Mathematics Learning Disorder Workup

  • Author: Vidhu V Thaker, MBBCh, MD; Chief Editor: Caroly Pataki, MD   more...
 
Updated: Nov 16, 2011
 

Procedures

Mathematics assessments play a valuable role in identifying students' strengths and weaknesses and in developing and monitoring instructional practices. The following assessment strategies are the most popular in use today.

  • The term portfolio refers to collections of students' work that exhibit their efforts, progress, and achievements in single or multiple subjects. In mathematics assessment, a portfolio can be a useful tool to monitor student learning and the effectiveness of instructional programs. In assembling a portfolio, ensure that content a valid representation of curricular goals, content is collected within a time frame, and content represents various situations. Documented analysis of the student's portfolio that incorporates the following points can be used to monitor student progress on a regular basis:
    • Answer correct or incorrect
    • Computational skills demonstrated or lacking
    • Reading errors that may have contributed to the incorrect solution
    • Syntactical errors made
    • Strategy used to solve problem
    • Visual aids (eg, pictures, graphs) used
  • Criterion-referenced test results demonstrate student knowledge of specific content that is unrelated to peer performance. These tests present a sufficient number of items to measure various aspects of mathematics skills. The tests are conducted within a specified time period (usually 1.5 times that of an average child's performance time) to identify specific skill deficiencies.
  • Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a validated version of curriculum-based assessment. CBM involves ongoing measurement of a student's actual performance in comparison to the school curriculum's planned outcomes. Because CBM uses the school's curriculum as a basis for comparison, CBM provides great help to teachers on a daily basis by evaluating each student's learning rates, by determining what instruction is needed, and by ascertaining the effectiveness of interventions with individual students.
    • Calculation error analysis, using structured interviews and checklists, rating scales, or both, is an efficient way to identify a student's calculation strategies. Checklists and rating scales can be used to note strategies used during the interview or strategies observed while the student performs a calculation. Checklists can be dichotomous (yes/no) responses or can use Likert scale (ie, sliding scales ranging from never to always). One approach is for the interviewer to give a student a problem and then ask the student to "think out loud" while working on the solution.
    • Observations provide valuable data, which should be combined with data accumulated via other strategies to assess the overall effectiveness of instructional efforts. Within the instructional context, teachers continually make informal judgments about student progress.
  • Gathering information about a student's motivation and confidence level during an instructional activity sometimes proves helpful. Students may respond to a brief survey of questions about their confidence level and any difficulties they encounter.
Proceed to Treatment & Management
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Vidhu V Thaker, MBBCh, MD  Attending Pediatrician, Haverstraw Pediatrics; Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, New York Medical College

Vidhu V Thaker, MBBCh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Angelo P Giardino, MD, PhD  Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine; Medical Director, Texas Children's Health Plan, Inc

Angelo P Giardino, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, Harris County Medical Society, Helfer Society, and International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect

Disclosure: Bayer Honoraria Review panel membership; Pfizer Grant/research funds Independent contractor; MedImmune Honoraria Review panel membership; Teva Pharmacutical travel & honoraria Managed Care Advisory Panel; CIGNA Honoraria Physician Advisory Council

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Carrie Sylvester, MD, MPH  Senior Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Sound Mental Health

Carrie Sylvester, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Caroly Pataki, MD  Professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Division Chair, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California

Caroly Pataki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York Academy of Sciences, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Henik A, Rubinsten O, Ashkenazi S. The "where" and "what" in developmental dyscalculia. Clin Neuropsychol. Aug 2011;25(6):989-1008. [Medline].

  2. Butterworth B, Varma S, Laurillard D. Dyscalculia: from brain to education. Science. May 27 2011;332(6033):1049-53. [Medline].

  3. US Department of Education. Seventeenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington DC: US office of Special Education Programs;1995.

  4. Berch DB. Making sense of number sense: implications for children with mathematical disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Jul-Aug 2005;38(4):333-9. [Medline].

  5. Rubinsten O, Sury D. Processing ordinality and quantity: the case of developmental dyscalculia. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24079. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Mussolin C, Martin R, Schiltz C. Relationships between number and space processing in adults with and without dyscalculia. Acta Psychol (Amst). Sep 2011;138(1):193-203. [Medline].

  7. Kaufmann L, Wood G, Rubinsten O, Henik A. Meta-analyses of developmental fMRI studies investigating typical and atypical trajectories of number processing and calculation. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(6):763-87. [Medline].

  8. Mazzocco MM, Feigenson L, Halberda J. Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Dev. Jul-Aug 2011;82(4):1224-37. [Medline].

  9. Levine MD, Lindsay RL, Reed MS. The wrath of math. Deficiencies of mathematical mastery in the school child. Pediatr Clin North Am. Jun 1992;39(3):525-36. [Medline].

  10. Gersten R, Jordan NC, Flojo JR. Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. J Learn Disabil. Jul-Aug 2005;38(4):293-304. [Medline].

  11. IDEA—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Available at http://www.nichcy.org/Laws/IDEA/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 12/7/08.

  12. AACAP. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with language and learning disorders. AACAP. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. Oct 1998;37(10 Suppl):46S-62S. [Medline].

  13. Badian NA. Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. In: Myklebust HR, ed. Progress in learning disabilities. Vol 5. New York, NY: Stratton; 235-64.

  14. Brainerd CJ. Young children's mental arithmetic errors: A working memory analysis. Child Dev. 1983;812-16.

  15. Bryant BR, Rivera DP. Educational assessment of mathematics skills and abilities. J Learn Disabil. Jan-Feb 1997;30(1):57-68. [Medline].

  16. Carnine D. Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):130-41. [Medline].

  17. Challinor J, Moore IK, Kramer R, et al. Development and testing of the School Competency Assessment Scale. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. Mar-Apr 2003;20(2):56-64. [Medline].

  18. Dirks E, Spyer G, van Lieshout EC, de Sonneville L. Prevalence of combined reading and arithmetic disabilities. J Learn Disabil. Sep-Oct 2008;41(5):460-73. [Medline].

  19. Earp NW, Tanner FW. Mathematics and Language. Arithmetic Teacher. 1980;28:32-38.

  20. Engelmann S, Carnine D, Steely DG. Making connections in mathematics. J Learn Disabil. May 1991;24(5):292-303. [Medline].

  21. Geary DC. Mathematical disabilities: cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychol Bull. Sep 1993;114(2):345-62. [Medline].

  22. Goldman SR, Hasselbring TS. Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):198-208. [Medline].

  23. Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM. Exceptional learners: Introduction to Special Education. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1997.

  24. Hammill DD, Bryant BR. Standardized assessment and academic intervention. In: Swanson HL, ed. Handbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research and Practice. Pro Ed;1991:373-406.

  25. Kosc L. Developmental dyscalculia. J Learn Disabil. 1974;7:46.

  26. LD Online. Available at http://www.ldonline.org/. Accessed February 23, 2006.

  27. Levine MD. Developmental Variations and Learning Disabilities. Cambridge MA: Educators Pub; 1987.

  28. Patton JR, Cronin ME, Bassett DS, Koppel AE. A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. J Learn Disabil. Mar-Apr 1997;30(2):178-87. [Medline].

  29. Rivera DP. Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: introduction to the special series. J Learn Disabil. Jan-Feb 1997;30(1):2-19, 68. [Medline].

  30. Yell ML, Shriner JG. The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. 1997;30:1-20.

 
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.