eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: Cardiac Disease and Critical Care Medicine > Cardiology

Coarctation of the Aorta: Treatment & Medication

Author: P Syamasundar Rao, MD, Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School; Director, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital; Professor of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas
Coauthor(s): Paul M Seib, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Medical Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Co-Medical Director, Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit, Arkansas Children's Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jul 20, 2009

Treatment

Medical Care

  • Early presentation of coarctation of the aorta (CoA)
    • Treatment in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) includes the use of diuretics and inotropic drugs.
    • Prostaglandin E1 (0.05-0.15 mcg/kg/min) is infused intravenously to open the ductus arteriosus.
    • Ventilatory assistance is provided to patients with markedly increased work of breathing.
    • Infusion of inotropic drugs (dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine) is useful when ventricular dysfunction is present, especially with hypotension.
    • A Foley catheter is inserted to monitor renal perfusion and urine output.
    • ABGs are tested to monitor acidosis.
    • An umbilical artery catheter may be placed in neonates to assess the response to prostaglandin infusion with regard to improving lower-body blood flow.
    • Patients stabilized by the above interventions are better candidates for surgical or catheter intervention.
    • In the presence of associated defects, the significance of coarctation on the clinical course of the patient should be assessed with echo-Doppler and/or catheterization and angiographic studies. If the coarctation has a significantly adverse effect on the physiology of the associated defects, and consequently the clinical status, the coarctation should be initially relieved with surgery or balloon angioplasty and the patient reassessed with regard to need for intervention for the associated defects. Based on the authors' experience and that of others, the aortic obstruction is usually a major contributing factor for the symptomatology, and relief of the obstruction may postpone or avert the need for additional surgical intervention for the associated cardiac defects.27,28
  • Late presentation of coarctation of the aorta
    • Treatment of hypertension
      • Preoperative hypertension can be effectively treated using beta-blockers. The goal should be to reduce upper extremity hypertension, but remember that vigorous attempts to achieve normal upper extremity blood pressure (BP) may result in inadequate lower-body perfusion. Beta-blocker therapy prior to surgery may reduce the severity of postoperative hypertension, although most patients with preoperative hypertension require at least transient postoperative therapy. Remember that relieving the aortic obstruction promptly rather that attempting to treat hypertension with antihypertensive medications is better.1
      • Postoperative hypertension can be treated short-term with vasodilators, such as sodium nitroprusside, and intravenous beta-blockers, such as esmolol. When longer-term antihypertensive therapy is required, beta-blockers may be continued, and if no residual arch obstruction exists, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists (pediatric dosing not established for angiotensin II antagonists) may be added if hypertension persists despite beta-blocker therapy.
      • Guidelines regarding beta-adrenergic receptor blockers have been established.29
      • A recent study concluded that data is not sufficient to discourage or recommend the use of beta-blockers in children with CHF.30
    • Evaluate associated abnormalities, such as aortic stenosis, subaortic stenosis, or mitral valve disease.
    • Evaluate adequacy of collateral blood vessels to assess the safety of surgical intervention.

Surgical Care

Significant hypertension or congestive heart failure (CHF) is an indication for intervention. Surgical relief of the aortic obstruction and catheter interventional techniques (balloon angioplasty and stents) are available alternatives. Symptomatic neonates and infants should undergo urgent intervention soon after the infant is stabilized. Asymptomatic infants, children, adolescents, and adults should undergo the procedure electively. If neither hypertension nor heart failure is present, elective surgical or balloon therapy in children aged 2-5 years is suggested. Waiting beyond age 5 years for surgery or balloon therapy to relieve aortic obstruction is not advisable because of the evidence of residual hypertension if intervention is performed after age 5 years.31

Since the introduction of surgical correction by Crafoord and Nylin (1945) and by Gross and Hufnagel (1945) in the early 1940s, surgical therapy has been the preferred treatment for aortic coarctation. Various surgical techniques have been used to treat patients with coarctation of the aorta, namely, resection and end-to-end anastomosis, patch aortoplasty, left subclavian flap aortoplasty, and tubular bypass grafts. The techniques are occasionally combined or modified to fit the individual patient's anatomy.32

For instance, a reverse left subclavian flap aortoplasty may be used, turning the left subclavian artery as a patch back toward the left carotid artery to enlarge an area of transverse arch hypoplasia. In addition, an extended end-to-end repair may be used, in which the segment of descending aorta is beveled and brought up to the underside of the transverse arch to enlarge areas of transverse arch hypoplasia. The exact technique used varies depending on the patient's age at presentation, size, associated abnormalities, and arch anatomy. A surgical approach from a median sternotomy, rather than the classic left lateral thoracotomy, is used commonly in complex arch repairs.

