eMedicine Specialties > Sports Medicine > Shoulder

Rotator Cuff Injury

Author: Gerard A Malanga, MD, Founder and Director, New Jersey Sports Medicine Institute; Director of Pain Management, Overlook Hospital; Director of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine Fellowship Director, Mountainside Hospital; Clinical Chief, Rehabilitation Medicine and Electrodiagnosis, St Michael's Medical Center; Medical Director, Consultant, Horizon Healthcare Worker's Compensation Services, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Worker's Compensation
Coauthor(s): Christopher J Visco, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Rehabilitation, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; Stephen G Andrus, MD, Sports Medicine Fellow, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; Jay E Bowen, DO, Assistant Professor, Clinical Coordinator Sports Medicine Fellowship, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kessler Rehabilitation Corporation
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 29, 2009

Introduction

Background

Rotator cuff injuries are a common cause of shoulder pain in people of all age groups. They represent a spectrum of disease, ranging from acute reversible tendinitis to massive tears involving the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis. Diagnosis is usually made through detailed history, physical examination, and often, imaging studies.1,2,3,4,5

Often, younger individuals with rotator cuff injuries relate a history of repetitive overhead activities involving the rotator cuff or, less commonly, a history of trauma preceding clinical onset of symptoms. In contrast, older individuals usually present with a gradual onset of shoulder pain and, ultimately, after radiographic testing is shown to have significant partial or full rotator cuff tears without a clear history of predisposing trauma. Nonoperative or conservative treatment is usually sufficient to heal the problem in the vast majority of individuals, with a few exceptions that are discussed.1,2,3,4,5

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Hand, Wrist, Elbow, and Shoulder Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Rotator Cuff Injury and Shoulder and Neck Pain.

Related eMedicine topics:
Overuse Injury
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Rotator Cuff Pathology
Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Injury (MRI)
Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Injury (Ultrasonography)

Frequency

United States

The frequency of full-thickness rotator cuff tears ranges from 5-40%, with an increasing incidence of cuff pathology in advanced age. Cadaveric studies by Bigliani et al found that 39% of individuals older than 60 years had full-thickness rotator cuff tears with an even higher incidence of partial tears.6

Functional Anatomy

Normal shoulder motion1,3,7,8,9,10,11,12

The shoulder complex is comprised of several joints, including the sternoclavicular joint, acromioclavicular joint, glenohumeral (GH) joint, and scapulothoracic (ST) joint or pseudoarticulation. These articulations work together to carry out normal shoulder motion. The majority of motion occurs at the GH and ST joints. A rhythm between these 2 areas of motion has been described.

The GH–to–ST motion ratio of total shoulder motion is 2:1 (ie, 180° of abduction, consisting of 120° of GH motion and 60° of ST motion). The 2:1 ratio is an average over the entire arc of motion. This ratio changes through the arc of motion (ie, the 2:1 ratio is not constant throughout the entire range of motion [ROM]). In the initial portion of abduction, GH motion predominates and the ratio is 4:4 (GH:ST). As the shoulder moves above 90° of abduction, this ratio becomes 1:1° GH to 1° ST motion.

The importance of the scapula in normal shoulder motion cannot be overstated. The scapula, with the glenoid as its contact point, forms the platform for humeral head articulation and motion. A stable platform is essential for normal shoulder biomechanics in everyday activities and is crucial for high-demand activities (eg, overhead sports or work).13

The scapula must glide along the chest wall as it protracts and retracts during normal shoulder movements. Scapular winging results in glenoid antetilting, which results in functional elevation of the humeral head and impingement of the rotator cuff. In addition, without scapular motion, the origin and insertion of the deltoid approximate each other, resulting in a decreased optimal length-tension relationship and a decrease in force as the shoulder abducts. Normal scapular motion allows the deltoid to maintain its length-tension relationship and generate adequate force.

