Approach Considerations
Most pediatric patients with SAS are asymptomatic. Therefore, medical therapy has no role for such patients. SAS is progressive, however, and intervention is often required at some point in the clinical course of the disease to relieve LVOT obstruction. Diagnostic evaluation can be performed on an outpatient basis.
Old reviews reported that heart failure occurred in small percentages of patients. However, surgical intervention is currently undertaken before heart failure develops. If SAS progresses to the point that heart failure or clinically significant LV dysfunction develops, standard medical therapy (except the use of systemic vasodilators such as angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) is indicated until surgery can be performed.
Indications for Intervention
The criteria and timing of intervention for discrete SAS have been controversial. Rationale for early intervention in patients with these lesions, based on rapid progression and eventual aortic valve injury in patients with unrelieved SAS, is offset by the problem of high postoperative incidence of recurrence, late reoperation, and development of aortic regurgitation even after successful early relief of the obstruction.[10, 11, 12]
Based on published data, an approach to the management of SAS after risk-benefit stratification is nonintervention and medical follow-up in children and adolescents with stable catheter LVOT peak-to-peak (or Doppler mean) gradients of less than 30 mm Hg and no LV hypertrophy.[10, 12]
Children and adolescents with catheter LVOT peak-to-peak (or Doppler mean) gradient of 50 mm Hg or more should have surgical intervention, similar to what is indicated in patients with valvar aortic stenosis.
Children and adolescents with catheter LVOT peak-to-peak (or Doppler mean) gradients of 30-50 mm Hg may be considered for surgical intervention if they are symptomatic with angina, syncope, or dyspnea on exertion (class I), if they are asymptomatic but develop ST/T-wave changes over left precordium on ECG at rest or with exercise (class I), or if they have substrate for a progressive course, a Doppler peak systolic gradient of more than 50 mm Hg, or an older age at diagnosis.[10, 11, 12, 13]
Prevention of aortic regurgitation is usually not an indication for surgical intervention in those with mild LVOT obstruction.[12] Tunnel-like SAS should have an early surgical intervention.
Interventional Procedures
Tunnel-type of subaortic stenosis (subvalvular aortic stenosis [SAS]). MV = mitral valve. Percutaneous balloon dilation of discrete SAS has been reported and can substantially reduce the LVOT pressure gradient. However, relief of LVOT obstruction is relatively brief. Therefore, balloon dilation is not typically thought to be useful in SAS.
The surgery of choice for discrete fibromuscular SAS is complete resection with myotomy, with or without myomectomy through an aortotomy. Children, adolescents, and young adults with clinically significant aortic regurgitation may require aortic valve repair or replacement.
For tunnel-type SAS (seen in the image below) with a small LV-aortic junction, an aortoventriculoplasty (Konno procedure) may be required. This involves excision and replacement of the aortic valve with a prosthesis, patch augmentation of ventricular septum to enlarge the LVOT, and pericardial patch closure of the right ventriculotomy, which is used to gain access to the LVOT.
Tunnel-type of subaortic stenosis (subvalvular aortic stenosis [SAS]). MV = mitral valve. For recurrent SAS and for tunnel-type SAS with normal LV-aortic junction and aortic valve, a modified Konno procedure (ie, without aortic valve excision and replacement) may be performed.
For complex SAS or tunnel stenosis, current surgical practices are individualized but may employ an aortoventriculoplasty in combination with aortic root replacement by using a prosthetic aortic valve, an aortic valve allograft, or a pulmonary valve autograft (Ross-Konno procedure).[15]
Activity
Competitive sports and games, weight training, and strenuous exercises should not be permitted if patients have any of the following:
- Clinically significant LVOT obstruction (peak pressure gradient >40-50 mm Hg)
- More-than-mild aortic regurgitation
- Marked LV hypertrophy
- Clinically significant ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmia
Complications
Preoperative complications include the following:
- Progressive aortic valve damage
- Ventricular dysfunction
- Infective endocarditis
- Sudden death
Sudden cardiac death, unlike in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, is reported in only a small percentage of patients with SAS. Sudden cardiac death is usually not the first clinical manifestation of the disease. It almost always occurs in previously symptomatic patients, typically those who have an LVOT pressure gradient of more than 50 mm Hg.
Postoperative complications include the following:
- Damage to the aortic or mitral valve or both (< 2% of patients)
- Variable degree of heart block (< 2-5% of patients)
- Iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD; < 2% of patients)
- Infective endocarditis.