  • In a review of 1337 patients undergoing repair of coarctation in infancy, the following findings were reported:19
    • Subclavian flap aortoplasty was performed in 763 patients (57%). Resection in end-to-end anastomosis was used in 406 patients (30%), and patch aortoplasty was used in 133 patients (9.9%). In addition, 20 patients underwent placement of an interposition graft or bypass graft.
    • In the series, the mortality risk was highest in neonates in whom surgery was performed during the first week of life, whereas only 8 of 279 infants aged 3 months to 1 year who underwent surgery died. Mortality associated with surgery was also higher in smaller infants, particularly in infants who weighed less than 3 kg and infants with associated cardiac anomalies.
    • The presence of a ventricular septal defect (VSD) with or without minor associated anomalies increased the risk of death from 0.9% (no anomalies) to 6.8% (with VSD). Complex associated anomalies, such as a single ventricle or transposition of the great arteries, greatly increased the mortality rate to 16.6%. Similarly, the surgical mortality rate in neonates who required surgery prior to coarctation repair was 45%. Urgent surgery may be required if the patent ductus arteriosus cannot be opened and the patient continues to have poor urine output and acidosis.
  • In the presence of a hemodynamically significant VSD, historically, placement of a pulmonary artery band was performed to limit pulmonary blood flow at the time of left thoracotomy for coarctation repair. Current surgical approach uses a single-stage repair of the coarctation and VSD, usually through a sternotomy, even in the small neonate.
  • In severe transverse arch hypoplasia that results in significant residual obstruction following coarctation repair, an ascending-to-descending aortic conduit may be placed. This is usually a less favorable approach because the patient may be obligated to undergo subsequent surgeries for conduit replacement.
  • In most centers, associated defects may be addressed at the time of surgery for coarctation by proceeding with a median sternotomy to repair lesions such as mitral stenosis or subaortic obstruction or to accomplish left ventricular (LV) outflow tract enlargement. Occasionally, the adequacy of the LV volume is called into question, and the patient may require a modified Norwood repair. Decision making about this issue is addressed in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. However, note that hypoplasia of the left heart structures, particularly the LV, associated with isolated CoA usually improves following relief of aortic obstruction.33
  • Repair of coarctation in the asymptomatic child or adolescent is usually undertaken on an elective basis after assessment of associated anomalies and appropriate preoperative evaluation. The timing of intervention in the otherwise asymptomatic patient has been debated. The rationale for delaying surgery until age 3-5 years has been based on the size of the aorta in childhood relative to the anticipated adult size. Because significant obstruction occurs when the diameter of the aorta is reduced by 50% or more, delaying surgery until age 3-5 years allows the aorta to be larger than half the anticipated adult size at operation, theoretically reducing the risk of significant residual obstruction in the event that the surgical repair site does not grow over time. However, issues of hypertension, progressive LV hypertrophy, or LV dysfunction mandate earlier repair.
  • Improvements in surgical techniques have led most cardiologists to recommend surgery at the time of diagnosis, especially in patients with hypertension. In patients with only mild obstruction, especially those diagnosed in the first year of life, surgery may safely be delayed and the patient monitored for worsening obstruction or development of hypertension prior to recommending surgery.
  • Pseudo-coarctation of the aorta refers to abnormal tortuosity of the aorta that does not result in significant obstruction or hypertension and is noted for the lack of development of collateral vessels. This abnormality does not require surgical intervention.
  • Surgical repair of coarctation of the aorta is accomplished in children and adolescents with generally good results and low mortality. Of 824 patients who underwent coarctation repair in childhood, 431 (52%) underwent end-to-end anastomosis, whereas patch aortoplasty was performed in 214 patients (26%) and only 109 patients (13%) underwent subclavian flap aortoplasty. Death occurred in only 6 of 824 patients for a total mortality rate of 0.73%.19 The surgical era of this cohort does not reflect the current surgical strategy for aggressive complete arch repair or the aorta and all associated lesions. The trend is toward the less frequent use of patch aortoplasty because of concerns regarding the development of aortic aneurysm at the site of repair.34,35,36,37
  • Operative mortality rates in neonates and infants are high (4-50%), whereas the operative mortality rates in older children are low (0-5%). The high mortality in the young infant appears to be related to the condition of the infant at the time of surgery and the associated defects.
  • Significant recoarctation (6-33% in infants, 0-18% in older children);27,38 formation of aneurysms in all types of coarctation repair,34 particularly well-documented following prosthetic patch angioplasty;39,38 development of paraplegia;40,41,42 paradoxical hypertension;43,44,45 and vascular complications related to subclavian flap repair46,47,48,49,50 continue to be problems. Despite these problems, surgical repair is considered by many to be the therapeutic option of choice in the treatment of aortic coarctation. Some groups of workers, including the authors' group, consider balloon angioplasty the initial therapy of choice and reserve surgical intervention for the following coarctations:
    • Coarctations that involve the long segment of the aorta
    • Coarctations that are completely or almost completely occluded so that no catheter or guide wire can be passed across the coarcted segment
    • Coarctations that are associated with a large patent ductus arteriosus and ventricular septal defect that requires prompt surgical intervention for the primary cardiac problem.
  • Balloon angioplasty: Gruntzig's technique of balloon angioplasty was adopted by Sos et al (1979), Singer et al (1982), and Sperling et al (1983) for enlargement of coarcted aortic segments in a postmortem specimen, postsurgical recoarctation, and native coarctation, respectively. Other cardiologists then used this technique to treat native coarctation of the aorta. Numerous investigators reported their experiences with balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctations. However, the use of balloon angioplasty for treatment of native aortic coarctation is controversial.51,1 This section describes the technique and the results of balloon angioplasty.
    • Technique52,15,38
      • Cardiac catheterization and selective cineangiography are performed to confirm the clinical diagnosis, to exclude other cardiac defects, and to assess suitability for balloon angioplasty. Once balloon angioplasty is chosen, a 4F-6F multi-A2 (Cordis) catheter is introduced into the femoral artery percutaneously and is positioned across the aortic coarctation. Then, a 0.021-0.035 in J-tipped guide wire is passed through the catheter into the ascending aorta and the tip of the wire positioned in the ascending aorta. A 4F-7F balloon angioplasty catheter is then positioned across the aortic coarctation. The balloon is inflated with diluted contrast material to approximately 3-5 atm of pressure or higher, depending on the manufacture's recommendations.
      • Monitoring pressure of inflation via any of the commercially available pressure gauges is recommended. The balloon is inflated for 5 seconds. A total of 2-4 balloon inflations are performed 5 minutes apart. Aortography and measurement of pressure gradients across the coarctation of the aorta are performed. The heart rate, systemic pressure, and cardiac index are recorded prior to and 15 minutes after balloon dilatation to ensure that the change in pressure gradient is related to balloon dilation rather than changes in patient status.
      • The author generally performs this procedure with the patient under conscious sedation, whereas others advocate general anesthesia. Most cardiologists use percutaneous femoral artery approach for cardiac catheterization and balloon angioplasty. Occasionally, femoral artery cutdown or left axillary artery cutdown is necessary if the percutaneous approach is unsuccessful. The authors and others have used a transumbilical approach in neonates in an attempt to avoid the use of the femoral arteries.15,53 In patients in whom the aorta can be entered from the right ventricle (either directly in patients with transposition of the great arteries or double outlet right ventricle or indirectly through a ventricular septal defect), balloon angioplasty may be performed transvenously.
      • The size of the balloon chosen for angioplasty is 2 or more times the size of the coarcted segment, but no larger than the size of the descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm, as measured from a frozen video recording. The authors usually choose a balloon that is midway between the size of the aortic isthmus (or transverse aortic arch) and the size of the descending aorta at the level of diaphragm. If the relief of obstruction is not adequate (pressure gradient reduction to <20 mm Hg and angiographic improvement), a balloon as large as the diameter of the descending aortic at the level of diaphragm is chosen for additional dilatation.54,38
      • The authors usually give 100 U of heparin per kilogram prior to introducing the balloon-angioplasty catheter. Activated clotting times should be measured every 30 minutes and maintained between 200 and 250 seconds. The heparin effect is neither reversed nor continued after the procedure. Administering adequate doses of heparin to prevent thromboembolism is important.55,38
      • The balloon inflation pressure should be monitored and attempts should be made not to exceed that stated by the manufacturer; this is to prevent balloon rupture and its adverse effects.27,38
      • A catheter or a guide wire must not be manipulated over the site of a freshly dilated coarctation of the aorta. A guide wire should always be left in place across the coarctation segment, and all angiographic and balloon-dilatation catheters should be exchanged over the guide wire.
      • Balloon size should be carefully chosen to prevent aneurysm.
      • Use of large-caliber angioplasty catheters may result in significant femoral artery compromise. Availability of balloon catheters that can be introduced through 4F sheaths appears to reduce the femoral artery injury. Even these may injure the femoral artery in the young infant; in such situations, the authors use 3F sheaths through which the more recently available balloon dilatation catheters (eg, Mini-Tyshak [Braun] catheters) can be introduced, which may further reduce such complications.
    • Short-term results
      • Despite an initial report of poor results,56 subsequent experience with balloon angioplasty appears encouraging and has been detailed elsewhere.57,58,23,59,38,27 A reduction of pressure gradient across the coarctation and an increase in the size of the coarcted segment have been observed. The collateral vessels promptly diminish. The femoral pulses, which had been either absent or markedly reduced and delayed (when compared with brachial pulses) become palpable with increased pulse volume after balloon angioplasty.
      • The infants who were in heart failure improved, as did their hypertension. The infants who were ventilator dependent could be weaned off of the ventilator support and were extubated. Most infants (beyond the neonate period) and children are discharged from the hospital within 24 hours after balloon angioplasty. None of the authors' patients required immediate surgical intervention.
    • Intermediate-term follow-up results
      • Several investigators have reported 1-year to 2-year follow-up results, and these studies suggest continued improvement. From the authors' study, 60 patients (58 catheterization, 2 clinical) were observed; the residual gradients 14 ± 11 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) months following angioplasty remained low at 16 ± 15 mm Hg.60 These gradients continue to be lower (P <.001) than those prior to angioplasty (46 ± 17 mm Hg) and are slightly higher (P <.05) than the gradients (11 ± 9 mm Hg) immediately following angioplasty. The angiographically measured coarctation segment remained wide. Only a modest increase is found (11 ± 9 vs 16 ± 15 mm Hg; P <.05) in peak gradients for the group as a whole, but, when individual patient values are examined, 15 (25%) of the 60 patients had evidence of recoarctation, defined as a peak-to-peak systolic pressure gradient in excess of 20 mm Hg.
      • The incidence of recoarctation is higher in neonates (5 [83%] of 6; P <.01) and infants (7 [39%] of 18; P =.011) than in children (3 [8%] of 36). Ten of these children underwent repeat balloon angioplasty, and their gradients were reduced (P < .001) from 39 ± 11 mm Hg to 10 ± 6 mm Hg.60 Early in the authors' experience, 2 patients underwent surgical resection with good results. The final 3 children had no discrete narrowing and had no hypertension; therefore, no intervention was recommended. Aneurysms developed in 3 (5%) of 58 patients who underwent follow-up angiography; one of these patients required surgical excision of the aneurysm and the other 2 are observed clinically.
      • Similar high recoarctation rates were documented by our group61,62 in neonates and infants less than three months of age, but balloon angioplasty provided successful and effective palliation in 92% infants.
    • Long-term follow-up results
      • Only scant data can be found on long-term follow-up after balloon angioplasty of native coarctation. Despite recoarctation and aneurysms, some requiring repeat intervention at intermediate-term follow-up, the long-term follow-up results (5-9 y) appear encouraging, in that minimal incidence of late recoarctation and no late aneurysm formation was found.63,51,64
      • Event-free survival curves following initial balloon angioplasty suggest that the event-free rates are better (P <.001) in children than in infants and neonates. In most children, the arm blood pressure remained normal and the blood pressure–determined gradient between arms and legs remained low.60
    • Applicability in adult patients
      • Although balloon angioplasty of aortic coarctation has most frequently been used in neonates, infants, and children, it can also be used in adult patients.
      • Lababidi et al (1984) were the first to apply this technique in a 27-year-old man, resulting in reduction of peak systolic pressure gradient across the coarctation (from 70 to 15 mm Hg), angiographic improvement, and reduced hypertension (190/124 mm Hg vs 130/80 mm Hg). They subsequently reported their experience with balloon dilatation of native coarctation in 8 consecutive adults, aged 19-30 years (25 ± 5 y).65 The systolic pressure gradient across the coarctation was reduced from 48 ± 19 mm Hg to 7 ± 5 mm Hg. The size of the coarcted segment increased from 6.8 ± 2.2 mm to 15.2 ± 5 mm. No complications were encountered. Clinical and echo-Doppler follow-up one year after the procedure revealed good results, with no more than 15 mm Hg peak systolic blood pressure difference between the arms and the legs (measured by cuff). They concluded that results in young adults are similar to those observed in children, balloon angioplasty should be considered as an option to surgical intervention, and follow-up studies (>1 y) are required.
      • Other reports followed, which revealed equally good results.66 Based on a review of these studies, aortic perforation during the procedure and aneurysmal formation at follow-up are also apparent in adults. In addition, intimal dissection that persisted at 6-month follow-up was seen in one patient. Therefore, (1) avoiding manipulation to the tips of the catheters and guide wires in the region of freshly dilated coarctation, (2) choosing an appropriate-sized balloon (no larger that the diameter of the descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm), and (3) monitoring for the development of aneurysms and, if found, closely following the progression of aneurysms with repeated angiography or MRI are prudent guidelines. Twenty-year follow-up for discrete coarctations appear encouraging.67
    • Surgery compared with balloon therapy
      • Scant data are available to compare surgical intervention with balloon angioplasty. In an attempt to compare the safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty with surgical correction of aortic coarctation, the authors scrutinized 49 papers (published from 1980-1991) that reported on results of surgery in infants younger than 1 year and 9 papers that compared the results of balloon angioplasty in children.38,27,38 These data showed that recoarctation rates are similar, whereas the mortality rates are slightly higher in the surgical than the balloon angioplasty series. Similar comparison of results in children older than 1 year showed identical results.
      • Shaddy and associates (1993) prospectively randomized 36 patients aged 3-10 years to undergo either balloon angioplasty (20 patients) or surgery (16 patients) and found similar immediate pressure gradient relief in both groups.68 The risks of aneurysm formation and restenosis were higher in the balloon angioplasty group, whereas risks of neurologic complications were higher in the surgical group. They concluded that balloon angioplasty in coarctation of the aorta may provide an effective initial alternative to surgery in children beyond infancy and suggested that further follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term risks of aneurysms following angioplasty.
      • The authors compared the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty with those of surgical correction in infants older than 3 months.28 Data on 29 infants who underwent intervention for aortic coarctation from 1982-1992 were examined. Fourteen infants underwent surgical repair, and 15 underwent balloon angioplasty. The data indicated that the degree of relief of aortic obstruction and the frequency with which reintervention is needed are similar in both groups. However, balloon angioplasty carries lower morbidity rates and complications than with surgical therapy. Based on these data, the authors suggested that balloon angioplasty may be an acceptable alternative to surgery in the treatment of symptomatic aortic coarctation in infants younger than 3 months.
      • Shim and colleagues (1997) compared hospital charges and found lower charges for patients who underwent balloon therapy compared to surgery.69
      • Complications such as paraplegia40,41,42 and paradoxical hypertension43,44  are seen following surgical repair, although such complications are rare and, if present, very mild and inconsequential following balloon angioplasty. Aneurysms following balloon angioplasty70,71,38 are of concern and need further study, although such aneurysms are also seen with surgical repair.34 The femoral artery occlusion rate following balloon angioplasty may be higher than that seen with surgical therapy. However, vascular complications can occur in the left upper limb following coarctation repair with subclavian flap aortoplasty; these complications include gangrene, reduction in the length and muscle mass of upper arm and forearm, and abnormal Doppler blood flow velocities in brachial arteries, suggesting potential for symptoms of ischemia.46,47,48,49
      • Cowley et al (2005) compared long-term (mean, 10-11 y) results of balloon angioplasty with those of surgery for patients with native aortic coarctation who were randomized at entry into the study and found similar resting blood pressures, residual gradients across the coarctation, exercise performance, aortic arch anatomy based on MRI angiography, and reintervention rates.72 However, the incidence of aneurysms and greater arm-to-leg blood pressure difference during exercise was higher in the balloon group than in the surgery group.
      • Cowley et al suggested that surgery is preferable to balloon angioplasty in the management of aortic coarctation in children. Although randomization is a virtue of the study, the study involves only 36 children, with only 21 (58%) returning for reevaluation. Furthermore, other studies in which a larger number of balloon angioplasty procedures were evaluated at long-term follow-up revealed 5% aneurysm formation. Aneurysm formation was also detected in surgical patients. Consequently, a multi-institutional randomized study with a larger number of subjects is in order to resolve the issues brought out by this paper.66
      • Rodés-Cabau et al (2007) compared transcatheter and surgical treatment and concluded that immediate results were similar, but with reduced morbidity and duration of hospitalization with transcatheter intervention.73 However, angioplasty was associated with a higher rate of reintervention and aneurysm formation.
      • Wong and associates (2008) used decision analysis to compare preferences for balloon angioplasty versus surgery and concluded that balloon angioplasty is preferred over surgery as the initial treatment for native aortic coarctation in children; however, this type of decision analysis approach was questioned.74
      • Based on the above review, the effectiveness of balloon angioplasty appears to be comparable with that of surgery; the mortality rates are similar (and are probably related to the associated cardiac defects, not related to type of intervention performed), and morbidity and complication rates are lower with balloon angioplasty than with surgical therapy. Balloon angioplasty may be an effective alternative to surgery for the relief of aortic coarctation.
    • Recoarctation
      • Residual and recurrent obstructions cannot be easily distinguished, and the term recoarctation may be used to describe both entities. Recoarctation is defined as a peak-to-peak systole pressure gradient in excess of 20 mm Hg with or without angiographically demonstrable narrowing.75 Recoarctation following both surgical correction and balloon angioplasty has been described.
