbital rim. A 6-0 fast-absorbing gut suture then is placed to reapproximate the gray line of the superior and inferior lids. The suture is left long and tethered laterally under the first skin sutures. Interrupted 6-0 nylon sutures are used to reapproximate the skin.

The primary advantages of this approach include a hidden scar and protection of the periorbita inferior oblique muscle. A theoretical disadvantage of the preseptal approach includes a slightly increased risk of lower lid malposition (when compared with the retroseptal approach) because the orbicularis oculi muscle is elevated from the orbital septum.

The postseptal (retroseptal) approach directly exposes the orbital rim through the orbital fat pad. It involves placement of a Sewall elevator in the fornix to elevate the globe superiorly and a Desmarres retractor to depress the lower lid. The conjunctiva is incised, and the orbital rim is exposed directly through the orbital fat. This technique is very rapid because it does not require meticulous dissection of the orbital septum. This reduces the risk of postoperative lower lid ectropion. However, the lack of dissection planes during the retroseptal approach increases the risk of inferior oblique muscle injury. Reduction and plating can also be more difficult secondary to the prolapse of orbital fat into the surgical field. Fracture reduction and repair are completed as described above. The conjunctival incision is closed with 6-0 fast absorbing gut sutures.

Subciliary approach

Inject local anesthetic into the lower eyelid skin 2 mm below the lash line (from the lower lid punctum to the lateral canthus). Use a scalpel to incise the skin, keeping the orbicularis oculi muscle intact. Reflect the eyelid skin from the orbicularis oculi muscle 4-6 mm inferiorly. Use fine scissors to bluntly dissect the orbicularis oculi muscle free from the orbital septum at the lateral aspect of the incision. Carry a tunnel medially just deep to the orbicularis oculi muscle moving toward the medial canthus. Take care to avoid exposure of orbital fat as the scissors are used to join the tunnel with the external skin incision.

The result is a stair-step incision that closes in layers, and reduces the risk of postoperative lower lid ectropion. The dissection is then completed as previously described (see transconjunctival dissection), and the orbital rim is exposed. This technique keeps the lower lid retractors intact and eliminates the need for a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis.

Disadvantages include an external incision and an increased risk of postoperative lower eyelid ectropion when compared to the transconjunctival approach.

Endoscopic approach

The utility of the sublabial incision can be greatly enhanced with the use of a 4-mm, 30-degree surgical endoscope. The sublabial application of a surgical endoscope can play a role in both the diagnosis and treatment of ZMC as well as orbital blowout fractures. Endoscopic visualization and reduction of zygomatic arch fractures has been described,[20] but is not the authors’ first choice.

For orbital rim fractures, sublabial insertion of the endoscope medial and lateral to the infraorbital nerve allows the surgeon to assess the reduction of the inferior orbital rim. Special care must be taken to avoid excessive tension on the infraorbital nerve while attempting to obtain an adequate cavity for endoscopic exposure. The endoscope can then be used to assist with application of a 1.0-mm miniplate along the orbital rim. Because the screws will be oriented toward the orbit from below, the surgeon must take special care to avoid extension of the screws through the rim and into the orbit. After extensive soft tissue dissection and completion of the repair, soft tissue resuspension should be performed. A midface suspension stitch (4-0 or 5-0 monofilament absorbable suture) can be passed from the malar fat pad, superolateral to the temporalis muscle fascia or a titanium plate. Traction on the suture allows the surgeon to resuspend the malar fat pad at the desired height.

In orbital blowout fractures, transmaxillary reduction of orbital blowout fractures is currently on the cutting edge of endoscopic facial fracture repair. The idea of transmaxillary repair of orbital blowout fractures is not new. Walter described it in 1972.[21] Most surgeons did not embrace the technique for fear of injury to the orbital contents while performing a blind reduction. The endoscope now provides an excellent view of prolapsed orbital contents into the maxillary sinus and greatly improves the accuracy of a transmaxillary reduction. However, great caution must be used when applying this technique. The surgeon must have extensive experience in traditional orbital approaches and repair of orbital blowout fractures.

