Aural Atresia Workup

  • Author: Bradley W Kesser, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: May 9, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

In a healthy patient with no other abnormalities, laboratory investigation is generally not necessary. A small subset of patients with aural atresia will have 18q chromosome deletion syndrome. These children typically have normal auricles with complete atresia of the ear canal. Genetic testing can identify this rare condition.[7, 15]

Next

Imaging Studies

Thin section (1 mm sections), high-resolution, axial and coronal computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone is the study of choice in the workup and evaluation of patients with congenital aural atresia (CAA).

  • Perform the study by obtaining contiguous images with a thickness of 1 mm or less (submillimeter thickness) in both axial and coronal planes (coronal reconstruction is adequate with the appropriate software).
  • Imaging provides information on whether surgical repair is feasible based on the anatomy present.
  • Obtain imaging when surgical correction is contemplated or just before surgery.
  • As long as audiologic evidence reveals that the inner ear is functional, imaging is not necessary during early infancy and childhood.

In 1992, Jahrsdoerfer et al developed a 10-point grading system to determine surgical candidacy based on key features from the CT scan and the appearance of the external ear.[11] This scheme is also used to indirectly estimate the likelihood of success if surgical correction is performed.[16]

Jahrsdoerfer operates on unilateral patients with scores of 7 or higher; bilateral patients with a grade 5-6 or higher. This system bases surgical success on a postoperative speech-reception threshold (SRT) of less than or equal to 30 dB HL, which, depending on the anatomy, is attainable in over 80% of patients.[16] As a reflection of the conservative nature of this grading system, a score of 10 is never given.

The following is a summary of this 10-point grading system:

  • Stapes present = 2 points
  • Oval window open = 1 point
  • Middle ear space = 1 point
  • Facial nerve = 1 point
  • Malleus-incus complex = 1 point
  • Mastoid pneumatization = 1 point
  • Incus-stapes connection = 1 point
  • Round window = 1 point
  • External ear appearance = 1 point

Each ear is given a grade based on the CT anatomy and this scale. The anatomy predicts the candidacy of that ear for atresia surgery.

Previous
Next

Other Tests

Audiometry is equally as important as imaging in the evaluation of the patient with CAA. Air and bone conduction pure tone thresholds at 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 4000 Hz, 6000 Hz, and 8000 Hz, speech reception thresholds, and speech discrimination scores comprise the routine audiological assessment. Air conduction thresholds in the atretic ear tend to run in the 60-70 dB HL range with similar speech reception thresholds. Bone conduction thresholds in the atretic ear are typically in the normal range (and if they are not, the patient may not be a candidate for surgery), with excellent speech discrimination scores.

The masking dilemma arises when testing the patient with bilateral CAA. How does the audiologist establish bone conduction thresholds for each ear in bilateral CAA? The sensorineural acuity level test (SAL) allows the establishment of individual bone conduction thresholds in bilateral CAA, as follows:

  • Determine patient's thresholds through earphones to 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
  • Place a bone oscillator on the forehead and present masking through it at the following intensities:
    • 500 Hz - 50 db HL
    • 1000 Hz - 50 db HL
    • 2000 Hz - 60 db HL
    • 4000 Hz - 60 db HL
  • With masking present, reestablish air conduction thresholds.
  • At each frequency, determine the difference between the masked air conduction threshold and the unmasked air conduction threshold
  • Norms of threshold shift with bone conduction masking are as follows:
    • 500 Hz - 40 db HL
    • 1000 Hz - 50 db HL
    • 2000 Hz - 45 db HL
    • 4000 Hz - 50 db HL

If the masked threshold shifts more than the norm, the bone conduction threshold is 0 dB HL. If the masked threshold shifts less than the norm, then the bone conduction threshold is the difference between the norm and the amount of shift (eg, if the norm is 50 and the amount of shift is 30, the masked bone conduction is 20).

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Bradley W Kesser, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia

Bradley W Kesser, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Neurotology Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, Triological Society, and Virginia Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Disclosure: Nasco, Inc. Royalty Inventor

Coauthor(s)

Matthew Ng, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California; Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Nevada School of Medicine

Matthew Ng, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Surgeons, American Laryngological Rhinological and Otological Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins Medical and Surgical Association, North American Skull Base Society, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, and Vestibular Disorders Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Drew M Horlbeck, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic; Director of Neurotology, Nemours Children's Clinic

Drew M Horlbeck, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and North American Skull Base Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Cliff A Megerian, MD, FACS  Medical Director of Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Program, Vice-Chairman and Director of Otology and Neurotology, University Hospitals of Cleveland; Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Cliff A Megerian, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Medical Society, Society for Neuroscience, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, and Triological Society

Disclosure: cochlear americas Consulting fee Board membership; Grace Corporation Consulting fee Board membership

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Gregory C Allen, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Gregory C Allen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Laryngological Rhinological and Otological Society, American Medical Association, Christian Medical & Dental Society, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Private Practice in Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Consulting; Headwatersmb Consulting fee Consulting; Venturequest Royalty Consulting

Additional Contributors

The author wishes to thank Dr. Robert Jahrsdoerfer for his advice and commentary.

References
  1. Kountakis SE, Helidonis E, Jahrsdoerfer RA. Microtia grade as an indicator of middle ear development in aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 1995;121(8):885-6. [Medline].

  2. Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1995;11(4):274-7. [Medline].

  3. Nager GT. Congenital aural atresia: anatomy and surgical management. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. Mar 1971;07(4):33-51. [Medline].

  4. Schuknecht HF. Reconstructive procedures for congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol. Mar 1975;101(3):170-2. [Medline].

