eMedicine Specialties > Sports Medicine > Introductory Topics in Sports Medicine

Sports Physicals

Anthony J Saglimbeni, MD, Staff Physician, Family Practice Residency, Medical Director, Center for Sports Medicine, O'Connor Hospital; Private Practice

Updated: Nov 1, 2007

Introduction

Need and cost

In the US alone, millions of athletes undergo preparticipation evaluations, and millions of healthcare hours are spent on performing these evaluations each year. Because the yield of significant abnormalities in this relatively healthy population is low, the cost-effectiveness of these evaluations has been questioned.¹

Philosophy

The approach to preparticipation evaluations varies depending on the practitioner and practice situation, as well as on the athlete, his or her level of competition, and the institution and its requirements. At this time, 50 of 51 states (including the District of Columbia) require some form of physical evaluation before participation in sports at the high school level, of which some are legal requirements. Some practitioners approach sports physicals as thorough, periodic health evaluations, whereas others consider these evaluations to be risk-based screening examinations. Neither approach is perfect, and no universal standard exists for what constitutes an adequate or appropriate evaluation for this population.

To complicate matters further, the positional statement of the American Medical Association (AMA) regarding such evaluations is vague and may be interpreted in many ways.² According to the AMA, every athlete has the right to a thorough preseason evaluation. Typically, these evaluations are not considered substitutes for thorough medical care, and they are described as screening tools with the purpose of identifying high-risk situations.

Main issues

The main athletic assessment issues can be classified into 3 categories: administrative, coaching/athletic, and medical.

Athletic directors are the ones who usually address the administrative issues, which are often based on institutional policy and on local, state, or national laws. These administrative issues involve liabilities, matters to do with insurers, and the rights of athletes to participate in competitive sports. The administrators rely on the physician to assess athletes for compliance with the relevant administrative codes.

The coaching/athletic issues involve both the coaches and athletes. The athletes want medical clearance so they can safely compete and train. If they have a history of injuries or medical problems, the athletes desire information about how to treat or rehabilitate those conditions to improve their performance and safety. Coaches are interested in fielding a team of healthy athletes. When injuries or illness preclude their athletes from competing, coaches need to know the time period that is required for the injury or illness to heal so they can make decisions about finding capable substitutes. Both athletes and coaches depend on the physician to help them in making these types of decisions.

Medical issues are handled by the physician, athlete, coaching staff, and administrators. The goal is to ensure, as completely and accurately as possible, that an athlete with a specific medical condition can compete safely. Achieving this goal is usually straightforward, but a particular situation can become complicated. Although a number of guidelines are available, many are difficult to interpret or implement. Furthermore, some conditions that affect an athlete's participation in sports do not have clear-cut guidelines. The physician's role is vital in these cases. He or she must not only determine the athlete's safety but also assist team coaches in making decisions about administrative and legal matters.

Goals and objectives

The goals of a preparticipation sports evaluation can be summarized as follows:

• Determine that the athlete is in general good health.
• Assess the athlete's present fitness level.
• Detect conditions that predispose the athlete to new injuries.
• Evaluate any existing injuries of the athlete.
• Assess the size and developmental maturation of the athlete.
• Detect congenital anomalies that increase the athlete's risk of injury.
• Detect poor preparticipation conditioning that may put the athlete at increased risk.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Public Health Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Walking for Fitness and Strength Training, as well as the Medscape article Sports Medicine in the Primary Care Setting.

Timing, Frequency, and Types of Evaluations

Timing of the evaluation

The timing of an athletic preparticipation evaluation is dependent upon the season of the sport. Many evaluations are performed throughout an entire institution that has teams competing in many sports during various seasons. In this circumstance, one approach is to perform the evaluations before each major season. This approach may be optimal for each sport in its season, but it also requires organization and frequent involvement by the medical team. Another approach is to conduct all physical examinations for the institution at the same time each year. Although this approach is more convenient for the medical team, the evaluations may not be optimally timed for all sports.

