Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Atrioventricular Node Reentry Supraventricular Tachycardia Workup

  • Author: Glenn T Wetzel, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: Stuart Berger, MD  more...
 
Updated: May 30, 2014
 

Laboratory Studies

Upon initial presentation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), assessments of serum electrolyte levels, thyroid function, and hemoglobin are often performed.

Other laboratory studies may be performed to monitor serum levels and adverse effects in children receiving antiarrhythmic medications.

Next

Electrocardiography

The ECG obtained during normal sinus rhythm shows a normal PR interval and the absence of preexcitation. Some patients may exhibit a slightly shortened PR interval or increased beat-to-beat variability of the PR interval, reflecting conduction through the fast or slow pathways. The typical AVNRT is characterized as a narrow complex regular tachycardia with rates that vary from 150-300 beats per minute.[14] Unlike AV reentrant tachycardia (WPW or accessory pathway mediated tachycardia), AVNRT may exhibit AV dissociation with block to either the atrium (1:2 conduction) or to the ventricle (2:1 conduction).[15]

Slow-fast form of AVNRT

Note the following:

  • The slow-fast form of AVNRT is typical.
  • Initiation of tachycardia usually occurs suddenly with a premature atrial beat. Sometimes, sudden sinus slowing is followed by a junctional escape beat as a trigger for the tachyarrhythmia.
  • The termination usually occurs with atrioventricular (AV) block, which is spontaneous or induced by vagal maneuvers or medications.
  • The rhythm may terminate with a P wave or QRS complex, depending on the site of block.
  • Little variability in RR intervals is usually noted.
  • The time that the impulse takes to reach the atrium and the ventricle from the distal node is approximately the same, which causes the retrograde P waves to be buried within the QRS or appear immediately preceding or at the terminal end of the QRS.
  • The RP interval is usually less than 50-70 milliseconds, which often results in the P wave being hidden in the QRS complex.
  • When the P wave is visible at the end of the QRS, it exhibits a characteristic late-positive component in ECG lead V1 (ie, pseudo-r' wave), or the retrograde P waves may simulate an S wave in the inferior leads.

Fast-slow form of AVNRT

Note the following:

  • The fast-slow form of AVNRT is atypical.[16]
  • The trigger is usually a premature ventricular beat that blocks in the fast pathway and is conducted in a retrograde fashion through the slow pathway and then in an antegrade fashion through the fast pathway.
  • In this form, conduction to the atria takes longer than conduction to the ventricles, and the RP interval is longer than the PR interval.
  • Another characteristic is that the P wave axis is superior (ie, negative P waves in inferior leads), because the impulse is retrograde and originates in the AV node.
  • Distinguishing this tachycardia from permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) is difficult, although PJRT usually presents with a more incessant rather than paroxysmal pattern.[12]
Previous
Next

Imaging Studies

Chest radiography and echocardiography are often performed to evaluate the degree of cardiopulmonary dysfunction associated with the tachyarrhythmia and to assess for structural abnormalities.

Clinical and experimental studies using electrophysiological and electroanatomical mapping are adding to the understanding of the anatomy and physiology of this disorder.

The coronary sinus, imaged at the time of electrophysiologic study, may have a broader opening in patients with AVNRT.[17] This has not been confirmed.

Previous
Next

Procedures

The electrophysiological characteristics of AVNRT include initiation and termination of tachycardia by extrastimulus or rapid pacing; normal antegrade and retrograde AV conduction (with earliest retrograde activation at the His bundle); and termination with AV block that, although uncommon, may allow the AVNRT to persist. These characteristics can be evaluated in patients through the electrophysiological study (EPS), which may be semi-invasive (eg, esophageal electrode behind the heart) or intracardiac.

Note the following:

  • During the EPS, the presence of the 2 functional pathways in adult patients can usually be demonstrated with atrial extrastimulus testing.
  • As the atrial extrastimulus-coupling interval (A1-A2) is shortened by 10-millisecond decrements, the AV nodal conduction time following the atrial extrastimulus (A2-H2) increases gradually.
  • At a critical atrial-coupling interval, a 10-millisecond decrease in A1-A2 results in a marked increase (>50 ms) in A2-H2. This abrupt increase in AV nodal conduction time is termed a jump in conduction (discontinuous AH conduction curve), and it often is associated with the appearance of atrial echo beats or initiation of AVNRT.
  • Further 10-millisecond decreases in the A1-A2 interval result in small additional increases (< 50 ms) in the A2-H2 interval, or, less commonly, additional AH jumps are evident.

