Pulmonary Artery Banding Treatment & Management

  • Author: Shabir Bhimji, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: John Kupferschmid, MD  more...
 
Updated: Feb 05, 2014
 

Medical Therapy

Preoperative treatment of patients with pulmonary overcirculation and congestive heart failure (CHF) should focus on minimizing left-to-right shunting, improving cardiac function with inotropic support, systemic afterload reduction, and aggressive diuresis. Mechanical ventilator support may be necessary to maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation in the setting of pulmonary edema. Maintaining higher carbon dioxide levels and lower fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) during ventilation may assist in reducing pulmonary blood flow (PBF) and pulmonary edema. If a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is present, attempts should be made to reduce or close it with medical therapy (eg, indomethacin) to reduce this source of PBF.

Next

Surgical Therapy

In the surgical treatment of congenital heart defects, pulmonary artery banding is a palliative intervention that is performed as a staged approach to a more definitive surgical repair. The goals of pulmonary artery banding include reduction of PBF to reduce left-to-right shunting and CHF, protection of the pulmonary vasculature from hypertensive changes, and training of the left ventricle (LV) in anticipation of an arterial switch procedure.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Three standard surgical approaches to pulmonary artery banding (PAB) have been established, depending on the need to perform additional procedures at the time of band placement. As an isolated procedure, pulmonary artery banding can be performed through an anterior left thoracotomy in the second or third interspace (see following image).

The left anterior thoracotomy approach through the The left anterior thoracotomy approach through the second or third intercostal space gives excellent exposure for isolated pulmonary artery banding. Note anatomy of the adjacent structures with medial limits of the incision at the internal mammary vessels. The thymus is swept superiorly away from the phrenic nerve. PA = pulmonary artery; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus.

If performed in conjunction with a coarctation or interrupted aortic arch repair, a left lateral thoracotomy is used and the chest is entered through the third or fourth intercostal space. In both of these approaches, the pericardium is incised anterior to the left phrenic nerve and the thymus is retracted to expose the main pulmonary artery (MPA). A third approach is through a median sternotomy for conditions in which intracardiac procedures (eg, atrial septectomy, partial Senning procedure) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass are indicated. A median sternotomy may also be used in patients with malposed or transposed great vessels in which direct access to the MPA is limited by the position of the aorta through a left thoracotomy approach.

Patients may benefit from placement of a band that can be easily and quickly tightened or loosened, both at the initial procedure and during subsequent interventions. The ability to readjust the band is particularly useful in patients who exhibit dynamic changes in cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance, and systemic vascular resistance. Additionally, it may benefit patients with significant lung disease (eg, pulmonary edema, atelectasis, pneumonia). Such patients develop severe arterial oxygen desaturation with pulmonary artery banding but may tolerate gradually increasing band tightness as the pulmonary process resolves.

Adjustable bands are also helpful in patients with AV valve regurgitation, particularly complex AV canal defects. The acute increase in afterload that accompanies pulmonary artery banding may exacerbate AV valve insufficiency. Staged tightening of the band is usually well tolerated and allows improvement in insufficiency by decreasing ventricular volume overload. Given the advantages of the adjustable band, this technique is routinely used at the UCLA Medical Center.[37, 38]

Surgical technique

The MPA and aorta are exposed, and the band is prepared for placement. Various banding materials are available, but the authors prefer to use umbilical tape. This material is broad enough to minimize risk of eroding through the PA wall but can still be passed easily through a silastic snare for use as an adjustable band.

The estimated band circumference is marked on the umbilical tape with fine sutures according to the Trusler formula.[39, 40] Pulmonary artery banding circumference in patients with noncyanotic nonmixing lesions (eg, ventricular septal defect [VSD]) is 20 mm + 1 mm/kg body weight. For patients with mixing lesions (eg, D-transposition of the great arteries [TGA] with VSD), the formula is 24 mm + 1 mm/kg body weight. In patients with single ventricles in whom the Fontan procedure is planned, an intermediate circumference of 22 mm + 1 mm/kg body weight is preferred. Note that these estimates of band circumference are used simply as guidelines and that the final tightness of the band is ultimately determined by the surgeon using blood gas and PAP measurements at the time of surgery.

The site of band placement is carefully selected in the mid portion of the MPA trunk, and distortion or injury to the pulmonary valve or impingement on the branch pulmonary arteries is avoided. Dissection is performed in the adventitia between the aorta and the MPA, and it is limited to prevent proximal or distal band migration. The MPA is handled very carefully because it often is dilated, thin-walled, and susceptible to injury. Regardless of the operative approach, injuries to the posterior wall of the MPA can be difficult to repair because of limited exposure.

