eMedicine Specialties > Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery > Reconstructive Surgery

Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh

Author: Joseph L Leach Jr, MD, Associate Professor of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
Coauthor(s): Larry L Myers, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery and Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; John M Truelson, MD, FACS, Chairman, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Associate Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 25, 2008

Introduction

Lateral thigh flap

The lateral thigh free flap is a fascial or fasciocutaneous flap based on the smaller vessels that extend from the profunda femoris system to the skin. These perforating vessels are typically numbered 1-4 in a superior to inferior direction. The flap is usually raised on the third perforator, although the second and the fourth are occasionally used. Since its first description, the flap has proven to be useful in many head and neck reconstructive situations.

  • The flap may be used for very large defects and requires no muscular sacrifice.
  • The lateral thigh flap is reliable, and it can be dissected easily while the head and neck ablative procedure is in progress. Use of the flap allows primary closure of the defect with minimal aesthetic deformity or functional impact.
  • The flap may potentially be split into 2 paddles based on separate perforators, or it can be de-epithelialized to create 2 separate skin islands on the same perforator.
  • A free fascial graft from the lateral thigh area is ideal for defects that require placement of bulk without lining. Performing a sensate flap is also possible.

Dissection of the vascular pedicle may be difficult because of anatomic variability. Proper positioning of the leg, use of suspended retractors, wide exposure, and sectioning of certain muscles from the femur are the keys to successful dissection. Although some variability in the vascularity is present, the vessels can be identified easily and preserved with proper surgical technique.

Anterolateral thigh flap

The anterolateral thigh flap is a fasciocutaneous flap usually based on the musculocutaneous and septocutaneous perforators of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and its venae comitantes. This flap is rapidly gaining acceptance in head and neck reconstruction because it has been proven to be an ideal donor site with reliable vascularity, ease of harvest, and extreme versatility. The flap offers the advantages of being pliable with a large cutaneous territory; having a lengthy pedicle with good caliber vessels; possessing multiple components (adipofascial, muscle, fascia, and skin); being used as a sensate flap; and having the possibility of chimeric applications.

The descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery is usually of sufficient caliber that a flap may even be based distally. As such, this flap has the ability to cover a variety of large cutaneous or mucosal defects. In special circumstances, it can be combined with other flaps (such as the fibula or iliac crest), using the "mosaic" principle to provide coverage of extremely large and challenging head and neck defects. In addition, the flap can easily be harvested using a 2-team approach without patient repositioning. The donor site can easily be closed primarily without functional deficit or significant conspicuous deformity. About 40% of the time, the donor site requires a skin graft. In elective situations, the graft may be avoided by pre-expanding the flap site for several months prior to flap elevation. Despite skin graft concerns, donor site morbidity is limited.

History of the Procedure

The lateral thigh flap was first described by Baek in 1983 as a fascial or fasciocutaneous flap based on the smaller vessels that extend from the profunda femoris system to the skin.1 The anterolateral thigh flap, first described in 1984 by Song et al, is a fasciocutaneous flap usually based on the musculocutaneous and septocutaneous perforators of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and its venae comitantes.2 Koshima et al and Kimata first described the use of this flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects.3,4

Indications

Lateral thigh flap

The lateral thigh flap is indicated for large head and neck defects. This flap is quite versatile, especially for defects requiring large flap area or bulk. The flap can be used to reconstruct defects from the nasopharynx to the clavicle. For combined total laryngopharyngectomy, the flap is usually thin enough for total pharyngeal reconstruction, allowing reconstruction without laparotomy for jejunal transfer. For tongue reconstruction, folding the flap on itself and creating a planned tissue protrusion (ie, dog ear) can create bulk in the anterior oral cavity. This protruding skin and soft tissue mimics a neotongue tip. The extra bulk is particularly helpful at the base of the tongue area. The defects most commonly indicated for reconstruction with this type of flap are total glossectomy, total or partial pharyngeal defects, and base of tongue defects.

Although size limits for the flap have not been established, skin paddles as large as 16 x 30 cm have been described. Because of its large surface area, the flap provides excellent coverage of large cutaneous defects in the temple and scalp area; however, the tissue match is generally poor because of the pale color of the flap. The flap harvests no muscle, and primary closure of the donor site is usually possible. Split-thickness skin grafts are needed for donor site closure if the width is greater than 8-10 cm. The vessels are usually of good caliber and length.

Disadvantages to the free lateral thigh flap include variability of the thigh vasculature and the unfamiliarity of most head and neck surgeons with the thigh area.

The free fascial lateral thigh flap takes advantage of the abundant subcutaneous fatty tissue in the lateral thigh. Because of positioning considerations, this flap is easier to harvest than a scapular or parascapular flap. The fatty tissue in the lateral thigh provides a stable, vascularized, volume filler that will not atrophy or resorb over time. This type of flap is most useful in the parotid or temporal area.

