Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Flap Free Tissue Transfer Treatment & Management

  • Author: Terance (Terry) Ted Tsue, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: May 7, 2012
 

Preoperative Details

Discuss the rigors of extensive surgery and potential complications with each patient. The patient must be prepared to remain in the hospital for 7-10 days postoperation.

Once the donor arm is chosen, avoid all future venipunctures, arterial line, and blood pressure cuff placements. Shave the donor forearm and lay the arm on an arm board. Usually, position the arm 30-45° from the body until harvest. At this time, move the arm approximately 90° from the body so that 2 surgeons can operate on either side of it. Place an appropriately sized tourniquet on the upper arm and check the cuff's function. Use of a tourniquet is optional but helpful, especially during radius bone harvest. Because the patient is usually placed in a supine position, the volar aspect of the forearm remains pointing superiorly.

Then, sterilely prepare the arm and drape it in separate limb drapes while the arm is wrapped in a stockinette. Complete these steps before preparing the clean-contaminated head and neck region. Also, prepare and drape the upper thigh to allow split-thickness skin graft (STSG) harvest for coverage of the forearm donor site. Until the harvest is initiated, cover the leg and arm with sterile drapes to prevent cross-contamination from the head and neck. A separate operating room (OR) instrument table and scrub nurse should be available during harvest so that harvest can occur concurrently with the extirpative procedure to minimize anesthetic and operative time.

Anesthetize and monitor the patient as indicated for the long procedure. To allow for intraoperative nerve stimulation, avoidance of muscle relaxants is preferred. Administer IV antibiotics, systemic steroids, and histamine-2 receptor antagonists.

Next

Intraoperative Details

Osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap harvest

Sterilely uncover the surgical donor site of the arm and draw the skin paddle on the volar aspect of the forearm, as shown below. The size and shape of the paddle depend on the needs of the head and neck defect. The paddle is proximally biased about 2 cm proximal to the wrist crease. The paddle is also ulnarly biased but insufficient to disrupt the perforators in the lateral intermuscular septum to the skin. These 2 positional biases aid in cutaneous coverage of the internal fixation plate hardware of the donor radius described below.

Planned fasciocutaneous paddle drawn with a surgicPlanned fasciocutaneous paddle drawn with a surgical pen on the volar aspect of the donor forearm. Note the ulnar bias to the skin paddle with the palpated radial artery (RA) and ulnar artery (UA) marked.

Next, exsanguinate the arm with elastic dressing and elevate it while the tourniquet cuff is inflated to well above arterial pressure (ie, 270 mm Hg). Remove the elastic bandage.

Perform the medial longitudinal skin incision first. Make this incision (as all skin incisions) with a number 15 scalpel. Then, perform subfascial dissection medially to laterally using tenotomy scissors, as shown in the image below. Make the proximal and distal incisions after confirming the defect size in the head and neck recipient site. Take care proximally to avoid the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve traveling in the muscular fascia. Distally, exercise caution lateral to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon to avoid damage to a superficially running ulnar artery pedicle. As dissection proceeds laterally, subfascial dissection occurs over the palmaris longus tendon (if present) and the flexor carpi radialis tendon. Maintain the paratenon on these tendons to assist with STSG take during wound closure.

Subfascial dissection is performed under the fasciSubfascial dissection is performed under the fasciocutaneous paddle in the medial to lateral direction. The flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, and flexor carpi radialis tendons are preserved as the surgeon moves medial to lateral. The pedicle is preserved just lateral to the flexor carpi radialis tendon. Care is taken to protect the sometimes superficial ulnar pedicle just lateral to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon distally.

Make the radial longitudinal skin incision and perform lateral-to-medial subfascial dissection over the large brachioradialis (BR) tendon, shown below. Take care to preserve the dorsal radial nerve. The radial artery pedicle can run close to the BR tendon medial margin; use exceptional caution in separating the lateral intermuscular septum from the medial border of this tendon. Next, widely undermine the BR tendon and retract it laterally. Distally, dissect the radial artery pedicle and place a vessel loop around it. Because of the ulnar-biasing, the cephalic vein and lateral antebrachial nerve are not frequently included in the harvest but can be, depending on need. The fasciocutaneous paddle should now be pedicled by only the lateral intermuscular septum and the radial artery pedicle.

Subfascial dissection is performed in a lateral-toSubfascial dissection is performed in a lateral-to-medial direction under the fasciocutaneous paddle. The superficial radial nerve is shown with the vessel loop and is preserved. Care is taken near the medial border of the brachioradialis tendon to preserve the radial artery pedicle. The proximal linear incision from the fasciocutaneous paddle to the antebrachial fossa has been elevated.

