Laboratory Studies
In a healthy patient with no other abnormalities, laboratory investigation is generally not necessary. A small subset of patients with aural atresia will have 18q chromosome deletion syndrome. These children typically have normal auricles with complete atresia of the ear canal. Genetic testing can identify this rare condition.[7, 15]
Imaging Studies
Thin section (1 mm sections), high-resolution, axial and coronal computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone is the study of choice in the workup and evaluation of patients with congenital aural atresia (CAA).
- Perform the study by obtaining contiguous images with a thickness of 1 mm or less (submillimeter thickness) in both axial and coronal planes (coronal reconstruction is adequate with the appropriate software).
- Imaging provides information on whether surgical repair is feasible based on the anatomy present.
- Obtain imaging when surgical correction is contemplated or just before surgery.
- As long as audiologic evidence reveals that the inner ear is functional, imaging is not necessary during early infancy and childhood.
In 1992, Jahrsdoerfer et al developed a 10-point grading system to determine surgical candidacy based on key features from the CT scan and the appearance of the external ear.[11] This scheme is also used to indirectly estimate the likelihood of success if surgical correction is performed.[16]
Jahrsdoerfer operates on unilateral patients with scores of 7 or higher; bilateral patients with a grade 5-6 or higher. This system bases surgical success on a postoperative speech-reception threshold (SRT) of less than or equal to 30 dB HL, which, depending on the anatomy, is attainable in over 80% of patients.[16] As a reflection of the conservative nature of this grading system, a score of 10 is never given.
The following is a summary of this 10-point grading system:
- Stapes present = 2 points
- Oval window open = 1 point
- Middle ear space = 1 point
- Facial nerve = 1 point
- Malleus-incus complex = 1 point
- Mastoid pneumatization = 1 point
- Incus-stapes connection = 1 point
- Round window = 1 point
- External ear appearance = 1 point
Each ear is given a grade based on the CT anatomy and this scale. The anatomy predicts the candidacy of that ear for atresia surgery.
Other Tests
Audiometry is equally as important as imaging in the evaluation of the patient with CAA. Air and bone conduction pure tone thresholds at 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 4000 Hz, 6000 Hz, and 8000 Hz, speech reception thresholds, and speech discrimination scores comprise the routine audiological assessment. Air conduction thresholds in the atretic ear tend to run in the 60-70 dB HL range with similar speech reception thresholds. Bone conduction thresholds in the atretic ear are typically in the normal range (and if they are not, the patient may not be a candidate for surgery), with excellent speech discrimination scores.
The masking dilemma arises when testing the patient with bilateral CAA. How does the audiologist establish bone conduction thresholds for each ear in bilateral CAA? The sensorineural acuity level test (SAL) allows the establishment of individual bone conduction thresholds in bilateral CAA, as follows:
- Determine patient's thresholds through earphones to 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
- Place a bone oscillator on the forehead and present masking through it at the following intensities:
- 500 Hz - 50 db HL
- 1000 Hz - 50 db HL
- 2000 Hz - 60 db HL
- 4000 Hz - 60 db HL
- With masking present, reestablish air conduction thresholds.
- At each frequency, determine the difference between the masked air conduction threshold and the unmasked air conduction threshold
- Norms of threshold shift with bone conduction masking are as follows:
- 500 Hz - 40 db HL
- 1000 Hz - 50 db HL
- 2000 Hz - 45 db HL
- 4000 Hz - 50 db HL
If the masked threshold shifts more than the norm, the bone conduction threshold is 0 dB HL. If the masked threshold shifts less than the norm, then the bone conduction threshold is the difference between the norm and the amount of shift (eg, if the norm is 50 and the amount of shift is 30, the masked bone conduction is 20).
Kountakis SE, Helidonis E, Jahrsdoerfer RA. Microtia grade as an indicator of middle ear development in aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 1995;121(8):885-6. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1995;11(4):274-7. [Medline].
Nager GT. Congenital aural atresia: anatomy and surgical management. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. Mar 1971;07(4):33-51. [Medline].
Schuknecht HF. Reconstructive procedures for congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol. Mar 1975;101(3):170-2. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA. Congenital atresia of the ear. Laryngoscope. Sep 1978;88(9 Pt 3 Suppl 13):1-48. [Medline].