After endoscopic identification of small trap door fractures (see Diagnostic procedures), torn mucosa from around the fracture site should be removed with a Cottle or Freer elevator. The prolapsed orbital contents can then be reduced into the orbital cone. Finally, the bone fragments can be snapped back into place without the need for an orbital implant.

Small-to-intermediate fractures can be repaired in a similar fashion. Often, removal of small bone fragments is necessary. After reduction of the orbital contents, the orbital floor can be reconstituted by inserting an appropriately trimmed piece of porous polyethylene (0.85 mm thick) through the maxillary antrostomy, maxillary sinus, and into the orbital defect.

Large defects must be repaired via traditional open approaches. However, endoscopic assistance can be an extremely helpful addition. After traditional exposure of the orbital floor defect, it can be very challenging to view the stable bone of the posterior orbit when looking tangentially along the orbital floor. However, precise placement of the implant into the posterior orbit and on top of the bony shelf (without impinging on the optic nerve) is vital to accurate orbital reconstruction. The author believes that sublabial, transmaxillary endoscopic visualization of the orbital floor makes identification of the posterior orbital shelf and implant placement much easier and more reliable, while reducing the risk of optic nerve injury.

The endoscopic approach to the orbital rim and floor is an evolving technique that shows great promise in augmenting our current methods. As the techniques and instrumentation are refined, the need for external incisions will be significantly reduced. However, the surgeon must show caution with any endoscopic repair and be inclined toward a traditional approach if any question of adequate reduction or entrapment of orbital contents exists.

Zygomatic arch buttress

Four common approaches to the zygomatic arch are available.

Direct percutaneous approach

This technique is less commonly used but offers a rapid and minimally invasive method for repair of mildly displaced ZMC fractures. After general endotracheal anesthesia, insert a towel clip, heavy suture, or bone hook through the skin at the site of injury. Pass the instrument deep to the zygomatic arch and apply lateral traction to reduce the fracture. Caution must be used to avoid any slippage of the instrumentation because tissue laceration and injury to the facial nerve may result. If the fracture reduces easily and is stable to palpation, no further treatment is necessary. Stability and accuracy of reduction can be difficult to assess if soft tissue edema is present.

Although an incision is avoided, this technique does not allow direct observation, bimanual surgical manipulation, or stabilization of the fracture.

Temporal (Gillies) approach

The author prefers this approach for isolated fractures that are mild to moderately displaced.

This approach requires a 2-cm incision placed behind the temporal hairline approximately 6 cm above the zygoma. Carry the incision through the skin, temporoparietal fascia (superficial temporal fascia), and temporalis muscle fascia (deep temporal fascia). Use a Freer elevator to dissect a tunnel superficial to the temporalis muscle and deep to the zygomatic arch.[22]

Limit dissection around the fracture site to minimize the risk of fracture destabilization. Once the dissection is beneath the zygomatic arch, insert a Boise elevator and apply lateral pressure to reduce the bone fragments. A Rowe-Killey elevator also can be used for resistant or partially healed fractures.

Care must be taken to avoid using the parietal scalp as a fulcrum for these instruments. This can result in a parietal skull fracture. The need for rigid fixation is uncommon in isolated arch fractures. An empty Glasscock ear dressing or a molded aluminum finger cot (foam padded) can be taped over the zygomatic arch for 3-7 days after the repair.

Advantages of this technique include no visible scar, protection of the facial nerve, and bimanual reduction of the fracture.

Transoral approach

The transoral approach uses a gingivobuccal sulcus incision (see Zygomaticomaxillary buttress). Expose the anterior insertion of the zygomatic arch, and place a Boies elevator deep to the zygomatic arch. Apply lateral pressure to reduce the fracture. Avoid using the dental arch as a fulcrum as palatal fractures can occur.