The optimal timing for the preparticipation sports evaluation is approximately 6 weeks before the onset of the sports season because this period affords time for the further evaluation of any problems that are discovered, if indicated. If treatable problems are detected, some rehabilitation success can be achieved during those 6 weeks. Furthermore, unconditioned athletes may have an opportunity to improve their conditioning in this time and, thus, hopefully prevent other injuries.

If the physical examination is performed less than 6 weeks before the start of a sports season, some athletes may not have time to recover, become conditioned, or complete a specific evaluation that may necessitate medical clearance for play. As a result, athletes may miss part of the sports season. If the preparticipation evaluation is performed earlier, there is time for other conditions to develop, and the findings of the initial evaluation may no longer be up to date.

Frequency of evaluations

No requirements are established for the frequency of these physical evaluations. Approaches vary from annual evaluations to season-specific examinations to single evaluations performed when an athlete enters a sports program.

High schools typically require annual evaluations before a student's participation. These are usually considered valid for the entire academic season and may diminish the number of evaluations needed by multisport athletes.

Many higher-level institutions use thorough initial evaluations upon the student's admission to its athletic programs, with annual follow-up examinations that are focused on particular items and a review of the athlete's medical history. Some of these follow-up examinations may address only the history if the individual is healthy. If abnormalities are detected on the history screening, these problems are evaluated thoroughly.

In a number of organized professional sports, such as football, preseason and postseason physical examinations are the standard.

Types of evaluations

Two extremes exist in the spectrum of the types of athletic preparticipation evaluations: one by the athlete's personal physician and the other by multiple providers in a multistation setting. Either evaluation is adequate if the proper documentation is completed.

At one end of the spectrum is an evaluation in a private office setting or by the athlete's personal physician. These make up a small percentage of all sports evaluations. The private office examination is ideal from the standpoint of continuity of care. Furthermore, the athlete may feel at ease in the surroundings of a familiar physician. The main drawback to this approach is the difficulty of performing many of these evaluations in the office settings.

At the other end of the spectrum of athletic preparticipation examinations is the multistation evaluation, which involves multiple providers and examination-based specialists. In this approach, a primary care physician may review the patient's history; check his or her vital signs; and examine the abdomen, lungs, and genitals. A cardiologist may then examine the heart, a neurologist performs neurologic testing, a physiatrist assesses the athlete's flexibility, and an orthopedist completes the musculoskeletal evaluation.

This multistation approach requires a coordinated effort of many more personnel. These types of evaluations are often performed in gymnasiums, locker rooms, or auditoriums; thus, privacy for the patient is lost. Multistation evaluation is ideal for large volumes of athletes and provides immediate access to a specialist if abnormalities surface. To achieve patient cooperation, personnel such as coaches may assist in supervising athletes who are waiting to be examined. Trainers and therapists are often used to assess vital signs, evaluate visual acuity, and assess flexibility and range of motion. See Table 1 for common requirements for station-based setup.

*The physical examination can be subdivided if more than 1 physician is present. Qualified medical personnel may perform the musculoskeletal examination under the direction of a physician.

†A station for the evaluation of musculoskeletal injury may be used to provide a more complete evaluation when a musculoskeletal injury is detected during the required musculoskeletal screening examination.

With the multistation approach, a lead physician should be designated. This physician reviews the results from all the stations and signs the needed forms to clear the athlete for play. The lead physician also checks to ensure that nothing is missed and supplies the appropriate personnel information about athletes who have abnormalities, including those who are still able to compete.

History

A thorough medical history is the most fruitful tool in the athletic preparticipation evaluation. When completed and thoroughly reviewed, this history supplies most of the information that is needed to decide if an athlete can safely compete in a given sport.

Many established tools are available to facilitate the collection of key medical information. Much research and thought has gone into the forms that are jointly recommended by the American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine (AOASM), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM). These forms are easily accessible.

An athlete's medical history should focus on the detection of previous and current disease, previous and current injuries, cardiovascular abnormalities, and musculoskeletal abnormalities. If the athlete's medical history suggests the presence of any of these problems, question him or her for further details, and strongly consider other testing to evaluate these problems.