Dostal A, Nemeckova J, Gaillyova R, Vranova V, Zezulkova D, Lejska M. Identification of 2.3-Mb gene locus for congenital aural atresia in 18q22.3 deletion: a case report analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Otol Neurotol. Apr 2006;27(3):427-32. [Medline].
Nuijten I, Admiraal R, Van Buggenhout G, Cremers C, Frijns JP, Smeets D. Congenital aural atresia in 18q deletion or de Grouchy syndrome. Otol Neurotol. Nov 2003;24(6):900-6. [Medline].
Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E. [Unilateral hearing loss in childhood. An empirical analysis comparing bilateral hearing loss]. Laryngorhinootologie. Jan 2001;80(1):18-22. [Medline].
Roberson JB Jr, Reinisch J, Colen TY, Lewin S. Atresia repair before microtia reconstruction: comparison of early with standard surgical timing. Otol Neurotol. Sep 2009;30(6):771-6. [Medline].
Cole RR, Jahrsdoerfer RA. The risk of cholesteatoma in congenital aural stenosis. Laryngoscope. Jun 1990;100(6):576-8. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, et al. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. American Journal of Otology. 1992;13:6-12. [Medline].
Trigg DJ, Applebaum EL. Indications for the surgical repair of unilateral aural atresia in children. Am J Otol. Sep 1998;19(5):679-84; discussion 684-6. [Medline].
De la Cruz A, Kesser BW. Management of the Unilateral Atretic Ear. In: Pensak M. Controversies in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1999:381-5.
Jahrsdoerfer RA. Transposition of the facial nerve in congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. May 1995;16(3):290-4. [Medline].
Dostal A, Nemeckova J, Gaillyova R, et al. Identification of 2.3-Mb gene locus for congenital aural atresia in 18q22.3 deletion: a case report analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Otol Neurotol. Apr 2006;27(3):427-32. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Shonka DC, Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. The Jahrsdoerfer Grading Scale in Surgery for Congenital Aural Atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug. 2008;134:873-7.
Granstrom G, Bergstrom K, Tjellstrom A. The bone-anchored hearing aid and bone-anchored epithesis for congenital ear malformations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;109:46-53. [Medline].
Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellstrom A. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience. Am J Otol. Nov 1998;19(6):737-41. [Medline].
van der Pouw KT, Snik AF, Cremers CW. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope. Apr 1998;108(4 Pt 1):548-53. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Lambert PR. Facial nerve injury in congenital aural atresia surgery. Am J Otol. May 1998;19(3):283-7. [Medline].
Oliver ER, Hughley BB, Shonka DC, Kesser BW. Revision aural atresia surgery: indications and outcomes. Otol Neurotol. Feb 2011;32(2):252-8. [Medline].
Oliver ER, Lambert PR, Rumboldt Z, Lee FS, Agarwal A. Middle ear dimensions in congenital aural atresia and hearing outcomes after atresiaplasty. Otol Neurotol. Aug 2010;31(6):946-53. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Dobratz E, Rastogi A, Jahrsdoerfer RA, and Kesser BW. To POP or not: Ossiculoplasty in congenital aural atresia surgery. Laryngoscope. Aug. 2008;118:1452-7.
Digoy GP, Cueva RA. Congenital aural atresia: review of short- and long-term surgical results. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2007;28(1):54-60. [Medline].
Chang H, Song JJ, Choi BY, Lee JH, Oh SH, Chang SO. Partial ossicular replacement versus type II tympanoplasty in congenital aural atresia surgery: a matched group study. Otol Neurotol. Aug 2009;30(5):609-13. [Medline].
Lambert PR. Congenital aural atresia: stability of surgical results. Laryngoscope. Dec 1998;108(12):1801-5. [Medline].
De la Cruz A, Teufert KB. Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2003;129(1):121-7. [Medline].
Chang SO, Choi BY, Hur DG. Analysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresia. Laryngoscope. Oct 2006;116(10):1835-41. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Gray L, Kesser B, Cole E. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Sep 2009;73(9):1281-7. [Medline].
Wilmington D, Gray L, Jahrsdoerfer R. Binaural processing after corrected congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss. Hear Res. Apr 1994;74(1-2):99-114. [Medline].