Advantages of this technique include no visible scar, protection of the facial nerve, and bimanual reduction of the fracture.

Hemicoronal

The hemicoronal approach is generally reserved for severe injuries with marked comminution of the zygomaticomaxillary complex. Expose the temporalis muscle as described earlier (see Frontozygomatic buttress).

Approximately 2 cm above the zygomatic arch, make a horizontal incision through the superficial layer of the temporalis muscle fascia, and expose the temporal fat pad. Use a periosteal elevator to dissect onto the zygomatic arch.

Caution must be used to stay in a subperiosteal plane. If the dissection is too superficial and disrupts the temporoparietal fascia, the facial nerve can be injured. If the dissection is too deep, the temporal fat pad can be disrupted and result in postoperative temporal wasting. Exposing the lateral aspect of the zygomatic arch from the root of the zygoma to the frontozygomatic buttress completes the dissection.

Adjunctive procedure for primary repair of trigeminal nerve

Recently, treating trigeminal nerve injuries (such as the infraorbital nerve in ZMC fractures) with microsurgical repair has been shown to be effective. Small, monofilament microsutures are used to complete the neurorrhaphy.[23]

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Appropriate antibiotic coverage should be initiated before surgery and continued for approximately 24 hours postoperatively. Many surgeons continue antibiotic therapy for 7-10 days; however, the literature does not support any clear benefit from this practice.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Fracture reduction

Fracture reduction is indicated in all patients who are likely to have a residual aesthetic deformity or functional deficit. A review of the literature reveals that 77-94% of patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures require surgical reduction.[3, 4, 5] Many authors advocate closed reduction of ZMC fractures through more limited surgical approaches.[3, 6, 24] Accurate closed reduction can be achieved in many cases.

However, many reports in the literature cite difficulty in obtaining adequate reduction, even with direct observation.[1, 6, 7, 15] Therefore, closed reductions are generally reserved for fractures with mild displacement and little soft tissue edema. Also, the patient must be willing to accept an increased risk of postoperative asymmetry.

The key to successful open surgical repair is strict adherence to basic principles. These principles include adequate (but not excessive) exposure, precise reduction, and accurate stabilization when necessary. The surgeon must view the fractures and remove any granulation tissue that may inhibit bone apposition and healing. Use geometric irregularities on opposing fracture surfaces for precise anatomic alignment. Slight inaccuracies in reduction at one fracture site can be amplified at distant sites.

Key buttresses that can be observed include the frontozygomatic, inferior orbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary, and the lateral orbital wall (zygomaticosphenoidal). The frontozygomatic, zygomaticomaxillary, and inferior orbital rim exposures provide information about displacement of the ZMC primarily in the x (horizontal) and y (vertical) planes.

Unfortunately, ZMC fractures rarely cause displacement in only one plane. Rotation of the ZMC often occurs along the axis of the frontozygomatic buttress because of masseter muscle pull.[24, 25] Visualization of the lateral orbital wall (zygomaticosphenoidal buttress) in combination with the frontozygomatic and zygomaticomaxillary buttresses provides information in all 3 planes, including rotation of the ZMC and changes in orbital volume. An accurate 3-dimensional understanding of the ZMC is essential to precise reduction and avoidance of postoperative asymmetry.

Rigid fixation

Open reduction with internal fixation is the mainstay of ZMC fracture repair.[1, 26, 27, 28] However, controversy exists regarding the need for 1-, 2-, or 3-point fixation. Some authors have advocated closed reduction in most cases.[5, 29, 30, 31] Other authors contend that all ZMC fractures require some form of fixation.[32, 33]

Davidson (1990) evaluated this complex issue.[34] Six skulls (12 zygomas), devoid of soft tissue, were placed in a test frame with a fiberoptic orthogonal measuring device. Traumatic ZMC fractures were simulated with a sagittal saw. The fractures were then reduced and fixated using different combinations of plates and wires.

