eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Trauma
Mandibular Body Fractures: Workup
Updated: Nov 11, 2008
Workup
Imaging Studies
- CT scanning and plain radiography, including panoramic, lateral-oblique, posteroanterior, occlusal, and periapical views, may be helpful. However, the single most informative radiologic study used in mandibular fracture diagnosis is panoramic radiography.
- Panorex provides the ability to view the entire mandible in one radiograph. However, it requires an upright patient, and it lacks fine detail in the TMJ, symphysis, and dental/alveolar process regions.
- Plain radiography may be helpful.
- The lateral-oblique view helps diagnose ramus, angle, or posterior body fractures. The condyle, bicuspid, and symphysis regions are often unclear.
- Mandibular occlusal views demonstrate discrepancies in the medial and lateral position of body fractures.
- Caldwell posteroanterior views demonstrate any medial or lateral displacement of ramus, angle, body, or symphysis fractures.
- CT scanning also may be helpful in assessment of facial fractures.
- CT scanning allows physicians to survey for facial fractures in other areas, including the frontal bone, naso-ethmoid-orbital complex, orbits, and the entire craniofacial horizontal and vertical buttress systems.
- Reconstructions of the facial skeleton are often helpful in conceptualizing the injury.
- CT scanning is also ideal for condylar fractures, which are difficult to visualize.
More on Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Overview: Mandibular Body Fractures |
Workup: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Treatment: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Follow-up: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Multimedia: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Dodson TB. Third molars may double the risk of an angle fracture of the mandible. Evid Based Dent. 2004;5(3):78. [Medline].
Kuriakose MA, Fardy M, Sirikumara M, et al. A comparative review of 266 mandibular fractures with internal fixation using rigid (AO/ASIF) plates or mini-plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 1996;34(4):315-21. [Medline].
Ellis E 3rd, Price C. Treatment protocol for fractures of the atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Mar 2008;66(3):421-35. [Medline].
Katakura A, Shibahara T, Noma H, et al. Material analysis of AO plate fracture cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Mar 2004;62(3):348-52. [Medline].
Luhr HG, Hausmann DF. [Results of compression osteosynthesis with intraoral approach in 922 mandibular fractures]. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:77-80. [Medline].
Alpert B, Engelstad M, Kushner GM. Invited review: small versus large plate fixation of mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. Fall 1999;5(3):33-9; discussion 40. [Medline].
Barber HD, Woodbury SC, Silverstein KE. Mandibular fractures. In: Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1991:473-526.
Collins CP, Pirinjian-Leonard G, Tolas A, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Nov 2004;62(11):1392-5. [Medline].
Gardner KE, Aragon SB. The mandibular fracture. In: ENT Secrets. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley & Belfus; 1996:302-309.
King RE, Scianna JM, Petruzzelli GJ. Mandible fracture patterns: a suburban trauma center experience. Am J Otolaryngol. Sep-Oct 2004;25(5):301-7. [Medline].
Lazow SK. The mandible fracture: a treatment protocol. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. Summer 1996;2(2):24-30. [Medline].
Schilli W, Stoll P, Bahr W. Mandibular fractures. In: Manual of Internal Fixation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990:65-80.
Spiessel B. The stability principle. In: Internal Fixation of the Mandible: A Manual of AO/ASIF Principle. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1989:30-45.
Further Reading
Keywords
mandible, mandibular body fractures, mandible body fractures, mandible fractures, mandible fracture, jaw fracture, broken jaw, horizontal ramus fracture, mandibular fracture, mandibular surgery, jaw fracture
Workup: Mandibular Body Fractures