Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Drooling Treatment & Management

  • Author: Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  more...
 
Updated: Sep 30, 2015
 

Medical Therapy

Treatment of patients with drooling problems has been successful at some centers using a team approach, including an otolaryngologist, pediatric dentist, speech pathologist, and physical therapist.

Aggressive physical medicine or medical management prior to considering surgical intervention is recommended. Medical management is directed towards correcting the oral motor dysfunction and decreasing the secretory volume of salivary glands.

Oral motor training

Patients with cerebral palsy are often affected by varying degrees of physical disability, including lack of muscle tone affecting head position and oral dysfunction, which causes the initiation of swallowing to be uncoordinated and inefficient. Exercises are used to attempt to normalize muscle tone, stabilize body and head position, promote jaw stability and lip closure, decrease tongue thrust, increase oral sensation, and promote swallowing. The speech pathologist, physical therapist, and occupational therapist administer this arm of medical therapy.

Oral motor training is time consuming. The therapy requires a minimal level of cognitive function and motivation on the part of the patient and caregiver.

Very few data are available to confirm the effectiveness of these therapies. However, because of the noninvasive nature and the varied response of individual patients, all patients capable of this therapy should undergo at least a 6-month trial of oral motor training.[2]

Behavioral therapy

Verbal and auditory cues are used to attempt to increase the frequency and efficiency of swallowing. Several methods, including reward, overcorrection, and punishment, are used by caregivers to initiate swallowing. External devices that deliver timed auditory cues to swallow are also used.

Several authors note that the success of therapy is dependent on the patient's cognitive level of function and ability to concentrate. Hence, patient-to-patient variability of results is considerable. Also, success is variable according to the task being completed by the individual patient when the cue is delivered. Consequently, extrapolation of results to patients' daily environments is difficult. Regression of therapy has been shown to occur at varying times following training sessions. Repeat therapy is often required.

Pharmacological therapy

The use of anticholinergics to inhibit activation at muscarinic receptors, at best, decreases the volume of drooling. The doses tolerated have not caused drooling to completely cease.

Adverse effects experienced secondary to the lack of selectivity of the muscarinic receptors affected often limit treatment. Adverse effects include irritability, restlessness, sedation, and delirium from central effects of the drugs. Also, the inhibition of sweat glands has caused significant inhibition of temperature regulation. Inhibition of GI motility has resulted in worsening constipation in a population already plagued with such difficulties. Photophobia, urinary retention, and facial flushing also result from these medications.

Transdermal scopolamine has been used with success for short periods. No data illustrate its efficacy over longer periods.

A double-blind trial illustrated a 50% decrease in drooling with the administration of benztropine in adults. However, the results varied significantly in the study that included a pediatric population. Glycopyrrolate was also shown to decrease drooling in 95% of patients.[3] However, 30% of patients in this unblinded study discontinued treatment because of adverse medication effects.

Botulinum therapy has been gaining popularity in recent times with the effect shown to be lasting for months; many articles published evaluate its role and effect on the quality of life in patients with excessive drooling. Botulinum toxin is an exotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum, a gram-positive, anaerobic bacillus.[4] Botulinum toxin type A is one of 8 distinct known neurotoxins, each with its own immunologic specificity.[4] It leads to partial or complete muscle paralysis by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular synaptic end plate.[5, 6, 7]

This toxin also blocks the release of acetylcholine at the cholinergic synapses of the autonomic nervous system; thus, this toxin can block cholinergic parasympathetic secretomotor fibers of the salivary gland. Hence, botulinum toxin has been tested in some autonomic disease, such as achalasia, hyperhidrosis and gustatory sweating (Frey syndrome).[8] Lim and Choi (2008) have reported that injection of botulinum toxin type A is a highly effective and relatively safe primary method of treatment for an acute postparotidectomy salivary fistula that, if treated with conventional pressure dressings, takes long to subside.[9]

Botulinum toxin type A can be injected into the parotid gland, but better results are obtained when it is injected into both the parotid and submandibular glands. In a study on 5 patients between ages 45-59 years with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, botulinum toxin application was guided by ultrasonography and injected in doses of 30U in one point for submandibular gland and 20U in 2 points for each parotid gland, after topic anesthetic with prilocaine. The symptoms of sialorrhea were observed to change dramatically in 4 patients. Three patients were treated for almost 4 months without experiencing repercussion in their quality of life. No patient presented local or systemic effects with local injection of BOTOX®.[10]