      • Recoarctation following surgery does not depend on the type of surgical repair;34,38 it has been observed following resection with end-to-end anastomosis, subclavian flap angioplasty, prosthetic patch repair, subclavian artery turn-down procedure, and interposition tube grafts. The reported incidence of recoarctation has varied depending on the study. The average recoarctations rates were 11-17% in neonates and infants younger than 1 year and 5.6% in children older than 1 year. In a large cohort of patients studied by Pinzon et al (1991), recoarctation occurred in 23%.34 Recent reports demonstrate similar recoarctation rates.76,77 The younger the child at surgery, the higher the chance for recoarctation.
      • Although no consensus has been reached in regard to the method of intervention (surgery vs balloon angioplasty) for native aortic coarctation, cardiologists generally agree that balloon angioplasty is the treatment of choice for postsurgical aortic coarctations.78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,38,86,87 The immediate and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty for postsurgical recoarctation are essentially similar to those of native coarctations and have been reviewed in detail elsewhere.64
      • Restenosis following balloon angioplasty also appears to be age dependent; the younger the child, the greater the chance for recoarctation.51 The authors57,51 and others63 recommend repeat balloon dilatations in such cases, whereas others88 prefer surgical intervention.
      • The technique of balloon angioplasty for the management of both postsurgical and post–balloon angioplasty recoarctations is similar to that described above for native coarctation.57
    • Conclusions: Based on an extensive review of the literature and personal experience with the procedure for more than 25 years, some generalizations with regard to balloon therapy may be made, as follows.
      • Children older than 1 year and adults with discrete native coarctation are candidates for balloon dilatation. Most cardiologists agree on this issue. Long-segment coarctations or those associated with significant isthmic hypoplasia may be candidates for stent placement, especially in adolescents and adults.
      • Recurrent coarctation following previous balloon angioplasty may be treated with repeat balloon angioplasty; others prefer surgery. If the recoarcted segment is long, surgical treatment in younger children and stents in adolescents and adults seem appropriate.
      • Treatment of coarctation in neonates and infants is perhaps the most controversial issue. Many cardiologists prefer surgical intervention, whereas a few cardiologists may opt for balloon angioplasty.
      • Balloon angioplasty is useful in the treatment of extremely ill neonates and infants with severe coarctation; in this subset of patients, the balloon angioplasty has a significant advantage over a surgical approach.
      • Most cardiologists and surgeons agree that balloon angioplasty is the treatment of choice for postsurgical recoarctations.
  • Aortic stents
    • Vascular stenotic lesions can be opened with balloon angioplasty, but, because of the elastic recoil of the vessel wall, the vessel lumen may return to the predilation size following withdrawal of the balloon catheter. Such recoil and vascular dissection following balloon dilatation can be circumvented with implantation of endovascular stents. Dotter (1969), in the late 1960s, suggested this concept and implanted spiral coil-spring prostheses into the experimentally produced peripheral artery stenotic lesions. The stent concept and technology were dormant until the early 1980s, when the balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents were designed and used.89 Initially, stents were used in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease and coronary artery stenotic lesions in adults. The technique was then extended to the treatment of other stenotic vessels, including aortic coarctation.90,54
    • Despite reasonably good short-term and long-term results of balloon angioplasty, some problems remain, including restenosis, probability of aortic rupture, formation of aneurysms, and inability to effectively treat long-segment tubular narrowing. Because of these and other reasons, endovascular stenting of aortic coarctation has gained acceptance over the last decade.91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,53,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,84,112 The following are perceived advantages of stents over balloon angioplasty
      • The ability to expand tubular long-segment coarctation, hypoplastic isthmus, and the distal transverse aortic arch
      • The ability to increase the coarcted segment diameter independently of the intimal tear
      • The ability to decrease the probability of restenosis
      • The ability to prevent dissection of the torn intimal flap by facilitating apposition of the intima against the media
      • The ability to prevent aneurysms because of the support of the weakened aortic wall with the stent and neointima
    • O'Laughlin et al (1991) were the first to use a stent for the treatment of aortic coarctation, although the results in a 12-year-old child were marginal. Subsequently, numerous others reported the use of a stent in aortic coarctation with encouraging results.92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,110,111,84,112,57,54
    • Because of growth issues and the need for large sheaths for implantation, most cardiologists limit stent usage to adolescents and adults. The following are indications for using stent:
      • Long-segment coarctation
      • Associated hypoplasia of the isthmus or aortic arch
      • Tortuous coarctation with malalignment of the proximal and distal aortic segment
      • Recurrent aortic coarctation or an aneurysm following prior surgical or balloon therapy
    • Technique
      • The procedure may be performed under conscious sedation or under general anesthesia. Cardiac catheterization is performed to confirm the clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis and to exclude other cardiac defects. Pressure gradients across the coarctation and selective cineangiography in multiple angiographic projections are initially performed to demonstrate the stenotic lesions.113
      • The following measurements are made: (1) the diameter of the stenotic lesion, (2) the diameter of the aorta proximal and distal to the obstructive segment, and (3) the length of the vessel that can be stented. All the measurements are made in 2 orthogonal views and averaged. Foreshortening of the vessel length is taken into account based on the anatomy. These measurements are used in the selection of expanded diameter and length of the stent. Heparin (100 U/kg) is administered, and activated clotting times are monitored and maintained between 200-250 seconds by giving additional doses of heparin, as needed.
      • An end-hole catheter (5F-6F multi-A2 [Cordis, Miami, FL]) is positioned across the coarctation with the help of a soft-tipped 0.035-in Bentson (Cook, Bloomington, IN) guide wire. The guide wire and catheter are advanced into the ascending aorta. The tip of the catheter may also be placed in the right or left subclavian arteries, depending on the location and angulation of the coarcted segment. The catheter is left in place, and the guide wire is removed and replaced with either an extra-stiff exchange-length 0.035-in Amplatz (Cook) or a super-stiff, short tip, Amplatz (Meditech, Nautik, MA) guide wire. The catheter is then removed. If the approach to the lesion is tortuous or difficult to reach, the authors select a 0.038-in super-stiff Amplatz wire (Meditech). An appropriate-sized long blue Cook sheath (Cook) with a multipurpose curve and a radiopaque marker at the tip is introduced over the stiff wire. Once the tip of the sheath is past the site intended to be stented, the dilator is removed and the sheath flushed. Sometimes, the dilator has to be withdrawn slightly to position the tip of the sheath at the desired location.
      • The selection of the sheath diameter obviously depends on the size of the stent delivery catheter. The authors have always attempted to select a balloon delivery system that would allow the smallest possible sheath diameter. Initially, when other workers were using Meditech PE-MT balloon catheters, which required 11F sheaths, the authors were using Olbert (Meadox-Surgimed, Oakland, NJ) balloon catheters, which can be introduced through 8F or 9F sheaths for mounting the stent. Subsequently, the authors have used Bridge stents (Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, CA), which can also be delivered via 8F or 9F sheaths.113 Most recently, the authors used IntraStent DoubleStrut stents (ParaMount and DoubleStrut LD; IntraTherapeutics, St. Paul, MN) and Palmaz Genesis (Cordis Endovascular, Warren, NJ).109 The latter stents are mounted on balloon-in-balloon (BIB) catheters (NuMed Inc, Hopkinton, NY). The size of the sheath used is 1F larger than the sheath size needed for the BIB catheter.
      • The selected stent is hand crimped onto a BIB catheter; the authors use a sterile umbilical tape to further crimp the stent onto the balloon.
      • The balloon catheter, with the stent mounted on it, is advanced over the stiff guide wire but within the sheath and positioned across the coarctation segment. The tip of the sheath is withdrawn distal to the aortic coarctation based on bony landmarks. Contrast is also injected via the side arm of the blue Cook sheath, and the position of the stent is adjusted as necessary. Some cardiologists place catheters into the ascending aorta via trans-septal route or from radial artery for angiography during stent placement.114 Although this may provide better visualization, the authors do not routinely recommend it to avoid additional time in the catheterization laboratory and morbidity associated with such additional procedures.
      • In cases in which the BIB catheter is used, the inner balloon is inflated at the manufacturer's recommended pressure and the position of the stent adjusted, if needed, followed by inflation of the outer balloon, thus implanting the stent. The balloon catheter is then advanced slightly, centering the balloon across the proximal end of the stent, and the outer balloon is re-inflated to ensure apposition of the stent against the vessel walls. The balloon catheter is then centered over the distal end of the stent. This is performed by advancing the tip of the sheath over the deflated balloon into the stent to prevent inadvertent displacement of the stent.115 The outer balloon is then re-inflated to ensure apposition of the distal stent against the vessel walls.
      • If the outer balloon diameter is not as large as the desired diameter of the stent, additional balloon expansion with larger diameter balloons is performed. The author always tries to avoid this step by using an outer balloon of the BIB catheter at the desired diameter. Following the removal of the balloon catheter, a multitrack catheter (Braun, Bethlehem, PA)116 is positioned over the wire, and pressure pullback tracings and angiography are performed to assess the results of stent implantation.
      • The effect of heparin is not reversed, and no additional doses of heparin are administered. Intravenous cefazolin 25 mg/kg/dose (maximum of 1 g) is started in the catheterization laboratory, and 2 additional doses are administered at 6- to 8-hour intervals. Aspirin in platelet-inhibiting doses (5-10 mg/kg/d) is started on the day following the procedure and continued for 6 weeks. Use of heparin overnight on the day of procedure and more potent platelet-inhibiting drugs or anticoagulation with warfarin (Coumadin) have been undertaken in the past. At present, the data do not indicate the need for intensive anticoagulation. Aspirin alone appears to suffice. However, more potent platelet-inhibiting drugs, such as clopidogrel, may be used in adults.
      • To avoid potential balloon rupture, the tip of the guide wire is placed in the right subclavian artery instead of the ascending aorta, which is the usual practice for balloon angioplasty. Try not to position the stent across the origins of left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery. However, on occasion, avoiding the subclavian artery is impossible. In such situations, the authors have carefully traversed the stent cells (in between the struts) with a soft guide wire followed by a multi-A2 catheter (Cordis). The stent cell is then dilated with an angioplasty balloon of a diameter equal to that of the proximal left subclavian artery; uncompromised flow to the left subclavian artery was found in these patients. Predilation of the coarcted segment with balloon angioplasty prior to stenting is no longer recommended.
    • Immediate results
      • The reduction of peak systolic pressure gradients and an increase in the diameter of the coarcted segment have been demonstrated following stent implantation.92,93,99,94,95,96,97,100,98,101,102,53,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,66,117 Stenting was found to be effective in postsurgical and postballoon recoarctations, as well as in native coarctations. The ratio of diameters of coarcted segment to the descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm increased to unity in many patients who undergo aortic stenting. Improvement in the size of hypoplastic isthmus or transverse aortic arch and exclusion of the aneurysm, if present, also occurred after stent placement.
      • In the first series of 10 patients published by Suarez de Lezo et al in 1995,93 the peak systolic pressure gradient across the coarctation decreased from 43 ± 12 to 2 ± 3 mm Hg (P <.001). The ratio of isthmus/descending aorta increased from 0.65 ± 0.14 to 1 ± 0.08 following the procedure. Similar results have been reported subsequently by other investigators.61,66
    • Complications
      • Vessel disruption,93 displacement of stent,93,99,101,106,118 stent fracture119 , and aneurysms99,97 are rare but do occur. Balloon rupture that results in inadequate stent expansion and stent migration has been reported but may be prevented by avoiding curvature of the balloon or stent assembly, the use of newer stents with less injurious ends, and the use of BIB catheters.92,106
      • Because of the large size of the sheath required, loss of pulse and bleeding from a puncture site may occur. Use of vascular closure devices may help circumvent this problem. Rare complications included myocardial infarction and retroperitoneal hemorrhage.
    • Follow-up results
      • Most studies had only a short-term and incomplete follow-up in a limited number of patients. However, a few studies examined results of more than 20 patients at a mean follow-up of 2 years or longer.102,105,106,117,99 The pressure gradients across the coarctation site (blood pressure, Doppler, or catheterization) remained low, and systemic hypertension decreased both in degree and frequency with the consequent decrease in the need for antihypertensive medications. No evidence for recoarctation, aneurysmal formation, or stent fracture or displacement was observed in most studies, although no systematic or complete follow-up was achieved in most studies. In some studies new aneurysms (in 6% of patients), stent fractures and jailed or partially covered brachiocephalic vessels were seen.120
      • Residual or recurrent obstruction was present in a few patients, and, in these, successful redilatation with larger balloons was accomplished. Detailed angiographic studies by Suarez de Lezo et al (1999) revealed no detectable neointimal proliferation in 75% of patients; in the remaining patients, focal neointimal ridge formation was observed at the ends of the stent, causing minimal restenosis.99 Segmental analysis of the aorta revealed an increase in nonstented segments of the aorta, consistent with normal growth. Two young patients (7%) developed small new aneurysms that were obliterated by coil placement following angiographic detection. However, the overall follow-up results were encouraging.
    • Comments
      • Stent therapy appears to be an attractive method for the treatment of recurrent coarctation or aneurysm formation following prior surgical or balloon intervention and for long-segment hypoplasia. Most cardiologists use stents in adolescents and adults, although a few have advocated their use in younger children.99,121,122 The selection of the type of stent and the type of balloon catheter used for stent deployment appears to be evolving. Balloon-expandable stents are preferred over self-expandable stents. However, some workers used self-expandable stents successfully.123
      • The use of a BIB catheter for stent delivery appears to be gaining momentum in an attempt to prevent balloon ruptures and perforation of other cardiovascular structures.
      • Positioning the guide wire into the right or left subclavian artery may avoid excessive curvature and, thus, may prevent balloon rupture.
      • Flexible instead of rigid Palmaz stents are being used.
      • Selected stent diameter at implantation should be at least twice the diameter of the narrowest aortic segment to prevent stent displacement during implantation.
      • The issues related to placement of the stent across the mouths of the arch vessel still need to be resolved.
      • Relief of obstruction both short-term and at follow-up with a low incidence of major complications is well demonstrated in several studies.
      • Meticulous attention to the technique and adoption of new technology, when it becomes available, may further reduce the incidence of complications.
      • Recoarctation rate at follow-up appears to be low. Re-expansion of the stent to treat residual or recoarctation and growth-related narrowing appears feasible, safe, and effective, although this is based on limited experience.124
      • The few studies that have compared balloon angioplasty with stents suggest that stents may be more effective.125,126,110 Similar comparison between surgery and stents indicate stenting for native coarctation of the aorta is an effective alternative to surgical intervention in older children.127,128  
      • Based on the available data, stenting aortic coarctation appears to be the preferred alternative to surgical or balloon therapy in adolescents and young adults.
    • Covered stents
      • Experience in the use of covered stents to manage aortic coarctation is limited.129,130,131,120,132,133,134,135 Different types of stents to treat aortic coarctation have been used and include Jostent grafts (Jomed International, Helsingborg, Sweden), C-P stents (NuMed Inc, Hopkinton, NY), and AneuRx (Medtronic, Watford, UK). Although these stents are available outside the United States, none are yet approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, customizing and off-label use of available endoluminal grafts are feasible, when necessary.136 The indications for intervention are similar to those used for balloon angioplasty and deployment of the standard stent.
      • The indications for use of covered stents include postangioplasty aneurysm, tortuous aortic arch and isthmus, associated patent ductus arteriosus, prior surgical conduit, Takayasu arteritis, and extremely narrow (subatretic) coarcted segment. When the assessed risk for development of aneurysm or dissection is high, a covered stent should be used. The results of the limited use of covered stents appear to be good.129,130,131,120,132,133,134,135 Some of the stents can be expanded to only an 18-mm diameter. In addition, the stent shortens when expanded to larger diameters. Use of covered stents has another disadvantage in that the vessels that arise from the aorta are blocked.
      • Aortic rupture remains an important, though an infrequent, complication following primary stenting for aortic coarctation. Covered stents have been used to reduce this risk. However, aortic rupture has been reported even with covered stents.137  
      • Renarrowing of covered stents has been reported, and data in limited number of patients suggest Covered Cheatham-Platinum stents can redilated.138
      • Based on the currently available data, the covered stents may be useful in highly selected patients with aortic coarctation.
  • Future directions
    • Causes of recoarctation following balloon angioplasty have been extensively investigated,75,139,140 and factors predictive of recoarctation have been identified and include young age and severely narrowed isthmus and coarcted segment. More recently, studies of biophysical characteristics of the coarcted segment revealed less recoil in the subset of recoarctation patients, implying that the elastic properties of the aortic wall are not preserved.141  This may be related to cystic medial necrosis142,143 or to extension of the ductal tissue into the aortic wall.143,144,145 However, the true cellular pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for recoarctation have not been identified. Once they are identified, appropriate treatment algorithms to prevent recoarctation could be developed to address the pathophysiology. Until such time, keeping coarcted segments open with stents is an attractive option. Unfortunately, the stents, which are metallic, do not grow with the child and cannot be used routinely in neonates and infants.
    • Biodegradable stents146,147 may offer a solution; these stents keep the coarcted aortic segment open for a 3-month to 6-month period, after which the stents dissolve. By then, the ratio of the normal aortic tissue to abnormal tissue may be in favor of the infant, thus preventing recurrence of significant narrowing. However, this hypothesis should be tested in appropriate animal models and stent delivery systems miniaturized so that they can be used in neonates and young infants. Similarly growth stents148 may allow re-dilatation at a later date.
  • Summary of treatment
    • At initial presentation, if cardiac failure or hypertension is the presenting problem, it should be addressed to stabilize the patient. Subsequently, the aortic obstruction should be relieved. The available options include surgical and catheter interventional procedures; the latter procedures include balloon angioplasty and bare or covered stents.
    • In general, surgical intervention in neonates and young infants (extremely ill babies with poor left ventricular function may benefit from balloon angioplasty), balloon angioplasty in children, and stent deployment in adolescents and adults appear to be appropriate options. Of course, the anatomy of the coarcted aortic segment and the aortic arch would greatly influence the method of therapy in a given patient.