Some data indicate that AV nodal physiology in children is different than in adults. Based on the traditional definition of a 50-millisecond AH jump after a decrement of 10 milliseconds in the extrastimulus coupling interval, only 62% of the children in one study met criteria for dual AV node physiology.[18] However, all patients had inducible AVNRT, and most of them were successfully ablated. The clinical importance of this finding is that children may not always fit the classic electrophysiologic criteria as it applies to adults; therefore, the endpoints for catheter ablation need to be readdressed and redefined in the pediatric population.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Glenn T Wetzel, MD, PhD Professor of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee College of Medicine; Director, Pediatric Arrhythmia Service, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

Glenn T Wetzel, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, Heart Rhythm Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ryan Jones, MD Assistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis

Ryan Jones, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Hugh D Allen, MD Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine

Hugh D Allen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Pediatric Research, Society of Pediatric Echocardiography, Western Society for Pediatric Research, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American Pediatric Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Stuart Berger, MD Medical Director of The Heart Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin

Stuart Berger, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American Heart Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Charles I Berul, MD Professor of Pediatrics and Integrative Systems Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Cardiology, Children's National Medical Center

Charles I Berul, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, Heart Rhythm Society, Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Medtronic for consulting.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Drugs & Diseases gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Robert Hamilton, MD, and Rejane Dillenburg, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Cohen MI, Wieand TS, Rhodes LA, Vetter VL. Electrophysiologic properties of the atrioventricular node in pediatric patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Feb. 29(2):403-7. [Medline].

  2. McCanta AC, Collins KK, Schaffer MS. Incidental dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in children and adolescents: clinical follow-up and implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec. 33(12):1528-32. [Medline].

  3. Van Hare GF. Developmental aspects of atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia. J Electrocardiol. 2008 Nov-Dec. 41(6):480-2. [Medline].

  4. Nakagawa H, Jackman WM. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2007 Nov 20. 116(21):2465-78. [Medline].

  5. Thapar MK, Gillette PC. Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: a common electrophysiologic response in children. Circulation. 1979 Dec. 60(6):1369-74. [Medline].

  6. Lee KW, Badhwar N, Scheinman MM. Supraventricular tachycardia--part I. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2008 Sep. 33(9):467-546. [Medline].

  7. Blaufox AD, Warsy I, D'Souza M, Kanter R. Transesophageal electrophysiological evaluation of children with a history of supraventricular tachycardia in infancy. Pediatr Cardiol. 2011 Dec. 32(8):1110-4. [Medline].

  8. Segal OR, Gula LJ, Skanes AC, Krahn AD, Yee R, Klein GJ. Differential ventricular entrainment: a maneuver to differentiate AV node reentrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Apr. 6(4):493-500. [Medline].

  9. Perez-Rodon J, Bazan V, Bruguera-Cortada J, et al. Entrainment from the para-Hisian region for differentiating atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia from orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Europace. 2008 Oct. 10(10):1205-11. [Medline].

  10. Hayes JJ, Sharma PP, Smith PN, Vidaillet HJ. Familial atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jan. 27(1):73-6. [Medline].

  11. Katritsis DG, Camm AJ. Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace. 2006 Jan. 8(1):29-36. [Medline].

  12. Ho RT, Frisch DR, Pavri BB, Levi SA, Greenspon AJ. Electrophysiological features differentiating the atypical atrioventricular node-dependent long RP supraventricular tachycardias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun. 6(3):597-605. [Medline].

  13. Yamabe H, Tanaka Y, Morihisa K, Uemura T, Enomoto K, Kawano H. Analysis of the anatomical tachycardia circuit in verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the vicinity of the atrioventricular node. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb. 3(1):54-62. [Medline].

  14. Josephson ME, Wellens HJ. Differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia. Cardiol Clin. 1990 Aug. 8(3):411-42. [Medline].

  15. Mahajan T, Berul CI, Cecchin F, Triedman JK, Alexander ME, Walsh EP. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with 2:1 block in pediatric patients. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Oct. 5(10):1391-5. [Medline].

  16. Goldberger J, Brooks R, Kadish A. Physiology of "atypical" atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia occurring following radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Dec. 15(12):2270-82. [Medline].

  17. Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Yamada T, et al. Comparison of coronary sinus morphology in patients with and without atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by intracardiac echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Mar. 15(3):269-73. [Medline].

  18. Blurton DJ, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, Van Hare GF, Collins KK. Characterizing dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in pediatric patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Jun. 17(6):638-44. [Medline].

  19. Dobreanu D, Micu S, Toma O, Rudzik R. Intraprocedural predictors of successful ablation of slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Rom J Intern Med. 2007. 45(1):35-46. [Medline].

  20. Lee PC, Chen SA, Hwang B. Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009 Mar. 24(2):105-12. [Medline].

  21. Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. Circulation. 1999 Jan 19. 99(2):262-70. [Medline].

  22. Etheridge SP. Cryoablation for supraventricular tachycardia in children: is it okay to trade success for decreased risk?. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep. 16(9):967-8. [Medline].

  23. Collins KK, Schaffer MS. Use of cryoablation for treatment of tachyarrhythmias in 2010: survey of current practices of pediatric electrophysiologists. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Mar. 34(3):304-8. [Medline].