Key issues that must be addressed in a sports medical history include the following:

• Demographic data: Updated information is critical, especially in athletes who are minors. Telephone contact numbers are also essential because the authorization to treat specific conditions may be needed.
• Tetanus status: With any athletic endeavor, the risk of abrasion and laceration increases as the risk of injury increases. All athletes should be current regarding tetanus immunization.
• History of excessive weight loss or gain: Changes in weight can indicate eating disorders, steroid abuse, and purging behavior. These disorders are seen not only in female athletes in gymnastics, dance, figure skating, and diving, but also in wrestlers and other athletes.
• History of anaphylactic reactions: This finding is especially important if an athlete has known anaphylaxis with insect bites. Because many sports take place in an outdoor environment, insect bites are possible. If an athlete has such a history of anaphylaxis, he or she can be advised to always keep an anaphylaxis kit at hand. Furthermore, advance knowledge of an athlete's allergy can alert coaches, trainers, and team physicians to be prepared to treat this life-threatening condition. (See also the eMedicine article Anaphylaxis.)
• Recent and previous concussions: Although the mortality rate associated with head injury in sports is low, more evidence regarding the morbidity associated with repetitive head injuries is emerging.³ Because athletes, especially those in certain sports, are at risk of head trauma, the athlete's concussion history must be assessed to identify individuals who are at risk and to determine whether they should continue playing contact or collision sports. (See also the eMedicine articles Concussion [in the Sports Medicine section], Postconcussive Syndrome [in the Emergency Medicine section], and Traumatic Brain Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology [in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation section]. See also the Medscape article Traumatic Brain Injury.)
• Dizziness or collapse with exertion: Although this symptom has multiple etiologies, the possibility of heart disease and sudden cardiac death warrants an in-depth evaluation of symptoms, when present. [See also the eMedicine article Commotio Cordis.)
• Family history of exercise-related death: This is a historical finding that puts direct relatives at higher risk for the same condition. Therefore, in cases in which a family history of collapse with exercise is found, the athlete should be evaluated in depth.
• History of asthma: Because asthma is often triggered by exercise or exertion, the severity of the previous episodes should be evaluated further. In addition, adequate instruction about treatment can help prevent dire consequences from this condition. (See also the eMedicine articles Exercise-Induced Asthma [in the Sports Medicine Section] and Asthma [in the Pulmonology section].)
• Loss or dysfunction in 1 of a pair of organs: If the remaining organ of a pair is injured, entire function can be lost. For the most part, this assessment applies to the eyes, kidneys, and testicles.
• Menstrual history: An abnormality in menstrual function can be a clue to significant underlying medical conditions, including pregnancy, osteoporosis, nutritional deficits, drug abuse, psychiatric conditions, and eating disorders. (See also the eMedicine article Female Athlete Triad.)
• Use of contact lenses, dental appliances, and other devices: It is important to be aware of the athlete's use of any lenses or devices because they may become dislodged during competition, and some items should not be worn during competition. In addition, athletes may wear jewelry or have body piercings; these should be noted and assessed.
• Recent or recurrent fractures, dislocations, and other injuries: A history of these types of injuries may indicate a condition that requires further treatment or surgery, or it may indicate an abnormality in the athlete's playing mechanics, style, or equipment.
• Previous heat illness: This finding is important for certain sports that have peak play seasons during hot seasons and for sports that require the use of heavy restrictive equipment. Individuals with 1 episode of heat illness are at high risk of recurrence. (See also the eMedicine article Heat Exhaustion and Heatstroke.)
• Source of the history: Because many athletes are minors, their medical and surgical histories must be obtained with a parent or guardian present. If this is not convenient, history forms could be completed and then sent to a parent or legal guardian for his or her signature. Without the parent's or guardian's involvement, the athlete's history cannot always be considered reliable.