The study revealed that 3-point fixation using miniplates conferred the greatest stability. However, 3-point wire fixation was only slightly less stable. Mixing wires with miniplates reduced the stability in proportion to the number of wires used. Minimal increases in stability were added using 3-point miniplate fixation when compared to 2-point miniplate fixation, regardless of the application site.

The authors concluded that stable fixation can be achieved with a miniplate on the frontozygomatic suture line and a single wire on a second buttress. Acceptable stability can be achieved with single-point miniplate fixation at the frontozygomatic suture line or the infraorbital rim.[34] These results do not take into account variables such as fracture comminution rotatory forces of the masseter muscle or the type of skin incision necessary to apply the fixation.

In a clinical setting, the need for open reduction and internal fixation is based on the anatomy, severity, and stability of the fracture. A mildly displaced tetrapod fracture with good stability may be amenable to closed reduction and require no fixation. Most fractures that require open reduction can be fixated with 1 or 2 miniplates.

Intraoperative photograph of a titanium plating fo Intraoperative photograph of a titanium plating for rigid fixation of a zygomatic-maxillary buttress fracture in a complex maxillary fracture.

Comminuted ZMC fractures with bone loss can often require 3-point fixation and may even need 4-buttress stabilization with bone grafting. Miniplates are helpful in stabilizing free-floating segments and fixating bone grafts harvested from the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus, calvaria, or iliac crest.

Most surgeons use titanium plates for internal fixation; however, wire fixation is time tested, inexpensive, and requires no special instrumentation. Unfortunately, wire fixation often requires more surgical exposure to see and grasp the wire on the deep surface of the fracture. Wires are also extremely difficult to use with comminuted fractures.

Although miniplate fixation is more expensive and requires special instrumentation, it has several advantages. The surgeon does not need to see the deep surface of the fracture. Once the fracture is reduced adequately, a plate can be applied from the lateral surface. Plates are also much more effective with bone grafts and comminuted fractures. Most importantly, plate fixation adds stabilization to the fracture site in 3 spatial planes. Wires primarily prevent distraction of the fracture (x plane). They do not inhibit hinging or rotation at the fracture site (y and z planes). Miniplates add stabilization in all 3 spatial planes (x, y, and z), inhibiting distraction, rotation, and hinging at the fracture site.

Resorbable plates offer many of the same advantages as titanium plates; however, they are reabsorbed within 3-12 months. The primary indication for the use of resorbable plates is in the pediatric population where long-term facial growth is a concern. Unlike titanium plates, resorbable plates contour very easily in situ. After heating the plate with warm water, small inaccuracies in bending can be corrected without difficulty. Mesh panels can also be applied. They offer multiple sites for insertion of screws and can be beneficial for comminuted fractures.

Many patients see the use of an absorbable material as a significant benefit; however, little evidence exists to support greater clinical efficacy. Disadvantages of the resorbable plates include larger size and the need for tapping. A 2-mm resorbable plate has a higher profile than a 2-mm titanium plate and the equivalent strength of a 1.6-mm titanium plate. The larger resorbable screws also require more bone stock for application. In areas such as the orbital rim and nasoorbitoethmoid complex, resorbable plates can be prohibitively large. All resorbable screws require tapping before the screw can be inserted. This adds surgical steps and time to the procedure.