Generally, the band is first passed through the transverse sinus to encircle both the aorta and MPA. The aortic end of the band is then carefully delivered between the aorta and the MPA through the previous site of dissection (see following image).

Safe placement of a pulmonary artery band: (A) enc Safe placement of a pulmonary artery band: (A) encircling the aortopulmonary trunk, (B) encircling the aorta, and (C) completing the pulmonary artery band at the final location.

With this technique, the clamp is never passed around the MPA alone and avoids injuries to the artery. This technique is particularly important when pulmonary artery banding is performed through a left thoracotomy on a patient with malposed great vessels.

The marked sites on the band are identified and aligned with each other on the anterior wall of the MPA. The band is snared with a short segment of #8 or #10 polyethylene tubing and fixed with medium hemoclips. A felt or pericardial pledget is placed beneath the band between the end of the snare and the MPA wall to prevent injury to the artery from the snare. The pledget and band material are then anchored to the MPA adventitia to prevent band migration (see following image).

Pulmonary artery banding technique (A-C) using a p Pulmonary artery banding technique (A-C) using a premeasured Trusler formula adjusted to the cardiac anatomy and physiology. An adjustable device is placed over a felt pledget with adventitial fixation sutures to prevent distal migration. Additional fixation sutures may be placed in the band itself. Each additional medium hemoclip causes approximately 1 mm of change in band circumference. Distal pulmonary artery pressure is measured during tightening.

Tightening the band by the addition of one medium hemoclip is approximately equivalent to a 1-mm decrease in the band circumference. Conversely, removal of a hemoclip enlarges the circumference approximately 1 mm. Instruments for hemoclip application and removal are kept with the patient in the intensive care unit to allow rapid tightening or loosening of the band if necessary. Note that with this technique, no cases of infection or erosion related to the snare have been reported.

Previous experience by the authors' group and others has documented that, although a band is adequate at the time of placement, it may become "too loose" over subsequent weeks and months. This can represent resorption of the internal folds of the vessel wall that are initially present when a circumferential band is placed (see following image).

Circumferential banding of a dilated pulmonary art Circumferential banding of a dilated pulmonary artery can acutely lead to internal infolding of the arterial wall. Later resorption of the infoldings and remodeling of the arterial wall restore a greater internal cross-sectional area.

These acute infoldings of the artery wall further decrease the cross-sectional area of the PA. However, these infoldings resorb with time, restoring a smooth wall and a greater internal cross-sectional area of lumen, a greater PBF, and thus, a looser band.

The authors have modified their technique by decreasing the diameter of the MPA (incisional technique) before applying the band.[41] A partially occluding C clamp is applied to half of the diameter of the MPA distal to the sinotubular junction (see following image).

Incisional pulmonary artery band yields a fixed re Incisional pulmonary artery band yields a fixed reduction of 40% of the vessel diameter before application of a circumferential band.

A perpendicular incision is made into the excluded portion of the artery. The deep V-shaped arteriotomy is closed with a running suture, effectively reducing the diameter of the artery by 40%. An umbilical tape is used with an adjustable snare as described earlier.

In the authors' experience, the incisional pulmonary artery banding has produced a more stable band gradient over time with less requirement for subsequent tightening. It has also eliminated the complication of band migration distally and impingement on the branch pulmonary arteries.

Physiologic assessment to determine the appropriate tightness of the pulmonary artery banding includes intraoperative measurements of the proximal and distal PA pressures, systemic blood pressure, and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (or by direct measurement of arterial blood gas sampling). The goal of pulmonary artery banding is to produce a distal PA pressure that is 30-50% of systemic pressure. In general, the authors attempt to achieve saturations of approximately 85-90% with an FIO2 of 50%. Lower saturations of 75-80% may be acceptable in patients with single ventricle physiology. Failure to achieve these levels in patients with mixed circulations suggests inadequacy of the interatrial communication. In such patients, addition of an atrial septectomy or septostomy may be indicated. In addition to changes in PA pressure and systemic oxygen saturation, one ideally should note a concomitant rise in systemic arterial pressure of 10-15 mm Hg.

One technique applied in patients has been a partial atrial baffle with pulmonary artery banding (see following image).