  5. Jahrsdoerfer RA. Congenital atresia of the ear. Laryngoscope. Sep 1978;88(9 Pt 3 Suppl 13):1-48. [Medline].

  6. Dostal A, Nemeckova J, Gaillyova R, Vranova V, Zezulkova D, Lejska M. Identification of 2.3-Mb gene locus for congenital aural atresia in 18q22.3 deletion: a case report analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Otol Neurotol. Apr 2006;27(3):427-32. [Medline].

  7. Nuijten I, Admiraal R, Van Buggenhout G, Cremers C, Frijns JP, Smeets D. Congenital aural atresia in 18q deletion or de Grouchy syndrome. Otol Neurotol. Nov 2003;24(6):900-6. [Medline].

  8. Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E. [Unilateral hearing loss in childhood. An empirical analysis comparing bilateral hearing loss]. Laryngorhinootologie. Jan 2001;80(1):18-22. [Medline].

  9. Roberson JB Jr, Reinisch J, Colen TY, Lewin S. Atresia repair before microtia reconstruction: comparison of early with standard surgical timing. Otol Neurotol. Sep 2009;30(6):771-6. [Medline].

  10. Cole RR, Jahrsdoerfer RA. The risk of cholesteatoma in congenital aural stenosis. Laryngoscope. Jun 1990;100(6):576-8. [Medline].

  11. Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, et al. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. American Journal of Otology. 1992;13:6-12. [Medline].

  12. Trigg DJ, Applebaum EL. Indications for the surgical repair of unilateral aural atresia in children. Am J Otol. Sep 1998;19(5):679-84; discussion 684-6. [Medline].

  13. De la Cruz A, Kesser BW. Management of the Unilateral Atretic Ear. In: Pensak M. Controversies in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1999:381-5.

  14. Jahrsdoerfer RA. Transposition of the facial nerve in congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. May 1995;16(3):290-4. [Medline].

  15. Dostal A, Nemeckova J, Gaillyova R, et al. Identification of 2.3-Mb gene locus for congenital aural atresia in 18q22.3 deletion: a case report analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Otol Neurotol. Apr 2006;27(3):427-32. [Medline].

  16. [Best Evidence] Shonka DC, Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. The Jahrsdoerfer Grading Scale in Surgery for Congenital Aural Atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug. 2008;134:873-7.

  17. Granstrom G, Bergstrom K, Tjellstrom A. The bone-anchored hearing aid and bone-anchored epithesis for congenital ear malformations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;109:46-53. [Medline].

  18. Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellstrom A. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience. Am J Otol. Nov 1998;19(6):737-41. [Medline].

  19. van der Pouw KT, Snik AF, Cremers CW. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope. Apr 1998;108(4 Pt 1):548-53. [Medline].

  20. Jahrsdoerfer RA, Lambert PR. Facial nerve injury in congenital aural atresia surgery. Am J Otol. May 1998;19(3):283-7. [Medline].

  21. Oliver ER, Hughley BB, Shonka DC, Kesser BW. Revision aural atresia surgery: indications and outcomes. Otol Neurotol. Feb 2011;32(2):252-8. [Medline].

  22. Oliver ER, Lambert PR, Rumboldt Z, Lee FS, Agarwal A. Middle ear dimensions in congenital aural atresia and hearing outcomes after atresiaplasty. Otol Neurotol. Aug 2010;31(6):946-53. [Medline].

  23. [Best Evidence] Dobratz E, Rastogi A, Jahrsdoerfer RA, and Kesser BW. To POP or not: Ossiculoplasty in congenital aural atresia surgery. Laryngoscope. Aug. 2008;118:1452-7.

  24. Digoy GP, Cueva RA. Congenital aural atresia: review of short- and long-term surgical results. Otol Neurotol. Jan 2007;28(1):54-60. [Medline].

  25. Chang H, Song JJ, Choi BY, Lee JH, Oh SH, Chang SO. Partial ossicular replacement versus type II tympanoplasty in congenital aural atresia surgery: a matched group study. Otol Neurotol. Aug 2009;30(5):609-13. [Medline].

  26. Lambert PR. Congenital aural atresia: stability of surgical results. Laryngoscope. Dec 1998;108(12):1801-5. [Medline].

  27. De la Cruz A, Teufert KB. Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2003;129(1):121-7. [Medline].

  28. Chang SO, Choi BY, Hur DG. Analysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresia. Laryngoscope. Oct 2006;116(10):1835-41. [Medline].

  29. [Best Evidence] Gray L, Kesser B, Cole E. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Sep 2009;73(9):1281-7. [Medline].

  30. Wilmington D, Gray L, Jahrsdoerfer R. Binaural processing after corrected congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss. Hear Res. Apr 1994;74(1-2):99-114. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Grade III microtia with complete absence (atresia) of the external auditory canal.
Appearance of surgically-corrected microtia with complete atresia of the external ear canal.
Axial CT scan in a patient with congenital aural atresia (CAA). Note the atretic plate just lateral to the ossicles.
Coronal CT scan of left temporal bone in a patient with congenital aural atresia (CAA). Note absence of the ear canal. The atretic plate may be seen just lateral to the ossicles.
Three-dimensional reconstructed CT scan of lateral skull in a child with aural atresia. Note the absence of a bony aperture (external ear canal) on the side of the left temporal bone.
Coronal CT scan of patient with ear canal cholesteatoma (right ear) in the setting of congenital aural stenosis. Note the rounded edges of ear canal bone filled with soft tissue density extending into the middle ear.
Very low tegmen (bone that separates brain from ear) and lack of middle ear aeration make this patient not a candidate for atresia surgery.
Intraoperative photograph of a newly drilled ear canal, middle ear space, and ossicular chain in a patient with congenital aural atresia (CAA).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.