A study by Song et al indicated that fibrin glue can effectively be used to restore the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus in ZMC fracture. In the study, of 234 patients with ZMC fracture, severe fractures of the maxillary sinus’s anterior wall were repaired with bone grafts cemented with fibrin glue. Computed tomography (CT) scanning revealed that the grafted fragments remained in place postoperatively.[35] However, although this study demonstrated a novel potential use for fibrin glue, the clinical relevance and necessity of its employment in this way is unproven, since the anterior maxillary sinus wall is commonly left unrepaired in ZMC fracture, with no adverse functional or aesthetic effects resulting.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Patients are observed for approximately 24 hours, and perioperative antibiotics are administered for 1-7 days depending the degree of wound contamination. Parenteral steroid administration may be used to reduce postoperative facial edema. Pressure dressings are applied only after coronal incisions to avoid postoperative hematoma. Gross visual acuity is checked in the recovery area and daily for the next 48 hours or until discharge.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Cutaneous sutures are removed 5-7 days after the operation. Scalp staples are removed 10-14 days after the operation. Patients are then observed in follow-up visits after 1 month and again after 3 months.

Previous
Next

Complications

Ophthalmologic

The most serious complication associated with a zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) injury is blindness. While this condition may occur at the time of injury, multiple cases of iatrogenic blindness have been reported in the literature[36] ; therefore, a preoperative ophthalmologic examination is essential. The surgeon should also assess pupillary size and symmetry prior to fracture repair. Intraoperative changes in pupillary size must be addressed. Local anesthesia containing epinephrine can result in transient pupillary dilation, which will resolve. Dilation of the pupil while traction is being applied to the globe (provided the other eye is closed) is a sign of optic nerve injury.

Periodic intraoperative evaluation of pupil size and symmetry is recommended. Postoperative visual acuity checks are essential. Mild postoperative visual acuity changes can occur transiently in up to 30% of patients.[37] Significant postoperative loss of visual acuity is an indication for orbital reexploration, particularly if orbital implants were placed.

Persistent diplopia is probably the most common ophthalmologic complication of ZMC fractures, occurring in approximately 7% of patients.[26, 38] Diplopia is noted most frequently in upward and far lateral gaze. Underlying etiologies include extraocular muscle entrapment, neurapraxia, or muscle contusion. If an iatrogenic entrapment is suspected, an urgent CT scan should be obtained. If the diagnosis is confirmed, rapid reoperation and release of the entrapped extraocular muscle is imperative. Diplopia that is felt to be secondary to neurapraxia or extraocular muscle contusion should be monitored for at least 6 months before any ophthalmologic surgical intervention is contemplated.[8]

Lower eyelid malposition

The lower eyelid can be separated into an outer lamella (skin and orbicularis oculi muscle) and an inner lamella (tarsal plate and conjunctiva). Lower eyelid ectropion occurs from excessive scarring in the outer lamella. This condition is most commonly associated with the subciliary approach. The resultant effect can range from simple scleral show to corneal exposure and ulceration.

Appling (1993) cited a 28% incidence of permanent scleral show with the subciliary approach and a 3% incidence with the transconjunctival approach.[39] Frank ectropion is observed in 0-44% of patients undergoing the subciliary approach and in 0-1.2% of patients undergoing the transconjunctival approach.[15, 39, 40]

Lower eyelid entropion results from injury to the inner lamella and occurs most commonly with the transconjunctival approach. Eyelid entropion can result in corneal exposure and abrasion of the cornea by the eyelashes. In many cases, lid malposition and scleral show can be treated effectively with simple massage. If the lid malposition is severe and does not respond to conservative management, surgical repair can be performed. Ectropion is often associated with excessive lower lid laxity prior to surgery. A lateral tarsal strip procedure can reposition and tighten the lower lid. If the ectropion is severe, this procedure can be combined with lysis of the anterior lamella contracture and skin grafting. Entropion can be effectively treated with a release of the contracture and placement of a palatal mucosal spreader graft in the posterior lamella. The spreader graft facilitates eversion of the lower lid and prevents repeat contracture.[41]

Facial asymmetry

Postoperative facial asymmetry occurs in 20-40% of patients.[42] Although facial fracture reductions can be strenuous and time consuming, failure to obtain adequate exposure and precise reduction at the time of initial repair often results in cosmetic deformities. Most postoperative irregularities require no surgical intervention; however, major asymmetry occurs in 3-4% of patients. Osteotomies and bone grafting may be required.[15, 42]