(A) A partial Senning technique for improved mixin (A) A partial Senning technique for improved mixing and saturation and providing both volume and afterload to the left ventricle after pulmonary artery banding. Autologous pericardium is used to baffle the inferior vena cava and the left pulmonary veins across the mitral valve into the left (pulmonary) ventricle, with superior vena cava and right pulmonary vein drainage to the systemic ventricle. The band is best positioned distally to avoid valvular damage in anticipation of the arterial switch procedure. (B) Pulmonary artery banding combined with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt for rapid preparation of the left ventricle and the arterial switch procedure. This provides left ventricular volume and afterload and can be performed through a left lateral thoracotomy, avoiding the need for a resternotomy at the time of arterial switch. Careful measurement of the proximal pulmonary artery pressure is shown to avoid overtightening the band. PA = pulmonary artery.

With this procedure, the inferior vena caval blood is directed toward the pulmonary (left) ventricle through a pericardial patch baffle. This represents approximately two thirds of systemic desaturated venous return. Conversely, saturated blood returning from the lungs through the right pulmonary veins is directed around the baffle toward the systemic (right) ventricle. This "favorable streaming" results in improvements in saturation and allows placement of an adequately tight pulmonary artery banding for preparation of the LV. This procedure also provides long-term palliation for patients who may not be candidates for the arterial switch procedure. Pulmonary artery banding in conjunction with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt is performed as a closed procedure without CPB and, therefore, is a more desirable approach for short-term preparation of the LV.

Pulmonary artery banding takedown is usually performed at the time of the intracardiac repair through a median sternotomy. Generally, the repair is completed first and the pulmonary artery banding removal is performed at the end of the procedure. The band is dissected free from surrounding scar tissue and removed. The area of banding usually remains stenotic and requires repair. This repair can be achieved by resection and end-to-end anastomosis of the proximal and distal MPA or by vertical incision of the MPA followed by pericardial (or polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) patch repair of the arteriotomy (see following image).

Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery after band Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery after band removal may be accomplished by patch arterioplasty using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium (A) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) material (B) or resection of the band site and end-to-end anastomosis using absorbable running sutures (C).

The repair must ensure relief of any branch PA stenosis that may exist as a consequence of the pulmonary artery banding.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Patients undergoing PAB are initially treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). They often benefit from a course of intravenous inotropic support and require careful attention to fluid balance and volume status. Following PAB, improved hemodynamics and greater left ventricular output often allow for diuresis and gradual resolution of CHF. The assessment of a patient following PAB should ideally be made under conditions of balanced volume status and in the absence of atelectasis or ongoing pulmonary pathology. Although measured parameters from the operating room are helpful guidelines, the overall clinical status of the patient is the most important assessment. This includes changes in systemic blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and overall cardiac function. Hypotension, bradycardia, and ischemic electrocardiographic changes all indicate an excessive band gradient and imminent cardiac failure or arrest.

The advantage of an adjustable PAB is that it allows for rapid loosening of the band with a hemoclip remover in the ICU, if necessary. Catheter debanding is also an invaluable technique in selected cases.[42]

Evaluation of the PAB is made by color flow Doppler echocardiography at the bedside; it usually provides an accurate assessment of band tightness, band gradient, band position, and overall cardiac function. Any impingement or stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries can also be observed with this study. Rarely, cardiac catheterization and direct measurement of PA pressure and band gradient is necessary. More recently, cinemagnetic resonance imaging[43] and 3-dimensional reconstruction have been useful as noninvasive methods of evaluation.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Most patients undergoing pulmonary artery banding for pulmonary overcirculation are monitored for 3-6 months and then undergo more definitive repair of their cardiac defect. Note that the degree of right ventricular hypertrophy that develops in response to any given pulmonary artery banding gradient varies greatly among infants. Those infants who develop rapid and severe right ventricular hypertrophy in response to pulmonary artery banding should be considered for earlier definitive repair to prevent long-term right ventricular dysfunction.

Patients with D-TGA who undergo pulmonary artery banding for training of the LV must be monitored with serial echocardiography to assess "readiness" of the LV before the arterial switch operation. After either technique, patients are monitored with serial echocardiography that allows quantitative measurements of left ventricular mass index, as well as qualitative assessment of ventricular septal geometry. Left-to-right septal bowing is an indication that the LV can generate near-systemic pressure. Left ventricular preparation is usually accomplished within 7-10 days, after which patients may undergo an arterial switch procedure, takedown of shunt, and pulmonary artery banding. The early mortality rate is 4-5%, only slightly greater than that for a primary arterial switch procedure.[44, 45] In infants, this may be several weeks, but older children may require longer periods of banding to achieve adequate results.

In one recent study, infants who required bilateral pulmonary artery banding as a part of temporary stabling treatment for hypoplastic left heart commonly required additional interventions. Those with a small band applied for longer duration were at the highest risk for interventions.[46]

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicineHealth's Heart Health Center. Also, see eMedicineHealth's patient education articles Ventricular Septal Defect and Electrocardiogram (ECG).