Stabilizers of the shoulder

The shoulder is considered a ball-in-socket joint, although the glenoid fossa is flat. In addition, the surface area of the glenoid is much smaller than that of the contacting humeral head (25-30%). The cartilaginous labrum provides much of the socket function and increases the surface area of contact for the humeral head.

Together, these components provide a great amount of shoulder mobility with limited stability. Shoulder stabilizers can be grossly categorized as static or dynamic. Dynamic stabilizers require an intact neuromuscular system to function, whereas static stabilizers help maintain congruity.
The static stabilizers have been studied well in cadaver specimens to understand their stabilizing effects. Static stabilizers continue to function in the setting of neurologic or intrinsic muscle pathology in conditions such as hemiplegia, spinal cord injury, brachial plexus injury, suprascapular nerve injury, and myopathies. This is not true for the dynamic stabilizers (eg, rotator cuff muscles). With neuromuscular injury or intrinsic muscle damage, the dynamic stabilizers lose their ability to exert dynamic motor control of the humeral head, ultimately leading to GH laxity and shoulder pain.

Static stabilizers

Static stabilizers include the bony structures, labrum, GH ligaments, and joint capsule. Unlike the hip joint, the bony articulation of the shoulder offers little stability. This is due to the limited contact area of the glenoid with the humeral head, flattened architecture, and retroverted positioning. The labrum is a fibrous structure that attaches to the glenoid to increase the contact area and deepen the socket of the glenoid up to 50%, forming a concave surface. Three GH ligaments exist, as follows: superior, middle, and inferior. The inferior GH ligament is the most important for shoulder stability and has 3 components — anterior, inferior, and posterior —t herefore, it is more appropriately referred to as the inferior GH complex.

Dynamic stabilizers14

Dynamic stabilizers include the rotator and scapular stabilizers (ie, teres major, rhomboids, serratus anterior, trapezius, levator scapula). The rotator cuff is composed of 4 muscles: the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor. The supraspinatus is the principal supporting and kinetic muscle of the shoulder. The primary function of the rotator cuff muscles is to stabilize the GH joint so that the larger shoulder movers (eg, deltoid, latissimus dorsi) can carry out their function without significant motion of the humeral head on the glenoid. Increased movement results in shearing forces across the joint (to the labrum, in particular) and may result in humeral head migration and impingement upon the rotator cuff muscles and tendons.

The rotator cuff muscles are associated and assist with some shoulder motion; however, their main function is to provide stability to the joint by compressing the humeral head on the glenoid. The supraspinatus assists in shoulder abduction by maintaining the humeral head centered on the glenoid, with the middle deltoid acting as the primary mover. These muscles act as force couples, because they work synergistically to carry out a particular movement.
 
Electromyography (EMG) studies have demonstrated a high degree of supraspinatus activity during the initial 30° of abduction. This has been misinterpreted to imply that the supraspinatus initiates shoulder abduction and acts to abduct the shoulder in the first 30°. In actuality, the supraspinatus fires to stabilize the GH joint as the deltoid abducts the arm.15,16,17,18,19

Increased EMG activity in the supraspinatus during the initial 30° is a reflection of increased firing requirements of this muscle to stabilize the GH joint as the deltoid is activated. The infraspinatus and teres minor muscles assist in external rotation of the shoulder and also provide an inferior pull upon the humeral head, assisting in its centering during overhead activity. The subscapularis muscle participates in this centering but also acts with the pectoralis muscles and latissimus dorsi as an internal rotator of the shoulder, serving as the main internal rotators of the shoulder.

Weakness or insufficiency of the rotator cuff muscles results in increasing demands on the static stabilizers. If these demands are long term or recurrent, static stabilizers may begin to fail. This can result in stretching or attenuation of the capsule, which results in even greater shoulder laxity and greater demands on the already weak rotator cuff muscles. Humeral head migration may occur with capsule laxity and result in rotator cuff impingement and pain. Pain may inhibit rotator cuff muscle firing, leading to disuse and further weakening of the dynamic stabilizers with greater demands placed on the static stabilizers.