In another study by Costa et al (2008) botulinum toxin type B injections in the parotids (1000 U) and submandibular (250 U) glands using anatomic landmarks were found to be effective and safe in treating sialorrhea (drooling) in bulbar-onset ALS.[11] Marina et al (2007) have shown that use of ultrasonography in injecting botulinum reduces the risks of complications.[12]

A study by Barbero et al indicated that ultrasonography-guided botulinum toxin type A injections have long-term efficacy in the treatment of sialorrhea. The study involved 38 adult patients with sialorrhea who received bilateral, ultrasonography-guided botulinum toxin injections in the parotid and submandibular glands. The investigators found a mean efficacy period of 5.6 months for the treatment, as determined through decreases in the frequency of daily aspirations and through patient and caregiver improvement reports.[13]

A study by Petracca et al found that ultrasonography-guided injections of either botulinum toxin type A or B produced long-term beneficial effects in cases of severe sialorrhea. The study, which involved 65 patients with either amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or Parkinson disease, reported a mean treatment benefit period of 87 days, with the duration similar for both toxin types. However, the efficacy period was significantly longer in patients with Parkinson disease than in those with ALS and was also longer in older-age patients.[14]

Radiotherapy

Radiation delivery to the major salivary glands has been used in an attempt to decrease the rate of saliva secretion.[15] Because of the risk of late malignancy in the irradiated field, it should be used judiciously. Neppelberg et al (2007) found that single-dose radiotherapy (7.5 Gy) significantly reduces sialorrhea and is an effective and safe palliative treatment in patients with ALS and is more effective than botulinum in these cases.[16] Postma et al 2007 concluded that a bilateral dose of 12 Gy can be given to the parotid and part of the submandibular glands and is useful in patients with parkinsonism.[17]

Next

Surgical Therapy

In most cases, surgical intervention should be instituted following the failure of at least 6 months of more conservative therapy. Surgery is best delayed until the patient is aged 6 years or older in order to allow time for complete maturation of oral motor function and coordination.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Procedures to control drooling fall into 2 main categories directed at decreasing salivary flow or redirecting the flow to a more advantageous location to promote swallowing. Multiple combinations of these procedures have been studied by various authors and have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Three surgical approaches can help decrease salivary flow, including removing the salivary glands, ligating the salivary ducts, or sectioning the nerves in the middle ear, which are responsible for salivary production, by an otologist. Most commonly, gland excision involves the submandibular glands. A large percentage of resting salivary production comes from the submandibular glands, and their excision is a common procedure performed by otolaryngologists, with minimal morbidity and risk. The sublingual glands make only a very small contribution to the volume of saliva, and parotid gland excision is a more hazardous procedure associated with greater risk.

Transtympanic neurectomy to reduce salivary flow

In this procedure, the parasympathetic nerve supply to the parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands is interrupted as the nerves traverse the middle ear along the medial wall. A transtympanic approach is completed by elevating a tympanomeatal flap and transecting the nerves of the tympanic plexus on the promontory and the chorda tympani as they pass the handle of the malleus. This procedure is technically simple, has little associated morbidity, and has a short recovery time. An initial success rate of 50-80% can be expected, with a high incidence of late failures secondary to regeneration of the nerve fibers. This procedure may be used to complement another drooling procedure or after other procedures fail to control drooling.

Sectioning the bilateral chorda tympani nerves has the expected outcome of loss of taste to the anterior two thirds of the tongue. This can have a significant impact on quality of life and must be carefully considered with the patient and family prior to proceeding.

Excision of submandibular glands with bilateral parotid duct ligation to reduce salivary flow

For many years, the Wilkie procedure of excising the bilateral submandibular glands and rerouting the parotid ducts to the tonsillar fossa was the mainstay of surgery for drooling patients. Because of associated postoperative morbidity and complications, authors have continued to pursue modifications of this procedure. Submandibular excision with parotid duct ligation is technically less challenging and is associated with less overall morbidity and a shorter hospital stay.