Previous
Next

Complications

Although pulmonary artery banding (PAB) is a seemingly simple operation, it has been associated with numerous complications. One of the most common complications of pulmonary artery banding is impingement and stenosis of one or both of the branch pulmonary arteries. The right pulmonary artery (PA) is involved in most cases of branch stenosis for anatomic reasons already mentioned.

The diagnosis of branch PA impingement is often suggested by a chest radiograph that shows asymmetric vascular markings between the right and left lungs. Definitive diagnosis can usually be made by echocardiography, and fractional pulmonary blood flow (PBF) to each lung can be determined with radionuclide lung perfusion scanning.[47] If significant branch stenosis is uncorrected, it can lead to underdevelopment of the involved lung with alveolar hypoplasia.[48] Early recognition of branch PA stenosis should allow a revision of the pulmonary artery banding before the development of this late sequela. Limiting dissection of the tissue between the aorta and the main pulmonary artery (MPA) and fixing the band with sutures on the proximal MPA adventitia both reduce risk of this complication. Use of the incisional pulmonary artery banding technique prevents distal band migration and generally avoids this complication.

Conversely, if the band is placed too proximal on the MPA, it may distort the pulmonary valve and ultimately create dysplastic changes in the pulmonary valve leaflets. This is particularly devastating when PAB is performed as preparation for an arterial switch procedure because the pulmonary valve becomes the neo-aortic valve after the arterial switch procedure. In addition, proximal placement of the band can lead to obstruction of coronary blood flow by direct impingement, usually of the circumflex coronary artery. Anomalous origin of a coronary artery may increase risk of this complication.[49, 50] These complications can generally be avoided by placement of the band more than 15 mm distal to the pulmonary valve cusps.[51] Preoperative demonstration of coronary anatomy is helpful, but intraoperative vigilance during the banding procedure should avoid these types of complications.

In patients with erosion of the band into the PA, scarring and fibrosis around the band site usually prevents the life-threatening bleeding from occurring. Hemolytic anemia and local thrombus formation have been reported.[52] Erosion seems to occur with increased frequency when narrow banding material is used, although it can occur with any material. PA pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of pulmonary artery banding. It may be preceded by local infection and, like band erosion, is heralded by loss of the band murmur and gradient. Imaging studies demonstrate an enlarged mediastinal shadow on chest radiography and a markedly enlarged PA on echocardiography or MRI. The diagnosis of PA pseudoaneurysm formation mandates urgent surgical intervention. Repair is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass with patch repair of the MPA. Glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium is preferred to synthetic material because this condition is sometimes associated with infection.

An additional complication is an ineffectual pulmonary artery banding, either from a loose band at the original procedure or later disruption of the band or erosion of the PA. In earlier studies, ineffectual banding occurred in as many as 15-20% of patients undergoing pulmonary artery banding.[53] The results of an ineffectual band are excessive PBF and early recurrence or continuation of congestive heart failure (CHF). In addition, pulmonary vascular disease with irreversible pulmonary hypertension may potentially develop. Loss of band murmur and recurrence of CHF after pulmonary artery banding suggests loosening or erosion of the band. Furthermore, subsequent improvement may herald the onset of pulmonary vascular disease with a decrease in left-to-right shunting.[54] Early evaluation and close follow-up should allow revision before the onset of irreversible changes.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Pulmonary artery banding (PAB) should result in improved hemodynamics and overall clinical improvement in the patient. The signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) should resolve or become medically manageable, cardiomegaly should decrease, and pulmonary vascular resistance should decrease. Pulmonary artery banding affords protection to the pulmonary vasculature against fixed irreversible pulmonary hypertension secondary to pulmonary overcirculation and elevated pulmonary artery (PA) pressures.

The mortality rate of pulmonary artery banding is clearly associated more with the complexity of cardiac defect and overall condition of the patients than with the procedure itself. Patients who are selected for pulmonary artery banding and a staged repair are often chosen because they are considered too high risk to undergo definitive repair. Therefore, the mortality rates from earlier series have been as high as 25%.[55] A decreasing mortality rate with pulmonary artery banding can be related to improved operative techniques, better patient selection, and timing of intervention.[56, 57, 58, 59] Additionally, improvements in anesthetic and postoperative management have also resulted in a decreased mortality rate. Current mortality rates for pulmonary artery banding are reported in some series to be as low as 3-5%.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Almost half a century since the introduction of pulmonary artery banding (PAB) by Muller and Dammann, this procedure still has a defined role in the treatment of infants who are not candidates for immediate definitive repair. In particular, it may be useful in patients with a functional single ventricle not amenable to early repair and in whom a future Fontan procedure is planned. It may also benefit patients with excessive pulmonary blood flow who are considered too ill to undergo complete repair of their cardiac defect. Interestingly, the original technique of an incisional band as described by Muller and Dammann has resurfaced as a desirable technique in some patients.