Increased humeral head translation can also lead to shearing and injury to the glenoid labrum. Rotator cuff impingement, tendinitis, and labral pathology are commonly encountered injury patterns in athletes and workers who perform overhead motions. Focusing solely on the static stabilizers in treatment neglects the dynamic structures that probably initiate and perpetuate the cycle.

Sport-Specific Biomechanics

A similar type of motion is involved in a number of overhead sports activities (eg, serving in tennis, spiking in volleyball, throwing a football or baseball). The baseball throwing motion has been studied in detail and can be divided into 5 stages.

  • Stage 1 is the wind-up phase. EMG studies have determined that the rotator cuff muscles are inactive during this initial stage.
  • Stage 2 is the early cocking stage and involves shoulder external rotation and abduction supplied primarily by the deltoid.
  • Stage 3 is the late cocking stage, which continues until maximal external rotation is achieved. The rotator cuff muscles are very active during this stage, especially the subscapularis, which eccentrically contracts and acts as a dynamic stabilizer.
  • Stage 4 is the acceleration stage, which begins with internal rotation of the humerus and ends with release of the baseball. During this phase, the pectoralis major and the latissimus dorsi are very active, whereas the muscles of the rotator cuff are inactive.
  • Stage 5 is the follow-through of the baseball pitch, where deceleration takes place. During this phase, the rotator cuff muscles and the posterior deltoid are most active. The supraspinatus eccentrically contracts to decelerate internal rotation of the limb.

Proper balance between the concentrically contracting muscles that generate force and the eccentrically contracting muscles that control movement is important. Imbalance between these opposing muscle groups results in overuse of muscles and, ultimately, overuse injuries of the shoulder. Note that a great deal of the force generated in overhead sports occurs in the trunk and lower extremity, and these areas should be targeted in any conditioning program for athletes who throw.

Clinical

History

A detailed history is important to diagnose a rotator cuff injury and can help rule out other diagnoses in the differential (eg, referred pain from the cervical spine, more serious referred symptoms of cardiac origin) (see Differential Diagnoses and Other Problems to Be Considered).

  • First, determine the patient's chief symptom (eg, pain, weakness, instability, limited ROM).
  • Direct further questions at how and when the problem began.
  • Determine if the patient's symptoms are related to a specific injury or event or to a repetitive motion or are of a more insidious onset.
  • Activities and arm positions that increase or decrease symptoms are also helpful in diagnosing and guiding treatment. Previous episodes of similar symptoms may give a useful clue to the patient's present condition.
  • The presence of associated symptoms (eg, instability, weakness, swelling, numbness, loss of motion, catching or popping of the shoulder) also provides helpful information.
  • Ask if previous treatments have been tried, including the use of ice, heat, or medications (eg, acetaminophen, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]).
  • Questions regarding previous medical treatment should include physical therapy, previous injections, and any surgical interventions.
  • A social history should include the patient's occupation and sport (including position) and level of athletic participation.
  • Pain, weakness, and loss of shoulder motion are common symptoms reported with rotator cuff pathology. Pain is often felt over the anterolateral part of the shoulder and is exacerbated by overhead activities. Night pain is a frequent symptom, especially when the patient lies on the affected shoulder.
  • Symptoms may be relatively acute, either following an injury or associated with a known repetitive overuse activity.
  • In elderly patients, symptoms are often insidious and with no specific injury. Repetitive motion can be associated with the symptoms.

Physical

Approach the shoulder examination systematically in every patient with a suspected rotator cuff injuries. Expose the entire shoulder and perform inspection, palpation, ROM testing, motor strength testing, and special shoulder tests as clinically indicated.