The free radial forearm flap is an alternative for soft tissue reconstruction; however, it is probably better suited to smaller defects that require a thinner, more pliable flap. The free radial forearm flap is also a good alternative for tubed pharyngeal reconstruction. Both flaps offer advantages to jejunal interposition grafts because neither flap requires laparotomy.

Anterolateral thigh flap

The anterolateral thigh flap is usually used for external defects of the head and neck and for oropharyngeal lining. Advantages of the anterolateral thigh flap include easy and safe elevation, minimal long-term donor site morbidity, a long pedicle with a wide arterial diameter, and a large amount of skin that can be used. The flap has good pliability and is of moderate thickness. Most of the experience with this flap has been in Asian populations, and the flap has been noted to be somewhat thicker in whites.

The flap is especially useful when forearm flaps are too thin or when the morbidity of harvesting a free forearm flap is too great. Flaps as small as 5 X 8 cm and as large as 22 X 32 cm have been used successfully. No major artery of the limb is sacrificed. It can be raised as either a single skin paddle for a 1-layer defect reconstruction or a double paddle for a 2-layer reconstruction. The flap may be designed to be fasciocutaneous, fascial, or musculocutaneous. The vastus lateralis muscle may be included in the flap when a muscular component is needed to cover exposed bone, skull base, artificial dura, osteosynthesis material, or open sinuses. A flap that includes ilium to form an osteomyocutaneous flap has also been reported. The vascular pedicle is approximately 10 cm long, and the artery is approximately 2 mm in diameter.

Since the vessels are long and of good caliber, the flap may be used as a flow through flap. With this mosaic or "chimeric" principle, flaps can be combined with bone containing free flaps such as the fibula or iliac crest to replace skin, muscle, and bone in very large defects. The potential exists for making the flap sensate if the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is included. Performing the flap procedure under epidural anesthesia is possible in those patients not suitable for general anesthesia. Since the donor area is far from the head and neck region, the flap may be elevated simultaneously with tumor extirpation. The patient does not have to be repositioned. Donor defects smaller than 9 cm in width may generally be closed primarily.

Relevant Anatomy

Lateral thigh flaps

Inferior to the inguinal ligament, the femoral artery branches into superficial and deep (profunda) branches. The adductor longus muscle acts as a partition between these 2 vessels. The superficial femoral artery courses anterior to the adductor longus, and the profunda courses lateral to that muscle. The profunda femoris artery (PFA) gives off several branches that nourish the posterior and lateral thigh musculature, after which they become cutaneous perforators, as shown below. The lateral thigh flap is based on 1 or more of these perforators.

Relationship of the perforating vessels of the la...

Relationship of the perforating vessels of the lateral thigh to the femur is shown. Adductor longus separates the profunda femoris artery (PFA) from the superficial femoral artery.

Relationship of the perforating vessels of the la...

Relationship of the perforating vessels of the lateral thigh to the femur is shown. Adductor longus separates the profunda femoris artery (PFA) from the superficial femoral artery.


The PFA passes distally between the adductor longus and adductor magnus. Typically, 4 perforating arteries are present, with the number of perforating arteries ranging from 2-6. After arising from the PFA, the perforators pierce the adductor magnus and enter the posterior compartment of the thigh. Each perforator has anastomotic branches that lead to other perforators, muscular branches, and cutaneous branches.

The first perforator provides the principle blood supply to the adductor magnus. The perforator pierces this muscle before it supplies other muscles or the skin overlying the iliotibial tract. After the PFA passes deep to the adductor longus, it gives off the second (usually the largest) perforator. The second perforator also contributes supply to most of the musculature of the posterolateral thigh.

The third perforator is the artery associated with the lateral thigh flap. It arises distal to the adductor brevis insertion on the linea aspera, supplying blood to the musculature in the area. After piercing the adductor magnus at the linea aspera, the third perforator travels as a septocutaneous artery between the vastus lateralis anteriorly and the long head of the biceps femoris posteriorly. This perforator may pass superior to or through the short head of the biceps femoris muscle. This vessel always passes anterior to the long head of the biceps femoris.

A wide variation in the position of the third perforator may exist, ranging from 8-32 cm superior to the lateral femoral condyle; however, the vessel is usually located within 2.5 cm of the midpoint of the thigh. If divided at the PFA, the pedicle of the flap is 6-8 cm long and 1.5-3 mm in diameter. The vein is slightly larger. If the 2 venae comitantes of the third perforator converge prior to entering the profunda femoris vein (PFV), a vein 3-5 mm in diameter is formed. Often, a Doppler ultrasonic device is used preoperatively to identify the third perforating vessel. This identification helps to prepare the surgeon for any anatomic variability.