Proximally, make a linear or curvilinear incision from the skin paddle to the antecubital fossa. Then, perform subcutaneous dissection to elevate skin flaps medially and laterally. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve can then be followed to the antecubital fossa prior to harvest. Also, follow the radial artery pedicle to the antecubital fossa using microclips or bipolar cautery on small vascular branches between the pedicle and underlying musculature. Those branches lying deep to the skin paddle must be preserved because they feed the underlying radius periosteum. Typically, clean the pedicle and follow it proximally to the radial artery's takeoff from the brachial artery. The paired venae comitantes frequently coalesce into a single larger vein near the antecubital fossa. If a superficial vein is preserved from the fasciocutaneous paddle, it can be followed into the antecubital fossa. These veins frequently connect to the deeper venous network as well.

Next, release the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) from the distal medial radius and retract it medially to visualize the flexor pollicis longus (FPL). Using a scalpel, split the FPL and periosteum over the longitudinal midline of the volar radial surface (on the ulnar side of the lateral intermuscular septum). Determine this midline by means of palpation, remembering that the radius enlarges distally.

Next, accurately determine the required length of radius bone from the head and neck defect and measure along the exposed radius. Generally, harvest the vascularized bone graft between the pronator teres (PT) and BR tendon insertions, remembering that the distal osteotomy must be made at least 2.5 cm proximal to the radius styloid process to allow insertion of at least 2 bicortical screws during internal fixation. Proximally, the bone can be harvested beyond the PT insertion, but the PT tendon must be reinserted to the remaining radius bone and/or fixation plate. (Using this technique, as much as 12 cm of radius bone has been harvested.) Mark the proximal and distal osteotomies by sharply incising the periosteum in a beveled fashion, so that the resulting bony defect is beveled somewhat concavely.

Use a fine-blade oscillating saw to make the longitudinal radius cut, as in the image below. Irrigate copiously with antibiotic-containing saline irrigation. The longitudinal radius cut is placed to allow harvest of approximately 50% of the radius circumference. Usually, cutting is started proximally. Because of the curvature of the radius and increased radius circumference distally, the frequency of harvesting too much of the radial circumference proximally is minimized. Next, make the proximal and distal beveled osteotomies with the saw, as shown below. Avoid past-cutting because this can weaken the remaining radius bone. Incise the dorsal periosteum lateral to the intermuscular septum and under or lateral to the retracted BR tendon, completing the bone-graft harvest.

The horizontal osteotomy is performed using the osThe horizontal osteotomy is performed using the oscillating saw. Fifty percent of the radius circumference is harvested proximally to distally. An oscillating saw is used to make the concave bevAn oscillating saw is used to make the concave beveled edges on both ends of the harvested radius bone graft. This step is performed on the medial side of the intermuscular septum. This photograph shows the proximal osteotomy. In order to maintain the donor radius strength, past-pointing the horizontal incision is prevented by placing a metal ruler in the previously made osteotomy.

Release the tourniquet and allow the OCRFFF to perfuse on its pedicle until its transfer to the recipient site. Bleeders are managed with bipolar cautery or hemoclips. Confirm adequate perfusion of the entire flap. First, clamp the distal pedicle and again confirm hand perfusion before actual pedicle sacrifice. Use silk ties and/or medium hemoclips during pedicle sacrifice, both proximally and distally. Then, transfer the OCRFFF to the head and neck recipient site for inset and microvascular anastomoses. Up to 2 osteotomies have been performed subperiosteally in the radius graft without vascular compromise to the bone graft.

Prophylactic internal fixation of donor radius and wound closure

Prophylactic internal fixation can be performed most efficiently after reinflating the arm tourniquet. Expose the dorsal radius proximally and distally. Position an appropriately sized 3.5-mm low-contact dynamic compression plate (AO Synthes, Davos, Switzerland) over the radius and bend it to the contour of the bone, as depicted in the image below. Typically, 14- to 18-hole plates are required, depending on the length of the harvested radius graft. Distally, retract the radial wrist extensors (ie, abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis) laterally and place at least 2 standard bicortical screws.

Model of proper prophylactic plating of the donor Model of proper prophylactic plating of the donor radius arm. The arrows point to the concave beveled edges' osteotomies. Note that the plate is placed partially over the defect and partially over the remaining radius bone. Usually, 2 bicortical screws are placed distally, while 3 bicortical screws are placed proximally.

Proximally, visualize the supinator (S). With long-bone harvests, elevate this muscle subperiosteally and place the plate beneath it. Take care to protect the posterior interosseous nerve, a branch of the deep radial nerve that pierces the S. Place at least 2 (usually 3) bicortical screws proximally. To avoid the creation of additional stress risers, do not place screws in the defect cavity. See the image below.