Physical Examination

The physical examination must be global and complete because any abnormality can affect an athlete's sports participation. However, the examination is still somewhat focused on screening for major anomalies. The athletic preparticipation physical evaluation includes a medical examination, an orthopedic examination, and performance testing. However, if the athlete's medical history reveals any problems, those problems should be examined thoroughly and not just for the purposes of screening.

A review of the skills of physical examination is beyond the scope of this article. However, the following is a list of areas that should receive specific attention in an athletic preparticipation evaluation.

• Height and weight: These measures indicate growth and development and may reflect general fitness (eg, obesity) and pathology (eg, eating disorders). These measures are also valuable in evaluating an athlete's risks for competing at certain levels. For example, these data may be useful in determining if a thin freshman should play varsity football. A common minimum weight for varsity football participation is 120 lb, although this is not a strict guideline. Furthermore, some sports are classified according to the athlete's size or weight, and these measures may affect the athlete's class.
• Blood pressure (BP): Although a BP measurement is rarely an indication for disqualification from sports, abnormalities are often first noted during the sports physical examination setting. Athletes with BP changes can be referred for follow-up care with a primary physician. Certain sports may cause significant BP elevations, and this may be a reason to limit an athlete's participation. The BP must be evaluated more than once, and normal BPs for the athlete's age must be considered. Rough guidelines are a BP of 125/80 mm Hg or less for those aged 10-15 years and 130/85 mm Hg for those aged 16 years and older. See Table 2.
• Visual acuity: Visual acuity does not need to be 20/20 for sports participation, but poor vision can affect the athlete's performance and increase the likelihood of injury. If the athlete's visual acuity is abnormal, interventions can be recommended before his or her participation in sports activities. Some recommendations advocate clearance without intervention for any person with visual acuity of 20/40 or better using both eyes.
• Skin: Certain sports, such as wrestling, disqualify athletes who have infectious dermatoses, which include impetigo, herpes, and forms of tinea. Other conditions (eg, acne, scabies, nevi) can be detected, and the athlete should be counseled in such cases. (See also the eMedicine articles Impetigo and Herpes Zoster [in the Infectious Disease section]; Impetigo, Herpes Simplex, Acne Vulgaris, and Scabies [in the Dermatology section]; and Tinea and Scabies [in the Emergency Medicine section].)
• Eyes: Pupil reactivity and anisocoria should be noted. Knowledge of preexisting abnormalities can be useful information at a later time in case an athlete has a head injury.
• Heart: Routine auscultation for murmurs or irregular rhythms is indicated, and auscultation should be obtained with the patient in at least 2 positions (usually sitting and supine), which increase the likelihood of detecting subtle abnormalities. A familiarity with the definitive findings of different valvular lesions is essential. The most common cause of sudden cardiac death in athletes is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, also known as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and Brock disease. The classic murmur in this anomaly is a systolic murmur along the left sternal border, which is accentuated by Valsalva maneuvers and standing; the murmur decreases with handgrip and squat maneuvers. These auscultation examinations can reveal many murmurs, which are mostly benign systolic-flow murmurs, but the examiner must have a trained ear to be able determine the need for further evaluation. (See also the eMedicine articles Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic [in the Pediatrics section] and Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic [in the Cardiology section], as well as the Medscape article Sudden Cardiac Death More Common Than Thought Among the Young.)
• Abdomen: The abdominal examination should be conducted to assess organomegaly, especially splenomegaly, because of the risk of rupture in contact sports.
• Genitalia: The need for a genital examination is an area of controversy among sports medicine physicians. This examination can be used for Tanner staging in adolescents to classify athletes by maturity; thus, developmental delays can be detected. The genital examination can also be used to assess males for the presence of a single testicle and to evaluate for the presence of hernias. Some sports physicians omit the genital examination unless the history indicates a single testicle or inguinal or scrotal swelling; the medical history may be adequate for finding these problems. Furthermore, unless hernias are incarcerated, sports participation may not be prohibited.
• Musculoskeletal: If the screening history is negative, this evaluation can be quickly completed by using the 90-second orthopedic evaluation as outlined below.
  • Note the general body habitus.
  • Assess the cervical range of motion.
  • Assess shoulder function by having the athlete perform shoulder shrugs, abduction to 90°, and internal and external rotation.
  • Visually inspect the forearms and have the athlete supinate and pronate the forearms with his or her elbows flexed to 90°.
  • Evaluate the hands for rotational deformities by asking the athlete to open and close his or her fists and spread the fingers.
  • Have the athlete perform a duck walk to evaluate function of the hips, knees, and ankles.
  • Assess knee extension and patellar tracking.
  • Ask the athlete to toe walk and heel walk.
  • Ask the athlete to touch his or her toes to check for scoliosis.

