Implants, Soft Tissue, Gore-Tex 

  • Author: Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: May 9, 2011
 

Overview

Facial augmentation can be undertaken for reconstructive or cosmetic purposes. Patients seeking facial augmentation are interested in enhancing a specific facial area. This area may have been scarred or altered by trauma, or the patient may desire an increase in the volume of tissue present in an area of the face for aesthetic reasons. Most often, patients seek these treatments to improve their appearance. See the image below.

Frontal view of patient before and after insertionFrontal view of patient before and after insertion of malar implants.

A variety of facial implant materials can be used. Autogenous material, such as a patient's own adipose tissue, can be harvested via syringe liposuction and injected into the desired area. Other autologous materials include dermis, dermal-fat grafts, fascia, and galea. Human-derived donor materials for facial augmentation include AlloDerm, Cymetra (which is AlloDerm in a particulate micronized form), CosmoDerm and CosmoPlast, Fascian particulate fascia, and Fasciablast (which is fascia in different forms, including strands). In addition, xenografts, such as bovine-derived collagen fillers like Zyderm and Zyplast, are available. Dermalogen, a homologous compound composed of different forms of human collagen, is no longer available.

More popular dermal fillers include different forms of hyaluronic acid such as Restylane, Perlane, Juvederm, and Hylaform. Synthetic materials include silicone (such as Silskin), polyalkylimide (such as Bio-Alcamid), hydroxyapatite (such as Radiesse), polylactic acid (such as Sculptra), and polymethylmethacrylate (such as ArteFill). All are useful for structural augmentation of the face. Other fillers are available in countries around the world.

Next

Aesthetic Considerations

In traditional discussions of facial aesthetics, the face is divided vertically into an upper, middle, and lower third. The upper third extends from the trichion, defined as the intersection of the midsagittal plane of the head and the hairline, to the brows or superior orbital rim. The middle third spans the brows to the base of the nose (ie, the area from the glabella to the subnasale). The subnasale is where the upper lip skin and the columella meet. The lower third of the face extends from the base of the nose to the chin (ie, the subnasale to the menton). The menton is described as the lowest point of the soft tissue of the chin.

As an alternative, the face may be divided into an upper and lower half at the lower eyelid, or the face may be described excluding the forehead since hairlines can be variable. The latter description can be especially useful in males with a receding or absent hairline. In this description, the portion from the nasion to the subnasale comprises 43% of the lower two thirds of the face, and the portion from the subnasale to the menton comprises 57% of this area. The nasion is found in the midsagittal plane and is the point where the deepest depression of the nose occurs.[1]

Horizontally, the face is divided into fifths from ear to ear. Tolleth has remarked on the classic artist's system of the face being 5 eye widths wide and 8 eye widths long.[2] The eyes are separated by slightly more than 1 eye width. The width of the neck should be in alignment with the lateral canthi of the eyes.

The profile view of the face can reveal a concave, convex, or straight appearance. Additionally, structures of the face form various angles that can cause a protuberant, flat, or retrusive appearance. The facial shape can appear oval, round, or square and can vary in the degree to which it meets this categorization. The appearance of the head can also vary.

In attempts to standardize descriptions of facial features, the standard, or template, must accommodate ethnic variability and must be applicable to both males and females. Faces that adhere to these templates are often considered beautiful or aesthetically appealing.

Previous
Next

Assessment and Indications

Assessment

Aesthetic assessment of a subunit of the face is of paramount importance to implant placement planning in order to achieve the desired augmentation. For a maximal surgical result, ascertain if the client had prior augmentation, and, if so, determine the materials used. Perform an assessment of the structural effect, note the client's satisfaction with the prior procedure, and establish any untoward outcomes.

Some patients may desire augmentation that is not medically advisable. Others have unrealistic expectations. The surgeon must be willing to frankly discuss such concerns and decline proceeding with surgery if these concerns are not resolved.

Soft tissue augmentation often involves augmentation of an aesthetic subunit. For example, in upper lip augmentation, though the upper lip is part of the lower third of the face, not focusing only on the area for which treatment is being sought is important. All of the facial structures and the overall appearance of the face must be considered. The effect of augmenting one area must be assessed, as it will affect other areas. Maintaining a harmonious balance is important in enhancing a person's features.

Indications

Soft tissue augmentation using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) can be performed in the following facial areas:

  • Nasolabial (melolabial) folds
  • Lips
  • Dorsum of the nose
  • Glabella area
  • Premaxilla
  • Anterior nasal spine
  • Malar area
  • Midface area
  • Mentum
  • Mandible
Previous
Next

Polytetrafluoroethylene

PTFE is a synthetic polymer that is carbon and fluorine based (CF2-CF2) and nonbiodegradable in the human body. It is biologically inert, adding to its appeal for use as implant material. Teflon is a type of PTFE in a paste form that has been used in the treatment of vocal cord disorders; however, this use has largely been abandoned, as injection difficulties and marked inflammatory reactions have limited Teflon's application in facial plastic surgery.

