eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: Developmental and Behavioral > Medical Topics
Learning Disorder: Mathematics: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Dec 17, 2008
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
Differential Diagnoses
Other Problems to Be Considered
Mathematical learning disorder may be associated with other neurodevelopmental or neuropsychological abnormalities; recognizing and simultaneously treating these disorders is as important as treating the principal disability.
Workup
Procedures
Mathematics assessments play a valuable role in identifying students' strengths and weaknesses and in developing and monitoring instructional practices. The following assessment strategies are the most popular in use today.
- The term portfolio refers to collections of students' work that exhibit their efforts, progress, and achievements in single or multiple subjects. In mathematics assessment, a portfolio can be a useful tool to monitor student learning and the effectiveness of instructional programs. In assembling a portfolio, ensure that content a valid representation of curricular goals, content is collected within a time frame, and content represents various situations. Documented analysis of the student's portfolio that incorporates the following points can be used to monitor student progress on a regular basis:
- Answer correct or incorrect
- Computational skills demonstrated or lacking
- Reading errors that may have contributed to the incorrect solution
- Syntactical errors made
- Strategy used to solve problem
- Visual aids (eg, pictures, graphs) used
- Criterion-referenced test results demonstrate student knowledge of specific content that is unrelated to peer performance. These tests present a sufficient number of items to measure various aspects of mathematics skills. The tests are conducted within a specified time period (usually 1.5 times that of an average child's performance time) to identify specific skill deficiencies.
- Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a validated version of curriculum-based assessment. CBM involves ongoing measurement of a student's actual performance in comparison to the school curriculum's planned outcomes. Because CBM uses the school's curriculum as a basis for comparison, CBM provides great help to teachers on a daily basis by evaluating each student's learning rates, by determining what instruction is needed, and by ascertaining the effectiveness of interventions with individual students.
- Calculation error analysis, using structured interviews and checklists, rating scales, or both, is an efficient way to identify a student's calculation strategies. Checklists and rating scales can be used to note strategies used during the interview or strategies observed while the student performs a calculation. Checklists can be dichotomous (yes/no) responses or can use Likert scale (ie, sliding scales ranging from never to always). One approach is for the interviewer to give a student a problem and then ask the student to "think out loud" while working on the solution.
- Observations provide valuable data, which should be combined with data accumulated via other strategies to assess the overall effectiveness of instructional efforts. Within the instructional context, teachers continually make informal judgments about student progress.
- Gathering information about a student's motivation and confidence level during an instructional activity sometimes proves helpful. Students may respond to a brief survey of questions about their confidence level and any difficulties they encounter.
More on Learning Disorder: Mathematics |
| Overview: Learning Disorder: Mathematics |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Learning Disorder: Mathematics |
| Treatment & Medication: Learning Disorder: Mathematics |
| Follow-up: Learning Disorder: Mathematics |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
US Department of Education. Seventeenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington DC: US office of Special Education Programs;1995.
Berch DB. Making sense of number sense: implications for children with mathematical disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Jul-Aug 2005;38(4):333-9. [Medline].
Levine MD, Lindsay RL, Reed MS. The wrath of math. Deficiencies of mathematical mastery in the school child. Pediatr Clin North Am. Jun 1992;39(3):525-36. [Medline].
Gersten R, Jordan NC, Flojo JR. Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. J Learn Disabil. Jul-Aug 2005;38(4):293-304. [Medline].
IDEA—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Available at http://www.nichcy.org/Laws/IDEA/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 12/7/08.
AACAP. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with language and learning disorders. AACAP. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. Oct 1998;37(10 Suppl):46S-62S. [Medline].
Badian NA. Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. In: Myklebust HR, ed. Progress in learning disabilities. Vol 5. New York, NY: Stratton; 235-64.
Brainerd CJ. Young children's mental arithmetic errors: A working memory analysis. Child Dev. 1983;812-16.
Bryant BR, Rivera DP. Educational assessment of mathematics skills and abilities. J Learn Disabil. Jan-Feb 1997;30(1):57-68. [Medline].
Carnine D. Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):130-41. [Medline].
Challinor J, Moore IK, Kramer R, et al. Development and testing of the School Competency Assessment Scale. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. Mar-Apr 2003;20(2):56-64. [Medline].
Dirks E, Spyer G, van Lieshout EC, de Sonneville L. Prevalence of combined reading and arithmetic disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Sep-Oct 2008;41(5):460-73. [Medline].
Earp NW, Tanner FW. Mathematics and Language. Arithmetic Teacher. 1980;28:32-38.
Engelmann S, Carnine D, Steely DG. Making connections in mathematics. J Learn Disabil. May 1991;24(5):292-303. [Medline].
Geary DC. Mathematical disabilities: cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychol Bull. Sep 1993;114(2):345-62. [Medline].
Goldman SR, Hasselbring TS. Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):198-208. [Medline].
Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM. Exceptional learners: Introduction to Special Education. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1997.
Hammill DD, Bryant BR. Standardized assessment and academic intervention. In: Swanson HL, ed. Handbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research and Practice. Pro Ed;1991:373-406.
Kosc L. Developmental dyscalculia. J Learn Disabil. 1974;7:46.
LD Online. Available at http://www.ldonline.org/. Accessed February 23, 2006.
Levine MD. Developmental Variations and Learning Disabilities. Cambridge MA: Educators Pub; 1987.
Patton JR, Cronin ME, Bassett DS, Koppel AE. A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):178-87. [Medline].
Rivera DP. Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: introduction to the special series. J Learn Disabil. Jan-Feb 1997;30(1):2-19, 68. [Medline].
Yell ML, Shriner JG. The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. 1997;30:1-20.
Further Reading
Keywords
mathematic learning disorder, MD, dyscalculia, reading disorder, RD, learning disability, cognitive development, linguistic development, perceptual disabilities, brain injury, dyslexia, developmental aphasia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Learning Disorder: Mathematics