Performance Testing

Coaches and trainers often perform this test, and the physician may not be needed. The main concern in the performance evaluation is assessing the athlete's flexibility and endurance.

Flexibility can be assessed in many ways. Charts and goniometry may be used to compare ranges of motion on the right and left sides. A simple sit-and-reach test can be used to measure general lower-extremity flexibility. This information is useful in planning exercise programs for specific athletes.

Endurance can be measured with timed tests. One such test is a 12-minute run, during which the athlete's ability to complete the test and the distance covered are measured. Another evaluation is a 1.5-mile run, which is similarly used to assess the athlete's ability to complete the test and the time needed to run the distance.

Other tests may include single maximal weight lifting, timed sprinting, broad jumping, and vertical leaping.

Source: Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children, 1987.⁴

Other Screening Evaluations

The role of other screening evaluations before sports participation has been questioned. For the most part, authorities have recommended against random screening with these tools. Some of these tests are expensive, and some have been evaluated and deemed to have no significant advantage over a thorough medical history and physical evaluation. Also, false-positive findings can lead to unnecessary evaluation and investigation, which can have legal implications that set legal precedents.

One evaluation that has been considered for all athletes is electrocardiography to evaluate cardiac rhythm and cardiac size. Echocardiography is also considered a screening tool for detecting anomalies that may place the athlete at risk for sudden cardiac death. The state of Oregon proposed a protocol approach to help teach providers the most useful screening methods and to collect data over time to help focus future efforts.⁵  In time, this effort may shed light on alternative approaches to screening young athletes for life-threatening cardiac anomalies.

Urinalysis had long been part of the sports physical evaluation, but this test eventually proved to yield several false-positive results. At one point, complete blood cell (CBC) counts were measured to evaluate for anemias, which are common among elite athletes; however, the findings are of questionable significance at times.

Orthopedic evaluations often include radiography of the cervical spine, especially among football players. The purpose is to try to detect an athlete's risk for spinal cord injury. Studies show that this kind of screening may not be effective.

Most guidelines for athletic preparticipation evaluations do not include the above tests. Some institutions do require such studies, but these tests are generally not good as screening tools, and they should not be performed in patients with an unremarkable medical history. However, when a risk is evident, a full workup should be performed. For example, some clinicians advocate radiography of the cervical spine in athletes with Down syndrome because these individuals have a higher incidence of congenital instability in the upper cervical spine.

(See also the eMedicine article Down Syndrome and the Medscape articles Part I: Clinical Practice Guidelines With Down Syndrome From Birth to 12 Years and Part II: Clinical Practice Guidelines  for Adolescents and Young Adults With Down Syndrome: 12-21 Years.)

Clearance for Sports Participation

An athlete should be medically cleared for sports participation only after the medical history and physical evaluation are deemed unremarkable. If the history or physical findings raise concerns, a negative complete workup can help in clearing the athlete for participation. Even then, however, the physician must realize that the athlete is only cleared for a specific sport. Sports with different levels of contact, static activity, and dynamic activity have different criteria for participation clearance. A single athlete may qualify to participate in 1 sport but not in another. Likewise, clearance for participation in 1 sport may not apply to another sport or another level of the same sport.

