eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Trauma
Mandibular Body Fractures: Follow-up
Updated: Nov 11, 2008
Outcome and Prognosis
Both closed and open reductions of mandibular fractures cause favorable results for bony union. In a study of 922 mandibular body and angle fractures treated with an intraoral approach without IMF, solid bony union was achieved in more than 99% of patients.5
Rarely does a second fracture following additional assault or vehicular accident occur. However, when it does happen, the cause for the second fracture is usually an assault, with 90% related to alcohol intake. Angle, body, and parasymphysis regions of the mandible were the most common sites to be involved in the first occasion.
In a study with 10 cases, an internal rigid fixation procedure was performed for the treatment of a secondary fracture. In the recurrent injuries, none of the fractures occurred at exactly the same anatomical site. Fractures were either in the neighboring side or in the contralateral side of the previously healed area of the mandible. On the second occasion, angle fractures were common, but body and subcondylar fracture rates increased. At second presentation, the complication rate increased from 23.1% to 53.8% and most commonly involved malocclusion.
Future and Controversies
Controversy exists over open versus closed reduction for angle fractures. Traditionally, MMF has been the mainstay of treatment. Plating techniques have revolutionized open reduction as a treatment modality.
Advantages of closed reduction include proven efficacy, low complication rate, and short operating time. This technique may be performed as an office procedure. Disadvantages include long fixation (ie, 3-6 wk), poor nutrition associated with MMF, risk of TMJ ankylosis, and airway problems.
Advantages to ORIF include earlier mobilization and nearly exact bone fragment reapproximation. Disadvantages include increased treatment cost and need for operating room time.
Another controversy involves disposition of teeth located in the fracture line. In the postantibiotic era, infection of involved teeth is less troublesome. Many teeth may be retained, and they can be useful in reduction and stabilization of fractured segments. Extract teeth if they prevent proper reduction and fracture stability or if they have significant periodontal disease or caries.
More on Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Overview: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Workup: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Treatment: Mandibular Body Fractures |
Follow-up: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| Multimedia: Mandibular Body Fractures |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Dodson TB. Third molars may double the risk of an angle fracture of the mandible. Evid Based Dent. 2004;5(3):78. [Medline].
Kuriakose MA, Fardy M, Sirikumara M, et al. A comparative review of 266 mandibular fractures with internal fixation using rigid (AO/ASIF) plates or mini-plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 1996;34(4):315-21. [Medline].
Ellis E 3rd, Price C. Treatment protocol for fractures of the atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Mar 2008;66(3):421-35. [Medline].
Katakura A, Shibahara T, Noma H, et al. Material analysis of AO plate fracture cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Mar 2004;62(3):348-52. [Medline].
Luhr HG, Hausmann DF. [Results of compression osteosynthesis with intraoral approach in 922 mandibular fractures]. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:77-80. [Medline].
Alpert B, Engelstad M, Kushner GM. Invited review: small versus large plate fixation of mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. Fall 1999;5(3):33-9; discussion 40. [Medline].
Barber HD, Woodbury SC, Silverstein KE. Mandibular fractures. In: Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1991:473-526.
Collins CP, Pirinjian-Leonard G, Tolas A, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Nov 2004;62(11):1392-5. [Medline].
Gardner KE, Aragon SB. The mandibular fracture. In: ENT Secrets. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley & Belfus; 1996:302-309.
King RE, Scianna JM, Petruzzelli GJ. Mandible fracture patterns: a suburban trauma center experience. Am J Otolaryngol. Sep-Oct 2004;25(5):301-7. [Medline].
Lazow SK. The mandible fracture: a treatment protocol. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. Summer 1996;2(2):24-30. [Medline].
Schilli W, Stoll P, Bahr W. Mandibular fractures. In: Manual of Internal Fixation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990:65-80.
Spiessel B. The stability principle. In: Internal Fixation of the Mandible: A Manual of AO/ASIF Principle. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1989:30-45.
Further Reading
Keywords
mandible, mandibular body fractures, mandible body fractures, mandible fractures, mandible fracture, jaw fracture, broken jaw, horizontal ramus fracture, mandibular fracture, mandibular surgery, jaw fracture
Follow-up: Mandibular Body Fractures