  • Inspection
    • Examination begins with patient observation during the history portion of evaluation.
    • Carefully inspect the shoulder from the anterior, lateral, and posterior positions.
    • Note any swelling, atrophy, asymmetry, or other findings.
    • Supraspinatus and infraspinatus atrophy can be observed in massive rotator cuff tears and in entrapments of the suprascapular nerve.
    • Scapular winging is rare in rotator cuff injuries; however, ST motion abnormalities are often present and should be addressed as part of the treatment plan.
  • Palpation
    • Tenderness is often localized to the greater tuberosity and subacromial bursa.
    • The biceps tendon is palpated anteriorly in the bicipital groove and can become inflamed and painful in this condition.
  • ROM: Evaluate total active and passive ROM in all planes and scapulohumeral rhythm.
    • Maximal total elevation occurs in the plane of the scapula, which lies approximately 30° forward of the coronal plane.
    • Patients with rotator cuff tears tend to have a decrease in GH motion and an increase in ST motion during active shoulder elevation.
    • Decreased active elevation with normal passive ROM is usually observed in rotator cuff tears secondary to pain and weakness. When both active and passive ROM are decreased similarly, this usually suggests onset of adhesive capsulitis.
    • Assess internal rotation by having the patient reach an extended thumb up the spine.
      • Patients with normal internal rotation reach the T5-T10 level.
      • Note that overhand throwers often develop excess external rotation (up to 15-20°) on the throwing side, which is usually accompanied by loss of internal rotation on the same side.  
    • Note any accompanying pain and specific pain location in ROM testing.
    • The impingement syndrome associated with rotator cuff injuries tends to cause pain with elevation ranging from 60-120° when the rotator cuff tendons are compressed against the anterior acromion and coracoacromial ligament.
  • Strength testing: Perform strength testing to isolate the relevant muscles individually.
    • The anterior cuff (subscapularis) can be assessed using the lift-off test, which is performed with the arm internally rotated behind the back.
    • Lifting the hand away from the back against resistance tests the strength of the subscapularis muscle.
    • The posterior cuff (infraspinatus and teres minor) is isolated best in 90° of forward flexion with the elbow flexed to 90°, testing external rotation.
    • Significant weakness in external rotation is observed in large rotator cuff tears.
    • Using either of 2 techniques described in the literature can test the supraspinatus muscle.
      • Jobe and Moynes suggested that the best position for isolating the supraspinatus is with the elbow extended, the shoulder in full internal rotation, and the arm in the scapular plane (thumbs down position).20
      • In another report, Blackburn et al recommended testing in the prone position, with the elbow extended and the shoulder abducted to 100° and externally rotated while the patient lifts in abduction (thumbs up position).17
      • Malanga et al noted that although both techniques significantly activate the supraspinatus muscle, neither truly isolates this muscle for testing because other muscles are active in both positions.21   
    • Dropping of the arm in either position usually indicates a significant supraspinatus muscle tear. More subtle weakness may represent early degeneration of the rotator cuff.
    • Testing of the scapula rotators (trapezius and serratus anterior) is also important. Serratus anterior weakness can be observed by having the patient lean against a wall. Winging of the scapula as the patient pushes against the wall indicates serratus anterior weakness.
  • Special tests
    • Drop-arm test
      • Abduct the patient's shoulder to 90° and ask the patient to lower the arm slowly to the side in the same arc of movement.
      • Severe pain or inability of the patient to return the arm to the side slowly indicates a positive test result.
      • A positive result indicates a rotator cuff tear.  
    • Neer impingement test
      • The shoulder is forcibly forward flexed and internally rotated, causing the greater tuberosity to jam against the anterior inferior surface of the acromion.
      • Pain reflects a positive test result and indicates an overuse injury to the supraspinatus muscle and possibly to the biceps tendon.
        Neer impingement test. The patient's arm is maxim...

        Neer impingement test. The patient's arm is maximally elevated through forward flexion by the examiner, causing a jamming of the greater tuberosity against the anteroinferior acromion. Pain elicited with this maneuver indicates a positive test result for impingement.

        Neer impingement test. The patient's arm is maxim...