The adjustable band technique has proved useful and safe for most patients. Interest has been shown for the development of an intraluminal technique for pulmonary artery banding using circular patches of fenestrated material.[60] This requires a cardiopulmonary bypass to perform and is therefore limited in its applicability to most patients. Ongoing research to develop a percutaneously adjustable, thoracoscopically implantable, pulmonary artery band is underway.[61]

Additionally, research is being conducted in animals to develop a hydraulic main pulmonary artery (MPA) constrictor as an adjustable pulmonary artery banding.[62] These types of devices would benefit patients who require multiple adjustments of a PAB for left ventricle (LV) training. An implantable device for pulmonary artery banding with telemetric control, FloWatch-R-PAB (Endoart SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) has emerged from animal studies and is currently in clinical trials.[63, 64] Early clinical results have shown the efficacy and reliability of the device, but more data and experience are needed to define the role of this technology in PAB.

A strategy of deferring biventricular repair by the application of a pulmonary artery band may not be applicable in developing and third world conditions primarily due to lack of patient compliance. A study by Brooks et al indicates that less than 50% are eventually repaired in a reasonable time frame. Moreover, patient follow-up is unreliable. Thus, in such circumstances, consideration should be given to early definitive repair, even in perceived high-risk cases.[65]

For most patients undergoing pulmonary artery banding, the goal of the procedure remains reduction of pulmonary blood flow (PBF) and preservation of pulmonary vessels from hypertrophy and hypertension. More recently, a new indication of preparing the LV for arterial switch in older infants and children with D-transposition of the great arteries (TGA) appears to have expanded the role of this procedure. Although some surgeons would contend that pulmonary artery banding is largely of historical interest, this technique clearly will continue to maintain a place in the therapeutic armamentarium of the congenital heart surgeon.[66]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Shabir Bhimji, MD, PhD Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeon, Saudi Arabia and Middle East Hospitals

Shabir Bhimji, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Cancer Society, American College of Chest Physicians, American Lung Association, Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary C Mancini, MD, PhD, MMM Professor and Chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport

Mary C Mancini, MD, PhD, MMM is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Surgical Association, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Kupferschmid, MD Director of Congenital Heart Surgery, Department of Surgery, Methodist Children's Hospital at San Antonio

John Kupferschmid, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Mark D Plunkett, MD; Hillel Laks, MD; and Khanh Nguyen, MD to the development and writing of this article.

References
  1. Muller WH, Dammann JF. Treatment of certain congenital malformations of the heart by the creation of pulmonic stenosis to reduce pulmonary hypertension and excessive pulmonary blood flow: A preliminary report. Surgery Gynecol Obstet. 1952. 95:213.

  2. Idriss FS, Riker WL, Paul MH. Banding of the pulmonary artery: a palliative surgical procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1968 Aug. 3(4):465-74. [Medline].

  3. Stark J, Aberdeen E, Waterston DJ, et al. Pulmonary artery constriction (banding): a report of 146 cases. Surgery. 1969 May. 65(5):808-18. [Medline].

  4. Hunt CE, Formanek G, Levine MA, et al. Banding of the pulmonary artery. Results in 111 children. Circulation. 1971 Mar. 43(3):395-406. [Medline].

  5. Thomson NB Jr, Niguidula FN, Hohn A. Correction of complete atrioventricular canal defect in patients with previous pulmonary artery banding. Am J Cardiol. 1966 Nov. 18(5):769-76. [Medline].

  6. Somerville J, Agnew T, Stark J, et al. Banding of the pulmonary artery for common atrioventricular canal. Br Heart J. 1967 Nov. 29(6):816-28. [Medline].

  7. Epstein ML, Moller JH, Amplatz K, Nicoloff DM. Pulmonary artery banding in infants with complete atrioventricular canal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Jul. 78(1):28-31. [Medline].

  8. Tingelstad JB, Lower RR, Howell TR, Eldredge WJ. Pulmonary artery banding in tricuspid atresia without transposed great arteries. Am J Dis Child. 1971 May. 121(5):434-7. [Medline].

  9. McNicholas K, de Leval M, Stark J, et al. Surgical treatment of ventricular septal defect in infancy. Primary repair versus banding of pulmonary artery and later repair. Br Heart J. 1979 Feb. 41(2):133-8. [Medline].