Consultations

  • Early presentation
    • In infants who present early with CHF, stabilization in the ICU may be required prior to surgical intervention.
    • In premature infants, consultation with a neonatologist may be required to manage associated diseases related to prematurity, such as hyaline membrane disease.
    • Consultation with a geneticist may be indicated if Turner syndrome or other genetic conditions are suspected.
    • Consultation with a nephrologist may be needed for assistance in treating patients with hypertension in preoperative or postoperative acute renal failure.
  • Late presentation
    • Older patients may be initially referred to specialists prior to the diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta.
      • Referral to a hypertension clinic may lead to the diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta by the nephrologist.
      • Patients who undergo evaluation for suspected genetic syndromes may be referred to the cardiologist for evaluation because of previously undiagnosed coarctation.
    • Complications of coarctation of the aorta, such as intracranial hemorrhage or endocarditis, may require consultation with a neurosurgeon or infectious disease specialist, respectively.

Diet

  • Persistent hypertension has been shown to increase the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD); therefore, periodically examine patients who have undergone coarctation of the aorta repair for hypertension and recommend a healthy low-fat, and perhaps, low-salt diet.
  • Measure cholesterol levels and intervene pharmacologically in older patients as indicated, with a total cholesterol goal of less than 200 g/dL.
  • Patients with persistent hypertension may require varying degrees of salt restriction.
  • Emphasize dietary counseling and avoidance of obesity and smoking.

Activity

  • Patients with coarctation of the aorta and hypertension who are awaiting surgical repair should limit heavy isometric exercises to a degree commensurate with the degree of hypertension.
  • Generally, the duration of hypertension after coarctation of the aorta repair is related in part to the duration of hypertension prior to diagnosis and repair of coarctation. Patients who undergo repair of coarctation in infancy usually remain normotensive in the absence of significant residual arch obstruction and require no specific activity restrictions or limitations. With growth, coarctation may recur, and some patients may be normotensive at rest but have significant upper extremity hypertension provoked by exercise. Such patients who desire to participate in competitive athletics should undergo exercise stress testing prior to clearance.
  • Patients who undergo repair later in life and who have had a significant period of preoperative hypertension are at particular risk for sustained postoperative hypertension, which may be permanent. Restrict heavy isometric exercise and other activities in these patients, commensurate with the degree of hypertension and BP control. Use exercise testing to assess BP response to exercise as a means of delineating reasonable exercise limitations.

Medication

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications of coarctation of the aorta (CoA).

Prostaglandins

Alprostadil (PGE1) promotes dilatation of the ductus arteriosus in infants with ductal-dependent cardiac abnormalities.


Alprostadil (Prostin VR Pediatric Injection)

Identical to the naturally occurring prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and possesses various pharmacologic effects, including vasodilation and inhibition of platelet aggregation.
First-line medication used as palliative therapy to temporarily maintain patency of the ductus arteriosus before surgery. Beneficial in infants with congenital defects that restrict pulmonary or systemic blood flow and in patients who depend on a PDA for adequate oxygenation and lower-body perfusion. Produces vasodilation and increases cardiac output. Each 1-mL ampule contains 500 mcg/mL.

Adult

Pediatric

0.05-0.15 mcg/kg/min IV to open ductus arteriosus; once ductus opens, gradually reduce dose to 0.02-0.025 mcg/kg/min

Limited data exist; caution with concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants

Documented hypersensitivity; hyaline membrane disease; respiratory distress syndrome

Pregnancy

X - Contraindicated; benefit does not outweigh risk

Precautions

Long-term infusions may cause cortical proliferation of long bones in neonates; prostaglandins inhibit platelet aggregation (caution in neonates with bleeding tendencies); adverse effects and toxicity include apnea, seizures, fever, hypotension, leukocytosis, fever, and pulmonary overcirculation; neonates are usually intubated prophylactically because of potential risk of apnea (10-12%); prolonged use is occasionally necessary (in hypoplastic left heart syndrome transplant candidates) and may be associated with third spacing of fluid; monitor blood oxygenation and arterial pressure

Inotropic agents

These agents are used to stimulate alpha-receptor and beta-receptors in the heart and vascular bed. Positive inotropic agents increase the force of contraction of the myocardium and are used to treat acute and chronic CHF. Some may also increase or decrease the heart rate (ie, positive or negative chronotropic agents), provide vasodilatation, or improve myocardial relaxation. These additional properties influence the choice of drug for specific circumstances.


Dopamine (Intropin)

Stimulates both adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors. Hemodynamic effects depend on the dose. Lower doses stimulate mainly dopaminergic receptors that produce renal and mesenteric vasodilation. Cardiac stimulation and renal vasodilation are produced by higher doses.
Positive inotropic agent at 2-10 mcg that can lead to tachycardia, ischemia, and dysrhythmias. Doses >10 mcg cause vasoconstriction, which increases afterload.

Adult

1-5 mcg/kg/min IV initially; titrate accordingly; not to exceed 50 mcg/kg/min

Pediatric

1-20 mcg/kg/min IV

Phenytoin, alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockers, general anesthesia, and MAOIs increase and prolong effects of dopamine

Documented hypersensitivity; pheochromocytoma; ventricular fibrillation

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Monitor urine output, cardiac output, pulmonary wedge pressure, and BP during infusion; correct hypovolemia prior to infusion; monitoring central venous pressure or LV filling pressure may be helpful in detecting and treating hypovolemia


Dobutamine (Dobutrex)

Produces vasodilation and increases the inotropic state. At higher doses, may cause increased heart rate, thereby exacerbating myocardial ischemia. Strong inotropic agent with minimal chronotropic effect and no vasoconstriction.

Adult

0.5 mcg/kg/min IV initially; titrate until desired therapeutic effect attained; not to exceed 40 mcg/kg/min

Pediatric

1-20 mcg/kg/min IV

Beta-adrenergic blockers antagonize effects of dobutamine; general anesthetics may increase toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis; atrial fibrillation or flutter

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Caution following MI; hypovolemic state should be corrected prior to administration

Cardiac glycosides

These medications improve ventricular systolic function by increasing the calcium supply available for myocyte contraction.


Digoxin (Lanoxin)

This form inhibits the sodium-potassium ATPase pump in cardiac myocytes.

Adult

Total digitalizing dose (TDD): 1-1.5 mg PO given in divided doses over 1 d
Maintenance dose: 0.125-0.375 mg PO in 1-2 doses

Pediatric

TDD:
Premature infants: 0.01 mg/kg PO once, then 8 h after first dose, give 0.005 mg/kg PO q8h for 2 doses.
Full-term infants: 0.015 mg/kg PO once, then 8 h after first dose, give 0.0075 mg/kg PO q8h for 2 doses
1-24 months: 0.02-0.025 mg/kg PO once, followed 8 h later by 0.125 mg/kg PO q8h for 2 doses
>2 years: 0.015-0.02 mg/kg PO once, followed 8 later by 0.0075 mg/kg PO q8h for 2 doses
If administered IV, give only 0.75 of PO dose.
Maintenance dose:
Infants: 6-8 mcg/kg/d PO divided bid; 2-5 years: 10-15 mcg/kg/d PO divided bid; 5-10 years: 7-10 mcg/kg/d PO divided bid
>10 years: 3-5 mcg/kg/d PO divided bid

Medications that may increase digoxin levels include alprazolam, benzodiazepines, bepridil, captopril, cyclosporine, propafenone, propantheline, quinidine, diltiazem, aminoglycosides, PO amiodarone, anticholinergics, diphenoxylate, erythromycin, felodipine, flecainide, hydroxychloroquine, itraconazole, nifedipine, omeprazole, quinine, ibuprofen, indomethacin, esmolol, tetracycline, tolbutamide, and verapamil Medications that may decrease serum digoxin levels include aminoglutethimide, antihistamines, cholestyramine, neomycin, penicillamine, aminoglycosides, PO colestipol, hydantoins, hypoglycemic agents, antineoplastic treatment combinations (including carmustine, bleomycin, methotrexate, cytarabine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine), aluminum or magnesium antacids, rifampin, sucralfate, sulfasalazine, barbiturates, kaolin/pectin, and aminosalicylic acid

Documented hypersensitivity; beriberi heart disease; idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis; constrictive pericarditis; carotid sinus syndrome

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Hypokalemia may reduce positive inotropic effect of digitalis; IV calcium may produce arrhythmias in digitalized patients; hypercalcemia predisposes patient to digitalis toxicity, and hypocalcemia can make digoxin ineffective until serum calcium levels are normal; magnesium replacement therapy must be instituted in patients with hypomagnesemia to prevent digitalis toxicity; patients with incomplete AV block may progress to complete block when treated with digoxin; exercise caution in hypothyroidism, hypoxia, and acute myocarditis

Diuretic agents

These agents promote excretion of water and electrolytes by the kidneys. They are used to treat heart failure or hepatic, renal, or pulmonary disease when sodium and water retention have resulted in edema or ascites. Generally includes a loop diuretic that inhibits sodium chloride reabsorption in the ascending loop of Henle.