Proplast, originally developed in 1970, was used to coat orthopedic joint implants. Later, Proplast II was used in facial plastic surgery. When used in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery, Proplast, under the strong shearing forces caused by mastication, breaks apart and induces a significant inflammatory reaction. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ultimately recalled Proplast and Proplast II.

Gore-Tex is a type of PTFE that has been used in humans as an implantable material for more than 26 years. It was first used in 1971 for human vascular grafts. In 1983, Neel used this polymer in rabbits and recommended its use in facial plastic surgery. Because vascular ingrowth is limited, this polymer has been shown to be only minimally integrated with the surrounding tissues. The pore sizes range from 0.5-30 microns, which is not an ideal diameter for macrophage migration and tissue ingrowth but can be a favorable environment for bacterial invasion and infection. Sclafani and Romo have reported a 2% rate of infection.

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is a woven polymer consisting of fibrils of PTFE that are connected via nodes of PTFE, creating a structure similar to mesh. ePTFE is FDA approved for facial augmentation.

Previous
Next

Types of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene

Originally, Gore-Tex strands used in the lip and nasolabial fold were not without problems. At times, the implants were palpable or extruded.

The tubular form of Gore-Tex, referred to as SoftForm (FDA approved for clinical use in 1997), is hollow to allow for vascular ingrowth through the tube. Nonetheless, problems remain. These include palpable implants and shortening of the implant over time. In the past, implant shortening was due to the implants being manufactured with insufficient length and diameter. The original implants were 7 cm in length and 3.2 mm in diameter. Newer implants measure 4.0 mm in diameter and up to 9.0 mm length. To attempt to prevent shortening over time, implants for lip augmentation now measure 4.8 mm in diameter and 11 cm in length. UltraSoft was launched in July 2001 by Tissue Technologies, which also created SoftForm; UltraSoft is reportedly softer than SoftForm.

Regardless of which type of implant is used, the polymer must be deposited deep in subcutaneous tissue or even in the subperiosteal area. Schoenrock and others have shown that a more anterior placement closer to the dermis will result in a more pronounced inflammatory process.

Newer, solid Gore-Tex implants, called Gore-Tex S.A.M. (subcutaneous augmentation material), are available as solid tubes, patches, preformed shapes, and custom-made shapes, dependent on the area to be treated.

Previous
Next

Technique

For tubular ePTFE, the augmentation site, such as the melolabial (nasolabial) fold, is prepared with an iodine-based solution. An infraorbital nerve block using 1% lidocaine with 1 part per 100,000 parts epinephrine and 0.5% Marcaine in a 50/50 mixture is used for anesthesia. In the nasolabial fold, a small puncture incision with an 11 blade is made, extending approximately 2 mm. To introduce the implant beneath the dermis, a Keith needle (for strands of ePTFE) or trocar is used. The SoftForm implant should be 7.0-9.0 cm long and 4.0 mm thick. Push the needle to the desired exit spot and make an incision of similar size to the entry wound. Externalize the needle or the trocar and cut the polymer to size so that the distal end is not protruding from the entry wounds. Skin is closed with 6-0 white nylon, and Steri-Strips are applied to the skin. Sutures are removed after 5-7 days.

In the lip, the technique for the strands is different from the technique for the SoftForm version of ePTFE. The entry and exit sites are approximately 2 mm medial to the commissure. In the lower lip, place the incision horizontally, medial to the commissure and at the vermillion border. With smaller implants, such as the 3.2 mm implant that was used in the past, the recommendation was to place one implant in the lower lip and 2 implants in the upper lip. However, the current recommendations for SoftForm use are one implant for the upper lip and one implant for the lower lip. These should be at least 9.0 cm long and 3.2 mm thick (11.0 cm long and 4.8 mm thick for greater augmentation).

Implant placement in the lip also varies depending on the type of implant used. If the strands are used, gently stretch the tissue of the lip. Do not stretch the lip tissue if using SoftForm. Lip implants are placed to enhance the vermillion border and augment the lip's fullness. If using SoftForm, the larger diameter implant accomplishes these goals. If strands are used, the number and exact placement can be varied to not only enhance the contour but also enhance the degree of augmentation.

Glabellar creases run vertically. Place incisions for the entry and exit wounds at the proximal and distal ends of these creases, mirroring their vertical orientation.

Preformed implants can be used to augment the malar area, the dorsum of the nose, the chin, the tear-trough, and other areas. These implants can be customized as needed.

Previous
Next

Complications

With any implantable material, complications can occur. Rubin and Yaremchuk described complications including bleeding, hematoma, infection, movement or extrusion of implant, malposition, and, rarely, undercorrection and overcorrection.[5]

If an infection does occur, the implant must be removed, as the infecting bacteria cannot be eradicated from the ePTFE despite antibiotic treatment.

Previous
Next

Conclusion

Most patients are pleased with the outcomes of ePTFE facial augmentation; however, if the need arises, the implant can be extracted and replaced. Gore-Tex implants have a long history of being well tolerated in the body as vascular grafts. Facial implants of ePTFE have a shorter history of use than vascular grafts, but the complication rate has been acceptable. Innovations in techniques and in the shape and form of the implants have reduced extrusion rates.