  10. Oldham HN Jr, Kakos GS, Jarmakani MM, Sabiston DC Jr. Pulmonary artery banding in infants with complex congenital heart defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 1972 Apr. 13(4):342-50. [Medline].

  11. Silverman N, Levitsky S, Fisher E, et al. Efficacy of pulmonary artery banding in infants with complete atrioventricular canal. Circulation. 1983 Sep. 68(3 Pt 2):II148-53. [Medline].

  12. Sasaki T, Takahashi Y, Ando M, Wada N, Kawase Y, Seki H. Bilateral pulmonary artery banding for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related anomalies. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Apr. 56(4):158-62. [Medline].

  13. Moodie DS, Ritter DG, Tajik AH, et al. Long-term follow-up after palliative operation for univentricular heart. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 1. 53(11):1648-51. [Medline].

  14. Juaneda E, Haworth SG. Double inlet ventricle. Lung biopsy findings and implications for management. Br Heart J. 1985 May. 53(5):515-9. [Medline].

  15. Murugesan C, Banakal SK, Garg R, Keshavamurthy S, Muralidhar K. The efficacy of aprotinin in arterial switch operations in infants. Anesth Analg. 2008 Sep. 107(3):783-7. [Medline].

  16. Sievers HH, Lange PE, Arensman FW, et al. Influence of two-stage anatomic correction on size and distensibility of the anatomic pulmonary/functional aortic root in patients with simple transposition of the great arteries. Circulation. 1984 Aug. 70(2):202-8. [Medline].

  17. Yacoub MH, Radley-Smith R, Maclaurin R. Two-stage operation for anatomical correction of transposition of the great arteries with intact interventricular septum. Lancet. 1977 Jun 18. 1(8025):1275-8. [Medline].

  18. Chang AC, Wernovsky G, Wessel DL, et al. Surgical management of late right ventricular failure after Mustard or Senning repair. Circulation. 1992 Nov. 86(5 Suppl):II140-9. [Medline].

  19. Winlaw DS, McGuirk SP, Balmer C. Intention-to-treat analysis of pulmonary artery banding in conditions with a morphological right ventricle in the systemic circulation with a view to anatomic biventricular repair. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1. 111(4):405-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  20. Duncan BW, Mee RB, Mesia CI, et al. Results of the double switch operation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jul. 24(1):11-9; discussion 19-20. [Medline].

  21. Duncan BW, Mee RB, Mesia CI. Results of the double switch operation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiovasc Surg. 2003. 24(1):11-19. [Medline].

  22. Ly M, Belli E, Leobon B, et al. Results of the double switch operation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Apr 3. [Medline].

  23. Quinn DW, McGuirk SP, Metha C, et al. The morphologic left ventricle that requires training by means of pulmonary artery banding before the double-switch procedure for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries is at risk of late dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 May. 135(5):1137-44, 1144.e1-2. [Medline].

  24. Franklin RC, Sullivan ID, Anderson RH, et al. Is banding of the pulmonary trunk obsolete for infants with tricuspid atresia and double inlet ventricle with a discordant ventriculoarterial connection? Role of aortic arch obstruction and subaortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov. 16(6):1455-64. [Medline].

  25. Huddleston CB, Canter CE, Spray TL. Damus-Kaye-Stansel with cavopulmonary connection for single ventricle and subaortic obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Feb. 55(2):339-45; discussion 346. [Medline].

  26. Rodefeld MD, Ruzmetov M, Schamberger MS, et al. Staged surgical repair of functional single ventricle in infants with unobstructed pulmonary blood flow. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. 27(6):949-55. [Medline].

  27. Freedom RM, Sondheimer H, Sische R, Rowe RD. Development of "subaortic stenosis" after pulmonary arterial banding for common ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Jan. 39(1):78-83. [Medline].

  28. Caspi J, Coles JG, Rabinovich M, et al. Morphological findings contributing to a failed Fontan procedure. Twelve-year experience. Circulation. 1990 Nov. 82(5 Suppl):IV177-82. [Medline].

  29. Malcic I, Sauer U, Stern H, et al. The influence of pulmonary artery banding on outcome after the Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Sep. 104(3):743-7. [Medline].

  30. Stein DG, Laks H, Drinkwater DC, et al. Results of total cavopulmonary connection in the treatment of patients with a functional single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Aug. 102(2):280-6; discussion 286-7. [Medline].

  31. Tomoyasu T, Miyaji K, Miyamoto T, Inoue N. The bilateral pulmonary artery banding for hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a diminutive ascending aorta. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr. 8(4):479-81. [Medline].