Furosemide (Lasix)

Increases excretion of water by interfering with chloride-binding cotransport system, which, in turn, inhibits sodium chloride reabsorption in the ascending loop of Henle and distal renal tubules. Dose must be individualized to patient. Depending on response, administer at increments no sooner than 6-8 h after the previous dose, until desired diuresis occurs.

Adult

20-80 mg/d PO/IV/IM; titrate up to 600 mg/d for severe edematous states

Pediatric

1-6 mg/kg/d PO divided q6-8h
1-2 mg/kg/dose IV/IM q6-8h; alternatively, 0.05 mg/kg/h IV infusion

Metformin decreases furosemide concentrations; furosemide interferes with hypoglycemic effect of antidiabetic agents and antagonizes muscle-relaxing effect of tubocurarine; auditory toxicity appears to be increased with coadministration of aminoglycosides and furosemide; hearing loss of varying degrees may occur; anticoagulant activity of warfarin may be enhanced when taken concurrently with furosemide; increased plasma lithium levels and toxicity are possible when taken concurrently with furosemide

Documented hypersensitivity; hepatic coma; anuria; severe electrolyte depletion

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Obtain frequent serum electrolyte, carbon dioxide, glucose, creatinine, uric acid, calcium, and BUN determinations during first few months of therapy and periodically thereafter

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents

These agents inhibit chronotropic, inotropic, and vasodilatory responses to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Preoperative hypertension can be treated effectively with beta-blockers.


Metoprolol (Lopressor)

Selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that decreases automaticity of contractions. During IV administration, carefully monitor BP, heart rate, and ECG. When considering conversion from IV to PO dosage forms, use ratio of 2.5 mg PO to 1 mg IV metoprolol.

Adult

100 mg/d PO qd or divided bid/tid initially; may increase at 1-wk intervals prn; not to exceed 450 mg/d

Pediatric

Not established
Limited data suggest 1-5 mg/kg/d PO qd or divided bid; typical range is 50-400 mg/d

Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease bioavailability and plasma levels of metoprolol, possibly resulting in decreased pharmacologic effects; toxicity of metoprolol may increase with coadministration of phenothiazines, calcium channel blockers, quinidine, flecainide, and contraceptives; metoprolol may increase toxicity of digoxin, flecainide, clonidine, epinephrine, nifedipine, prazosin, verapamil, and lidocaine

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated congestive heart failure; cardiogenic shock; bradycardia; AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Pregnancy category D in second or third trimester; beta-adrenergic blockade may reduce signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and may decrease clinical signs of hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm (monitor patient closely and withdraw drug slowly); during IV administration, carefully monitor BP, heart rate, and ECG


Esmolol (Brevibloc)

Ultra–short-acting beta2-blocker. Particularly useful in patients with labile arterial pressure, especially if surgery is planned, because it can be discontinued abruptly, if necessary. May be useful as a means to test beta-blocker safety and tolerance in patients with history of obstructive pulmonary disease who are at uncertain risk for bronchospasm from beta-blockers. Elimination half-life is 9 min.

Adult

Loading dose: 250-500 mcg/kg/min IV for 1 min, followed by maintenance infusion of 50 mcg/kg/min for 4 min; if adequate therapeutic effect (decreased HR and BP) is not observed within 5 min, repeat loading dose and follow with maintenance infusion using 100 mcg/kg/min for 4 min; sequence may be repeated q5-10min, increasing maintenance infusion by 50 mcg/kg/min with each sequence; not to exceed 200 mcg/kg/min

Pediatric

100-500 mcg/kg IV administered over 1 min initially; followed by continuous IV infusion titrated to range of 25-100 mcg/kg/min; continue titration according to BP or HR response; doses exceeding 200 mcg/kg/min are rarely necessary

Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease bioavailability and plasma levels of esmolol, possibly resulting in decreased pharmacologic effect; cardiotoxicity of esmolol may increase when administered concurrently with sparfloxacin, astemizole (recalled from US market), calcium channel blockers, quinidine, flecainide, and contraceptives; toxicity of esmolol increases when administered concurrently with digoxin, flecainide, acetaminophen, clonidine, epinephrine, nifedipine, prazosin, haloperidol, phenothiazines, and catecholamine-depleting agents

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated congestive heart failure, bradycardia, cardiogenic shock, and AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockers may mask signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and clinical signs of hyperthyroidism; symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm, may worsen when medication is abruptly withdrawn (withdraw drug slowly and monitor patient closely)


Labetalol (Normodyne, Trandate)

Blocks alpha-aderenergic, beta1-aderenergic, and beta2-aderenergic receptor sites, decreasing BP.

Adult

20-30 mg IV over 2 min, followed by 40-80 mg at 10-min intervals; not to exceed 300 mg for cumulative dose

Pediatric

3 mg/kg/d PO divided bid; may titrate to effect; not to exceed 20 mg/kg/d
0.2-0.5 mg/kg/dose IV initially; not to exceed 20 mg/dose; followed by continuous IV infusion of 0.2-1.5 mg/kg/h

Labetalol decreases effect of diuretics and increases toxicity of methotrexate, lithium, and salicylates; may diminish reflex tachycardia resulting from nitroglycerin use without interfering with hypotensive effects; cimetidine may increase labetalol blood levels; glutethimide may decrease labetalol effects by inducing microsomal enzymes

Documented hypersensitivity; cardiogenic shock, atrioventricular block; uncompensated congestive heart failure; pulmonary edema; bradycardia; reactive airway disease; severe bradycardia

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Caution in impaired hepatic function; discontinue therapy if signs of liver dysfunction are present; lower response rate and higher incidence of toxicity may be observed in elderly patients


Propranolol (Inderal, Betachron E-R)

Class II antiarrhythmic nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker. Has membrane-stabilizing activity and decreases automaticity of contractions. Not suitable for emergency treatment of hypertension.

Adult

40-80 mg PO bid initially; increase to 160-320 mg/d (some patients require up to 640 mg/d)

Pediatric

1-4 mg/kg/d PO divided q6-8h; not to exceed 16 mg/kg/d
Intravenous: Avoid IV use; however, if necessary (eg, hypercyanotic spell in tetralogy of Fallot), administer 0.1-0.25 mg/kg/dose IV over minimum of 10 min; not to exceed 1 mg (infants) or 3 mg (children)

Coadministration with aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease propranolol effects; calcium channel blockers, cimetidine, loop diuretics, and MAOIs may increase toxicity of propranolol; toxicity of hydralazine, haloperidol, benzodiazepines, and phenothiazines may increase with propranolol

Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated congestive heart failure; bradycardia, cardiogenic shock; AV conduction abnormalities

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockade may decrease signs of acute hypoglycemia and hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm (withdraw drug slowly and monitor closely)


Atenolol (Tenormin)

Selectively blocks beta1-receptors with little or no effect on beta2-receptors.

Adult

25-50 mg/d PO initially; may increase to 100 mg/d prn

Pediatric

0.8-1 mg/kg/d PO initially; may titrate upward according to symptoms; not to exceed 2 mg/kg/d

Coadministration with aluminum salts, barbiturates, calcium salts, cholestyramine, NSAIDs, penicillins, and rifampin may decrease effects; haloperidol, hydralazine, loop diuretics, and MAOIs may increase toxicity of atenolol

Documented hypersensitivity; congestive heart failure; pulmonary edema; cardiogenic shock; AV conduction abnormalities; heart block (without pacemaker)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Beta-adrenergic blockade may reduce symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and mask signs of hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism and cause thyroid storm (monitor patients closely and withdraw drug slowly); during IV administration, carefully monitor BP, heart rate, and ECG

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

These agents reduce afterload and decrease myocardial remodeling that worsens chronic heart failure. May be added if hypertension persists despite beta-blocker therapy and no residual arch obstruction is noted.


Captopril (Capoten)

ACE inhibitors decrease the production of angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor, resulting in peripheral vasodilatation and afterload reduction, improved myocardial performance, and theoretically reduced atrioventricular and semilunar valve insufficiency.

Adult

12.5-25 mg PO bid/tid; may increase by 12.5-25 mg/dose at 1- to 2-wk intervals; typical dosage range for hypertension is 50-100 mg/d; not to exceed 450 mg/d

Pediatric

Infants: 0.01-0.3 mg/kg/dose PO q8h
Children: 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/dose PO q8h; not to exceed 6 mg/kg/d
Older children and adolescents: 6.25-20 mg PO q8h; not to exceed 6 mg/kg/d (older children) or 450 mg/d (adolescents)

NSAIDs may reduce hypotensive effects of captopril; ACE inhibitors may increase digoxin, lithium, and allopurinol levels; rifampin decreases captopril levels; probenecid may increase captopril levels; hypotensive effects of ACE inhibitors may be enhanced when administered concurrently with diuretics

Documented hypersensitivity; renal impairment; renal artery stenosis

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Pregnancy category D in second and third trimesters; caution in renal impairment, valvular stenosis, severe congestive heart failure, hypotension, tachycardia, and renal failure; persistent dry cough has been reported


Enalapril (Vasotec)

Competitive ACE inhibitor with prolonged duration of action with oral administration.
Reduces angiotensin II levels, reducing aldosterone secretion.

Adult

2.5-5 mg/d PO; may increase as necessary
Dosing range: 10-40 mg/d PO divided qd/bid
Alternative: 1.25 mg/dose IV over 5 min q6h

Pediatric

Infants and children: 0.1 mg/kg PO qd or divided bid initially; may increase gradually; not to exceed 0.5 mg/kg/d
Adolescents: Administer as in adults

NSAIDs may reduce hypotensive effects of enalapril; ACE inhibitors may increase digoxin, lithium, and allopurinol levels; rifampin decreases enalapril levels; probenecid may increase enalapril levels; hypotensive effects of ACE inhibitors may be enhanced when administered concurrently with diuretics

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Pregnancy category D in second and third trimesters; caution in renal impairment, valvular stenosis, or severe congestive heart failure

Vasodilators

Postoperative hypertension can be treated short-term with vasodilators, which reduce SVR, allowing more forward flow, thus improving cardiac output.


Nitroprusside (Nitropress)

Directly acting vasodilator. Exerts its effect on both arterial and venous circulation. Causes reflex tachycardia, small decrease in cardiac output, and decreases total peripheral resistance and cardiac and stroke index.

Adult

0.3-0.5 mcg/kg/min IV initially; titrate to desired effect by increments of 0.5 mcg/kg/min; average dose is 1-6 mcg/kg/min
Infusion rates >10 mcg/kg/min may lead to cyanide toxicity

Pediatric

0.3-0.5 mcg/kg/min IV titrated to effect; consider additional antihypertensive agent if BP remains uncontrolled at 5 mcg/kg/min

Effects are additive when administered with other hypotensive agents

Documented hypersensitivity; subaortic stenosis; idiopathic, hypertrophic, or atrial fibrillation or flutter

Pregnancy
Precautions

Caution in increased intracranial pressure, hepatic failure, severe renal impairment, and hypothyroidism; in renal or hepatic insufficiency, nitroprusside levels may increase and can cause cyanide toxicity; lowers BP, thus, should be used only in patients with mean arterial pressures >70 mm Hg

More on Coarctation of the Aorta

Overview: Coarctation of the Aorta
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Coarctation of the Aorta
Treatment & Medication: Coarctation of the Aorta
Follow-up: Coarctation of the Aorta
Multimedia: Coarctation of the Aorta
References

References

  1. Rao PS. Should balloon angioplasty be used instead of surgery for native aortic coarctation?. Br Heart J. Dec 1995;74(6):578-9. [Medline].