The fourth perforator is the terminal branch of the PFA. This vessel arises approximately 7 cm above the knee, where it pierces the adductor magnus and the short head of the biceps femoris. Occasionally, the fourth perforator may be the dominant pedicle to the lateral thigh flap.

At the time of surgery, designating the vessel as a particular numbered perforator is difficult to do with accuracy because of the variations in location and size of vessels coupled with the inability to dissect the entire PFA. Despite these uncertainties, an adequate blood supply is present in 99% of thighs. Although the third perforator is usually designated as the vessel that arises distal to the adductor brevis, this muscle is difficult to visualize in a limited lateral surgical view. In clinical cases, regarding the second perforator as that vessel located near the insertion of the gluteus maximus and the iliotibial tract is generally safe. Any vessel distal to the second perforator has been called the third perforator. The terminal vessel that branches from the PFA is named the fourth perforator. Using this method, no more than a single third perforator can exist.

Regardless of what a vessel is called, the most important issue is finding a usable vessel somewhere along the long axis of the thigh. The surgeon must be prepared for the variations. The primary function of the intermuscular septal artery is to supply blood to neighboring muscles; thus, the blood flow to the muscles exceeds the supply going to the skin. The caliber of the branching vessels reflects this fact.

The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve innervates the flap. This nerve lies just above the fascia lata, after passing deep to the inguinal ligament near the anterior superior iliac spine. The nerve may arborize extensively before entering the flap; therefore, harvesting a wide cuff of subcutaneous tissue around the nerve is best.

Anterolateral thigh flaps

Anterior lateral thigh flaps are usually based on septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral system, although they may occasionally be based on the transverse branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery in those occasional cases in which the descending branch is absent or small. The lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) is a large branch of the common femoral artery, as shown below. Deep to the rectus femoris muscle, the LCFA divides into ascending, transverse, and descending branches. The descending branch, which is also known as the quadriceps artery, supplies the rectus femoris, the vastus lateralis, and the vastus intermedius muscles.

Identifying the approximate course of the LCFA

Identifying the approximate course of the LCFA

Identifying the approximate course of the LCFA

Identifying the approximate course of the LCFA


The course of the descending branch varies somewhat. It lies totally buried within the vastus lateralis muscle in 22% of individuals. It lies on top of the vastus lateralis in 12% and dives into the muscle in the remainder. In 6% of the population, the descending branch is absent. Routinely, 2 venae comitantes with the descending branch exist. Arterial diameter ranges from 0.2-3.5 mm, while the accompanying venae comitantes measure between 1.8 and 4.0 mm in diameter. Additional pedicle length may be obtained by ligating the transverse and rectus femoris branches.

Critical to the success of the flap is the dissection and preservation of at least 1 healthy perforator from the LCFA to the skin. Perforators pass in a septocutaneous (between rectus femoris and vastus lateralis) or musculocutaneous (through the vastus lateralis muscle) pattern. In 60% of individuals, musculocutaneous perforators exist, and in 40%, septocutaneous perforators exist. These perforators usually arise from the descending branch but may instead arise from the transverse branch. In any event, the surgeon may be confident of finding a useful perforator. In a large series of dissections, viable cutaneous perforators were found in every case. Occasionally, the motor nerve to the vastus lateralis muscle passes between perforators or between the venae comitantes. In these cases, the surgeon is faced with the options of sacrificing one of the perforators or venae comitantes or operating on the other leg.

Contraindications

Lateral thigh flaps

Local trauma and previous surgery to the thigh may be contraindications to use of this flap. The lateral thigh free flap is least useful in small defects or in cases in which lack of space may compress the flap. This flap is also contraindicated in patients who would not be candidates for any free flap. Patients who lack recipient vessels, who are poor risks for prolonged anesthesia, and who have impaired vascularity to the leg are not candidates for this type of surgery. Nevertheless, free tissue transfer has been performed successfully in patients who are elderly, in people who smoke heavily, in individuals with diabetes mellitus, and in patients who have had previous radiation to the neck.

In men, the flap may be hairy. Generally, a poor color match with the head and neck recipient site is common. If the patient is obese, a fasciocutaneous flap may not be possible. Lateral thigh flaps with large amounts of subcutaneous fat cannot be tubed adequately for laryngopharyngeal defects. The flap also cannot carry bone, but it can carry fascia.

Anterolateral thigh flaps

Contraindications to harvesting the anterolateral thigh flap include previous surgery or injury to the upper thigh, compromising pedicle, and morbid obesity, which may make the flap too thick and compromise the vascularity. As would be expected, the flap is usually hair bearing in males.

More on Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh

Overview: Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh
Workup: Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh
Treatment: Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh
Follow-up: Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh
Multimedia: Free Tissue Transfer, Lateral Thigh and Anterolateral Thigh
References

References

  1. Baek SM. Two new cutaneous free flaps: the medial and lateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1983;71(3):354-65. [Medline].