  32. Gibbs JL, Wren C, Watterson KG, et al. Stenting of the arterial duct combined with banding of the pulmonary arteries and atrial septectomy or septostomy: a new approach to palliation for the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Br Heart J. 1993 Jun. 69(6):551-5. [Medline].

  33. Lim DS, Peeler BB, Matherne GP, et al. Risk-stratified approach to hybrid transcatheter-surgical palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006. 27(1):91-95. [Medline].

  34. Pizarro C, Norwood WI. Pulmonary artery banding before Norwood procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Mar. 75(3):1008-10. [Medline].

  35. Ishizaka T, Ohye RG, Suzuki T, et al. Bilateral pulmonary artery banding for resuscitation in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jan. 75(1):277-9. [Medline].

  36. Michel-Behnke I, Akintuerk H, Marquardt I, et al. Stenting of the ductus arteriosus and banding of the pulmonary arteries: basis for various surgical strategies in newborns with multiple left heart obstructive lesions. Heart. 2003 Jun. 89(6):645-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  37. Assad R, Devine C. Adjustable pulmonary artery banding system. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2008 Dec. 23(4):591. [Medline].

  38. Davis MC. Use of a new implantable adjustable pulmonary artery banding device: a report of two patients. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008 Mar. 40(1):65-7. [Medline].

  39. Trusler GA, Mustard WT. A method of banding the pulmonary artery for large isolated ventricular septal defect with and without transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 1972 Apr. 13(4):351-5. [Medline].

  40. Albus RA, Trusler GA, Izukawa T, Williams WG. Pulmonary artery banding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984 Nov. 88(5 Pt 1):645-53. [Medline].

  41. Laks H, Odim JN, Sadeghi AM, Allada V. The incisional pulmonary artery band. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun. 67(6):1813-4. [Medline].

  42. Holmström H, Bjørnstad PG, Smevik B, Lindberg H. Balloon dilatation of pulmonary artery banding: Norwegian experience over more than 20 years. Oct 9, 2009. [Medline].

  43. Simpson IA, Valdes-Cruz LM, Berthoty DP, et al. Cine magnetic resonance imaging and color Doppler flow mapping in infants and children with pulmonary artery bands. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Jun 15. 71(16):1419-26. [Medline].

  44. Yasui H, Kado H, Yonenaga K, et al. Arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries, with special reference to left ventricular function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Oct. 98(4):601-10. [Medline].

  45. Wernovsky G, Giglia TM, Jonas RA, et al. Course in the intensive care unit after ''preparatory'' pulmonary artery banding and aortopulmonary shunt placement for transposition of the great arteries with low left ventricular pressure. Circulation. 1992 Nov. 86(5 Suppl):II133-9. [Medline].

  46. Davies RR, Radtke WA, Klenk D, Pizarro C. Bilateral pulmonary arterial banding results in an increased need for subsequent pulmonary artery interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb. 147(2):706-12. [Medline].

  47. Robertson MA, Penkoske PA, Duncan NF. Right pulmonary artery obstruction after pulmonary artery banding. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Jan. 51(1):73-5. [Medline].

  48. Fletcher BD, Garcia EJ, Colenda C, Borkat G. Reduced lung volume associated with acquired pulmonary artery obstruction in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979 Jul. 133(1):47-52. [Medline].

  49. Steussy HF, Caldwell RL, Wills ER, Waller BF. High takeoff of the left main coronary artery from the pulmonary trunk: potentially fatal combination with pulmonary trunk banding. Am Heart J. 1984 Sep. 108(3 Pt 1):619-21. [Medline].

  50. Daskalopoulos DA, Edwards WD, Driscoll DJ, et al. Fatal pulmonary artery banding in truncus arteriosus with anomalous origin of circumflex coronary artery from right pulmonary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Dec 1. 52(10):1363-4. [Medline].

  51. Warnecke I, Bein G, Bucherl ES. The relevance of intraoperative pressure and oxygen saturation monitoring during pulmonary artery banding in infancy. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989 Feb. 3(1):31-6. [Medline].

  52. Kutsche LM, Alexander JA, Van Mierop LH. Hemolytic anemia secondary to erosion of a Silastic band into the lumen of the pulmonary trunk. Am J Cardiol. 1985 May 1. 55(11):1438-9. [Medline].

  53. Garcia EJ, Riggs T, Hirschfeld S, Liebman J. Echocardiographic assessment of the adequacy of pulmonary arterial banding. Am J Cardiol. 1979 Sep. 44(3):487-92. [Medline].