The plate is placed on the dorsal aspect of the doThe plate is placed on the dorsal aspect of the donor radius, and bicortical screws are placed both distally and proximally. The brachioradialis tendon can be retracted to facilitate screw and plate placement.

Using a dermatome, harvest an STSG (0.015-in thickness) from the prepared thigh. Then, mesh the STSG and bring it up to the donor arm. Dress the leg with Xeroform gauze (Sherwood Medical, St Louis, Mo) or an occlusive dressing.

Reinsert the PT tendon into the remaining radius or fixation plate as necessary. Using absorbable sutures, suture the FPL remnant over the radius defect and plate. The FDS can usually be brought over the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon to the radial skin edge. This method provides a second muscular layer over the bony donor site and helps the STSG take on the FCR tendon. Then, cover the defect with a 1.0:1.5 meshed STSG. Cover the donor site with Xeroform gauze, cotton balls, and a gauze wrap. Finally, apply a rigid plaster ulnar-gutter splint and wrap with an elastic bandage.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Perfusion of the flap and the hand are closely monitored, as is the motor and sensory neural integrity of the hand and fingers.

Keep the donor arm elevated. Take down the arm splint 5-7 days postoperatively and dress the donor site with a fresh Xeroform gauze and cotton wrap dressing for protection during healing. Remove the arm sutures and/or staples approximately 10 days postoperatively. Encourage the patient to perform normal movements with the donor arm after splint removal.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Monitor the arm and leg wounds during routine postoperative follow-up as dictated by the head and neck problem. Encourage normal wrist activity; physical therapy is needed only if limited range of motion or decreased strength is encountered. Postoperative radiographs of the donor arm are needed only to investigate arm symptoms.

Previous
Next

Complications

Microvascular free flaps always carry the risk of ischemia and flap loss. Early detection of vascular compromise and expeditious flap revision is important and can result in overall success rates greater than 95%. As with the fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap (FCRFFF), the most common donor site complication is poor split-thickness skin graft (STSG) take over the flexor carpi radialis tendon. This problem usually responds readily to wet-to-dry dressings and rarely requires debridement or regrafting.

Complications from the harvest of the radius bone include donor radius fracture, decreased range of motion, and decreased strength. Werle et al report eliminating radius fractures by using keel-shaped osteotomies and prophylactic plating of the donor radius bone.[8] Their results have been reproduced by other authors. Kim et al looked at donor and recipient site complications in 52 patients who underwent osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFF) for oromandibular and maxillofacial reconstruction.[2] In their series, only one fracture of the donor site occurred, which was subsequently repaired without sequelae. With careful closure of the forearm, paying attention to the muscle coverage of the plate, these authors had no incidences of plate exposure in the forearm.

In more than 100 consecutive cases, the authors experienced no cases of symptomatic radius fractures that required any intervention. Interestingly, one patient fell on an outstretched donor arm on postoperative day 7 and suffered a humerus fracture; the plated radius was uninjured.

The rate of major surgical complications at the donor site was comparable or better for the radius bone harvest compared with a harvest of the fibula and scapula osteocutaneous flaps (7% vs 16%). Only 1 patient (0.9%) required plate removal because of hardware loosening, and 2 patients required another surgical intervention at the donor site. None of the above complications resulted in any further sequelae.

Limitations of wrist range of motion and strength have not been significant. Mean grip and pinch strength were at least 84% of the unoperated, and usually dominant, arm. Wrist range of motion was at least 87% of the control side. Again, operated arms are usually the nondominant arm, which may have decreased values at baseline. Any minimal limitation has generally been overcome with physical therapy. One case of an attritional tear of the extensor pollicis longus tendon tear from the end of a fixation plate placed too ulnarly occurred. This patient required repair and plate removal without sequelae. No instances of infection or loosening of donor arm hardware have occurred.

Thigh STSG donor sites become intermittently infected and require local wound care and topical antibiotics. However, they usually heal without difficulties.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

As was shown in the authors' recent review, when compared with other commonly used osteocutaneous free flaps in head and neck reconstruction, patients with osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) had significantly fewer problems with wound infections, breakdown, and postoperative fistulae at the primary site. Also, at the authors' institution, OCRFFF patients had a shorter postoperative rehabilitation time as demonstrated by the length of ICU and total hospital stay. A similar percentage of patients were rehabilitated with tissue-borne dental prostheses in the OCRFFF group to the percentage for other osteocutaneous free flap groups without any problems with mandibular or bone graft fractures. When the prophylactic internal fixation technique is performed, as described in the previous section, donor site morbidity of the OCRFFF procedure is similar to that seen in the fasciocutaneous free flap procedure.

