Nasal Reconstruction Following Soft Tissue Resection 

  • Author: FP Johns Langford, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: May 9, 2011
 

Background

Reconstruction of nasal defects continues to challenge facial reconstructive surgeons. In this article, several local flaps are described and illustrated, including nasolabial flaps, dorsal nasal flaps, bilobed flaps, glabellar flaps, midline forehead flaps, and cheek and cervicofacial flaps.

Next

History of the Procedure

The nose is the most prominent feature of the human face. Its central location and projection not only emphasize its overall aesthetic importance but also contribute to its frequent injury. Loss of nasal tissue may be caused by congenital malformation, infection, trauma, or neoplasm.

Previous
Next

Problem

Although the repair of nasal wounds is the oldest form of facial reconstructive surgery, its complexity continues to challenge reconstructive surgeons. The unique shape and configuration of the nose are often difficult to re-create, even under ideal circumstances. In addition, the central location of the nose in relation to the eyes, lips, and forehead make the choice of reconstructive techniques of paramount importance to avoid deformity or dysfunction of these associated structures. For any given nasal wound, a number of reconstructive options must be considered.

Previous
Next

Indications

This article deals primarily with the reconstruction of soft tissue wounds of the nose created in the surgical treatment of skin cancer, although the principles and techniques discussed have wider application.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Careful attention must be paid to the thickness of the nasal skin because it varies from thick and densely adherent to the underlying cartilaginous structures in the lower half of the nose to thin and loosely attached to the bony framework of the upper half of the nose. Along the upper portion of the nose, the limiting factor in soft tissue closure is the prominence of the nasal skeleton. In the lower portion of the nose, the immobility of the skin severely limits the reconstructive options; even small wounds can result in obvious distortions of the nasal ala when closed primarily.

When performing aesthetic restoration of the nose, the facial reconstructive surgeon must take into account the concept of nasal aesthetic subunits. The nose is made of alternating concave and convex surfaces, or subunits, which are separated from one another by depressions and elevations of the surrounding nasal skin. When a large portion of a given subunit has been lost, replacing the entire subunit rather than simply patching the defect often produces a superior aesthetic result. This approach places the scars of flaps and grafts within the normal depressions and elevations of the nose where they are best camouflaged.

Most important in reconstruction of nasal wounds is preservation of nasal function. Adequate osteocartilaginous support, internal nasal lining, and soft tissue coverage are the minimum requirements in reestablishing a functional nasal airway. In treatment of nasal skin cancer, complete tumor removal may require excision of portions of the underlying bony and cartilaginous framework to ensure a cancer-free plane. Accordingly, reconstructive measures to establish adequate support and internal nasal lining become essential to a functional reconstructive effort.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Contraindications for nasal dorsal flaps are limited but include residual disease, uncertain surgical margins, and previous surgery that may violate the blood supply to the proposed flap.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

FP Johns Langford, MD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Head and Neck Specialists, Duke University Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Carolina ENT Specialists, PA

FP Johns Langford, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mark K Wax, MD  Professor and Program Director, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University; Service Chief, Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Mark K Wax, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Bronchoesophagological Association, American College of Surgeons, American Rhinologic Society, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Canadian Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, North American Skull Base Society, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Dominique Dorion, MD, MSc, FRCSC, FACS  Vice Dean and Associate Dean of Resources, Professor of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Sherbrooke Faculty of Medicine, Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Honoraria Consulting; GYRUS ACMI Honoraria Consulting

References
  1. Baker SR, Swanson NA. Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction. ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.

  2. Baker S, Swanson N. Regional and distant skin flaps in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg. 1984;2:33.

  3. Becker FF. Facial Reconstruction with Local and Regional Flaps. New York, NY:. Thieme-Straton;1985.

  4. Becker FF. The nose. In: Harahap M. Skin Surgery. St. Louis, Mo: Warren H Green; 1985:1985.

  5. Becker FF, Langford FP. Deep plane cervicofacial flap for reconstruction of cheek defects. Paper presented at:. Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery meeting;1995.

  6. Burget GC. Aesthetic restoration of the nose. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1985;12(3):463-80. [Medline].

  7. Burget GC, Menick FJ. Aesthetic Reconstruction of the Nose. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1994.

  8. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1985;76(2):239-47. [Medline].

  9. Byrne PJ, Garcia JR. Autogenous nasal tip reconstruction of complex defects: a structural approach employing rapid prototyping. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Sep-Oct 2007;9(5):358-64. [Medline].

  10. Larrabee WF Jr. Design of local skin flaps. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Oct 1990;23(5):899-923. [Medline].

  11. Thomas JR, Griner N, Cook TA. The precise midline forehead flap as a musculocutaneous flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1988;114(1):79-84. [Medline].

  12. Zitelli JA. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol. Jul 1989;125(7):957-9. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Full-thickness skin graft to nasal dorsum.
Glabellar and cheek components of the wound have been closed with local tissue advancement. As a result of its shallow nature and location on nonsebaceous skin, the larger nasal portion of the wound has been covered with a full-thickness skin graft.
A rhombic flap is used to donate more available proximal nasal skin into the surgical defect.
The wound is reconstructed with a bilobed transposition flap. The distal part of the nose is not distorted because the flap is properly designed.
Traditional nasolabial transposition flap.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.