  54. Danilowicz D, Presti S, Colvin S. The disappearing pulmonary artery band. Pediatr Cardiol. 1990 Jan. 11(1):47-9. [Medline].

  55. Horowitz MD, Culpepper WS 3rd, Williams LC 3rd, et al. Pulmonary artery banding: analysis of a 25-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Sep. 48(3):444-50. [Medline].

  56. Mahle S, Nicoloff DM, Knight L, Moller JH. Pulmonary artery banding: long-term results in 63 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979 Mar. 27(3):216-24. [Medline].

  57. Kron IL, Nolan SP, Flanagan TL, et al. Pulmonary artery banding revisited. Ann Surg. 1989 May. 209(5):642-7; discussion 647. [Medline].

  58. Dajee H, Benson L, Laks H. An improved method of pulmonary artery banding. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984 Mar. 37(3):254-7. [Medline].

  59. Takayama H, Sekiguchi A, Chikada M, et al. Mortality of pulmonary artery banding in the current era: recent mortality of PA banding. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Oct. 74(4):1219-23; discussion 1223-4. [Medline].

  60. Piluiko VV, Poynter JA, Nemeh H, et al. Efficacy of intraluminal pulmonary artery banding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. 129(3):544-50. [Medline].

  61. Le Bret E, Bonhoeffer P, Folliguet TA, et al. A new percutaneously adjustable, thoracoscopically implantable, pulmonary artery banding: an experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001. 72(4):1358-61. [Medline].

  62. Leeuwenburgh BP, Schoof PH, Steendijk P, et al. Chronic and adjustable pulmonary artery banding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003. 125(2):231-7. [Medline].

  63. Bonnet D, Corno AF, Sidi D, et al. Early clinical results of the telemetric adjustable pulmonary artery banding FloWatch-PAB. Circulation. 2004 Sep 14. 110(11 Suppl 1):II158-63. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  64. Corno AF, Bonnet D, Sekarski N, et al. Remote control of pulmonary blood flow: initial clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003. 126(6):1775-80. [Medline].

  65. Brooks A, Geldenhuys A, Zuhlke L, Human P, Zilla P. Pulmonary artery banding: still a valuable option in developing countries?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Feb. 41(2):272-6. [Medline].

  66. Valente AS, Mesquita F, Mejia JA, Maia IC, Maior MS, Branco KC, et al. Pulmonary artery banding: a simple procedure? A critical analysis at a tertiary center. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovas. 2009. 24(3):327-33. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
The left anterior thoracotomy approach through the second or third intercostal space gives excellent exposure for isolated pulmonary artery banding. Note anatomy of the adjacent structures with medial limits of the incision at the internal mammary vessels. The thymus is swept superiorly away from the phrenic nerve. PA = pulmonary artery; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus.
Safe placement of a pulmonary artery band: (A) encircling the aortopulmonary trunk, (B) encircling the aorta, and (C) completing the pulmonary artery band at the final location.
Pulmonary artery banding technique (A-C) using a premeasured Trusler formula adjusted to the cardiac anatomy and physiology. An adjustable device is placed over a felt pledget with adventitial fixation sutures to prevent distal migration. Additional fixation sutures may be placed in the band itself. Each additional medium hemoclip causes approximately 1 mm of change in band circumference. Distal pulmonary artery pressure is measured during tightening.
Circumferential banding of a dilated pulmonary artery can acutely lead to internal infolding of the arterial wall. Later resorption of the infoldings and remodeling of the arterial wall restore a greater internal cross-sectional area.
Incisional pulmonary artery band yields a fixed reduction of 40% of the vessel diameter before application of a circumferential band.
(A) A partial Senning technique for improved mixing and saturation and providing both volume and afterload to the left ventricle after pulmonary artery banding. Autologous pericardium is used to baffle the inferior vena cava and the left pulmonary veins across the mitral valve into the left (pulmonary) ventricle, with superior vena cava and right pulmonary vein drainage to the systemic ventricle. The band is best positioned distally to avoid valvular damage in anticipation of the arterial switch procedure. (B) Pulmonary artery banding combined with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt for rapid preparation of the left ventricle and the arterial switch procedure. This provides left ventricular volume and afterload and can be performed through a left lateral thoracotomy, avoiding the need for a resternotomy at the time of arterial switch. Careful measurement of the proximal pulmonary artery pressure is shown to avoid overtightening the band. PA = pulmonary artery.
Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery after band removal may be accomplished by patch arterioplasty using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium (A) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) material (B) or resection of the band site and end-to-end anastomosis using absorbable running sutures (C).
 
Medscape Consult
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.