        Neer impingement test. The patient's arm is maximally elevated through forward flexion by the examiner, causing a jamming of the greater tuberosity against the anteroinferior acromion. Pain elicited with this maneuver indicates a positive test result for impingement.

    • Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test
      • Perform this test by forward flexing the shoulder and elbow to 90° and forcibly internally rotating the shoulder.
      • Pain indicates a positive test result and is due to supraspinatus tendon and greater tuberosity impingement under the coracoacromial ligament and coracoid process.
        Hawkins test. The examiner forward flexes the arm...

        Hawkins test. The examiner forward flexes the arms to 90° and then forcibly internally rotates the shoulder. This movement pushes the supraspinatus tendon against the anterior surface of the coracoacromial ligament and coracoid process. Pain indicates a positive test result for supraspinatus tendonitis.

        Hawkins test. The examiner forward flexes the arm...

        Hawkins test. The examiner forward flexes the arms to 90° and then forcibly internally rotates the shoulder. This movement pushes the supraspinatus tendon against the anterior surface of the coracoacromial ligament and coracoid process. Pain indicates a positive test result for supraspinatus tendonitis.

    • Apprehension test
      • Abduct the arm 90° and fully externally rotate, while placing anteriorly directed force on the posterior humeral head from behind.
      • The patient becomes apprehensive and resists further motion if chronic anterior instability is present.  
    • Relocation test
      • Perform the apprehension test with the patient supine and the shoulder at the edge of the table.
      • In a positive relocation test result indicative of anterior instability, a posteriorly directed force on the proximal humerus causes resolution of the patient's apprehension and usually allows more external rotation of the humerus.

Causes

Several primary causes of rotator cuff pathology have been described, including age-related degeneration, compromised microvascular supply, and primary outlet impingement. Secondary factors (eg, GH instability) also appear to be related to rotator cuff injuries.

  • Age-related degeneration22
    • Intrinsic tendinopathy is an age-related degenerative process.
    • Uhthoff and Ozaki found an increase in frequency of partial-thickness and full-thickness tears with increasing age.
    • Increased degenerative changes are observed in athletes and workers who perform overhead motions.
  • Compromised microvascular supply
    • In 1934, Codman first described a critical zone in the supraspinatus tendon where a tenuous blood supply exists.1
    • A decrease in vascularity is noted with aging.
    • In 1970, Rathburn and Macnab showed that shoulder position is important for proper vascular supply to the rotator cuff.23
    • The term "wringing out" was coined to describe the reduced blood flow that occurs upon shoulder adduction.
    • The microvascular pattern of the supraspinatus tendon is thought to be nonhomogenic in cadavers.24
    • In 1990, Lohr and Uhthoff found that the bursal side of the supraspinatus tendon has a higher blood supply compared to the articular surface.24 This difference in blood supply is thought to contribute to the increased incidence of articular surface tears compared with bursal tears.
  • Outlet impingement
    • The rotator cuff is surrounded by the coracoacromial arch, which comprises the supraspinatus outlet and consists of the acromion, coracoacromial ligament, and coracoid process.
    • The shape of the acromion has been implicated in rotator cuff pathology.
    • Bigliani and Morrison classified 3 types of acromions based on cadaveric examination, as follows6 :
      • Type I – Flat
      • Type II – Curved
      • Type III – Hooked
    • Bigliani noted a significant increase in rotator cuff tears in curved (type II) and hooked (type III) acromions. This work has led to the belief that rotator cuff pathology occurs secondary to the type of acromion and that treatment should be directed toward correcting pathoanatomic changes by making the acromion smoother and flatter. However, debate exists concerning whether the acromion shape causes pathology to the rotator cuff or is a result of a diseased rotator cuff that secondarily causes bony changes to the acromion.
    • Neer proposed that acromial changes are secondary to rotator cuff tendinopathy.3 According to this view, the initial process is migration of the humeral head superiorly with repeated impingement, followed by secondary bony changes to the undersurface of the anterior acromion. This view was further corroborated by the work of Yamanaka and Fukuda, who found a greater incidence of partial rotator cuff tears on the articular surface of the rotator cuff rather than the bursal surface.22 If acromial changes actually caused rotator cuff tendinopathies, one would expect the opposite (ie, higher incidence of pathology on the bursal surface).
    • The rotator cuff contacts the coracoacromial arch undersurface in the normal shoulder.
    • The coracohumeral ligament is often resected in order to decompress the supraspinatus outlet, which can lead to increased superior translation of the humeral head, particularly in the young athlete.
    • Rotator cuff abrasions and fiber failure occur when repeated and excessive compression from humeral head migration is present.
    • This occurs secondary to underlying muscular imbalance and loss of rotator cuff depressor effects.
  • Instability
    • Most people with ligamentous laxity are functionally stable. In patients with inherent shoulder or generalized laxity, instability may develop with minimal or no injury.
    • Ligamentous laxity may be acquired by repetitive stretching of the joint, as observed in swimmers, gymnasts, and tennis players.
    • Dynamic stability may be lost if the shoulder becomes deconditioned. As a result, a vicious self-perpetuating cycle of instability, less use, more muscle weakness, and more instability is present.
    • These patients frequently have relative rotator cuff muscle weakness, particularly the external rotators and scapular stabilizers.
    • Subtle instability patterns may contribute to the impingement development.
    • Increased anterior and superior translation of the humeral head, as observed in athletes with generalized laxity and multidirectional instability of the shoulder, may predispose to impingement along the coracoacromial arch, resulting in rotator cuff injury.