  24. Kirsh JA, Gross GJ, O'Connor S, Hamilton RM. Transcatheter cryoablation of tachyarrhythmias in children: initial experience from an international registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 4. 45(1):133-6. [Medline].

  25. Avari JN, Jay KS, Rhee EK. Experience and results during transition from radiofrequency ablation to cryoablation for treatment of pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Apr. 31(4):454-60. [Medline].

  26. Drago F, De Santis A, Grutter G, Silvetti MS. Transvenous cryothermal catheter ablation of re-entry circuit located near the atrioventricular junction in pediatric patients: efficacy, safety, and midterm follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 5. 45(7):1096-103. [Medline].

  27. Miyazaki A, Blaufox AD, Fairbrother DL, Saul JP. Prolongation of the fast pathway effective refractory period during cryoablation in children: a marker of slow pathway modification. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Nov. 2(11):1179-85. [Medline].

  28. Van Hare GF, Chiesa NA, Campbell RM, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Mar. 13(3):203-9. [Medline].

  29. Chanani NK, Chiesa NA, Dubin AM, Avasarala K, Van Hare GF, Collins KK. Cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in young patients: predictors of recurrence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep. 31(9):1152-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  30. Eckhardt LL, Leal M, Hollis Z, Tanega J, Alberte C. Cryoablation for AVNRT: Importance of Ablation Endpoint Criteria. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr 17. [Medline].

  31. Silka MJ, Kron J, Park JK, et al. Atypical forms of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular node reentry in children after radiofrequency modification of slow pathway conduction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 May. 23(6):1363-9. [Medline].

  32. Rhodes LA, Wieand TS, Vetter VL. Low temperature and low energy radiofrequency modification of atrioventricular nodal slow pathways in pediatric patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul. 22(7):1071-8. [Medline].

  33. Epstein MR, Saul JP, Fishberger SB, et al. Spontaneous accelerated junctional rhythm: an unusual but useful observation prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in young patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jun. 20(6):1654-61. [Medline].

  34. Kriebel T, Broistedt C, Kroll M, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoenergy in the ablation of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia substrates in children and adolescents. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep. 16(9):960-6. [Medline].

  35. Hanninen M, Yeung-Lai-Wah N, Massel D, Gula LJ, Skanes AC, Yee R, et al. Cryoablation versus RF ablation for AVNRT: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cardiovasuclar Electrophysiology. Dec 2013. 24:1354-60. [Medline].

  36. Sileikiene R, Vaskelyte J, Mizariene V, Nedzelskiene I, Verseckaite R, Jurkevicius R, et al. Heart rate variability and atria function in children at late follow-up evaluation after atrioventricular node slow-pathway radiofrequency ablation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2011 Aug. 32(6):792-800. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  37. Cokkinakis C, Avramidis D, Alexopoulos C, Kirvassilis G, Papagiannis J. Cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and adolescents: improved long-term outcomes with increasing experience. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2013 May-Jun. 54(3):186-91. [Medline].

  38. Scaglione M, Ebrille E, Caponi D, Blandion A DI Donna P, Siboldi A, Bertero G, et al. Single center experience of fluoroless AVNRT ablation guided by electroanatomic reconstruction in children and adolescents. Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology. Dec 2013. 36:1460-7. [Medline].

  39. Mah DY, Miyake CY, Sherwin ED, Walsh A, Anderson MJ, Western K, et al. The use of an integrated electroanatomic mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography to reduce radiation exposure in children and young adults undergoing ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Europace. Feb 2014. 16:277-83. [Medline].

  40. Drago F, Placidi S, Righi D, DI Mambro C, Russo MS< Silvetti MS, Palmieri R, et al. Cryobaltaion of AVNRT in Children and Adolescents: Early Intervention Leads to a Better Outcome. J Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. April 2014. 25:398-403. [Medline].

  41. Kiplapinar N, Ergul Y, Akdeniz C, Saygi M, Ozyilmaz I, Gul EE, et al. Assessment of Atrioventricular Conduction Following Cryoablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Children. Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology. Jan 2014. e-pub. [Medline].

  42. Dixon J, Foster K, Wyllie J, Wren C. Guidelines and adenosine dosing in supraventricular tachycardia. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Nov. 90(11):1190-1. [Medline].

  43. Ratnasamy C, Rossique-Gonzalez M, Young ML. Pharmacological therapy in children with atrioventricular reentry: which drug?. Curr Pharm Des. 2008. 14(8):753-61. [Medline].

  44. Shah A, Moon-Grady A, Bhogal N, Collins KK, Tacy T, Brook M, et al. Effectiveness of Sotalol as First-Line Therapy for Fetal Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 21. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
The patient's heart rate is approximately 146 beats per minute with a normal axis. Note the pseudo S waves in leads II, III, and aVF. Also note the pseudo R' waves in V1 and aVR. These deflections represent retrograde atrial activation.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.