Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
- Author: Matthew Gammons, MD; Chief Editor: Sherwin SW Ho, MD more...
Background
Based on statements found in the recent Orthopaedic Knowledge Update regarding the increased incidence of knee ligament injuries, the author proposes that this incidence may be associated with the current emphasis on fitness. These injuries are most often a result of low-velocity, noncontact, deceleration injuries and contact injuries with a rotational component. Contact sports also may produce injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) secondary to twisting, valgus stress, or hyperextension all directly related to contact or collision.
The MRI image below shows a rupture ACL:
MRI displaying a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. When matched for activities, a greater prevalence for ACL injury is found in females compared with males. Approximately 50% of patients with ACL injuries also have meniscal tears. In acute ACL injuries, the lateral meniscus is more commonly torn; in chronic ACL tears, the medial meniscus is more commonly torn. The only study on the prevalence of ACL injuries in the general population has estimated the incidence as 1 case in 3,500 people, resulting in 95,000 new ACL ruptures per year.
The importance of the ACL has been emphasized in athletes who require stability in running, cutting, and kicking. The ACL-deficient knee has also been linked to an increased rate of degenerative changes and meniscal injuries. For these reasons, approximately 60,000-75,000 ACL reconstructions are performed annually in the United States.
For restoration of activity and stability, the expected long-term success rate of ACL reconstruction is between 75-95%. The current failure rate is 8%, which may be attributed to recurrent instability, graft failure, or arthrofibrosis.
Treatment options must be tailored to a patient's preoperative level of activity. The following activity levels are based on the International Knee Documentation Committee:
- level I includes jumping, pivoting, and hard cutting.
- level II is heavy manual work or side-to-side sports.
- level III encompasses light manual work and noncutting sports (eg, running, cycling).
- level IV is sedentary activity without sports.
Nonsurgical treatment may be considered for patients who participate in level III or IV activities; all others should be considered as candidates for surgery. In addition, consider surgical consultation on any young athlete due to potential complications from recurrent instability.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Recent studies
A recent randomized, prospective study by Wipfler et al comparing bone-patella-bone (BTB) autografts to hamstring tendon (HT) grafts at 9 years demonstrated significantly better International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores in the HT group, with no significant differences in laxity, tunnel widening, or any other parameters.[7]
Leys et al also found equivalent IKDC scores and better long-term outcomes (radiological evidence of osteoarthritis, level of activity, knee motion and single leg hop test) in HT versus BTB in a long-term cohort study following patients for 15 years postoperatively. The HT group had higher ipsilateral graft rupture rates (17% versus 8%), but lower contralateral ACL injury (12% versus 26%).[8]
One study compared the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus irradiated allograft. The results found the rate of laxity with irradiated allograft was higher than that with autograft (32.3% vs 8.3%, respectively) in the 67 patients studied. Statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in the Lachman test (P = .00011), anterior drawer test (P = .00016), pivot-shift test (P = .008), and KT-2000 arthrometer assessment (P = .00021); the anterior and rotational stabilities decreased significantly in the irradiated allograft group. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in functional and subjective evaluations, and activity level testing; however, patients in the irradiated allograft group had a shorter operative time and a longer duration of postoperativefever.[9]
Another study evaluated the outcome of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts in both women and men. After a 2-year postoperative evaluation, the results noted that the assessment results for ligament laxity were approximately identical in both groups.[10]
The results from another study noted that 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, both hamstring and patellar tendon autografts provided good long-term outcomes and stability. However, a positive result on the pivot-shift (1+) test was significantly more frequent in the patellar tendon group, as was the rate of osteoarthritis.[11]
Geib et al compared intermediate-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction by bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) with the outcomes associated with quadriceps tendon with a bone plug (BQT) and quadriceps tendon without a bone plug (QT). They found that QT and BQT produced results equivalent to those of BPTB autograft in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. When compared with BPTB autograft, the quadriceps tendon autograft showed significantly better results, with less anterior knee pain (4.56% vs 26.7%), less anterior numbness (1.5% vs 53.3%), a higher percentage of arthrometer measurements showing a side-to-side difference of 0 to 3 mm (88% vs 68%), and better extension (mean loss, 0.55º vs 2.77º).[12]