This procedure has been reported to have an 85-100% success rate. Shott et al reported cessation of drooling in 21 of the 24 patients in their series who underwent these 2 procedures in combination.[18] They reported their highest success with long-term management of drooling compared with other procedures. In their review, they also compared results of submandibular duct rerouting and bilateral tympanic neurectomy in various combinations. This has become one of the most popular current techniques used for control of drooling. It has several advantages, including technical ease and lack of postoperative morbidity. The hospital stay is usually approximately 3 days. Submandibular gland excision avoids the complication of floor of the mouth edema observed with duct rerouting procedures. The external scars and temporary mild facial swelling after surgery are the most significant drawbacks to the procedure. Parotid duct ligation is a quick procedure and does not put the facial nerve at risk.

Parotid duct ligation involves locating the papilla across from the upper second molar. The papilla is cannulated with a lacrimal probe, and 1-2 cm of duct length is dissected. The duct is then ligated with a suture and resected. The mucosa can be closed primarily. Submandibular gland excision is a familiar procedure to all otolaryngologists. Very briefly, it involves incisions parallel to the mandible. The gland is excised in a subcapsular plane, and care is taken to avoid injury to the marginal mandibular, lingual, and hypoglossal nerves. The wound is typically closed in a subcuticular fashion without a drain.

Procedures to Redirect Salivary Flow

Rerouting procedures have the positive effect of preserving salivary production and taste.

Bilateral transposition of the submandibular ducts is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for drooling in many centers. The procedure is accomplished by making a rhombus-shaped incision in the mucosa, including the 2 ductal openings within, and then separating the 2 openings with an incision in the middle so as to provide a mucosal cuff around each ductal opening. The ducts are thereafter dissected for a length of 3-4 cm, usually until the lingual nerve is seen crossing the duct. A submucosal tunnel is then developed between the incision and the tonsillar fossa just behind the anterior pillar. The ducts are then passed posteriorly in the submucosal plane, and the mucosal islands are secured with 2-3 sutures. Bilateral submandibular duct transposition can be carried out in most cases without prior tonsillectomy, and the duct can be transposed on the tongue just behind the medial edge of the anterior pillar (see the following images).

Rhombus-shaped incision for bilateral submandibula Rhombus-shaped incision for bilateral submandibular duct transposition. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Dissected submandibular duct with peri-stomal cuff Dissected submandibular duct with peri-stomal cuff mucosa. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Artery passed through the submucosal tunnel openin Artery passed through the submucosal tunnel opening just behind the anterior tonsillar pillar. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Sublingual glands seen along submandibular duct an Sublingual glands seen along submandibular duct and relation of duct to lingual nerve. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Floor of mouth, as seen after bilateral submandibu Floor of mouth, as seen after bilateral submandibular duct transposition. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.

Alternatively, some authors advocate transposing the ducts to a location at the base of the anterior pillar. This is thought to eliminate the need for tonsillectomy in a patient with large tonsils and also reduces the risk of infection of the duct secondary to tonsillar infection. The success rate reported in the literature is 80-100%. Many authors advocate sublingual gland excision at the time of the primary procedure to prevent ranula formation, which is a frequent complication of this procedure.

Submandibular duct rerouting in combination with tympanic neurectomy has a reported success rate of approximately 75%. Parotid duct rerouting has been a popular procedure in the past but has been associated with a significant amount of postoperative facial swelling and morbidity. It is performed in a fashion similar to submandibular duct rerouting, with mucosal islands formed around the Stensen duct and submucosal tunnels used to pass the ducts posteriorly. The buccal incision is closed primarily. This procedure combined with submandibular duct excision was first described by Wilkie in 1967 and was subsequently referred to as the Wilkie procedure.[19] In recent years, this procedure has been abandoned by most authors in favor of parotid duct ligation, which results in much less postoperative facial swelling and is technically very simple.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

After most drooling procedures, intravenous hydration is necessary until intake is adequate. Patients or caregivers are given proper instruction on appropriate wound care (when indicated) and adequate oral hygiene using medicated rinses.