A study by Kim et al indicated that cone-beam CT scanning can be used to evaluate soft tissue asymmetry following open reduction of unilateral ZMC fracture. The study involved patients who had undergone the open reduction procedure at least 3 months prior to symmetry assessment, with a control group of patients without ZMC fracture being used for comparison. Cone-beam CT scanning revealed that, compared with controls, the ZMC patients had statistically significant asymmetry at various landmarks, including the zygion, point of cheek, and frontozygomatic point.[43]

Paresthesias

ZMC fractures often traverse the infraorbital foramen and result in infraorbital nerve injury. Preoperative evaluation and documentation of infraorbital nerve function is strongly recommended. Patients should be counseled that the sublabial incision itself will result in some transient postoperative anesthesia of the upper gingiva. The incidence of persistent sensory dysfunction ranges from 22-65% for open reductions and 9-40% for closed reductions.[6, 15] In one large series, iatrogenic injuries were noted in 11% of open reductions.[15] Excessive traction or surgical manipulation of the infraorbital nerve during exposure and fracture reduction will also increase the risk of postoperative paresthesias. While these symptoms can be distressing to the patient, observation and reassurance are the most appropriate treatments. Attempts at surgical decompression or ablation are highly unpredictable.[1]

Coronal incisions will also result in postoperative paresthesias/anesthesia of the supraorbital and supratrochlear dermatomes distal to the incision. Aggressive manipulation of the nerve at the foramina can exacerbate these symptoms. Resolution of the paresthesias is slow and can be extremely frustrating to some patients. All patients should be warned regarding the postoperative sequelae and counseled that resolution of the symptoms (which may be partial or complete) cannot be expected for 3-12 months after the surgery.

Miscellaneous

Plate exposure: In the absence of infection, intraoral exposure of plates or wires can be monitored conservatively. These wounds often granulate with appropriate oral hygiene. Persistent exposure for longer than 3 months, evidence of loose hardware, or gross infection are indications for hardware removal.

Cold sensitivity: Patients will rarely complain of pain over titanium implants with cold exposure. When present, cold sensitively is an indication for hardware removal.

Sinusitis: Zingg (1991) reported a 7% incidence of maxillary sinus opacification after ZMC fracture repair[15] : however, only 1.6% of patients were symptomatic. Postoperative sinusitis was related directly to the severity of injury. Reserve sinus surgery for patients who do not respond to conservative medical management.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Unacceptably poor surgical outcomes are uncommon. Significant facial asymmetry requiring surgical revision occurs in 3-4% of patients. Postoperative infection rates are extremely low, and these infections nearly always resolve with oral antibiotics. In general, the long-term prognosis after repair of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures is very good.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Future advances in the treatment of facial trauma most likely will involve more extensive use of endoscopy for minimally invasive repair of traumatic injuries. The authors are using computer imaging software that can compare the more nonfractured side and create a computer model for reconstruction planning.[44] Image-guidance surgery systems may also play a role in optimizing fracture reduction.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Travis T Tollefson, MD, MPH, FACS Associate Professor, Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center

Travis T Tollefson, MD, MPH, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Received honoraria from AO North America for speaking and teaching.

Coauthor(s)

E Bradley Strong, MD Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center

E Bradley Strong, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Rhinologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Erik Kass, MD Chief, Department of Clinical Otolaryngology, Associates in Otolaryngology of Northern Virginia

Erik Kass, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Association for Cancer Research, American Rhinologic Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;SymbiaAllergySolutions<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Symbia<br/>Received from Allergy Solutions, Inc for board membership; Received honoraria from RxRevu for chief medical editor; Received salary from Medvoy for founder and president; Received consulting fee from Corvectra for senior medical advisor; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for consulting; Received consulting fee from Essiahealth for advisor; Received consulting fee from Carespan for advisor; Received consulting fee from Covidien for consulting.