In a review by Clark et al, nonplated donor radii were shown to have sustained an unacceptably high fracture rate (18% among males and 32% among females).[9] In addition, patients with nonplated donor radii had been wearing immobilizing splints for 6-8 weeks, whereas patients with prophylactically plated donor radii had their casts removed on postoperative day 5 and had been encouraged to resume normal activity thereafter.

Reconstitution and remodeling, which are both evidence of bone healing, are observable radiographically by 5 months postoperatively, with bony remodeling seen as early as 3 months postoperatively.

The soft tissue characteristics of the fasciocutaneous paddle are nearly ideal for intraoral reconstruction and yield improved function compared with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. The available bone is adequate for small-to-medium segmental mandibular defects, with the primary disadvantage being its inability to support osseointegrated implants. As previously mentioned, because of insurance and cost restrictions, the percentage of the authors' patients who are able to afford this type of rehabilitation is low.

Even in the setting of heavily radiated tissues, such as when treating patients with advanced mandibular osteoradionecrosis, reconstruction using OCRFFF achieves excellent functional results.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The possible integration of osseointegrated implants into the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) radius bone graft would make it an even more desirable flap. The OCRFFF can readily tolerate a tissue-borne prosthesis and help rehabilitate mastication to a certain extent.

Hatoko et al described the use of calcium phosphate cement to fill the radius bone defect after harvesting radial forearm osteocutaneous flap in 5 patients.[10] The maximum size of harvested radius was 10x50 mm, and the maximum volume required was 3-4 mL. No plating was used, but postoperative fixation of the forearm continued for 14 days. Postoperative radiographs revealed a uniform high-density mass that filled the bone defect, with only a 5% volume reduction at 5 months, suggesting the need for overfilling the defect.

However, further studies of bone replacement that compare the use of calcium phosphate cement with internal fixation of the radius bone are necessary before adopting the technique because of the success and paucity of symptoms associated with the use of prophylactic internal fixation alone.

The authors' goal is to reintroduce this useful and versatile flap as a viable reconstructive option to the head and neck surgery community. Because of the orthopedic technology and principles that currently exist, the flap's stigmatization because of unacceptable donor site morbidity should be only historical. Future applications should become evident as the OCRFFF regains popularity.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Terance (Terry) Ted Tsue, MD  Vice-Chairman for Administrative Affairs, Professor, Residency Program Director, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine

Terance (Terry) Ted Tsue, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins Medical and Surgical Association, Missouri State Medical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Yelizaveta (Lisa) Shnayder, MD, FACS  Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center

Yelizaveta (Lisa) Shnayder, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Douglas A Girod, MD  Professor and Chairman, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine; Professor, Department of Hearing and Speech, School of Allied Health, University of Kansas

Douglas A Girod, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, and Southwest Oncology Group

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Oleg N Militsakh, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Facial Plastic Reconstruction, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Surgeon in Head and Neck Surgery, Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Oleg N Militsakh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society, and American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Anthony P Sclafani, MD  Director of Facial Plastic Surgery and Surgeon Director, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary; Professor of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College

Anthony P Sclafani, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American College of Surgeons

Disclosure: Contura None Board membership; Aesthetic Factors, Inc. Salary Consulting; Aesthetic Factors, Inc. Grant/research funds Independent contractor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

David W Stepnick, MD  Associate Professor, Departments of Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center

David W Stepnick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher L Slack, MD  Private Practice in Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders

Christopher L Slack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Covidien Corp Consulting fee Consulting; US Tobacco Corporation Unrestricted gift Unknown; Axis Three Corporation Ownership interest Consulting; Omni Biosciences Ownership interest Consulting; Sentegra Ownership interest Board membership; Medvoy Ownership interest Management position; Cerescan Imaging Consulting; Headwatersmb Consulting fee Consulting; Venturequest Royalty Consulting

References
  1. Yang GF, Chen PJ, Gao YZ, Liu XY, Li J, Jiang SX. Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1997;50(3):162-5. [Medline].

  2. Kim JH, Rosenthal EL, Ellis T, Wax MK. Radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap in maxillofacial and oromandibular reconstructions. Laryngoscope. Sep 2005;115(9):1697-701. [Medline].

  3. Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Use of the AO plate for immediate mandibular reconstruction in cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1991;88(4):588-93. [Medline].

  4. Arden RL, Rachel JD, Marks SC, Dang K. Volume-length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 1999;125(1):68-72. [Medline].