Bacterial endocarditis is uncommon and most likely to occur in patients with a damaged aortic valve. Bacterial endocarditis can also result in hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation and congestive heart failure in patients with SAS.
Endocarditis Prophylaxis
According to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, no antibiotic prophylaxis is required for SAS when no surgery for the condition has been performed.[16] If a patch is used for outflow reconstruction (eg, for the Konno procedure), then subsequent antibiotic prophylaxis against bacterial endocarditis is recommended.
Consultations
Consultation with a pediatric cardiologist and a pediatric cardiac surgeon, as needed, is advisable.
Long Term Monitoring
Sudden cardiac death is possible because SAS is a progressive disorder. Close follow-up care is important to detect the progressive course of the disease and to prevent sudden death. Routine follow-up care is required for patients who undergo surgery and for those who do not.
Because of the possibility of rapid progression, follow-up care for infants and young children should be more frequent (eg, every 4-6 mo) until the rate of progression is understood. Other children may be followed up at intervals of 3-12 months, depending on the severity of their obstruction and associated lesions.
Long-term postoperative follow-up care is indicated for all patients with SAS. About 10-25% of patients may have a residual gradient in excess of 50 mm Hg. The known high incidence of recurrence and the possible progressive worsening of aortic regurgitation after surgery underscore the need for long-term surveillance. Repeat surgery may be indicated.
More-than-mild SAS poses a high risk during pregnancy. Therefore, close monitoring for heart failure, follow-up by a multidisciplinary team, and delivery at a center experienced in dealing with such problems are warranted.
Iwata Y, Imai Y, Shin'oka T, Kurosawa H. Subaortic stenosis associated with systolic anterior motion. Heart Vessels. Nov 2008;23(6):436-9. [Medline].
Somerville J, Stone S, Ross D. Fate of patients with fixed subaortic stenosis after surgical removal. Br Heart J. Jun 1980;43(6):629-47. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bezold LI, Smith EO, Kelly K, et al. Development and validation of an echocardiographic model for predicting progression of discrete subaortic stenosis in children. Am J Cardiol. Feb 1 1998;81(3):314-20. [Medline].
Edwards JE. Pathology of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Circulation. Apr 1965;31:586-99. [Medline].
Barkhordarian R, Wen-Hong D, Li W, et al. Geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract in fixed subaortic stenosis and intact ventricular septum: an echocardiographic study in children and adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jan 2007;133(1):196-203. [Medline].
Kleinert S, Geva T. Echocardiographic morphometry and geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract in fixed subaortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 1 1993;22(5):1501-8. [Medline].
Newfeld EA, Muster AJ, Paul MH, et al. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients. Am J Cardiol. Jul 1976;38(1):53-61. [Medline].
Wright GB, Keane JF, Nadas AS, et al. Fixed subaortic stenosis in the young: medical and surgical course in 83 patients. Am J Cardiol. Oct 1 1983;52(7):830-5. [Medline].
Suri RM, Dearani JA, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Puga FJ. Long-term results of the Konno procedure for complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Nov 2006;132(5):1064-71. [Medline].
Karamlou T, Gurofsky R, Bojcevski A, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors for intervention in 313 children with subaortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 2007;84(3):900-6; discussion 906. [Medline].
Rohlicek CV, del Pino SF, Hosking M, Miro J, Côté JM, Finley J. Natural history and surgical outcomes for isolated discrete subaortic stenosis in children. Heart. Dec 1999;82(6):708-13. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Gersony WM. Natural history of discrete subvalvar aortic stenosis: management implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2001;38(3):843-5. [Medline].
Brauner R, Laks H, Drinkwater DC Jr, Shvarts O, Eghbali K, Galindo A. Benefits of early surgical repair in fixed subaortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 1997;30(7):1835-42. [Medline].
Singh GK, Shiota T, Cobanoglu A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and role of intraoperative biplane transesophageal echocardiography in pediatric patients with left ventricle outflow tract lesions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. Jan 1998;11(1):47-56. [Medline].
Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, et al. Operative results and outcomes in children with Shone's anomaly. Ann Thorac Surg. Apr 2005;79(4):1358-65. [Medline].
[Guideline] Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. Aug 1 2006;114(5):e84-231. [Medline].