Tympanic neurectomy and chorda tympani nerve sections are outpatient procedures that require similar postoperative care to other minor otologic procedures. The patients' ears must be kept dry. Antibiotic drops may be used.

Submandibular gland transposition can lead to significant postoperative floor of the mouth edema. Continued intubation for the first 24-48 hours postoperatively may be necessary if this becomes a significant airway concern. In most circumstances, this is not necessary, and the average hospital stay is 3-5 days. Perioperative antibiotics are used for 7-10 days.

Submandibular gland excision with bilateral parotid duct ligation commonly causes transient cheek swelling. This is not to the extent seen with submandibular rerouting procedures that require floor of the mouth dissection. The average hospital stay is 3-5 days.

Patients undergoing tympanic neurectomy have no diet restriction. Patients undergoing submandibular gland duct transposition and submandibular gland excision with bilateral parotid duct ligation normally remain on intravenous fluids for approximately 24 hours or until adequate intake is tolerated. Postoperative antibiotics are continued for 7-10 days, and pain medication is prescribed as needed.

A soft diet is tolerated very well by most patients within the first 48 hours and should be maintained for the first postoperative week in any patient with an intraoral incision.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Further inpatient care

Airway monitoring is often necessary because of the immediate postoperative swelling associated with submandibular gland rerouting. This risk is higher in children with associated craniofacial abnormalities or those with preexisting airway concerns.

Further outpatient care

Patients may continue to benefit from behavioral or pharmacological intervention in addition to surgical treatment. More commonly, this is no longer necessary. Sometimes, surgery is offered as a staged procedure. Patients and families are counseled that a second procedure can be added at a later date if the patient does not have adequate control of symptoms with the first surgery.

Previous
Next

Complications

Tympanic neurectomy

Complications may include hearing loss, tympanic membrane perforation, otitis media, and cholesteatoma. Additionally, xerostomia is reported.

The incidence of otologic complications associated with tympanic neurectomy mirrors that of most otologic procedures using a transcanal approach. The risk of these complications is not increased with the completion of tympanic neurectomy.

Recurrence of drooling has been seen within 6 months. It is attributed to regeneration of the nerve fibers of the chorda tympani and tympanic plexus.

Loss of taste in the anterior two thirds of the tongue is an expected and unavoidable adverse effect of sectioning the bilateral chorda tympani nerves; however, most authors believe this is a cruel and unacceptable result in a patient population in which taste may be one of the few simple pleasures.

Submandibular gland duct rerouting

Floor of the mouth edema is a reported complication of this procedure. Others include duct obstruction, lateral cervical cyst formation, and sialadenitis.

Ranula formation is a common problem, occurring in as many as 10% of patients in some studies. This is secondary to interruption of the sublingual ducts as they empty into the submandibular duct. Some authors advocate sublingual gland excision in combination with this procedure in order to avoid ranula formation.

Submandibular gland excision and parotid gland duct ligation

Complications may include parotid gland swelling, marginal mandibular nerve injury with a resultant increase in problems with oral sphincter control, hypoglossal nerve injury, lingual nerve injury, xerostomia, and transient facial swelling.

Additionally, dental caries are a reported complication with this procedure. An increase in dental caries can be associated with any procedure that decreases the volume of saliva. An initial evaluation and close follow-up with a pediatric dentist is a necessity in patients considering this surgery.

Parotid duct rerouting

Complications include parotitis, fistula formation, dental caries, gingivitis, and cyst formation.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS Director-Professor, Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Associated Safdarjang Hospital; Professor, Delhi University and Indraprastha University, India

Neeraj N Mathur, MBBS, MS is a member of the following medical societies: Royal Society of Medicine, Indian Medical Association, Association of Otolaryngologists of India, Cochlear Implant Group of India, National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), Neuro-Otological and Equilibriometric Society of India

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Karen H Calhoun, MD, FACS, FAAOA Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Karen H Calhoun, MD, FACS, FAAOA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Head and Neck Society, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Southern Medical Association, American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;SymbiaAllergySolutions<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Symbia<br/>Received from Allergy Solutions, Inc for board membership; Received honoraria from RxRevu for chief medical editor; Received salary from Medvoy for founder and president; Received consulting fee from Corvectra for senior medical advisor; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for consulting; Received consulting fee from Essiahealth for advisor; Received consulting fee from Carespan for advisor; Received consulting fee from Covidien for consulting.