  5. Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2000;105(7):2331-46; discussion 2347-8. [Medline].

  6. Chepeha DB, Moyer JS, Bradford CR, Prince ME, Marentette L, Teknos TN. Osseocutaneous radial forearm free tissue transfer for repair of complex midfacial defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 2005;131(6):513-7. [Medline].

  7. Militsakh ON, Wallace DI, Kriet JD, Tsue TT, Girod DA. The role of the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap in the treatment of mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2005;133(1):80-3. [Medline].

  8. Werle AH, Tsue TT, Toby EB, Girod DA. Osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap: its use without significant donor site morbidity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2000;123(6):711-7. [Medline].

  9. Clark S, Greenwood M, Banks RJ, Parker R. Fracture of the radial donor site after composite free flap harvest: a ten-year review. Surgeon. Oct 2004;2(5):281-6. [Medline].

  10. Hatoko M, Tanaka A, Iioka H, Niitsuma K, Tada H. Use of calcium phosphate cement for bone defect after harvesting radial forearm osteocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 2004;53(3):245-9. [Medline].

  11. Blackwell KE, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. Lateral mandibular reconstruction using soft-tissue free flaps and plates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1996;122(6):672-8. [Medline].

  12. Matthews RN, Fatah F, Davies DM, Eyre J, Hodge RA, Walsh-Waring GP. Experience with the radial forearm flap in 14 cases. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;18(3):303-10. [Medline].

  13. Militsakh ON, Werle A, Mohyuddin N, Toby EB, Kriet JD, Wallace DI, et al. Comparison of radial forearm with fibula and scapula osteocutaneous free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2005;131(7):571-5. [Medline].

  14. Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Yamada A, Ueda K, Ebihara S. Dual free flap transfer using forearm flap for mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck. Nov-Dec 1992;14(6):452-8. [Medline].

  15. Nuckols DA, Tsue TT, Toby EB, Girod DA. Preoperative evaluation of the radial forearm free flap patient with the objective Allen's test. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 2000;123(5):553-7. [Medline].

  16. Soutar DS, McGregor IA. The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction: the experience of 60 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1986;78(1):1-8. [Medline].

  17. Soutar DS, Scheker LR, Tanner NS, McGregor IA. The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intra-oral reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. Jan 1983;36(1):1-8. [Medline].

  18. Tsue TT, Desyatnikova SS, Deleyiannis FW, Futran ND, Stack BC Jr, Weymuller EA Jr. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 1997;123(7):731-7. [Medline].

  19. Urken ML, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Aviv JE, Buchbinder D, Lawson W, et al. The combined sensate radical forearm and iliac crest free flaps for reconstruction of significant glossectomy-mandibulectomy defects. Laryngoscope. May 1992;102(5):543-58. [Medline].

  20. Vaughan ED. The radial forearm free flap in orofacial reconstruction. Personal experience in 120 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. Jan 1990;18(1):2-7. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Planned fasciocutaneous paddle drawn with a surgical pen on the volar aspect of the donor forearm. Note the ulnar bias to the skin paddle with the palpated radial artery (RA) and ulnar artery (UA) marked.
Subfascial dissection is performed under the fasciocutaneous paddle in the medial to lateral direction. The flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, and flexor carpi radialis tendons are preserved as the surgeon moves medial to lateral. The pedicle is preserved just lateral to the flexor carpi radialis tendon. Care is taken to protect the sometimes superficial ulnar pedicle just lateral to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon distally.
Subfascial dissection is performed in a lateral-to-medial direction under the fasciocutaneous paddle. The superficial radial nerve is shown with the vessel loop and is preserved. Care is taken near the medial border of the brachioradialis tendon to preserve the radial artery pedicle. The proximal linear incision from the fasciocutaneous paddle to the antebrachial fossa has been elevated.
The horizontal osteotomy is performed using the oscillating saw. Fifty percent of the radius circumference is harvested proximally to distally.
An oscillating saw is used to make the concave beveled edges on both ends of the harvested radius bone graft. This step is performed on the medial side of the intermuscular septum. This photograph shows the proximal osteotomy. In order to maintain the donor radius strength, past-pointing the horizontal incision is prevented by placing a metal ruler in the previously made osteotomy.
Model of proper prophylactic plating of the donor radius arm. The arrows point to the concave beveled edges' osteotomies. Note that the plate is placed partially over the defect and partially over the remaining radius bone. Usually, 2 bicortical screws are placed distally, while 3 bicortical screws are placed proximally.
The plate is placed on the dorsal aspect of the donor radius, and bicortical screws are placed both distally and proximally. The brachioradialis tendon can be retracted to facilitate screw and plate placement.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.