To help clarify the risks of different sports, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) developed 2 sports classifications based on the level of contact and the level of intensity, as determined by the dynamic and static demands of the sport. Neither classification is all-inclusive, but most of the common sports are included. These range from popular sports, such as football, baseball, hockey, soccer, and basketball, to less common sports, such as skiing, sailing, rodeo, and weight lifting. (Note: Although water sports have their own concerns, the AAP does not consider them a category of sports.)

Contact is divided into 3 categories: contact/collision, limited contact, and noncontact (see Table 3).

Intensity is divided into 2 categories: high to moderate intensity and low intensity. Sports with high to moderate intensity can be subdivided into those with high-dynamic and high-static demands, those with high-dynamic and low-static demands, and those with low-dynamic and high-static demands (see Table 4). Low-intensity sports have low-dynamic and low-static demands; these sports include bowling, cricket, curling, golf, and riflery.

Medical clearance for a sport is easily granted in most cases because the athletes' medical histories and physical findings are often unremarkable. However, when an abnormality is detected, the sport and the severity of the abnormality must be considered together in making a decision about an athlete's participation. The AAP addresses common conditions that arise in athletic preparticipation evaluations and discusses how they are related to clearance for different sports (see Table 5). The physician in charge makes 1 of the following 4 choices⁶ :

• Unrestricted participation for a particular sport: If an athlete is cleared to participate in a contact sport with high dynamic and static demands, the athlete could potentially qualify to participate in any sport. However, this is not always the case.
• Clearance with notification of the coach, trainer, and team physician: This choice may be selected for athletes with conditions that allow their participation in a sport; however, these athletes may need special treatment on occasion. A good example is an athlete with mild to moderate and well-controlled, exercise-induced asthma. (See also the eMedicine article Exercise-Induced Asthma.)
• Deferred clearance: This category can be used when suspicious symptoms or signs indicate further workup should be conducted in an athlete, who may eventually be cleared. A good example is an athlete with a newly discovered cardiac murmur that has suspicious characteristics or an individual with a recent concussion and postconcussion syndrome. (See also the eMedicine articles Concussion [in the Sports Medicine section], Postconcussive Syndrome [in the Emergency Medicine section], and Traumatic Brain Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology [in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation section]. See also the Medscape article Traumatic Brain Injury.) 
• Disqualification: This category is used when a known condition prohibits an athlete's participation in the given sport. Generally, this decision is not reversible for that particular sport; however, the condition may not preclude the athlete's participation in a sport with a lower safety risk.

*Participation not recommended by the AAP.⁶ The AAFP, AMSSM, AOASM, and AOSSM have no recommendation against boxing.

*Participation not recommended by the AAP.⁶ The AAFP, AMSSM, AOASM, and AOSSM have no stand against boxing.

Note: This table is designed to be understood by medical and nonmedical personnel. In the Explanation column, a notation that the athlete needs an evaluation means that a physician with appropriate knowledge and experience should determine whether an athlete with the listed medical condition can safely participate in a given sport. Unless otherwise noted, these evaluations are generally recommended because of variations in the severity of disease and in the risk of injury in specific sports.⁶

*Not discussed in text of the AAP source monograph.

†See Table 4 above.

‡Mild, moderate, and severe congenital heart disease are defined elsewhere (26th Bethesda Conference, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1994).⁷

§See the APP recommendation⁶ as indicated for qualifications by other commentators.

Disqualification From Sports Participation and Its Implications

The decision to disqualify an athlete from sports participation is made in light of the specific sport for which the individual seeks medical clearance to participate. When the situation is vague, the guidelines described above (see Clearance for Sports Participation) can help in clinical decision making about granting clearance.

The AAP guidelines⁶  are broad and not specific in many areas. If obscure cardiac defects are detected, the current criterion standard for decision making is the 26th Bethesda Conference on cardiac anomalies and participation in sports.⁷ Articles by Torg^8,9  are often referenced, as well as those of Torg et al^10,11,12 for cases involving congenital or acquired cervical spinal deformities. Fortunately, obscure conditions that may require such referencing are rare, and usually, a general guideline like that of the AAP is most often used. This resource is valuable because the associated categorizations (contact and intensity) can be used to make recommendations for the athletes that are denied sports participation.