According to the results of a study by Marchant et al, computed tomography is the most reliable imaging modality for evaluation of ACL bone tunnels, as proven by superior intraobserver and interobserver testing results, when compared with results obtained with MRI and radiographs. According to the authors, radiographs and MRIs were not reliable even for identifying the presence of a bone tunnel. Intraobserver kappa scores for tibial cross-sectional area using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.66, 0.5, and 0.37, respectively. Interobserver kappa scores for tibial cross-sectional area using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.65, 0.39, and 0.32, respectively.[13]
According to a study of National Football League players by Brophy et al, a history of meniscectomy, but not ACL reconstruction, shortens the expected career of a professional football player, but a combination of ACL reconstruction and meniscectomy may be more detrimental to an athlete's durability than either surgery alone. In their study, 54 athletes with a history of meniscectomy, 29 with a history of ACL reconstruction, and 11 with a history of both were identified and matched with control subjects. Isolated meniscectomy reduced the length of career in both years (5.6 vs 7.0; P = .03) and games played (62 vs 85; P = .02). Isolated ACL surgery did not significantly reduce the length of career in years or games played. Athletes with a history of both surgeries had shorter careers in games started (7.9 vs 35.1; P < .01), games played (41 vs 63; P = .07), and years (4.0 vs 5.8; P = .08) than athletes with a history of either surgery alone.[14]
Lyman et al found that although ACL reconstruction appears to be a safe procedure, the risk of a subsequent operation on either knee is increased among younger patients and those treated by a lower-volume surgeon or at a lower-volume hospital. According to the authors, patients were at increased risk for readmission within 90 days after surgery if they were older than 40 years, sicker (eg, had a preexisting comorbidity), male, or operated on by a lower-volume surgeon. Predictors of subsequent knee surgery included being female, having concomitant knee surgery, and being operated on by a lower-volume surgeon. Predictors of a subsequent ACL reconstruction included age less than 40 years, concomitant meniscectomy or other knee surgery, and surgery in a lower-volume hospital.[4]
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States
An estimated 200,000 ACL-related injuries occur annually in the United States, with approximately 95,000 ACL ruptures. Approximately 100,000 ACL reconstructions are performed each year. The incidence of ACL injury is higher in people who participate in high-risk sports such as basketball, football, skiing, and soccer. When the frequency of participation is considered, a higher prevalence of injury is observed in females over males, at a rate 2.4-9.7 times greater for females.
Functional Anatomy
The knee joint develops as a cleft between mesenchymal rudiments of the femur and the tibia. This occurs around the eighth week of fetal development. The cruciate ligaments appear as condensations of vascular synovial mesenchyme at the same time.
By 14weeks' gestation, the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament have divided; both have a functional blood supply, which is mainly derived from the middle geniculate artery. The inferomedial and lateral genicular arteries also provide blood supply through the fat pad.
The ACL is composed of densely organized, fibrous collagenous connective tissue that attaches the femur to the tibia. The ACL is composed of 2 groups, the anteromedial and the posterolateral bands. During flexion, the anterior band is taut, while the posterior band is loose; during extension, the posterolateral band is tight, while the anterior band is loose.
The ACL attaches to bone through a transitional zone of fibrocartilage and mineralized cartilage. On the femur, the ACL is attached to a fossa on the posteromedial edge of the lateral femoral condyle. The tibial insertion is located in a fossa that is anterior and lateral to the anterior tibial spine. The tibial attachment is noted to be somewhat wider and stronger than the femoral attachment.
The ACL is intracapsular and extrasynovial. It courses anteriorly, medially, and distally as it runs from the femur to the tibia.
The ACL receives nerve fibers from the posterior branch of the posterior tibial nerve. The main function is believed to be proprioception, providing the afferent arc for postural changes during motion and ligament deformation.
Sport-Specific Biomechanics
The ACL is the primary (85%) restraint to limit anterior translation of the tibia. The greatest restraint is in full extension.
The ACL also serves as a secondary restraint to tibial rotation and varus/valgus angulation at full extension. Since the relationship between the tibia and femur provides little bony stability, the ligamentous structures must provide stability. When the ACL is injured, a combination of anterior translation and rotation occurs.
The average tensile strength for the ACL is 2160 N. This is slightly less than the strength of the posterior cruciate ligament and approximately half as strong as the medial collateral ligament (MCL).
Wu JL, Seon JK, Gadikota HR, Hosseini A, Sutton KM, Gill TJ, et al. In Situ Forces in the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Under Simulated Functional Loading Conditions. Am J Sports Med. Dec 31 2009;[Medline].
Steckel H, Musahl V, Fu FH. The femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Jan 2010;18(1):52-5. [Medline].
Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, Warren RF, Williams RJ 3rd, Allen AA. Effect of Graft Selection on the Incidence of Postoperative Infection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. Nov 13 2009;[Medline].
Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2009;91(10):2321-8. [Medline].
Walsh MP, Wijdicks CA, Armitage BM, Westerhaus BD, Parker JB, Laprade RF. The 1:1 versus the 2:2 tunnel-drilling technique: optimization of fixation strength and stiffness in an all-inside double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction--a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. Aug 2009;37(8):1539-47. [Medline].
Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. Jan 2009;22(1):7-12. [Medline].
Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann C, Springer J, Siebold R, Heinrich Paessler H. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon: A Prospective Comparative Study With 9-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. May 2011;27(5):653-65.
Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski L. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. Mar 2012;40(3):595-605. [Medline].
Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T, et al. Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With at Least 2.5 Years' Follow-up Comparing Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Irradiated Allograft. Arthroscopy. Sep 2011;27(9):1195-202. [Medline].
Tohyama H, Kondo E, Hayashi R, Kitamura N, Yasuda K. Gender-based differences in outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. Sep 2011;39(9):1849-57. [Medline].
Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K. Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An 11-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. Oct 2011;39(10):2161-9. [Medline].
Geib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, Clark L. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy. Dec 2009;25(12):1408-14. [Medline].
Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E, Pietrobon R, Garrett WE, Higgins LD. Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Dec 2 2009;[Medline].
Brophy RH, Gill CS, Lyman S, Barnes RP, Rodeo SA, Warren RF. Effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscectomy on length of career in National Football League athletes: a case control study. Am J Sports Med. Nov 2009;37(11):2102-7. [Medline].
Chhadia AM, Inacio MC, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP, Davis BR, Funahashi TT. Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Am J Sports Med. Sep 2011;39(9):1894-9. [Medline].
Suomalainen P, Moisala AS, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Järvelä T. Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Randomized Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study With 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. Aug 2011;39(8):1615-22. [Medline].
Zaffagnini S, Bonanzinga T, Muccioli GM, et al. Does chronic medial collateral ligament laxity influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH A MINIMUM THREE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 2011;93(8):1060-4. [Medline].
Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. May-Jun 1990;18(3):292-9. [Medline].
Brophy RH, Wright RW, David TS, McCormack RG, Sekiya JK, Svoboda SJ, et al. Association Between Previous Meniscal Surgery and the Incidence of Chondral Lesions at Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. Apr 2012;40(4):808-814. [Medline].
Belanger MJ, Moore DC, Crisco JJ 3rd, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Ehrlich MG. Knee laxity does not vary with the menstrual cycle, before or after exercise. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 2004;32(5):1150-7.
Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med. Oct 2005;33(10):1579-602.
Cosgarea AJ, Sebastianelli WJ, DeHaven KE. Prevention of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central third patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1995;23(1):87-92. [Medline].
Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R. Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1985;67(5):720-6. [Medline].
Gardner E, O'Rahilly R. The early development of the knee joint in staged human embryos. J Anat. Jan 1968;102(2):289-99. [Medline].
Getelman MH, Friedman MJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. May-Jun 1999;7(3):189-98. [Medline].
Hewson GF Jr, Mendini RA, Wang JB. Prophylactic knee bracing in college football. Am J Sports Med. Jul-Aug 1986;14(4):262-6. [Medline].
Johnson DL, Harner CD, Maday MG. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Knee Surg. 1994;1:877-95.
Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC. Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1982;10(6):329-35. [Medline].
Larson RL, Tailon M. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: Principles of Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Jan 1994;2(1):26-35. [Medline].
Maday MG, Harner CD, Fu FH. Evaluation and Treatment. In: Feagin JA, ed. The Crucial Ligaments: Diagnosis, Treatment of Ligamentous Injuries About the Knee. 2nd. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:711-23.
Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J of Knee Surg. 1991;4:3-8.
Montgomery KD, Herschman EB, Nicholas S. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: Arendt EA, ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Sports Medicine 2. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1999:307-316.
Noyes FR, Bassett RW, Grood ES, Butler DL. Arthroscopy in acute traumatic hemarthrosis of the knee. Incidence of anterior cruciate tears and other injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1980;62(5):687-95, 757. [Medline].
Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1984;66(3):344-52. [Medline].
Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year followup. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1997;25(6):786-95. [Medline].
Stanitski CL. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in the Skeletally Immature Patient: Diagnosisand Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. May 1995;3(3):146-158. [Medline].
Toman CV, Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, et al. Success of meniscal repair at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. Jun 2009;37(6):1111-5. [Medline].
Watson JT. Knee and leg: bone trauma. In: Beaty JH, ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1999:521-32.