Additional Contributors

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS Private Practice

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sarasota County Medical Society, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Association of Military Surgeons of the US

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Donald PJ. Zygomatic fractures. English GM, ed. Otolaryngology: A Text Book. 1st ed. Hagerstown, Md: Medical Dept, Harper & Row; 1976.

  2. Arosarena OA, Fritsch TA, Hsueh Y, Aynehchi B, Haug R. Maxillofacial injuries and violence against women. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb. 11(1):48-52. [Medline].

  3. Ellis E 3rd, el-Attar A, Moos KF. An analysis of 2,067 cases of zygomatico-orbital fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Jun. 43(6):417-28. [Medline].

  4. Yanagisawa E. Symposium on maxillo-facial trauma. 3. Pitfalls in the management of zygomatic fractures. Laryngoscope. 1973 Apr. 83(4):527-46. [Medline].

  5. Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: An analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 1961. 13:325-339.

  6. Zingg M, Laedrach K, Chen J, et al. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: a review of 1,025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Aug. 50(8):778-90. [Medline].

  7. Jackson IT. Classification and treatment of orbitozygomatic and orbitoethmoid fractures. The place of bone grafting and plate fixation. Clin Plast Surg. 1989 Jan. 16(1):77-91. [Medline].

  8. Jelks GW, La Trentra G. Orbital fractures. Foster CA, Sherman JE, eds. Surgery of Facial Bone Fractures. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1987. 67-91.

  9. Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma complex fractures. Facial Plast Surg. 1998. 14(1):105-15. [Medline].

  10. Fujii N, Yamashiro M. Classification of malar complex fractures using computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Sep. 41(9):562-7. [Medline].

  11. Strong EB, Kim KK, Diaz RC. Endoscopic approach to orbital blowout fracture repair. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov. 131(5):683-95. [Medline].

  12. Cheong EC, Chen CT, Chen YR. Broad application of the endoscope for orbital floor reconstruction: long-term follow-up results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar. 125(3):969-78. [Medline].

  13. Imai T, Michizawa M, Fujita G, et al. C-arm-guided reduction of zygomatic fractures revisited. J Trauma. 2011 Nov. 71(5):1371-5. [Medline].

  14. Stanley RB Jr. The zygomatic arch as a guide to reconstruction of comminuted malar fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Dec. 115(12):1459-62. [Medline].

  15. Zingg M, Chowdhury K, Ladrach K, Vuillemin T, Sutter F, Raveh J. Treatment of 813 zygoma-lateral orbital complex fractures. New aspects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jun. 117(6):611-20; discussion 621-2. [Medline].

  16. Lynch DJ, Lamp JC, Royster HP. The conjunctival approach for exploration of the orbital floor. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974 Aug. 54(2):153-6. [Medline].

  17. Tessier P. The conjunctival approach to the orbital floor and maxilla in congenital malformation and trauma. J Maxillofac Surg. 1973 Mar. 1(1):3-8. [Medline].

  18. Converse JM, Firmin F, Wood-Smith D, Friedland JA. The conjunctival approach in orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973 Dec. 52(6):656-7. [Medline].

  19. Tenzel RR, Miller GR. Orbital blow-out fracture repair, conjunctival approach. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 May. 71(5):1141-2. [Medline].

  20. Mueller R. Endoscopic treatment of facial fractures. Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Jan. 24(1):78-91. [Medline].

  21. Walter WL. Early surgical repair of blowout fracture of the orbital floor by using the transantral approach. South Med J. 1972 Oct. 65(10):1229-43. [Medline].

  22. Gillies HD, Kilner JP, Stone D. Fractures of the malar-zygomatic compound with a description of a new x-ray position. Br J Surg. 1927. 14:651.

  23. Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Khan HA, Steed MB. Microsurgical repair of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries from maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep. 67(9):1791-9. [Medline].