  2. Rudolph AM, Heymann MA, Spitznas U. Hemodynamic considerations in the development of narrowing of the aorta. Am J Cardiol. Oct 1972;30(5):514-25. [Medline].

  3. Talner NS, Berman MA. Postnatal development of obstruction in coarctation of the aorta: role of the ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics. Oct 1975;56(4):562-9. [Medline].

  4. Cassels DE. The Ductus Arteriosus. Springfield, IL,: Charles C. Thomas; 1973:161.

  5. Skoda J. Demonstration eines Falles Ven Obliteration de Aorta. Wochenblatt Zeischrift de kaiserlichen-Konighiche Gesellschaft der Aerttze Zur Wien. 1995;1:710-720.

  6. Goldblatt H, Kahn JR, Hanzal RF. Studies on experimental hypertension. The effect on blood pressure of constriction of the abdominal aorta above and below the site of origin of both renal arteries. J Exper Med. 1939;69:649-674.

  7. Scott HW Jr, Bahnson HT. Evidence for a renal factor in the hypertension of experimental coarctation of the aorta. Surgery. Jul 1951;30(1):206-17. [Medline].

  8. Scott HW Jr, Collins HA, Langa AM, Olsen NS. Additional observations concerning the physiology of the hypertension associated with experimental coarctation of the aorta. Surgery. Sep 1954;36(3):445-59. [Medline].

  9. Alpert BS, Bain HH, Balfe JW, Kidd BS, Olley PM. Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive children with coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1979;43(4):828-34. [Medline].

  10. Bagby SB. Dissection of pathogenetic factors: I. coarctation hypertension, in Loggie. In: JMH, Horan MJ, Hohn AR, et al Ieds). Proceedings of the NHLBI Workshop on Juvenile Hypertension. Biomedical Informatio Corp. New York, NY: 1984:pp. 253-266.

  11. Gersony WM. Riemenschneider TA (eds). Coarctation of the aorta, in Adams FH, Emmanouildes GC, Moss’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children and Adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:pp. 243-255.

  12. Cody RJ. Hormonal alterations in heart failure. In: Hosenpud JD, Greenberg BH, eds. Congestive Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Comprehensive Approach to Management. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2000:199-212.

  13. Nadas, AS, Fyler DC. Pediatric Cardiology. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1972:p. 683.

  14. Keith JD, Rowe RD, Vlad P. Heart Disease in Infancy and Childhood. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1978:pp. 4-6.

  15. Rao PS. Balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 1992;20(3):750-1. [Medline].

  16. Campbell M. Natural history of coarctation of the aorta. Br Heart J. Sep 1970;32(5):633-40. [Medline].

  17. Strafford MA, Griffiths SP, Gersony WM. Coarctation of the aorta: a study in delayed detection. Pediatrics. Feb 1982;69(2):159-63.

  18. Thoele DG, Muster AJ, Paul MH. Recognition of coarctation of the aorta. A continuing challenge for the primary care physician. Am J Dis Child. Nov 1987;141(11):1201-4. [Medline].

  19. Norton JB Jr. Coarctation of the Aorta. In: Moller JH, ed. Surgery of Congenital Heart Disease: Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co; 1984-1995.:143-57.

  20. Salahuddin N, Wilson AD, Rao PS. An unusual presentation of coarctation of the aorta in infancy: role of balloon angioplasty in the critically ill infant. Am Heart J. Dec 1991;122(6):1772-5. [Medline].

  21. Ing FF, Starc TJ, Griffiths SP, Gersony WM. Early diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta in children: a continuing dilemma. Pediatrics. Sep 1996;98(3 Pt 1):378-82. [Medline].

  22. Nora JJ. Multifactorial inheritance hypothesis for etiology of congenital heart disease: the genetic-environmental interaction. Circulation. 1968;38:604-17.

  23. Rao PS, Carey P. Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pressure gradients across aortic coarctation. Am Heart J. Aug 1989;118(2):299-307. [Medline].

  24. Silvilairat S, Cetta F, Biliciler-Denktas G, Ammash NM, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ. Abdominal aortic pulsed wave Doppler patterns reliably reflect clinical severity in patients with coarctation of the aorta. Congenit Heart Dis. Nov-Dec 2008;3(6):422-30. [Medline].

  25. Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, Rees S, Longmore DB. Magnetic resonance volume flow and jet velocity mapping in aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 1 1993;22(5):1515-21. [Medline].

  26. Pitlick PT, Anthony CL, Moore P, Shifrin RY, Rubin GD. Three-dimensional visualization of recurrent coarctation of the aorta by electron-beam tomography and MRI. Circulation. Jun 15 1999;99(23):3086-7. [Medline].

  27. Rao PS, Chopra PS. Role of balloon angioplasty in the treatment of aortic coarctation. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 1991;52(3):621-31. [Medline].

  28. Rao PS, Chopra PS, Koscik R, et al. Surgical versus balloon therapy for aortic coarctation in infants < or = 3 months old. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 1994;23(6):1479-83.

  29. [Guideline] Lopez-Sendon J, Swedberg K, McMurray J, et al. Expert consensus document on beta-adrenergic receptor blockers. Eur Heart J. Aug 2004;25(15):1341-62. [Medline].

  30. [Best Evidence] Frobel AK, Hulpke-Wette M, Schmidt KG, Läer S. Beta-blockers for congestive heart failure in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 21 2009;CD007037. [Medline].

  31. Liberthson RR, Pennington DG, Jacobs ML, Daggett WM. Coarctation of the aorta: review of 234 patients and clarification of management problems. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1979;43(4):835-40. [Medline].

  32. Lacour-Gayet F, Bruniaux J, Serraf A, Chambran P, Blaysat G, Losay J. Hypoplastic transverse arch and coarctation in neonates. Surgical reconstruction of the aortic arch: a study of sixty-six patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Dec 1990;100(6):808-16. [Medline].

  33. Krauser DG, Rutkowski M, Phoon CK. Left ventricular volume after correction of isolated aortic coarctation in neonates. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1 2000;85(7):904-7, A10. [Medline].

  34. Pinzon JL, Burrows PE, Benson LN, Moës CA, Lightfoot NE, Williams WG. Repair of coarctation of the aorta in children: postoperative morphology. Radiology. Jul 1991;180(1):199-203.

  35. Parikh SR, Hurwitz RA, Hubbard JE, Brown JW, King H, Girod DA. Preoperative and postoperative "aneurysm" associated with coarctation of the aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 1991;17(6):1367-72. [Medline].

  36. Parks WJ, Ngo TD, Plauth WH Jr, Bank ER, Sheppard SK, Pettigrew RI. Incidence of aneurysm formation after Dacron patch aortoplasty repair for coarctation of the aorta: long-term results and assessment utilizing magnetic resonance angiography with three-dimensional surface rendering. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jul 1995;26(1):266-71. [Medline].

  37. Chiesa R, Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L, Setacci F, Baccellieri D. Giant aneurysm 25 years after patch aortoplasty for aortic coarctation. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008;35(2):220-1. [Medline].

  38. Rao PS. Neurologic complications following balloon angioplasty. Pediat Cardiol. 1993;14:63-4.

  39. Mendelsohn AM, Crowley DC, Lindauer A, Beekman RH 3rd. Rapid progression of aortic aneurysms after patch aortoplasty repair of coarctation of the aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 1992;20(2):381-5. [Medline].

  40. Crawford FA, Sade RB. Spinal cord injury associated with hyperthermia during aortic coarctation repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;87:610-6.

  41. Brewer LA, III, Fosburg RG, Mulder GA, et al. Spinal cord complications following surgery for coarctation of the aorta: a study of 66 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;64:368-80.

  42. Connolly JE. Hume Memorial lecture. Prevention of spinal cord complications in aortic surgery. Am J Surg. Aug 1998;176(2):92-101. [Medline].

  43. Sealy WC, Harris JS, Young WG Jr, Callaway HA Jr. Paradoxical hypertension following resection of coarctation of aorta. Surgery. Jul 1957;42(1):135-47. [Medline].

  44. Ho ECK, Moss AJ. The syndrome of mesenteric arteriitis following surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Pediat. 1972;49:40-5.

  45. Tabbutt S, Nicolson SC, Adamson PC, Zhang X, Hoffman ML, Wells W. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of esmolol for blood pressure control immediately after repair of coarctation of the aorta in infants and children: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Aug 2008;136(2):321-8. [Medline].

  46. Kittle CF, Schafer PW. Gangrene of the forearm after subclavian arterio-aortostomy for coarctation of the aorta. Thorax. 1953;8:319-22.

  47. Geiss D, Williams WG, Lindsay WK, Rowe RD. Upper extremity gangrene: a complication of subclavian artery division. Ann Thorac Surg. Nov 1980;30(5):487-9. [Medline].

  48. Todd PJ, Dangerfield PH, Hamilton DI, Wilkinson JL. Late effects on the left upper limb of subclavian flap aortoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. May 1983;85(5):678-81. [Medline].

  49. van Son JA, van Asten WN, van Lier HJ, Daniels O, Vincent JG, Skotnicki SH. Detrimental sequelae on the hemodynamics of the upper left limb after subclavian flap angioplasty in infancy. Circulation. Mar 1990;81(3):996-1004. [Medline].

  50. Maddali MM, Menon RG, Valliattu J, Maimouna HA. Left upper limb shortening following reverse flap subclavian artery angioplasty. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. Aug 2008;16(4):346-7. [Medline].

  51. Rao PS, Galal O, Smith PA, Wilson AD. Five- to nine-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 1996;27(2):462-70. [Medline].

  52. Rao PS. Balloon angioplasty for coarctation of the aorta in infancy. J Pediatr. May 1987;110(5):713-8. [Medline].

  53. Rao PS. Current status of balloon angioplasty for neonatal and infant aortic coarctation. Progress Pediat Cardiol. 2001;14:35-44.

  54. Rao PS. Rao PS (ed). Demographic features of tricuspid atresia in Tricuspid Atresia. 2nd Ed. NY, Futura: Mt. Kisco; 1992:pp. 23-37.

  55. Tracy EP, Duncan WJ, Tyrrell MJ, et al. Neurological complications of balloon angioplasty in children. Pediat Cardiol. 1991;12:98-101.

  56. Lock JE, Bass JL, Amplatz K, Fuhrman BP, Castaneda-Zuniga W. Balloon dilation angioplasty of aortic coarctations in infants and children. Circulation. Jul 1983;68(1):109-16. [Medline].

  57. Rao PS, Galal O, Wilson AD. Feasibility and effectiveness of repeated balloon dilatation of restenosed congenital obstructions after previous balloon valvuloplasty/angioplasty. Am Heart J. Aug 1996;132(2 Pt 1):403-7. [Medline].

  58. Rao PS, Wilson AD, Chopra PS. Immediate and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of postoperative recoarctation in infants and children. Am Heart J. Dec 1990;120(6 Pt 1):1315-20. [Medline].

  59. Tynan M, Finley JP, Fontes V, Hess J, Kan J. Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of native coarctation: results of Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies Registry. Am J Cardiol. Mar 15 1990;65(11):790-2. [Medline].

  60. Rao PS. Should Balloon Angioplasty be Used as a Treatment of Choice for Native Aortic Coarctations?. J Invasive Cardiol. Sep 1996;8(7):301-313. [Medline].

  61. Rao PS. Stents in the management of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Indian Heart J. Nov-Dec 2001;53(6):714-30. [Medline].

  62. Rao PS, Jureidini SB, Balfour IC, et al. Severe aortic coarctation in infants less than 3 months: successful palliation by balloon angioplasty. J Intervent Cardiol. 2003;15:203-208.

  63. Lababidi Z. Percutaneous balloon coarctation angioplasty: long-term results. J Interv Cardiol. Mar 1992;5(1):57-62. [Medline].

  64. Rao PS. Long-term follow-up results after balloon dilatation of pulmonic stenosis, aortic stenosis, and coarctation of the aorta: a review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. Jul-Aug 1999;42(1):59-74. [Medline].

