eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Reconstructive Surgery
Ear Reconstruction: Follow-up
Updated: Feb 11, 2009
Outcome and Prognosis
Under ideal conditions, a surgeon with some degree of artistic ability who uses sound judgment can expect a good result after adequately spaced stages. Nevertheless, much of the prognosis depends on factors beyond the surgeon's immediate control, such as skin pliability, scar tissue formation, and the resolution of edema.
Future and Controversies
The greatest morbidity with the rib cartilage technique is at the harvest site. The postoperative pain, the thoracic scar, and the occasional concavity produced in the chest area have motivated surgeons to seek an adequate alternative. The use of porous alloplastic material has proven to be effective, but concerns persist about its long-term viability and the propensity for exposure and infection.
Prosthetic ears, with or without osteointegrated fixation, are popular with some physicians. Although these prosthetics are remarkably natural in appearance, they have several drawbacks. These include limited longevity, lack of sensation, and unnatural feel. Prosthetics should probably not be considered a first-line remedy for microtia.
Cadaveric (homograft) or animal (xenograft) cartilage has been demonstrated to have high resorption rates that make them unacceptable for preserving the delicate architecture of the reconstructed ear. In addition, concern exists about the transmission of HIV or slow viral diseases.
Seeding autologous cartilage onto a biologic framework to grow tissue in a foreign host is now possible. An auricular cartilage framework was grown in a nude mouse, whose picture was circulated widely by the lay press. Nevertheless, problems remain with such technologies, primarily because the new cartilage lacks the skeletal strength to withstand the contracting forces of the skin pocket and the subsequent scar formation.
More on Ear Reconstruction |
| Overview: Ear Reconstruction |
| Workup: Ear Reconstruction |
| Treatment: Ear Reconstruction |
Follow-up: Ear Reconstruction |
| Multimedia: Ear Reconstruction |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Brent B. Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1992;90(3):355-74; discussion 375-6. [Medline].
Aguilar EF 3rd. Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia (grade III). Laryngoscope. Dec 1996;106(12 Pt 2 Suppl 82):1-26. [Medline].
Bhandari PS. Use of triamcinolone acetonide injection in ear reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. Oct 2000;45(4):458-61. [Medline].
DellaCroce FJ, Green S, Aguilar EF 3rd. Framework growth after reconstruction for microtia: is it real and what are the implications?. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 2001;108(6):1479-84; discussion 1485-6. [Medline].
Eavey RD. Microtia and significant auricular malformation. Ninety-two pediatric patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1995;121(1):57-62. [Medline].
Eavey RD. Microtia repair: creation of a functional postauricular sulcus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1999;120(6):789-93. [Medline].
Eavey RD, Ryan DP. Refinements in pediatric microtia reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1996;122(6):617-20. [Medline].
Kamil SH, Vacanti MP, Aminuddin BS, Jackson MJ, Vacanti CA, Eavey RD. Tissue engineering of a human sized and shaped auricle using a mold. Laryngoscope. May 2004;114(5):867-70. [Medline].
Leach JL Jr, Jordan JA, Brown KR, Biavati MJ. Techniques for improving ear definition in microtia reconstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Apr 25 1999;48(1):39-46. [Medline].
Mastroiacovo P, Corchia C, Botto LD, Lanni R, Zampino G, Fusco D. Epidemiology and genetics of microtia-anotia: a registry based study on over one million births. J Med Genet. Jun 1995;32(6):453-7. [Medline].
Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1993;92(2):187-201. [Medline].
Nagata S. Secondary reconstruction for unfavorable microtia results utilizing temporoparietal and innominate fascia flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1994;94(2):254-65; discussion 266-7. [Medline].
Romo T 3rd, Presti PM, Yalamanchili HR. Medpor alternative for microtia repair. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. May 2006;14(2):129-36, vi. [Medline].
Thomson HG, Correa A. Unilateral microtia reconstruction: is the position symmetrical?. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1993;92(5):852-7. [Medline].
Thorne CH, Brecht LE, Bradley JP, Levine JP, Hammerschlag P, Longaker MT. Auricular reconstruction: indications for autogenous and prosthetic techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 15 2001;107(5):1241-52. [Medline].
Uppal RS, Sabbagh W, Chana J, Gault DT. Donor-site morbidity after autologous costal cartilage harvest in ear reconstruction and approaches to reducing donor-site contour deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2008;121(6):1949-55. [Medline].
Walton RL, Beahm EK. Auricular reconstruction for microtia: Part II. Surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2002;110(1):234-49; quiz 250-1, 387. [Medline].
Watson RM, Coward TJ, Forman GH. Results of treatment of 20 patients with implant-retained auricular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Jul-Aug 1995;10(4):445-9. [Medline].
Wilkes GH, Wolfaardt JF. Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1994;93(5):967-79. [Medline].
Williams JD, Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, Cho H. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1997;123(6):578-83. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
ear reconstruction, ear, ear deformity, microtia, anotia, external ear deformity, aural atresia, external ear reconstruction, microtia repair, auricular reconstruction
Follow-up: Ear Reconstruction