More on Rotator Cuff Injury

Overview: Rotator Cuff Injury
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Rotator Cuff Injury
Treatment & Medication: Rotator Cuff Injury
Follow-up: Rotator Cuff Injury
Multimedia: Rotator Cuff Injury
References

References

  1. Codman EA. The Shoulder. Boston, Mass: Thomas Todd; 1934.

  2. Bierman W, Licht S. Physical Medicine in General Practice. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers; 1952:1377-80, 601.

  3. Neer CS 2nd, Welsh RP. The shoulder in sports. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1977;8(3):583-91. [Medline].

  4. Cailliet R. Shoulder Pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis Publishers; 1991:42-6.

  5. Baker CL, ed. Shoulder impingement and rotator cuff lesions. The Hughston Clinic Sports Medicine Book. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1995:272-9.

  6. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:228.

  7. Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1944;26:1-30. [Full Text].

  8. Moseley HF. Disorders of the shoulder. Clin Symp. May-Jul 1959;11(3):75-102. [Medline].

  9. Saha AK. Dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1971;42(6):491-505. [Medline].

  10. Janda DH, Loubert P. Basic science and clinical application in the athlete's shoulder. A preventative program focusing on the glenohumeral joint. Clin Sports Med. Oct 1991;10(4):955-71. [Medline].

  11. Poppen NK, Walker PS. Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1976;58(2):195-201. [Medline][Full Text].

  12. Steinbeck J, Liljenqvist U, Jerosch J. The anatomy of the glenohumeral ligamentous complex and its contribution to anterior shoulder stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Mar-Apr 1998;7(2):122-6. [Medline].

  13. Kibler WB. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1998;26(2):325-37. [Medline].

  14. Wuelker N, Korell M, Thren K. Dynamic glenohumeral joint stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Jan-Feb 1998;7(1):43-52. [Medline].

  15. Steindler A. Kinesiology of Human Body Under Normal and Pathological Conditions. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas Publishing; 1984.

  16. Jobe FW, Moynes DR, Tibone JE, Perry J. An EMG analysis of the shoulder in pitching. A second report. Am J Sports Med. May-Jun 1984;12(3):218-20. [Medline].

  17. Blackburn TA, White B, McLeod WD, Wofford L. EMG analysis of posterior rotator cuff exercises. Athl Training. 1990;25:40-5.