  65. Attia IM, Lababidi ZA. Early results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in young adults. Am J Cardiol. Apr 15 1988;61(11):930-1. [Medline].

  66. Rao PS. Coarctation of the aorta. Curr Cardiol Rep. Nov 2005;7(6):425-34. [Medline].

  67. Fawzy ME, Fathala A, Osman A, Badr A, Mostafa MA, Mohamed G. Twenty-two years of follow-up results of balloon angioplasty for discreet native coarctation of the aorta in adolescents and adults. Am Heart J. Nov 2008;156(5):910-7. [Medline].

  68. Shaddy RE, Boucek MM, Sturtevant JE, Ruttenberg HD, Jaffe RB, Tani LY. Comparison of angioplasty and surgery for unoperated coarctation of the aorta. Circulation. Mar 1993;87(3):793-9. [Medline].

  69. Shim D, Lloyd TR, Moorehead CP, Bove EL, Mosca RS, Beekman RH 3rd. Comparison of hospital charges for balloon angioplasty and surgical repair in children with native coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol. Apr 15 1997;79(8):1143-6. [Medline].

  70. Marvin WJ, Mahoney LT, Rose EF. Pathologic sequelae of balloon dilation angioplasty of unoperated coarctation of the aorta in children (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:117A.

  71. Cooper RS, Ritter SB, Rothe WB, Chen CK, Griepp R, Golinko RJ. Angioplasty for coarctation of the aorta: long-term results. Circulation. Mar 1987;75(3):600-4. [Medline].

  72. Cowley CG, Orsmond GS, Feola P, McQuillan L, Shaddy RE. Long-term, randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty and surgery for native coarctation of the aorta in childhood. Circulation. Jun 28 2005;111(25):3453-6. [Medline].

  73. Rodes-Cabau J, Miro J, Dancea A, Ibrahim R, Piette E, Lapierre C. Comparison of surgical and transcatheter treatment for native coarctation of the aorta in patients > or = 1 year old. The Quebec Native Coarctation of the Aorta study. Am Heart J. Jul 2007;154(1):186-92. [Medline].

  74. Ebels T, Maruszewski B, Blackstone EH. What is the preferred therapy for patients with aortic coarctation--the standard gamble and decision analysis versus real results?. Cardiol Young. Feb 2008;18(1):18-21. [Medline].

  75. Rao PS. Balloon angioplasty of aortic coarctation: a review. Clin Cardiol. Nov 1989;12(11):618-28. [Medline].

  76. Hager A, Schreiber C, Nutzl S, Hess J. Mortality and restenosis rate of surgical coarctation repair in infancy: a study of 191 patients. Cardiology. 2009;112(1):36-41. [Medline].

  77. Bacha EA. Long-term outcomes after coarctation repair in infancy. Cardiology. 2009;112(1):35. [Medline].

  78. Singer MI, Rowen M, Dorsey TJ. Transluminal aortic balloon angioplasty for coarctation of the aorta in the newborn. Am Heart J. Jan 1982;103(1):131-2. [Medline].

  79. Kan JS, White RI Jr, Mitchell SE, Farmlett EJ, Donahoo JS, Gardner TJ. Treatment of restenosis of coarctation by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Circulation. Nov 1983;68(5):1087-94. [Medline].

  80. Hess J, Mooyaart EL, Busch HJ, Bergstra A, Landsman ML. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in restenosis of coarctation of the aorta. Br Heart J. May 1986;55(5):459-61. [Medline].

  81. Lorber A, Ettedgui JA, Baker EJ, Jones OD, Reidy J, Tynan M. Balloon aortoplasty for recoarctation following the subclavian flap operation. Int J Cardiol. Jan 1986;10(1):57-63. [Medline].

  82. Saul JP, Keane JF, Fellows KE, Lock JE. Balloon dilation angioplasty of postoperative aortic obstructions. Am J Cardiol. Apr 15 1987;59(9):943-8. [Medline].

  83. Rao PS. Which aortic coarctations should we balloon-dilate?. Am Heart J. Apr 1989;117(4):987-9. [Medline].

  84. Hellenbrand WE, Allen HD, Golinko RJ, Hagler DJ, Lutin W, Kan J. Balloon angioplasty for aortic recoarctation: results of Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies Registry. Am J Cardiol. Mar 15 1990;65(11):793-7. [Medline].

  85. Anjos R, Qureshi SA, Rosenthal E, et al. Determinents of hemodynamic results of balloon dilation of aortic recoarctation. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:665-71.

  86. Reich O, Tax P, Bartakova H, et al. Long-term (up to 20 years) results of percutaneous balloon angioplasty of recurrent aortic coarctation without use of stents. Eur Heart J. Aug 2008;29(16):2042-8.

  87. Yetman AT, Nykanen D, McCrindle BW, Sunnegardh J, Adatia I, Freedom RM. Balloon angioplasty of recurrent coarctation: a 12-year review. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 1997;30(3):811-6. [Medline].

  88. Minich LL, Beekman RH, Rocchini AP, et al. Surgical repair is safe and effective after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty of native coarctation of the aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;19:389-3.

  89. Zollikofer CL, Antonucci F, Stuckmann G, Mattias P, Salomonowitz EK. Historical overview on the development and characteristics of stents and future outlooks. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. Sep-Oct 1992;15(5):272-8. [Medline].

  90. Rao PS. Stents in treatment of aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 1997;30(7):1853-5. [Medline].

  91. O'Laughlin MP, Perry SB, Lock JE, Mullins CE. Use of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease. Circulation. Jun 1991;83(6):1923-39. [Medline].

  92. Reddington AN, Hayes AM, Ho SY:. Transcatheter stent implantation to treat aortic coarctation in infancy. Br Heart J. 1993;69:80-2.

  93. Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M, et al. Balloon-expandable stent repair of severe coarctation of aorta. Am Heart J. May 1995;129(5):1002-8. [Medline].

  94. Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA, Tynan M. Stent implantation for aortic recoarctation. Am Heart J. Jun 1995;129(6):1220-1. [Medline].

  95. Bulbul ZR, Bruckheimer E, Love JC, Fahey JT, Hellenbrand WE. Implantation of balloon-expandable stents for coarctation of the aorta: implantation data and short-term results. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. Sep 1996;39(1):36-42. [Medline].

  96. Chander JS, Wolfe SB, Rao PS. Role of stents in the management of congenital heart disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996;8:314-25.

  97. Thanopoulos BV, Triposkiadis F, Margetakis A, Mullins CE. Long segment coarctation of the thoracic aorta: treatment with multiple balloon-expandable stent implantation. Am Heart J. Apr 1997;133(4):470-3. [Medline].

  98. Ebeid MR, Prieto LR, Latson LA. Use of balloon-expandable stents for coarctation of the aorta: initial results and intermediate-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 1997;30(7):1847-52. [Medline].

  99. Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M, Romero M, Medina A, Segura J, Lafuente M. Immediate and follow-up findings after stent treatment for severe coarctation of aorta. Am J Cardiol. Feb 1 1999;83(3):400-6. [Medline].

  100. Thanopoulos BD, Hadjinikolaou L, Konstadopoulou GN, et al. Stent treatment for coarctation of the aorta: intermediate-term follow-up and technical considerations. Heart. 1999;84:65-70.

  101. Magee AG, Brzezinsk-Rajszys G, Qureshi SA, et al. Stent implantation for aortic coarctation and re-coarctation. Heart. 1999;82:600-6.

  102. Marshall AC, Perry SB, Keane JF, Lock JE. Early results and medium-term follow-up of stent implantation for mild residual or recurrent aortic coarctation. Am Heart J. Jun 2000;139(6):1054-60. [Medline].

  103. Harrison DA, McLaughlin PR, Lazzam C, Connelly M, Benson LN. Endovascular stents in the management of coarctation of the aorta in the adolescent and adult: one year follow up. Heart. May 2001;85(5):561-6. [Medline].

  104. Cheatham JP. Stenting of coarctation of the aorta. Cathet Cardiovascu Intervent. 2001;54:112-25.

  105. Ledesma M, Alva C, Gomez FD, et al. Results of stenting for aortic coarctation. Am J Cardiol. Aug 15 2001;88(4):460-2. [Medline].

  106. Hamdan MA, Maheshwari S, Fahey JT, Hellenbrand WE. Endovascular stents for coarctation of the aorta: initial results and intermediate-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 1 2001;38(5):1518-23. [Medline].

  107. Santoro G, Carminati M, Bigazzi MC, Palladino MT, Russo MG, Sarubbi B. Primary stenting of native aortic coarctation. Tex Heart Inst J. 2001;28(3):226-7. [Medline].

  108. Tyagi S, Singh S, Mukhopadhyay S, Kaul UA. Self- and balloon-expandable stent implantation for severe native coarctation of the aorta in adults. Am Heart J. 2003;146:920-8.

  109. Rao PS. Edited by Rao PS, Kern MJ. Newer stents in the management of vascular stenosis in children. In: Catheter Based Devices in the Treatment of Non-coronary Cardiovascular Disease in Adults and Children. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, William & Wilkins; 2003:369-378.

  110. Pedra CA, Fontes VF, Esteves CA, Pilla CB, Braga SL, Pedra SR. Stenting vs. balloon angioplasty for discrete unoperated coarctation of the aorta in adolescents and adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Apr 2005;64(4):495-506. [Medline].

  111. Golden AB, Hellenbrand WE. Coarctation of the aorta: stenting in children and adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Feb 1 2007;69(2):289-99. [Medline].

  112. Holzer RJ, Chisolm JL, Hill SL, Cheatham JP. Stenting complex aortic arch obstructions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Feb 15 2008;71(3):375-82. [Medline].

  113. Rao PS. Current status of balloon angioplasty for neonatal and infant aortic coarctation. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2001;14:35-44.

  114. Dehghani P, Collins N, Benson L, Horlick E. Role of routine radial artery access during aortic coarctation interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Oct 1 2007;70(4):622-3. [Medline].

  115. Recto MR, Ing FF, Grifka RG, Nihill MR, Mullins CE. A technique to prevent newly implanted stent displacement during subsequent catheter and sheath manipulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Mar 2000;49(3):297-300. [Medline].

  116. Bonnhoeffer P, Piechaud J, Stumper O, et al. The multi-track angiography catheter: a new tool for complex catheterization in congenital heart disease. Heart. 1996;76:173-7.

  117. Forbes TJ, Moore P, Pedra CA, Zahn EM, Nykanen D, Amin Z. Intermediate follow-up following intravascular stenting for treatment of coarctation of the aorta. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Oct 1 2007;70(4):569-77. [Medline].

  118. Amirghofran AA, Peiravian F, Borzoee M, Emaminia A, Mollazadeh R. A wandering stent in the ascending aorta. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). Sep 2008;9(9):969-70. [Medline].

  119. Rohit MK, Garg PK, Talwar K. Stent fracture after stent therapy for aortic coarctation: nightmares in invasive cardiology. Indian Heart J. Jan-Feb 2007;59(1):77-9. [Medline].

  120. Qureshi AM, McElhinney DB, Lock JE, Landzberg MJ, Lang P, Marshall AC. Acute and intermediate outcomes, and evaluation of injury to the aortic wall, as based on 15 years experience of implanting stents to treat aortic coarctation. Cardiol Young. Jun 2007;17(3):307-18. [Medline].

  121. Schaeffler R, Kolax T, Hesse C, Peuster M. Implantation of stents for treatment of recurrent and native coarctation in children weighing less than 20 kilograms. Cardiol Young. Dec 2007;17(6):617-22. [Medline].

  122. Al-Ata J, Arfi AM, Hussain A, Kouatly A, Galal MO. Stent angioplasty: an effective alternative in selected infants with critical native aortic coarctation. Pediatr Cardiol. May-Jun 2007;28(3):183-92. [Medline].

  123. Hijazi ZM, Fahey JT, Kleinman CS, Hellenbrand WE. Balloon angioplasty for recurrent coarctation of aorta. Immediate and long-term results. Circulation. Sep 1991;84(3):1150-6. [Medline].

  124. Duke C, Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA. The efficacy and safety of stent redilatation in congenital heart disease. Heart. Aug 2003;89(8):905-12. [Medline].