Modifications are continually being made to improve the results of soft tissue augmentation. For example, the diameter of the SoftForm lip implant has been increased. Advanta has a harder outer shell that covers a softer inner one, creating a softer feel.[6] UltraSoft is 3 times softer than SoftForm. Neither SoftForm and UltraSoft are now available. Gore SAM discontinued the marketing of their products for plastic surgery in November 2006. Advanta is still available through Surgiform. A new ePTFE called FulFil is available from Evera. IT is a saline-filled ePTFE implant that is adjustable by filling it with saline.

Although more and longer-lasting varieties of injectable dermal fillers are available, ePTFE implants will continue to have their role in permanent augmentation.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS  Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Doctors Hospital of Sarasota

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Sarasota County Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Adam J Cohen, MD  Eyelid and Facial Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Diseases and Surgery of the Orbit and Lacrimal System, Cosmetic Laser Surgery

Adam J Cohen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, and American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward W Chang, MD, DDS  Consulting Staff, Department of Cosmetic Services, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California at Santa Rosa

Edward W Chang, MD, DDS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, and California Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mark K Wax, MD  Professor and Program Director, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University; Service Chief, Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Mark K Wax, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Bronchoesophagological Association, American College of Surgeons, American Rhinologic Society, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Canadian Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, North American Skull Base Society, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Karen Hall Calhoun, MD  William E Davis Professor and Chair, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Karen Hall Calhoun, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Head and Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, Southern Medical Association, Texas Medical Association, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Private Practice in Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Honoraria Consulting; GYRUS ACMI Honoraria Consulting

References
  1. Nassif PS, Kokoska MS. Aesthetic Facial Analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;7(1):6.

  2. Tolleth H. Aesthetics and plasic surgery. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS, eds. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. Baltimore, Md: Mosby, Inc; 2000:5.

  3. Neel HB 3rd. Implants of Gore-Tex. Arch Otolaryngol. Jul 1983;109(7):427-33. [Medline].

  4. Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd. Alloplasts for Nasal Augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;7(1):47.

  5. Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1997;100(5):1336-53. [Medline].

  6. Verret DJ, Leach JL, Gilmore J. Dual-porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants for lip, nasolabial groove, and melolabial groove augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Nov-Dec 2006;8(6):423-5. [Medline].

  7. Cox AJ 3rd, Wang TD. Skeletal implants in aesthetic facial surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(1):3-12. [Medline].

  8. Cox SE. Who is still using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene?. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2005;31(11 Pt 2):1613-5; discussion 1615. [Medline].

  9. Duffy DM. Complications of fillers: overview. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2005;31(11 Pt 2):1626-33. [Medline].

  10. Godin MS, Waldman SR, Johnson CM Jr. Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Apr-Jun 1999;1(2):118-21; discussion 122. [Medline].

  11. Hanke CW. A new ePTFE soft tissue implant for natural-looking augmentation of lips and wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. Oct 2002;28(10):901-8. [Medline].

  12. Maas CS, Eriksson T, McCalmont T, Mabry D, Cooke D, Schindler R. Evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a soft-tissue filling substance: an analysis of design-related implant behavior using the porcine skin model. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1998;101(5):1307-14. [Medline].

  13. Maas CS, Gnepp DR, Bumpous J. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex soft-tissue patch) in facial augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Sep 1993;119(9):1008-14. [Medline].

  14. Maas CS, Monhian N, Shah SB. Implants in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. Oct 1997;13(4):279-90. [Medline].

  15. Min SA, Monhian N, Maas CS. Soft Tissue Augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1999;7:35-41.

  16. Monhian N, Greene David, Maas CS. The Role of Soft-Tissue Implants in Scar Revision. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1998;6:183-190.

  17. Owens JM. Soft tissue implants and fillers. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Apr 2005;38(2):361-9. [Medline].

  18. Owens JM. Soft tissue implants and fillers. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Apr 2005;38(2):361-9. [Medline].

  19. Panossian A, Garner WL. Polytetrafluoroethylene facial implants: 15 years later. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2004;113(1):347-9. [Medline].

  20. Ramirez AL, Monhian N, Maas CS. Current Concepts in Soft Tissue Augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2000;8:235-250.

  21. Schoenrock LD. Correction of subcutaneous and subperiosteal facial defects with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex). In: Terino EO, Flowers RS, eds. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. Baltimore, Md: Mosby, Inc; 2000:209-219.

  22. Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Apr-Jun 2000;2(2):130-6. [Medline].

  23. Silver FS, Maas CS. Biology of Synthetic Facial Implant Materials. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1994;2:241-253.

  24. Verret DJ, Leach JL, Gilmore J. Dual-porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants for lip, nasolabial groove, and melolabial groove augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Nov-Dec 2006;8(6):423-5. [Medline].

  25. Williams SK, Patula VB, Kleinert LB, Martakos P, Lane JP, Karwoski T. Dual porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2005;115(7):1995-2006. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Frontal view of patient before and after insertion of malar implants.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.