  18. Nuber GW, Jobe FW, Perry J, Moynes DR, Antonelli D. Fine wire electromyography analysis of muscles of the shoulder during swimming. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1986;14(1):7-11. [Medline].

  19. Malanga GA, Jenp YN, Growney ES, An KN. EMG analysis of shoulder positioning in testing and strengthening the supraspinatus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jun 1996;28(6):661-4. [Medline].

  20. Jobe FW, Moynes DR. Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1982;10(6):336-9. [Medline].

  21. Malanga GA, Bowen JE, Nadler SF, Lee A. Nonoperative management of shoulder injuries. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehab. 1999;12:179-89.

  22. Yamanaka K, Fukda H. Aging process of the supraspinatus tendon in surgical disorders of the shoulder. In: Watson N, ed. Surgical Disorders of the Shoulder. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1991:247.

  23. Rathbun JB, Macnab I. The microvascular pattern of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 1970;52(3):540-53. [Medline][Full Text].

  24. Lohr JF, Uhthoff HK. The microvascular pattern of the supraspinatus tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. May 1990;254:35-8. [Medline].

  25. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, et al. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2000;82(4):498-504. [Medline][Full Text].

  26. Kabat H. Proprioceptive facilitation in therapeutic exercise. In: Licht S, ed. Therapeutic Exercises. Baltimore, Md: Waverly Press; 1965:327-43.

  27. Park HB, Lin SK, Yokota A, McFarland EG. Return to play for rotator cuff injuries and superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions. Clin Sports Med. Jul 2004;23(3):321-34, vii. [Medline].

  28. Arroyo JS, Hershon SJ, Bigliani LU. Special considerations in the athletic throwing shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am. Jan 1997;28(1):69-78. [Medline].

  29. Asami A, Sonohata M, Morisawa K. Bilateral suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome associated with rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Jan-Feb 2000;9(1):70-2. [Medline].

  30. Bandy WD, Irion JM. The effect of time on static stretch on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther. Sep 1994;74(9):845-50; discussion 850-2. [Medline][Full Text].

  31. Blevins FT. Rotator cuff pathology in athletes. Sports Med. Sep 1997;24(3):205-20. [Medline].

  32. Borsa PA, Lephart SM, Kocher MS, Lephart SP. Functional assessment and rehabilitation of shoulder proprioception for glenohumeral instability. J Sports Rehabil. 1994;3(1):84-104.

  33. Cho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. Feb 2009;25(2):183-91. [Medline].

  34. Clarnette RG, Miniaci A. Clinical exam of the shoulder. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Apr 1998;30(4 suppl):S1-6. [Medline].

  35. Cohen RB, Williams GR Jr. Impingement syndrome and rotator cuff disease as repetitive motion disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 1998;351:95-101. [Medline].

  36. DeLateur BI. Exercise for strength and endurance. In: Basma-jian JV, ed. Therapeutic Exercise. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1984.

  37. Dixit R. Nonoperative management of shoulder injuries in sports. Phys Med Rehab Clin N Am. 1994;5(1):69-80.

  38. Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Ticker JB, et al. Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Patterns of subacromial contact. Am J Sports Med. Nov-Dec 1994;22(6):779-88. [Medline].

  39. Gerber C, Terrier F, Ganz R. The role of the coracoid process in the chronic impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1985;67(5):703-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  40. Halpern B, Herring SA, Altchek D, Herzog R. Imaging of the shoulder. Imaging in Musculoskelatal and Sports Medicine. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science; 1997:108-34.

  41. Harryman DT 2nd, Sidles JA, Clark JM, et al. Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1990;72(9):1334-43. [Medline][Full Text].

  42. Howell SM, Galinat BJ. The glenoid-labral socket. A constrained articular surface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Jun 1989;243:122-5. [Medline].

  43. Jobe FW, Bradley JP. The diagnosis and nonoperative treatment of shoulder injuries in athletes. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1989;8(3):419-38. [Medline].