  125. Zabal C, Attie F, Rosas M, Buendia-Hernandez A, Garcia-Montes JA. The adult patient with native coarctation of the aorta: balloon angioplasty or primary stenting?. Heart. Jan 2003;89(1):77-83. [Medline].

  126. Macdonald S, Thomas SM, Cleveland TJ, Gaines PA. Angioplasty or stenting in adult coarctation of the aorta? A retrospective single center analysis over a decade. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. Jul-Aug 2003;26(4):357-64. [Medline].

  127. Anagnostopoulos-Tzifa A. Management of aortic coarctation in adults: endovascular versus surgical therapy. Hellenic J Cardiol. Sep-Oct 2007;48(5):290-5. [Medline].

  128. Weber HS, Cyran SE. Endovascular stenting for native coarctation of the aorta is an effective alternative to surgical intervention in older children. Congenit Heart Dis. Jan 2008;3(1):54-9. [Medline].

  129. Gunn J, Cleveland T, Gaines P. Covered stent to treat co-existent coarctation and aneurysm of the aorta in a young man. Heart. Sep 1999;82(3):351. [Medline].

  130. De Giovanni JV. Covered stents in the treatment of aortic coarctation. J Intervent Cardiol. 2001;14:187-90.

  131. Forbes T, Matisoff D, Dysart J, Aggarwal S. Treatment of coexistent coarctation and aneurysm of the aorta with covered stent in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Cardiol. May-Jun 2003;24(3):289-91. [Medline].

  132. Ewert P, Peters B, Nagdyman N, Miera O, Kuhne T, Berger F. Early and mid-term results with the Growth Stent--a possible concept for transcatheter treatment of aortic coarctation from infancy to adulthood by stent implantation?. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Jan 1 2008;71(1):120-6. [Medline].

  133. Duggal B, Radhakrishnan S, Mathur A, Khurana P, Shrivastava S. Covered stents deployed for coarctation of aorta with aneurysm. Indian Heart J. Jul-Aug 2005;57(4):346-9. [Medline].

  134. Butera G, Piazza L, Chessa M, Negura DG, Rosti L, Abella R. Covered stents in patients with complex aortic coarctations. Am Heart J. Oct 2007;154(4):795-800. [Medline].

  135. Eicken A, Kaemmerer H, Ewert P. Treatment of aortic isthmus atresia with a covered stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Nov 15 2008;72(6):844-6. [Medline].

  136. Preventza O, Wheatley GH 3rd, Williams J, Ramaiah VG, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Diethrich EB. Novel endovascular repair of the small thoracic aorta: customizing off-the-shelf endoluminal grafts. J Card Surg. Sep-Oct 2007;22(5):434-5. [Medline].

  137. Collins N, Mahadevan V, Horlick E. Aortic rupture following a covered stent for coarctation: delayed recognition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Oct 2006;68(4):653-5. [Medline].

  138. Butera G, Gaio G, Carminati M. Redilation of e-PTFE covered CP stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Aug 1 2008;72(2):273-7. [Medline].

  139. Rao PS, Koscik R. Validation of risk factors in predicting recoarctation following initially successful balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctations. Am Heart J. 1995;130:116-21.

  140. Kaine SF, Smith EO, Mott AR, Mullins CE, Geva T. Quantitative echocardiographic analysis of the aortic arch predicts outcome of balloon angioplasty of native coarctation of the aorta. Circulation. Sep 1 1996;94(5):1056-62. [Medline].

  141. Rao PS, Waterman B. Relation of biophysical response of coarcted aortic segment to balloon dilatation with development of recoarctation following balloon angioplasty of native coarctation. Heart. Apr 1998;79(4):407-11. [Medline].

  142. Isner JM, Donaldson RF, Fulton D, Bhan I, Payne DD, Cleveland RJ. Cystic medial necrosis in coarctation of the aorta: a potential factor contributing to adverse consequences observed after percutaneous balloon angioplasty of coarctation sites. Circulation. Apr 1987;75(4):689-95. [Medline].

  143. Ho SY, Somerville J, Yip WC, Anderson RH. Transluminal balloon dilation of resected coarcted segments of thoracic aorta: histological study and clinical implications. Int J Cardiol. Apr 1988;19(1):99-105. [Medline].

  144. Elzenga NH, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Oppenhein-Dekker A. Coarctation and obstructive aortic arch anomalies; their relationship to the ductus arteriosus. Int J Cardiol. 1986;13:289-308.

  145. Russell GA, Berry PJ, Watterson K, Dhasmana JP, Wisheart JD. Patterns of ductal tissue in coarctation of the aorta in the first three months of life. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Oct 1991;102(4):596-601. [Medline].

  146. Tamai H, Igaki K, Kyo E, Kosuga K, Kawashima A, Matsui S. Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. Circulation. Jul 25 2000;102(4):399-404. [Medline].

  147. Schranz D, Zartner P, Michel-Behnke I, Akinturk H. Bioabsorbable metal stents for percutaneous treatment of critical recoarctation of the aorta in a newborn. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. May 2006;67(5):671-3. [Medline].

  148. Ewert P, Abdul-Khaliq H, Peters B, Nagdyman N, Schubert S, Lange PE. Transcatheter therapy of long extreme subatretic aortic coarctations with covered stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Oct 2004;63(2):236-9. [Medline].

  149. Morris CD, Reller MD, Menashe VD. Thirty-year incidence of infective endocarditis after surgery for congenital heart defect. JAMA. Feb 25 1998;279(8):599-603. [Medline].

  150. Bobby JJ, Emami JM, Farmer RD, Newman CG. Operative survival and 40 year follow up of surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Br Heart J. May 1991;65(5):271-6. [Medline].

  151. Saidi AS, Bezold LI, Altman CA, Ayres NA, Bricker JT. Outcome of pregnancy following intervention for coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol. Sep 15 1998;82(6):786-8. [Medline].

  152. Crafoord O, Nylin G. Congenital coarctation of the aorta and its surgical treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1945;14:347-361.

  153. Dotter CT. Transluminally placed coil spring endarterial grafts. Invest Radiol. 1969;4:654-70.

  154. Gross RE, Hufnagl CA. Coarctation of the aorta: experimental studies regarding its surgical correction. N Engl J Med. 1945;233:287-291.

  155. Haji-Zeinali AM, Ghasemi M. Coarctoplasty with self-expandable stent implantation for treatment of coarctation of aorta in adults. Arch Iran Med. Oct 2006;9(4):348-53. [Medline].

  156. Ho SY, Anderson RH. Coarctation, tubular hypoplasia, and the ductus arteriosus. Histological study of 35 specimens. Br Heart J. Mar 1979;41(3):268-74. [Medline].

  157. Lababidi Z, Madigan N, Wu JR, Murphy TJ. Balloon coarctation angioplasty in an adult. Am J Cardiol. Jan 15 1984;53(2):350-1. [Medline].

  158. McCrindle BW, Jones TK, Morrow WR, Hagler DJ, Lloyd TR, Nouri S. Acute results of balloon angioplasty of native coarctation versus recurrent aortic obstruction are equivalent. Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies (VACA) Registry Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 1996;28(7):1810-7. [Medline].

  159. Qureshi SA, Zubrzycka M, Brzezinska-Rajszys G, Kosciesza A, Ksiazyk J. Use of covered Cheatham-Platinum stents in aortic coarctation and recoarctation. Cardiol Young. Feb 2004;14(1):50-4. [Medline].

  160. Rao PS. Faculty of 1000 Medicine: Evaluation of Cowley CG et al. Long-term, randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty and surgery for native coarctation of the aorta in childhood. Circulation. 2005; Jun 28;111 (25):3453-6. [Full Text].

  161. Rao PS. Fatal aortic rupture following balloon angioplasty of aortic recoarctation. Br Heart J. 1991;66:406-7.

  162. Rao PS. Pseudoaneurysm following balloon angioplasty of aortic coarctation (Editorial). Am Heart J. 1993;125:1205-6.

  163. Rao PS. Coarctation of the aorta. In: Ram CVS (ed). Secondary Forms of Hypertension, Seminars in Nephrology, Kurtzman NA (ed). 15(2). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995:81-105.

  164. Rao PS. Balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation. In: Rao PS (ed). Transcatheter Therapy in Pediatric Cardiology. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1993:pp. 153-196.

  165. Rao PS. Transcatheter treatment of pulmonary stenosis and coarctation of the aorta: experience with percutaneous balloon dilatation. Br Heart J. Sep 1986;56(3):250-8. [Medline].

  166. Rao PS, Balfour IC, Singh GK, Jureidini SB, Chen S. Bridge stents in the management of obstructive vascular lesions in children. Am J Cardiol. Sep 15 2001;88(6):699-702. [Medline].

  167. Rao PS, Thapar MK, Kutayli F, Carey P. Causes of recoarctation after balloon angioplasty of unoperated aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 1989;13(1):109-15. [Medline].

  168. Rao PS, Wilson AD, Brazy J. Transumbilical balloon coarctation angioplasty in neonates with critical aortic coarctation. Am Heart J. Dec 1992;124(6):1622-4. [Medline].

  169. Rao PS. Rao PS (ed). Balloon angioplasty for aortic recoarctation following previous surgery in Transcatheter Therapy in Pediatric Cardiology. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1993:pp. 197-212.

  170. Rao PS. Technique of balloon valvuloplasty. In: Rao PS (ed). Transcatheter Therapy in Pediatric Cardiology, Wiley-Liss. New York, NY: 1993:pp 29-44.

  171. Siblini G, Rao PS, Nouri S, Ferdman B, Jureidini SB, Wilson AD. Long-term follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of postoperative aortic recoarctation. Am J Cardiol. Jan 1 1998;81(1):61-7. [Medline].

  172. Sos T, Sniderman KW, Rettek-Sos B, Strupp A, Alonso DR. Percutaneous transluminal dilatation of coarctation of thoracic aorta post mortem. Lancet. Nov 3 1979;2(8149):970-1. [Medline].

  173. Sperling DR, Dorsey TJ, Rowen M, Gazzaniga AB. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of congenital coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol. Feb 1983;51(3):562-4. [Medline].

  174. Wong D, Benson LN, Van Arsdell GS, Karamlou T, McCrindle BW. Balloon angioplasty is preferred to surgery for aortic coarctation. Cardiol Young. Feb 2008;18(1):79-88. [Medline].

  175. Zellers TM. Balloon angioplasty for recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients following staged palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol. Jul 15 1999;84(2):231-3, A9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

coarctation of the aorta, CoA, left ventricular obstruction, LV outflow tract obstruction, aortic arch obstruction, interrupted aortic arch, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular afterload, aortic obstruction, bicuspid aortic valve, ventricular septal defect, VSD, left heart obstruction, aortic stenosis, heart defects, congenital heart disease, congestive heart failure, CHF, hypertension, perinatal circulatory insufficiency, Takayasu arteritis, transposition of the great arteries, Taussig-Bing anomaly, double-inlet left ventricle, tricuspid atresia, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, right ventricular outflow tract obstructions, tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, cerebral aneurysm, treatment, diagnosis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

P Syamasundar Rao, MD, Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School; Director, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital; Professor of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas
P Syamasundar Rao, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Society, Medical Association of Georgia, Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, Society for Pediatric Research, Southern Society for Pediatric Research, and Western Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Paul M Seib, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Medical Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Co-Medical Director, Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit, Arkansas Children's Hospital
Paul M Seib, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Arkansas Medical Society, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Juan Carlos Alejos, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, University of California at Los Angeles
Juan Carlos Alejos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
Disclosure: Actelion Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Pharmacy Editor

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Pfizer Inc Stock Investment from financial planner; Avanir Pharma Stock Investment from financial planner ; WebMD Salary and stock Employment and investment from financial planner

Managing Editor

Julian M Stewart, MD, PhD, Associate Chairman of Pediatrics, Director, Center for Hypotension, Westchester Medical Center; Professor of Pediatrics and Physiology, New York Medical College
Julian M Stewart, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Gilbert Z Herzberg, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, New York Medical College; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatrics, Sound Shore Medical Center
Gilbert Z Herzberg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Stuart Berger, MD, Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin; Chief of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Director of Pediatric Heart Transplant Program, Medical Director of The Heart Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Stuart Berger, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American Heart Association, and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.