  24. Matsunaga RS, Simpson W, Toffel PH. Simplified protocol for treatment of malar fractures. Based on a 1,220-case, eight-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977 Sep. 103(9):535-8. [Medline].

  25. Eisele DW, Duckert LG. Single-point stabilization of zygomatic fractures with the minicompression plate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Mar. 113(3):267-70. [Medline].

  26. Karlan MS, Cassisi NJ. Fractures of the zygoma. A geometric, biomechanical, and surgical analysis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979 Jun. 105(6):320-7. [Medline].

  27. Chuong R, Kaban LB. Fractures of the zygomatic complex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Apr. 44(4):283-8. [Medline].

  28. Ballenger JJ. Diseases of the Nose, Throat, Ear, Head, and Neck. 14th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febinger; 1991.

  29. Lund K. Fractures of the zygoma: a follow-up study on 62 patients. J Oral Surg. 1971 Aug. 29(8):557-60. [Medline].

  30. Lundin K, Ridell A, Sandberg N, Ohman A. One thousand maxillo-facial and related fractures at the ENT-clinic in Gothenburg. A two-year prospective study. Acta Otolaryngol. 1973 Apr. 75(4):359-61. [Medline].

  31. Larsen OD, Thomsen M. Zygomatic fractures. II. A follow-up study of 137 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978. 12(1):59-63. [Medline].

  32. Dingman RO, Natvig P. Surgery of Facial Fractures. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1976.

  33. Wavak P, Zook EG. Immobilization of fractures of the zygomatic bone with an antral pack. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Oct. 149(4):587-9. [Medline].

  34. Davidson J, Nickerson D, Nickerson B. Zygomatic fractures: comparison of methods of internal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Jul. 86(1):25-32. [Medline].

  35. Song SH, Kyung H, Oh SH, et al. Fixation of fractured anterior wall of maxillary sinus using fibrin glue in a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May. 25(3):919-21. [Medline].

  36. Lederman IR. Loss of vision associated with surgical treatment of zygomatic-orbital floor fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981 Jul. 68(1):94-9. [Medline].

  37. Crumley RL, Leibsohn J, Krause CJ, Burton TC. Fractures of the orbital floor. Laryngoscope. 1977 Jun. 87(6):934-47. [Medline].

  38. Dingman RO, Natvig P. Surgery of Facial Fractures. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1964. 212-213.

  39. Appling WD, Patrinely JR, Salzer TA. Transconjunctival approach vs subciliary skin-muscle flap approach for orbital fracture repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Sep. 119(9):1000-7. [Medline].

  40. Wray RC, Holtmann B, Ribaudo JM, Keiter J, Weeks PM. A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures. Br J Plast Surg. 1977 Apr. 30(2):142-5. [Medline].

  41. Patel BC, Patipa M, Anderson RL, McLeish W. Management of postblepharoplasty lower eyelid retraction with hard palate grafts and lateral tarsal strip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Apr. 99(5):1251-60. [Medline].

  42. Perino KE, Zide MF, Kinnebrew MC. Late treatment of malunited malar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Jan. 42(1):20-34. [Medline].

  43. Kim DH, Kim RH, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun. 40(3):103-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  44. Pham AM, Rafii AA, Metzger MC, Jamali A, Strong EB. Computer modeling and intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct. 137(4):624-31. [Medline].

  45. Meslemani D, Kellman RM. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb. 14(1):62-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  46. Wilde F, Lorenz K, Ebner AK, Krauss O, Mascha F, Schramm A. Intraoperative Imaging With a 3D C-Arm System After Zygomatico-Orbital Complex Fracture Reduction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan 23. S0278-2391(12):01621-7. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Axial CT scan demonstrating zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture on right with severe displacement.
Intraoperative photograph of a titanium plating for rigid fixation of a zygomatic-maxillary buttress fracture in a complex maxillary fracture.
Coronal CT scan demonstrating displaced right zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. Note the associated orbital floor fracture.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.