  44. Mantone JK, Burkhead WZ Jr, Noonan J Jr. Nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am. Apr 2000;31(2):295-311. [Medline].

  45. Marx RG, Koulouvaris P, Chu SK, Levy BA. Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 2009;467(2):450-6. [Medline].

  46. Moorman CT, Deng X, Warren RF, Torzilli PA, Wickiewicz TL. The coracoacromial ligament: is it the appendix of the shoulder?. Paper presented at: The Forty-First Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; February 13-16, 1995; Orlando, Fla.

  47. Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1972;54(1):41-50. [Medline][Full Text].

  48. Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2009;192(2):473-9. [Medline].

  49. Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1988;70(8):1224-30. [Medline][Full Text].

  50. Tobis JS. Posthemiplegic shoulder pain. N Y State J Med. Apr 15 1957;57(8):1377-80. [Medline].

  51. Williams GR Jr, Rockwood CA Jr, Bigliani LU, Iannotti JP, Stanwood W. Rotator cuff tears: why do we repair them?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 2004;86-A(12):2764-76. [Medline].

  52. Wright T, Yoon C, Schmit BP. Shoulder MRI refinements: differentiation of rotator cuff tear from artifacts and tendonosis, and reassessment of normal findings. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Aug 2001;22(4):383-95. [Medline].

  53. Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. May-Jun 2001;10(3):199-203. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff tendonitis, rotator cuff tendinitis, supraspinatus tendonitis, subacromial tendonitis, subacromial tendinitis, impingement syndrome, shoulder injury, shoulder pain, loss of shoulder motion, supraspinatus atrophy, infraspinatus atrophy, entrapments of suprascapular nerve,

scapular winging, scapulohumeral rhythm, adhesive capsulitis, dropping of the arm, scapula rotators, drop-arm test, Neer impingement test, Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test, apprehension test, relocation test, intrinsic tendinopathy, curved acromions, hooked acromions, rotator cuff tendinopathy

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Gerard A Malanga, MD, Founder and Director, New Jersey Sports Medicine Institute; Director of Pain Management, Overlook Hospital; Director of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine Fellowship Director, Mountainside Hospital; Clinical Chief, Rehabilitation Medicine and Electrodiagnosis, St Michael's Medical Center; Medical Director, Consultant, Horizon Healthcare Worker's Compensation Services, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Worker's Compensation
Gerard A Malanga, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American College of Sports Medicine, North American Spine Society, and Physiatric Association of Spine, Sports and Occupational Rehabilitation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Christopher J Visco, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Rehabilitation, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Christopher J Visco, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Medical Association, and American Medical Student Association/Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Stephen G Andrus, MD, Sports Medicine Fellow, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Stephen G Andrus, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Association, and Physiatric Association of Spine, Sports and Occupational Rehabilitation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jay E Bowen, DO, Assistant Professor, Clinical Coordinator Sports Medicine Fellowship, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kessler Rehabilitation Corporation
Jay E Bowen, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine, and American Osteopathic Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Andrew L Sherman, MD, MS, Associate Professor of Clinical Rehabilitation Medicine, Vice Chairman, Chief of Spine and Musculoskeletal Services, Program Director, SCI Fellowship and PMR Residency Programs, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leonard A Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami
Andrew L Sherman, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Association, American Paraplegia Society, American Spinal Injury Association, and Association of Academic Physiatrists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Henry T Goitz, MD, Fellowship Director, Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital
Henry T Goitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Jon B Whitehurst, MD, Clinical Instructor of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine; Partner and Executive Board Member, Rockford Orthopedic Associates; Orthopedic Chairman, Rockford Memorial Hospital
Jon B Whitehurst, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Craig C Young, MD, Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Community and Family Medicine, Medical Director of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine Fellowship Director, Medical College of Wisconsin
Craig C Young, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, Phi Beta Kappa, and Wilderness Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.