Additional Contributors

Jennifer P Porter, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Communicative Science, Chevy Chase Facial Plastic Surgery

Jennifer P Porter, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Karla R Brown, MD, and Traci L Vaughn, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Jongerius PH, van Hulst K, van den Hoogen FJ, et al. The treatment of posterior drooling by botulinum toxin in a child with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Sep. 41(3):351-3. [Medline].

  2. Walshe M, Smith M, Pennington L. Interventions for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14. 11:CD008624. [Medline].

  3. Evatt ML. Oral glycopyrrolate for the treatment of chronic severe drooling caused by neurological disorders in children. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011. 7:543-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. von Lindern JJ, Niederhagen B, Appel T, et al. New prospects in the treatment of traumatic and postoperative parotid fistulas with type A botulinum toxin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun. 109(7):2443-5. [Medline].

  5. Yuan M, Shelton J. Acute sialadenitis secondary to submandibular calculi after botulinum neurotoxin injection for sialorrhea in a child with cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec. 90(12):1064-7. [Medline].

  6. Hay N, Penn C. Botox(®) to reduce drooling in a paediatric population with neurological impairments: a Phase I study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Sep. 46(5):550-63. [Medline].

  7. Squires N, Wills A, Rowson J. The management of drooling in adults with neurological conditions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun. 20(3):171-6. [Medline].

  8. Laskawi R, Drobik C, Schönebeck C. Up-to-date report of botulinum toxin type A treatment in patients with gustatory sweating (Frey's syndrome). Laryngoscope. 1998 Mar. 108(3):381-4. [Medline].

  9. Lim YC, Choi EC. Treatment of an acute salivary fistula after parotid surgery: botulinum toxin type A injection as primary treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Feb. 265(2):243-5. [Medline].

  10. Manrique D. Application of botulinum toxin to reduce the saliva in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep-Oct. 71(5):566-9. [Medline].

  11. Costa J, Rocha ML, Ferreira J, et al. Botulinum toxin type-B improves sialorrhea and quality of life in bulbaronset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol. 2008 Apr. 255(4):545-50. [Medline].

  12. Marina MB, Sani A, Hamzaini AH, et al. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin A injection: an alternative treatment for dribbling. J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Jun. 122(6):609-14. [Medline].

  13. Barbero P, Busso M, Tinivella M, et al. Long-term follow-up of ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin-A injections for sialorrhea in neurological dysphagia. J Neurol. 2015 Sep 26. [Medline].

  14. Petracca M, Guidubaldi A, Ricciardi L, et al. Botulinum toxin A and B in sialorrhea: long-term data and literature overview. Toxicon. 2015 Aug 30. [Medline].

  15. Hawkey NM, Zaorsky NG, Galloway TJ. The role of radiation therapy in the management of sialorrhea: A systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul 7. [Medline].

  16. Neppelberg E, Haugen DF, Thorsen L, et al. Radiotherapy reduces sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Dec. 14(12):1373-7. [Medline].

  17. Postma AG, Heesters M, van Laar T. Radiotherapy to the salivary glands as treatment of sialorrhea in patients with parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2007 Dec. 22(16):2430-5. [Medline].

  18. Shott SR, Myer CM 3rd, Cotton RT. Surgical management of sialorrhea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Jul. 101(1):47-50. [Medline].

  19. Wilkie TF. The problem of drooling in cerebral palsy: a surgical approach. Can J Surg. 1967 Jan. 10(1):60-7. [Medline].

  20. Suskind DL, Tilton A. Clinical study of botulinum-A toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy. Laryngoscope. 2002 Jan. 112(1):73-81. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Rhombus-shaped incision for bilateral submandibular duct transposition. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Dissected submandibular duct with peri-stomal cuff mucosa. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Artery passed through the submucosal tunnel opening just behind the anterior tonsillar pillar. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Sublingual glands seen along submandibular duct and relation of duct to lingual nerve. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
Floor of mouth, as seen after bilateral submandibular duct transposition. Image courtesy of Dr Neeraj N Mathur.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.