  2. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1984;37(2):149-59. [Medline].

  3. Koshima I, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Ohta S. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1993;92(3):421-8; discussion 429-30. [Medline].

  4. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Yoshizumi T, Asai M, Saikawa M, et al. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 1997;123(12):1325-31. [Medline].

  5. Hage JJ, Woerdeman LA. Lower limb necrosis after use of the anterolateral thigh free flap: is preoperative angiography indicated?. Ann Plast Surg. Mar 2004;52(3):315-8. [Medline].

  6. Tsukino A, Kurachi K, Inamiya T, Tanigaki T. Preoperative color Doppler assessment in planning of anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2004;113(1):241-6. [Medline].

  7. Casey WJ 3rd, Rebecca AM, Smith AA, Craft RO, Hayden RE, Buchel EW. Vastus lateralis motor nerve can adversely affect anterolateral thigh flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2007;120(1):196-201. [Medline].

  8. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. The blood supply of thigh skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1985;75(3):342-54. [Medline].

  9. Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. Blood supply by regions. In: Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH, eds. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:232-235.

  10. Ha B, Baek CH. Head and neck reconstruction using lateral thigh free flap: flap design. Microsurgery. 1999;19(3):157-65. [Medline].

  11. Hallock GG. The preexpanded anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 2004;53(2):170-3. [Medline].

  12. Hayden RE. Lateral thigh flap. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 1994;27(6):1171-83. [Medline].

  13. Hayden RE, Deschler DG. Lateral thigh free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope. Sep 1999;109(9):1490-4. [Medline].

  14. Huang CH, Chen HC, Huang YL, Mardini S, Feng GM. Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2004;114(7):1704-10. [Medline].

  15. Koshima I. Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects following Cancer Ablation. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2000;105(7):2358-2360. [Medline].

  16. Koshima I, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Hamanaka T, Kawata S, Hata T. A combined anterolateral thigh flap, anteromedial thigh flap, and vascularized iliac bone graft for a full-thickness defect of the mental region. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 1993;31(2):175-80. [Medline].

  17. Koshima I, Hosoda S, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Free combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula for wide, through-and-through oromandibular defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. Nov 1998;14(8):529-34. [Medline].

  18. Lipa JE, Novak CB, Binhammer PA. Patient-reported donor-site morbidity following anterolateral thigh free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. Aug 2005;21(6):365-70. [Medline].

  19. Lueg EA. The anterolateral thigh flap: radial forearm's "big brother" for extensive soft tissue head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2004;130(7):813-8. [Medline].

  20. Miller MJ, Reece GP, Marchi M, Baldwin BJ. Lateral thigh free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1995;96(2):334-40. [Medline].

  21. Mäkitie AA, Beasley NJ, Neligan PC, Lipa J, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW. Head and neck reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 2003;129(5):547-55. [Medline].

  22. Pan SC, Yu JC, Shieh SJ, Lee JW, Huang BM, Chiu HY. Distally based anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2004;114(7):1768-75. [Medline].

  23. Posch NA, Mureau MA, Flood SJ, Hofer SO. The combined free partial vastus lateralis with anterolateral thigh perforator flap reconstruction of extensive composite defects. Br J Plast Surg. Dec 2005;58(8):1095-103. [Medline].

  24. Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP, Epstein MD, Sampson CE, Hergrueter CA. Anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 1995;34(6):585-92. [Medline].

  25. Shimizu T, Fisher DR, Carmichael SW, Bite U. An anatomic comparison of septocutaneous free flaps from the thigh region. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 1997;38(6):604-10. [Medline].

  26. Truelson JM, Leach JL. Lateral thigh flap reconstruction in the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 1998;118(2):203-10. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

lateral thigh free flap, fascial flap, fasciocutaneous flap, lateral thigh flap, fascial graft, sensate flap, vascular pedicle, anterolateral thigh flap, anterolateral thigh free flap, lateral circumflex femoral artery, profunda femoris artery, PFA, lateral circumflex femoral artery, LCFA, free lateral thigh flap

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Joseph L Leach Jr, MD, Associate Professor of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
Joseph L Leach Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Texas Medical Association, and Triological Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Larry L Myers, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery and Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Larry L Myers, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Head and Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Rhinologic Society, and National Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John M Truelson, MD, FACS, Chairman, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Associate Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
John M Truelson, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Phi Beta Kappa, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Terance (Terry) Ted Tsue, MD, Vice-Chairman for Administrative Affairs, Professor, Residency Program Director, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine
Terance (Terry) Ted Tsue, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins Medical and Surgical Association, Missouri State Medical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Managing Editor

David W Stepnick, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center
David W Stepnick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders
Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society
Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation unstricted gift unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Syndicom Ownership interest Consulting; Oxlo  Consulting; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.