A pitfall to keep in mind is discouraging athletes from general sports participation when they are disqualified from a particular sport; athletes might still be able to compete in other sports and experience the benefits of participation. Furthermore, an optimistic approach is always important when problems are detected in young and impressionable athletes. Many disqualifying conditions can be resolved or controlled with medical or surgical intervention, enabling future sports participation.

In a study by Rifat et al¹³ , the authors showed that the great majority of disqualifications as a result of athletic preparticipation evaluations involved the following 7 findings:

1. Dizziness with exercise
2. Asthma history
3. Unfavorable body mass index
4. Systolic BP elevation
5. Visual acuity defect
6. Presence of a heart murmur
7. Musculoskeletal abnormality

However, many of these conditions were further evaluated and deemed low risk, and clearance was eventually granted to the affected athletes.

Conclusion

An athletic preparticipation evaluation can be performed efficiently and thoroughly when protocols and tools are in place. Use of a reliable medical history questionnaire and a good screening physical examination are usually adequate to meet these needs. The following issues should always be emphasized:

• Demographic data (eg, name, age, sex, sport, telephone numbers, current medications, allergies to medications)
• History of exercise-induced loss of consciousness
• Family history of sudden cardiac death
• History of poorly controlled asthma
• History of recent or previous concussions
• History of fractures or major musculoskeletal problems
• History of heat stroke
• History of environmental anaphylactic reactions, as with insect bites
• History of loss or dysfunction of 1 of a pair of organs
• History of chronic illness requiring regular physician intervention
• History of drastic weight change
• For females only – First menstrual period, menstrual irregularity, last menstrual period
• Parental signature on history forms for minors

• Vital signs (eg, height, weight, BP)
• Visual acuity
• Infectious dermatoses
• Anisocoria
• Wheezing
• Heart murmurs or irregular heart rhythms
• Abdominal organomegaly

• To discover any abnormalities that places the individual at sport-specific risk of injury
• To inform the athlete of correctible abnormalities before the start of the sport's season
• To determine the safety of the athlete's participation
• To provide a database that team physicians, coaches, and administrators can use for reference
• To provide a platform of interaction between athletes and physicians

References

1. Risser WL, Hoffman HM, Bellah GG Jr, Green LW. A cost-benefit analysis of preparticipation sports examinations of adolescent athletes. J Sch Health. Sep 1985;55(7):270-3. [Medline].

2. American Medical Association. Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations Monograph. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1997. [Full Text].

3. Kirkwood MW, Yeates KO, Wilson PE. Pediatric sport-related concussion: a review of the clinical management of an oft-neglected population. Pediatrics. Apr 2006;117(4):1359-71. [Medline]. [Full Text].

4. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children 1987. Pediatrics. Jan; 1987;79(1):1-25. [Medline]. [Full Text].

5. Bader RS, Goldberg L, Sahn DJ. Risk of sudden cardiac death in young athletes: which screening strategies are appropriate?. Pediatr Clin North Am. Oct 2004;51(5):1421-41. [Medline].

6. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Medical conditions affecting sports participation. Pediatrics. Nov 1994;94(5):757-60. [Medline].

7. 26th Bethesda Conference: recommendations for determining eligibility for competition in athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities. January 6-7, 1994. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Oct 1994;26(10 suppl):S223-83. [Medline].

8. Torg JS. Epidemiology, pathomechanics, and prevention of athletic injuries to the cervical spine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jun 1985;17(3):295-303. [Medline].

9. Torg JS. Management guidelines for athletic injuries to the cervical spine. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1987;6(1):53-60. [Medline].

10. Torg JS, Ramsey-Emrhein JA. Management guidelines for participation in collision activities with congenital, developmental, or postinjury lesions involving the cervical spine. Clin J Sport Med. Oct 1997;7(4):273-91. [Medline].

11. Torg JS, Ramsey-Emrhein JA. Suggested management guidelines for participation in collision activities with congenital, developmental, or postinjury lesions involving the cervical spine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jul 1997;29(7 suppl):S256-72. [Medline].

12. Torg JS, Ramsey-Emrhein JA. Management guidelines for participation in collision activities with congenital, developmental, or post-injury lesions involving the cervical spine. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1997;16(3):501-30. [Medline].

13. Rifat SF, Ruffin MT 4th, Gorenflo DW. Disqualifying criteria in a preparticipation sports evaluation. J Fam Pract. Jul 1995;41(1):42-50. [Medline].

14. 26th Bethesda Conference: recommendations for determining eligibility for competition in athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities. January 6-7, 1994. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 1994;24(4):845-99. [Medline].

15. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine. Preparticipation Physical Examination. 3^rd ed. Minneapolis, Minn: McGraw-Hill; 2004:1-82.

16. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine. Preparticipation Physical Examination. 2^nd ed. Minneapolis, Minn: McGraw-Hill Healthcare; 1997:1-46.

17. Armsey TD, Hosey RG. Medical aspects of sports: epidemiology of injuries, preparticipation physical examination, and drugs in sports. Clin Sports Med. Apr 2004;23(2):255-79, vii. [Medline].

18. Cardone DA. The preparticipation evaluation: evolving to enhance the health and safety of athletes [editorial]. Am Fam Physician. Apr 1 2007;75(7):983-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

19. Donnelly DK, Howard TM. Electrocardiography and the preparticipation physical examination: is it time for routine screening?. Curr Sports Med Rep. Apr 2006;5(2):67-73. [Medline].

20. Fahrenbach MC, Thompson PD. The preparticipation sports examination. Cardiovascular considerations for screening. Cardiol Clin. May 1992;10(2):319-28. [Medline].

21. Garrick JG. Orthopedic preparticipation screening examination. Pediatr Clin North Am. Oct 1990;37(5):1047-56. [Medline].

22. Giese EA, O'Connor FG, Brennan FH, Depenbrock PJ, Oriscello RG. The athletic preparticipation evaluation: cardiovascular assessment. Am Fam Physician. Apr 1 2007;75(7):1008-14. [Medline]. [Full Text].

23. Hara JH, Puffer JC. The preparticipation physical examination. In: Mellion MB, Walsh WM, Shelton GL, eds. The Team Physician's Handbook. 2^nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley & Belfus; 1997:295.

24. Lebrun CM. Care of the high school athlete: prevention and treatment of medical emergencies. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:687-702. [Medline].

25. Lombardo JA. Preparticipation examination. In: Cantu R, Micheli L, eds. ACSM's Guidelines for the Team Physician. Philadelphia, Pa: Malvern, Lea & Febiger; 1991:71-94.

26. Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Ackerman MJ, et al. Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. Mar 27 2007;115(12):1643-455. [Medline]. [Full Text].

27. Ryan AJ. Qualifying exams: a continuing dilemma (editorial). Phys Sportsmed. 1980;8:10.

Keywords

sports physical examination, sports participation physical examination, preparticipation physical examination, sports evaluation, preparticipation evaluation, performance testing, clearance for sports participation, athletic preparticipation evaluation, athletic evaluation, athletic examination

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Anthony J Saglimbeni, MD, Staff Physician, Family Practice Residency, Medical Director, Center for Sports Medicine, O'Connor Hospital; Private Practice
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Andrew D Perron, MD, Residency Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center
Andrew D Perron, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Henry T Goitz, MD, Chief, Sports Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Ohio
Henry T Goitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Jon B Whitehurst, MD, Clinical Instructor of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine; Partner and Executive Board Member, Rockford Orthopedic Associates; Orthopedic Chairman, Rockford Memorial Hospital
Jon B Whitehurst, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Craig C Young, MD, Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Community and Family Medicine, Medical Director of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine Fellowship Director, Medical College of Wisconsin
Craig C Young, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, Phi Beta Kappa, and Wilderness Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

© 1994- by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)